Explore the vast range of titles available.

There is a lack of prospective data about second-line treatments for metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients. This is partially due to recent changes in first-line chemotherapy treatments. Despite this dearth of information, 50.0% of the patients who experience failure with first-line folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan and oxaliplatin (folfirinox) treatment are eligible for additional chemotherapy. In this setting, gemcitabine is widely used without any standard recommendations available. The present study evaluated 42 patients who received gemcitabine subsequent to a first-line treatment of folfirinox between January 2008 and December 2012 at the Centre Léon Bérard (Lyon, France). Clinical data, biological data and tumor characteristics were retrospectively analyzed to identify prognostic factors for successful treatment with gemcitabine. In total, 11 patients (26.2%) experienced control of their cancer with gemcitabine treatment. However, there was no predictive marker for their response to the drug. The median overall survival was 3.6 months from gemcitabine initiation [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.1-5.1]. The median length of gemcitabine treatment was 1.5 months (95% CI, 0.3-13.3). Among the 11 patients who were successfully treated with gemcitabine, 6 were resistant to first-line folfirinox treatment. Patients who were non responsive to folfirinox had a higher probability of success with gemcitabine compared with patients that responded to folfirinox (54.5 vs. 21.4%, respectively; P=0.061). The present study did not identify any clinical or biological marker with a predictive value for successful gemcitabine treatment. Furthermore, successful gemcitabine treatment was not correlated with patients' response to first-line folfirinox treatment. This suggests an absence of cross-resistance in the chemotherapy protocols and provides evidence for effective cancer treatment with the second-line gemcitabine therapy.

Purpose This study was designed to evaluate neoadjuvant intensified chemotherapy in potentially resectable or unresectable liver metastases (LM) from colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods Criteria for potentially resectable LM were complex hepatectomy and/or risky procedure, close contact with major vascular structures, and for unresectable LM, a future liver remnant predicted to be less than 25–30 % of total liver volume. Between October 2004 and August 2007, 125 patients were randomized to either standard (FOLFIRI/FOLFOX4) or intensified chemotherapy (FOLFIRI-HD/FOLFOX7/FOLFIRINOX). Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) after 4 cycles of chemotherapy. Secondary endpoints included safety, R0 surgical resection, best ORR, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results A total of 122 patients were treated; 45 % of patients had less than 30 % of remaining liver tissue, 20 % had major vascular contact, and 35 % were potentially resectable. Grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (24, 19, 10, 23 %) diarrhoea (0, 6, 3, 23 %), mucositis (0, 3, 0, 7 %), vomiting (7, 9, 0, 3 %), and neurotoxicity (0, 0, 10, 3 %) in arms (FOLFIRI + FOLFOX4)/FOLFIRI-HD/FOLFOX7/FOLFIRINOX, respectively. ORR was 33, 47, 43, and 57 % after the first 4 cycles in arms (FOLFIRI + FOLFOX4)/FOLFIRI-HD/FOLFOX7/FOLFIRINOX, respectively. FOLFIRINOX offered the best conversion rate to resectability (67 %). Disease-free status after chemotherapy and surgery (R0, R1, Rx) was achieved in 54 of 64 operated patients. Median PFS was 9.2 months in control arms versus 11.9 months in experimental arms (hazards ratio [HR] = 0.76, p  = 0.115), and the median OS was 17.7 versus 33.4 months (HR = 0.73, p  = 0.297), respectively. Conclusions FOLFIRINOX showed promising activity in CRC patients with LM compared with standard or intensified bi-chemotherapy regimens.

In this study, a four-drug combination chemotherapy regimen was associated with objective responses in more than 30% of patients and increased survival by more than 4 months, as compared with standard gemcitabine. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma was the fourth leading cause of death from cancer in the United States in 2010, 1 and it carries a grim prognosis: the 5-year survival rate is 6% in Europe and the United States. 1 , 2 Gemcitabine became the reference regimen for advanced pancreatic cancer after a randomized trial showed significant improvement in the median overall survival as compared with fluorouracil administered as an intravenous bolus (5.6 vs. 4.4 months, P=0.002). 3 In the subsequent phase 3 trials of single-agent gemcitabine, 4 the median overall survival ranged from 5.0 to 7.2 months. The combination of gemcitabine with a variety of cytotoxic and . . .

