Explore the vast range of titles available.

The surgical treatment of pain has been an integral part of neurosurgery since the early 20th century when Harvey Cushing pioneered ganglionectomy for trigeminal neuralgia. Over the ensuing years, as anatomic and physiologic knowledge of pain systems grew, new techniques aimed at new targets were developed for various pain conditions. Our objective was to provide an informative and up-to-date summary of radiosurgery for chronic facial pain, emphasizing trigeminal neuralgia and discussing the advantages and challenges of this modality. A PubMed search with keywords (\"trigeminal neuralgia\" or \"cluster headache\" or \"glossopharyngeal neuralgia\") and (\"radiosurgery\") and (\"systematic review\" or \"review\") was conducted. Relevant publications in English published from January 2000 to May 2022 were screened manually for their title, abstract, and even full text to determine their relevance. References from the searched articles were also searched as other supplementary articles. We excluded original articles and personal series from the analysis and only considered systematic reviews to maintain the transparency in the record. A total of 19 studies for trigeminal neuralgia (n > 100), 52 cases of cluster headache, and 42 cases of glossopharyngeal neuralgia were found. Radiosurgery remains the safest among various treatment options with equitable pain control with other percutaneous procedures. MVD remains the gold standard for long-term pain control. There is no difference in efficacy or tolerance between patients treated with gamma knife, linear accelerator, or CyberKnife. The minimum recommended prescription dose was 70 Gy (level of evidence II), and the maximum dose was 90 Gy (level of evidence III) in a single fraction. Radiosurgery provides 5-year pain control in 50% of patients without medication (85% of patients with/without medication) with an average latency period of 1-3 months. Approximately 8-15% of patients will experience a recurrence of pain after an average period of 1 year. Prospective pain relief will be about 60% at 3 years, 40% at 7 years, and 37% in 10 years. The main complication was facial hypoesthesia occurring in 25-50% of patients within 6 months-3 years and disabling in 10% of cases. Cluster headache and glossopharyngeal neuralgia are emerging conditions for treatment with GKRS, although long-term efficacy remains to be studied. Having searched PubMed and other databases and summarized the application of radiosurgery for facial pain, we concluded that radiosurgery is undoubtedly a promising tool for chronic facial pain, but further studies are needed to realize its long-term efficiency and advanced applications of the same.

Background: While several publications have focused on the intuitive role of augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) in neurosurgical planning, the aim of this review was to explore other avenues, where these technologies have significant utility and applicability. Methods: This review was conducted by searching PubMed, PubMed Central, Google Scholar, the Scopus database, the Web of Science Core Collection database, and the SciELO citation index, from 1989–2021. An example of a search strategy used in PubMed Central is: “Virtual reality” [All Fields] AND (“neurosurgical procedures” [MeSH Terms] OR (“neurosurgical” [All Fields] AND “procedures” [All Fields]) OR “neurosurgical procedures” [All Fields] OR “neurosurgery” [All Fields] OR “neurosurgery” [MeSH Terms]). Using this search strategy, we identified 487 (PubMed), 1097 (PubMed Central), and 275 citations (Web of Science Core Collection database). Results: Articles were found and reviewed showing numerous applications of VR/AR in neurosurgery. These applications included their utility as a supplement and augment for neuronavigation in the fields of diagnosis for complex vascular interventions, spine deformity correction, resident training, procedural practice, pain management, and rehabilitation of neurosurgical patients. These technologies have also shown promise in other area of neurosurgery, such as consent taking, training of ancillary personnel, and improving patient comfort during procedures, as well as a tool for training neurosurgeons in other advancements in the field, such as robotic neurosurgery. Conclusions: We present the first review of the immense possibilities of VR in neurosurgery, beyond merely planning for surgical procedures. The importance of VR and AR, especially in “social distancing” in neurosurgery training, for economically disadvantaged sections, for prevention of medicolegal claims and in pain management and rehabilitation, is promising and warrants further research.

