Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
3 result(s) for "Di Paola, Sean G."
Sort by:
DRopEridol for Abdominal pain in the emergency department for Morphine Equivalent Reduction. The DREAMER study
Droperidol is a dopamine-2 receptor antagonist in the class of butyrophenone antipsychotics with antiemetic, sedative, analgesic, and anxiolytic properties. In the postoperative setting, droperidol provides an opioid sparing effect and decreases nausea/vomiting. Another butyrophenone antipsychotic, haloperidol, has been shown to reduce morphine milliequivalents (MME) administered when used for abdominal pain in the emergency department (ED). The purpose of this study is to evaluate if the use of droperidol for undifferentiated abdominal pain reduces the amount of MME administered in the ED. This retrospective, single-center study included patients ≥18 years old who presented to the ED for undifferentiated abdominal pain. Patients must have had two separate encounters for abdominal pain, one encounter where they received droperidol and one encounter where they did not receive droperidol but did receive an opioid. The primary outcome was the difference in MME administered between the two separate patient encounters. Secondary outcomes included utilization rates of rescue antiemetics, rescue analgesics, admission to the hospital, hospital length of stay, and adverse effects (including arrhythmias and extrapyramidal symptoms). Fifty patients with self-matched encounters were evaluated. A majority of the patients were female (33/50, 66 %) with a median age of 38 years old. All doses of droperidol were intravenous and the majority of patients received a dose of 2.5 mg (34/50, 68 %; range 1.25–5 mg). Non-droperidol encounters received significantly more MME compared to droperidol encounters (19.4 MME [IQR 12–30] vs 10 MME [IQR 0–20], p-value 0.0002). There were no statistically significant differences between the secondary outcomes. Among patients presenting to the ED for abdominal pain, droperidol administration resulted in a significant reduction in MME administration. Future research should include prospective studies, comparison of droperidol to haloperidol, and investigate droperidol use beyond the ED for these encounters.
Droperidol vs. haloperidol for abdominal pain
Haloperidol and droperidol are antipsychotic medications with multimodal pharmacodynamic effects making them useful in the emergency department (ED). Data suggests that droperidol and haloperidol may reduce morphine milliequivalents (MME) administered when used for undifferentiated abdominal pain (UAP) in the ED. However, there is a paucity of data comparing the two agents in this cohort. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of haloperidol versus droperidol in reducing MME requirements for UAP in the ED. This retrospective, single-center study included patients ≥18 years old who presented to the ED for UAP. Patients were excluded if they required urgent surgery or received haloperidol or droperidol for agitation. The primary outcome was the difference in MME administered in the ED between patients who received haloperidol versus droperidol. Secondary outcomes included rates of rescue antiemetics, rescue analgesics, admission to the hospital, hospital length of stay, and adverse effects. A total of 100 patients were evaluated, with 50 patients receiving haloperidol and 50 patients receiving droperidol. Patients in the haloperidol group received a lower median MME compared to those in the droperidol group (0 MME [IQR 0–10] vs 10 MME [IQR 0–20], p-value 0.033). There was no statistical difference between secondary outcomes evaluated, including safety events. Haloperidol was associated with a significant reduction in MME administration compared to droperidol for UAP in the ED. Large high-quality data sets are needed to confirm haloperidol's role in multimodal pain management of UAP compared to droperidol.
Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery
Protein complexes are key molecular entities that integrate multiple gene products to perform cellular functions. Here we report the first genome-wide screen for complexes in an organism, budding yeast, using affinity purification and mass spectrometry. Through systematic tagging of open reading frames (ORFs), the majority of complexes were purified several times, suggesting screen saturation. The richness of the data set enabled a de novo characterization of the composition and organization of the cellular machinery. The ensemble of cellular proteins partitions into 491 complexes, of which 257 are novel, that differentially combine with additional attachment proteins or protein modules to enable a diversification of potential functions. Support for this modular organization of the proteome comes from integration with available data on expression, localization, function, evolutionary conservation, protein structure and binary interactions. This study provides the largest collection of physically determined eukaryotic cellular machines so far and a platform for biological data integration and modelling.