Background Conventional treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer usually combines neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy and surgery. Until recently, there have been limited predictive factors (clinical or biological) for rectal tumor response to conventional treatment. KRAS , BRAF and PIK3CA mutations are commonly found in colon cancers. In this study, we aimed to determine the mutation frequencies of KRAS , BRAF and PIK3CA and to establish whether such mutations may be used as prognostic and/or predictive factors in rectal cancer patients. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and biological data of 98 consecutive operated patients between May 2006 and September 2009. We focused in patients who received surgery in our center after radiochemotherapy and in which tumor samples were available. Results In the 98 patients with a rectal cancer, the median follow-up time was 28.3 months (4–74). Eight out of ninety-eight patients experienced a local recurrence (8%) and 17/98 developed distant metastasis (17%). KRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA were identified respectively in 23 (23.5%), 2 (2%) and 4 (4%) patients. As described in previous studies, mutations in KRAS and BRAF were mutually exclusive. No patient with local recurrence exhibited KRAS or PIK3CA mutation and one harbored BRAF mutation (12.5%). Of the seventeen patients with distant metastasis (17%), 5 were presenting KRAS mutation (29%), one BRAF (5%) and one PIK3CA mutation (5%). No relationship was seen between PIK3CA , KRAS or BRAF mutation and local or distant recurrences. Conclusion The frequencies of KRAS , BRAF and PIK3CA mutations in our study were lower than the average frequencies reported in colorectal cancers and no significant correlation was found between local/distant recurrences and KRAS , BRAF or PIK3CA mutations. Future studies with greater number of patients, longer follow-up time and greater power to predict associations are necessary to fully understand this relationship.

Primary malignant melanoma of the esophagus is rare, accounting for less than 0.1-0.2% of all esophageal malignancies. It is associated with a poor outcome due to late detection and high metastatic potential. Here, we report a case of esophageal cancer, which was initially diagnosed as an adenocarcinoma and finally was confirmed as a primary malignant melanoma. This 75-year-old Caucasian male had a history of dysphagia and recent lingering abdominal pain. First biopsy showed a poorly-differentiated adenocarcinoma. He was then treated with neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy. Biopsies were repeated because of an incomplete tumor response, evaluated by endoscopic and imaging studies. The final diagnosis was a malignant melanoma. The patient has been treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitor, nivolumab, an anti-PD1 antibody.

Since the first report by our group in 1999, more than 20 unrelated biallelic mutations in DNA mismatch repair genes (MMR) have been identified. In the present report, we describe two novel cases: one carrying compound heterozygous mutations in the MSH6 gene; and the other, compound heterozygous mutations in the PMS2 gene. Interestingly, the inactivation of one PMS2 allele was likely caused by gene conversion. Although gene conversion has been suggested to be a mutation mechanism underlying PMS2 inactivation, this is the first report of its involvement in a pathogenic mutation. The clinical features of biallelic mutation carriers were similar to other previously described patients, with the presence of café-au-lait spots (CALS), early onset of brain tumors, and colorectal neoplasia. Our data provide further evidence of the existence, although rare, of a distinct recessively inherited syndrome on the basis of MMR constitutional inactivation. The identification of this syndrome should be useful for genetic counseling, especially in families with atypical hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC) associated with childhood cancers, and for the clinical surveillance of these mutation carriers. Hum Mutat 28(11), 1084-1090, 2007. © 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