Background Scientific research can offer the joy of discovery. For many graduating neurosurgeons, often, a seminar, class, or instructional module is their first and only formal exposure to the world of conducting research responsibly, to write down and report the results of such research. The pressure to publish scientific research is high, but any young neurosurgeon who is unaware of how predatory publishers operate can get duped by it and can lose their valuable and hard-fought research. Hence, we have attempted to provide an overview of all potentially predatory neurosurgery publications and provide some “red flags” to recognize them. Methods A suspected list of predatory publications was collected via a thorough review of the Neurosurgery journals listed in 4 major so-called blacklists, i.e., Beall’s list, Manca’s list, Cabell’s blacklist, and Strinzel blacklist and then cross-referenced with UGC CARE whitelist to remove any potential legitimate journals. All journals with a scope of the Neurosurgery publication were searched using terms in the search bar: “Neurosurgery”, “Neuroanatomy”, “Neuropathology”, and “Neurological disorder/disease”. Since all predatory journals claim to be open access, all possible types of open access journals on Scimago were also searched, and thus a comparison was possible in terms of publication cost and number of legitimate open access journals when compared with predatory ones. In addition, methodologies by which these journals penetrate legitimate indexes like PubMed was investigated. Results A total of 46 predatory journals were found and were enlisted along with their publishers and web addresses. Sixty of the 360 Neurosurgery journals listed on Scimago were open access and the fee for the predatory journals was substantially lower (< $150) when compared with legitimate journals ($900–$3000). Six types of open access types exist while a total of 26 red flags in 7 stages of publication can be found in predatory journals. These journals have penetrated indexes by having similar names to legitimate journals and by publishing articles with external funding which mandate their indexing. Conclusion These 46 journals were defined as predatory by 4 major blacklists, and none of them was found in the UGC Care white list. They also fulfill the 26 red-flags that define a predatory journal. The blacklist detailed here may become redundant; hence “whenever in doubt” regarding a journal with “red-flags”, the authors are advised to refer to whitelists to be on the safer side. Publishing in predatory journals leads to not only loss of valuable research but also discredits a researcher among his peers and can be hindrance in career progression. Some journals are even indexed on PubMed, and they have sophisticated webpages and high-quality online presentations.

Background and Objectives: Stereotactic biopsies are a relatively safe and reliable way of tissue diagnosis and characterization of eloquent area lesions/neoplasm. However, predicting the accuracy of the site of biopsy with the desired/planned site is not always possible. We describe a technique to identify the precise location of the biopsy site in the post-operative computed tomography (CT) scan using the injection of a low volume of air into the biopsy cannula. Methods: Hundred consecutive biopsies were performed in 80 adults/20 children (59 males/41 females, median age 51 years) over 3 years, consisting of 75 frameless and 25 frame-based stereotactic biopsies. After the biopsy specimens had been collected, a small volume of air (median 1 cc) was injected into the site. Post-operative CT was done within 4 hours of the biopsy to see the site of the air bubble, and the same was correlated with the histopathological accuracy. Results: Intra-cranial air in the selected target was present in 95 patients (Grade 1 and 2), while the air was seen in the track (Grade 3) in 3% and at an unrelated site (Grade 4) in 2% of cases. Both Grade 4 biopsies were negative on histopathology (diagnostic yield = 98%). Two negative biopsies were reported, which were both predicted with the Grade 4 biopsy. The grading allowed uniform reporting across series and eliminated the chance of upgrading/downgrading the report due to wrong site sampling within the lesion/neoplasm. Conclusion: The air-injection manoeuvre proposed for use in stereotactic biopsies of intra-cranial mass lesions is a safe and reliable technique that allows the exact biopsy site to be located without any related complications.

Neurosurgical residency is tough. Grueling hours and tough decisions require a mental makeup unlike many other specialties. But the real examination begins after the residency is over. Many young neurosurgeons are faced with a daunting task of deciding their future as soon as they step out of the medical school. Sometimes, such decisions can shape the entire career of the neurosurgeon. However, over the many years of academic teaching and learning what we are not taught is how to \"Manage.\" Management of careers, decision making, and understanding the business end of our profession is lacking. Here, we review the career and decisions needed to be taken by a young neurosurgeon through the glass of a business management mindset. We try to define the opportunities and decisions and how they may reflect on the general population and patients as a whole.

While sudden hearing loss after stereotactic radiosurgery has been demonstrated in some cases a recent article by Linge et al. and have demonstrated the need for further discussion on this topic. We attempt to delineate the fact that the type of dosing regimen or technology used will not affect the hearing or radio-graphical control outcomes and thus should not be a consideration while administering treatment. Also we discuss the role of location of the lesion and vascularity and potential new therapies for this unexpected outcome after radiosurgery.