Explore the vast range of titles available.

Despite the recent advanced developments in radiation therapy planning, treatment planning for head-neck and pelvic cancers remains challenging due to large concave target volumes, multiple dose prescriptions and numerous organs at risk close to targets. Inter-institutional studies highlighted that plan quality strongly depends on planner experience and skills. Automated optimization of planning procedure may improve plan quality and best practice. We performed a comprehensive dosimetric and clinical evaluation of the Pinnacle 3 AutoPlanning engine, comparing automatically generated plans (AP) with the historically clinically accepted manually-generated ones (MP). Thirty-six patients (12 for each of the following anatomical sites: head-neck, high-risk prostate and endometrial cancer) were re-planned with the AutoPlanning engine. Planning and optimization workflow was developed to automatically generate “dual-arc” VMAT plans with simultaneously integrated boost. Various dose and dose-volume parameters were used to build three metrics able to supply a global Plan Quality Index evaluation in terms of dose conformity indexes, targets coverage and sparing of critical organs. All plans were scored in a blinded clinical evaluation by two senior radiation oncologists. Dose accuracy was validated using the PTW Octavius-4D phantom together with the 1500 2D-array. Autoplanning was able to produce high-quality clinically acceptable plans in all cases. The main benefit of Autoplanning strategy was the improvement of overall treatment quality due to significant increased dose conformity and reduction of integral dose by 6–10%, keeping similar targets coverage. Overall planning time was reduced to 60–80 minutes, about a third of time needed for manual planning. In 94% of clinical evaluations, the AP plans scored equal or better to MP plans. Despite the increased fluence modulation, dose measurements reported an optimal agreement with dose calculations with a γ-pass-rate greater than 95% for 3%(global)-2 mm criteria. Autoplanning engine is an effective device enabling the generation of VMAT high quality treatment plans according to institutional specific planning protocols.

Aims This review aims to synthesize the existing literature on palliative radiotherapy (RT) delivered in two daily fractions for patients with advanced cancer, focusing on its impact on symptom alleviation, treatment tolerance, and the implications for clinical practice and future research. Methods An international team conducted this narrative review, adhering to SANRA guidelines. Studies published in English on palliative RT delivered in two daily fractions were selected without date restrictions. The literature search, using a combination of specific key terms, led to a comprehensive examination of relevant studies. Data on study objectives, treatment approaches, palliative effectiveness, and toxicity were extracted and qualitatively analyzed. Results The review included 29 publications, showing consistent efficacy in symptom reduction (63.0%–100% palliative response rate) and general tolerability across various cancer types. These studies highlighted the potential radiobiological advantages and practicality of accelerated multi-fractionated regimens, which provide rapid tumor response with reduced late toxicity risks. Furthermore, the logistical benefits of such treatments, including shorter hospital stays and minimized travel requirements, were noted as particularly valuable during challenging times such as recent pandemics. Conclusions The evidence supports the integration of evidence-based, accelerated-hypofractionated RT into palliative care strategies, ensuring effective symptom management with minimal patient burden. Future research should focus on comparative studies on single versus multiple-cycle treatments, optimal intervals between treatment cycles, and the integration of advanced RT techniques.

Purpose DESTROY—4 ( D OSE- E SCALATION STUDY OF ST EREOTACTIC BODY R ADIATI O N THERAP Y ) was a Phase I trial aimed to evaluate the safety and the feasibility of escalating doses of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) on MRI-defined Dominant Intraprostatic Lesion (DIL) in low- and intermediate-risk pCa patients using a simultaneous integrated boost-volumetric arc therapy (SIB-VMAT) technique. Methods Eligible patients included those with low- and intermediate-risk prostate carcinoma (NCCN risk classes) and an International Prostatic Symptoms Score (IPSS) ≤ 15. No restriction about DIL and prostate volumes was set. Pretreatment preparation required an enema and the placement of intraprostatic gold fiducials. SBRT was delivered in five consecutive daily fractions. For the first three patients, the DIL radiation dose was set at 8 Gy per fraction up to a total dose of 40 Gy (PTV1) and was gradually increased in succeeding cohorts to total doses of 42.5 Gy, 45.0 Gy, 47.5 Gy, and finally, 50.0 Gy, while keeping the prescription of 35 Gy/7 Gy per fraction for the entire prostate gland. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade 3 or worse gastrointestinal (GI) or genitourinary (GU) toxicity occurring within 90 days of follow-up (Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events scale 4.0). Patients completed quality-of-life questionnaires at defined intervals. Results Twenty-four patients with a median age of 75 (range, 58–89) years were enrolled. The median follow-up was 26.3 months (8.9–84 months). 66.7% of patients were classified as intermediate-risk groups, while the others were low-risk groups, according to the NCCN guidelines. Enrolled patients were treated as follows: 8 patients (40 Gy), 5 patients (42.5 Gy), 4 patients (45 Gy), 4 patients (47.5 Gy), and 3 patients (50 Gy). No severe acute toxicities were observed. G1 and G2 acute GU toxicities occurred in 4 (16%) and 3 patients (12.5%), respectively. Two patients (8.3%) and 3 patients (12.5%) experienced G1 and G2 GI toxicities, respectively. Since no DLTs were observed, 50 Gy in five fractions was considered the MTD. The median nadir PSA was 0.20 ng/mL. A slight improvement in QoL values was registered after the treatment. Conclusion This trial confirms the feasibility and safety of a total SIB-VMAT dose of 35 Gy on the whole gland and 50 Gy on DIL in 5 fractions daily administered in a well-selected low- and intermediate-risk prostate carcinoma population. A phase II study is ongoing to confirm the tolerability of the schedule and assess the efficacy.