A substantial proportion of MLH1 and MSH2 gene mutations in hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer syndrome (HNPCC) families are characterized by nucleotide substitutions, either within the coding sequence (missense or silent mutations) or in introns. The question of whether these mutations affect the normal function of encoding mismatch DNA repair proteins and thus lead to the predisposition to cancer is determinant in genetic testing. Recent studies have suggested that some nucleotide substitutions can induce aberrant splicing by disrupting cis‐transcription elements such as exonic enhancers (ESEs). ESE disruption has been proposed to be the mechanism that underlies the presumed pathological missense mutations identified in HNPCC families. To investigate the prevalence of aberrant splicing resulting from nucleotide substitutions, and its relevance to predicted ESEs, we conducted a systematic RNA screening of a series of 60 patients who carried unrelated exonic or intronic mutations in MLH1 or MSH2 genes. Aberrant splicing was found in 15 cases, five of which were associated with exonic mutations. We evaluated the link between those splicing mutations and predicted putative ESEs by using the computational tools ESEfinder and RESCUE‐ESE. Our study shows that the algorithm‐based ESE prediction cannot be definitely correlated to experimental observations from RNA screening. By using minigene constructs and in vitro transcription assay, we demonstrated that nucleotide substitutions are the direct cause of the splicing defect. This is the first systematic screening for the effect of missense and silent mutations on splicing in HNPCC patients. The pathogenic splicing mutations identified in this study will contribute to the assessment of “unclassified variants” in genetic counseling. Our results also suggest that one must use caution when determining the pathogenic effect of a missense or silent mutation using ESE prediction algorithms. Analysis at the RNA level is therefore necessary. Hum Mutat 27(2), 145–154, 2006. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is an autosomal dominant syndrome caused by germline mutations of the mismatch repair (MMR) genes. Only a few studies have taken into account the selection of families tested for these mutations in estimating colorectal cancer (CRC) risk in carriers. They found much lower estimates of CRC risks than previous ones, but these estimates lacked precision despite the large number of families. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of the ‘genotype restricted likelihood’ (GRL) method that provides unbiased estimates of risks whatever the ascertainment process of families, and to estimate CRC and endometrial cancer risk for carriers of the MMR genes. Efficiency of the GRL method was evaluated using simulations. Risks were estimated from a sample of 36 families diagnosed with HNPCC and carrying a mutation of MSH2 or MLH1, ascertained through a cancer family clinic in Lyon (France). The efficiency of the GRL method was found to be strongly dependent on the proportion of family members tested. By age 70 years, CRC risk was estimated at 47% (95% confidence interval: 12–98%) for men and 33% (95% confidence interval: 24–54%) for women. The endometrial cancer risk was only 14% (confidence interval: 6–20%). As methods allowing for the selection of families lack efficiency, large-scale family studies should be undertaken and data should be pooled to provide reliable and precise estimates of risks for an optimal familial management.

Background: Endobronchial metastases (EBM) secondary to extrapulmonary solid malignant tumours are rare but may occur. The most common extrathoracic malignancies associated with EBM are breast, renal and colorectal carcinomas. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and bronchoscopic aspects of EBM from colorectal carcinomas and the prognosis of the patients. Methods: EBM were diagnosed in 7 patients with colorectal carcinomas between 2004 and 2005. All patients underwent colorectal resection at the time of primary tumour diagnosis. Bronchial involvement was proved by bronchoscopy, and the metastatic nature of the lesions was confirmed histopathologically in all patients. EBM patients were compared with a control group of 7 patients with pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer. Results: Median age at time of colorectal carcinoma was 55 years in EBM patients and 57 years in controls. Distressing airway symptoms caused by EBM were relieved by use of newer intrabronchial therapies: radiotherapy, brachytherapy and cryotherapy. One patient underwent metastasis resection. The median survival after diagnosis of EBM was 18.9 months. All patients had pulmonary metastases. The median survival after diagnosis of pulmonary metastasis from colorectal carcinoma was 55.7 months in EBM patients and 12.7 months in controls (p < 0.005). Discussion: EBM are generally underdiagnosed in patients with colorectal carcinoma. Bronchoscopy is not part of the standard evaluation of these patients. Physicians must be more attentive to pulmonary symptoms, even when patients’ pulmonary metastases are known. Various management options are available for localized endobronchial tumours. Conclusion: On average, EBM are diagnosed about 5 years after the diagnosis of the primary tumour, which is a relatively long lead time. Although this metastatic location usually implies a very negative prognosis regarding life expectancy, it did not seem to significantly reduce survival in our patients. Local treatments allow substantial improvement of pulmonary symptoms.

Irinotecan at 180 mg/m2 combined with an infusional 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) regimen (FOLFIRI) is a standard first line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This phase II study aimed to assess whether increasing the irinotecan dose in the first line FOLFIRI regimen would benefit mCRC patients. Patients received FOLFIRI every 2 weeks for up to six cycles, comprising a 5-FU/LV regimen combined with irinotecan at 180 mg/m2 (cycle 1), increasing to 220 mg/m2 (cycle 2) and 260 mg/m2 (cycle 3 and subsequent cycles) dependent on toxicity. Efficacy and safety were determined in the intention to treat (ITT) population and in patients able to receive irinotecan at 260 mg/m2 for at least four cycles [high-dose (HD) population]. Fifty-four eligible patients were included. Among them, 44 (81.5%) formed the HD population. The ITT objective response rate was 48% (90%CI: 36-60) with 25/26 of the responses in the HD population. The disease control rate was 76% (90%CI: 65-85) and median overall survival was 20.4 months (90%CI: 6.4-27.1). The main grade 3/4 toxicities (ITT/HD populations) were neutropenia (61%/59%), and diarrhoea (18%/11%), respectively. This study confirms the feasibility of increasing the standard dose of the irinotecan component of FOLFIRI to 260 mg/m2, for more than 80% of patients but does not support a clear advantage of this strategy on unselected mCRC patients.