Skin metastases occur in 5–30% of breast cancer (BC) patients. Standard treatments include systemic therapies (chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, and immunotherapy) and local treatments (surgery and radiotherapy). Electrochemotherapy (ECT) could be another option in this setting based on preclinical and clinical studies. Aim of this review was to analyze the available evidence on ECT in skin metastases from BC. Studies reporting on ECT in skin metastases from BC were included in this review. Studies not reporting toxicity or tumor response or not reporting results separately from other primary cancers were excluded. The search was based on Medline, Scopus, and The Cochrane Library databases. Eleven studies including 464 patients were analyzed. ECT was performed using intravenous/intratumoral bleomycin (10 studies) or intratumoral cisplatin (one study). Complete and overall pooled response rates were 46.2% (95%CI 33.2–59.4 and 74.6% (95%CI 60.6–86.4) in studies reporting results on a per patient basis and 61.9% (95%CI 53.8–69.6) and 86.9% (95%CI 80.0–92.6) in studies reporting results on a per lesion basis, respectively. Worse response rates in larger lesions were observed in three studies. The incidence of toxicity was heterogeneous but adverse events were mild and manageable in all studies. One- and 3-year local progression-free survival was 86.2% and 81.0% in two studies, respectively. ECT is tolerable and effective in terms of response in BC skin metastases especially in less advanced lesions. Further studies are justified to compare ECT with other treatments in this setting.

Background: This study aimed to develop a predictive model for acute gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity in prostate cancer patients treated with salvage radiotherapy (SRT) post-prostatectomy, using machine learning techniques to identify key prognostic factors. Methods: A multicenter retrospective study analyzed 454 patients treated with SRT from three Italian radiotherapy centers. Acute toxicity was assessed using Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria. Predictors of grade ≥ 2 toxicity were identified through Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression and Classification and Regression Tree (CART) modeling. The analyzed variables included surgical technique, clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) margins, extent of lymphadenectomy, radiotherapy technique, and androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT). Results: No patients experienced grade ≥ 4 toxicity, and grade 3 toxicity was below 1% for both GI and GU events. The primary determinant of acute toxicity was the surgical technique. Open prostatectomy was associated with significantly higher grade ≥ 2 GI (41.8%) and GU (35.9%) toxicity compared to laparoscopic/robotic approaches (18.9% and 12.2%, respectively). A CTV-to-PTV margin ≥ 10 mm further increased toxicity, particularly when combined with extensive lymphadenectomy. SRT technique and ADT were additional predictors in some subgroups. Conclusions: SRT demonstrated excellent tolerability. Surgical technique, CTV-to-PTV margin, and treatment parameters were key predictors of toxicity. These findings emphasize the need for personalized treatment strategies integrating surgical and radiotherapy factors to minimize toxicity and optimize outcomes in prostate cancer patients.

The management of large bulky tumors is very challenging. The current treatment options for effective palliation of symptoms are limited. These tumors often present a large burden at the time of diagnosis, growing along critical bony and neural structures and preventing surgical resection in most of the cases. These tumors are also known to be relatively resistant to chemotherapy, with very low response rates. In addition, conventional photon-based radiotherapy has a limited effect due to their radioresistance, the use of large treatment fields, and the impossibility of delivering high doses because of the higher risk of normal tissue toxicity. Therefore, more effective radiation treatments for palliation are needed to achieve greater local control rates. A recent approach called partial ablative radiotherapy (PART) has been shown to be potentially able to improve the effectiveness of radiotherapy. This technique is based on the ability of recent advanced delivery techniques to deliver a high “ablative” dose to the central part of the tumor, maintaining a very low and safe dose profile at the periphery to spare the surrounding organs at risk. Although this technique has been evaluated only in small studies and case reports, it showed notable treatment responses and safety profiles. The present narrative review describes the rationale for PART, the current and forthcoming state of evidence, the existing studies, and the future directions for the development of this approach, including the associated challenges.

Previous trials showed the tolerability and efficacy of a palliative radiotherapy (RT) regimen (SHARON) based on the 4 fractions delivered in 2 days in different oncological settings. In order to identify possible predictors of symptomatic response, the purpose of this study is to perform a pooled analysis of previous trials. We analyzed the impact on symptomatic response of the following parameters: tumor site, histological type, performance status (ECOG), dominant symptom, and RT dose using the Chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test. One-hundred-eighty patients were analyzed. Median RT dose was 20 Gy (range: 14–20 Gy). The overall response rate was 88.8% (95% CI 83.3–92.7%) while pre- and post-treatment mean VAS was 5.3 (± 7.7) and 2.2 (± 2.2), respectively ( p  < 0.001). The overall response rate of pain, dyspnea, bleeding, dysphagia, and other symptoms was 86.2%, 90.9%, 100%, 87.5%, and 100%, respectively. Comparing the symptomatic effect based on the analyzed parameters no significant differences were recorded. However, patients with locally advanced disease showed a higher rate of symptomatic responses than metastatic ones (97.3% vs 83.0%; p  = 0.021). Finally, the complete pain response rate was more than double in patients with mild to moderate (VAS: 4–7) compared to those with severe (VAS > 7) pain (36.0% vs 14.3%; p  = 0.028). This pooled analysis showed high efficacy of the SHARON regimen in the relief of several cancer-related symptoms. The markedly and significantly higher complete pain response rate, in patients with mild-moderate pain, suggests early referral to palliative RT for patients with cancer-related pain.

In a recent multicenter analysis of 454 patients undergoing post-prostatectomy salvage radiotherapy, the open surgical approach, as opposed to minimally invasive surgery, emerged, unexpectedly, as the strongest predictor of acute gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity. Patients treated with laparoscopic or robotic prostatectomy experienced significantly lower rates of ≥grade 2 toxicity compared to those who had undergone open retropubic surgery, irrespective of total dose, treatment margins, or radiation delivery platform. This finding, which to our knowledge has not been previously reported, raises the hypothesis that surgical technique leaves a lasting biological imprint on irradiated tissues. Drawing on current knowledge in radiobiology, cytokine signaling, wound healing, and pelvic dosimetry, we explore potential mechanisms by which open surgery may create a more hypoxic, inflamed, and fibrotic microenvironment, thereby amplifying radiation damage. We further discuss how target volume margins may biologically interact with this tissue state to increase normal tissue exposure. This Perspective aims to provide a conceptual framework for understanding this unexpected association, highlighting its clinical relevance for individualizing margins, counselling high-risk patients, and designing future studies at the interface of surgery and radiation oncology. This paper does not introduce additional patients or statistical models; instead, it offers an in-depth clinical and mechanistic interpretation of previously published ICAROS findings.

Objective: The SHARON (Short course RadiatiON therapy for palliative treatment) Bone trial is a phase III randomized non-inferiority multicentric study comparing symptom relief for complicated bone metastases (BMs) achieved through hypofractionated accelerated palliative radiotherapy (RT) to a standard RT regimen. Methods: Eligible participants were adults with ECOG PS ≤ 3 who were referred for palliative RT for painful BMs. Patients were assigned to receive either 30 Gy delivered in 10 daily fractions or 20 Gy in 4 fractions over two consecutive days. The primary outcome was pain relief one month post-treatment. Pain relief and adverse events were also evaluated at 2, 3, 6, and 12 months after RT. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03503682). Results: Between February 2018 and November 2021, 83 patients were enrolled (30 Gy: 41; 20 Gy: 42). In the standard RT group, five patients did not complete the prescribed RT, while none in the experimental arm discontinued treatment (p = 0.026). Due to early mortality, the primary endpoint was evaluable in 73 patients (35 and 38 in the standard and experimental arms, respectively). The rate of complete pain response at one month was 22.9% and 28.9% in the 30 Gy and 20 Gy arms, respectively (p: 0.571). The overall pain response rates, which included complete and partial responses, were 74.3% and 78.9% in the 30 Gy and 20 Gy arms, respectively (p = 0.638), when considering at least a 2-point reduction in the numerical rating scale. In both arms, 4.8% of patients experienced Grade >2 toxicity. Conclusions: Administering 20 Gy in four fractions twice a day is non-inferior to the standard 30 Gy delivered in 10 fractions for pain relief in the context of complicated BMs. Furthermore, this regimen demonstrated comparable safety in terms of acute toxicity, with a lower incidence of definitive interruptions of radiotherapy.