Explore the vast range of titles available.

Allograft rejection is a critical issue following solid organ transplantation (SOT). Immunosuppressive therapies are crucial in reducing risk of rejection yet are accompanied by several significant side effects, including infection, malignancy, cardiovascular diseases, and nephrotoxicity. There is a current unmet medical need with a lack of effective minimization strategies for these side effects. Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) has shown potential as an immunosuppression (IS)-modifying technique in several SOT types, with improvements seen in acute and recurrent rejection, allograft survival, and associated side effects, and could fulfil this unmet need. Through a review of the available literature detailing key areas in which ECP may benefit patients, this review highlights the IS-modifying potential of ECP in the four most common SOT procedures (heart, lung, kidney, and liver transplantation) and highlights existing gaps in data. Current evidence supports the use of ECP for IS modification following SOT, however there is a need for further high-quality research, in particular randomized control trials, in this area.

In the context of COVID-19 pandemic, we aimed to analyze the epidemiology, clinical characteristics, risk factors for mortality and impact of COVID-19 on outcomes of solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients compared to a cohort of non transplant patients, evaluating if transplantation could be considered a risk factor for mortality. From March to May 2020, 261 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia were evaluated, including 41 SOT recipients. Of these, thirty-two were kidney recipients, 4 liver, 3 heart and 2 combined kidney-liver transplants. Median time from transplantation to COVID-19 diagnosis was 6 years. Thirteen SOT recipients (32%) required Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission and 5 patients died (12%). Using a propensity score match analysis, we found no significant differences between SOT recipients and non-transplant patients. Older age (OR 1.142; 95% [CI 1.08–1.197]) higher levels of C-reactive protein (OR 3.068 ; 95% [CI 1.22–7.71]) and levels of serum creatinine on admission (OR 3.048 95% [CI 1.22–7.57]) were associated with higher mortality. The clinical outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection in our cohort of SOT recipients appear to be similar to that observed in the non-transplant population. Older age, higher levels of C-reactive protein and serum creatinine were associated with higher mortality, whereas SOT was not associated with worse outcomes.

Background/objectives: Kidney transplant recipients require lifelong immunosuppression and monitoring to prevent rejection, infection, and graft dysfunction. Current surveillance relies on tacrolimus therapeutic drug monitoring and, when needed, invasive biopsies. Dried blood spot (DBS) sampling provides a minimally invasive, patient-friendly option for remote follow-up. This study aims to develop and evaluate a DBS-based method for CXCL-10 quantification that, in combination with tacrolimus exposure monitoring, could help identify kidney recipients at risk of rejection and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and guide immunosuppression adjustment. Methods: The study included 81 selected kidney recipients for CXCL-10-DBS analysis by ELISA (12 T-cell mediated rejection; 10 antibody-mediated rejection; 6 CMV infection and 53 clinical event-free) and 10 healthy volunteers. A Tacrolimus-DBS LC-MS/MS method was developed and validated, and it was compared with the reference method on venous whole blood (WB) LC-MS/MS in a validation cohort (n = 160) and a clinical cohort (n = 36) using linear regression, Passing–Bablok and Bland–Altman analyses. Results: CXCL-10-DBS concentrations were significantly higher in rejectors (p < 0.001), with intermediate increases in CMV infection in comparison with event-free patients and healthy volunteers. ROC analysis demonstrated excellent diagnostic accuracy for rejection (AUC: 0.952; cutoff: 216.2 pg/mL; sensitivity: 100%; specificity: 79%; PPV: 88%; NPV: 100%). In contrast, tacrolimus trough concentrations did not differ significantly among the three clinical groups but showed strong correlation and agreement between DBS and venous WB with no systematic or proportional bias. Conclusions: This pilot study demonstrates the feasibility and diagnostic potential of DBS-based CXCL-10 measurement in adult kidney recipients. Integration of DBS-tacrolimus monitoring supports a minimally invasive pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic approach for personalized immunosuppression management.

An increasing number of sensitized patients awaiting transplantation face limited options, leading to fatalities during dialysis and higher costs. The absence of established evidence highlights the need for collaborative consensus. Donor-specific antibodies (DSA)-triggered antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) significantly contributes to kidney graft failure, especially in sensitized patients. The European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) launched the ENGAGE initiative, categorizing sensitized candidates by AMR risk to improve patient care. A systematic review assessed induction and maintenance regimens as well as antibody removal strategies, with statements subjected to the Delphi methodology. A Likert-scale survey was distributed to 53 European experts (Nephrologists, Transplant surgeons and Immunologists) with experience in kidney transplant recipient care. A rate ≥75% with the same answer was considered consensus. Consensus was achieved in 95.3% of statements. While most recommendations aligned, two statements related to complement inhibitors for AMR prophylaxis lacked consensus. The ENGAGE consensus presents contemporary recommendations for desensitization and immunomodulation strategies, grounded in predefined risk categories. The adoption of tailored, patient-specific measures is anticipated to streamline the care of sensitized recipients undergoing renal allografts. While this approach holds the promise of enhancing transplant accessibility and fostering long-term success in transplantation outcomes, its efficacy will need to be assessed through dedicated studies.

Background/Objectives: Tacrolimus is the most used immunosuppressive agent in solid organ transplantation due to its efficacy in preventing acute rejection, but it has a narrow therapeutic range, and overexposure often leads to toxicities, including neurological side effects like tremors. Tremor affects up to 54% of renal transplant patients under tacrolimus. Extended-release tacrolimus (LCPT) has demonstrated efficacy in reducing tremor severity, as evidenced by studies employing quality of life (QoL) questionnaires, the Fahn–Tolosa–Marin (FTM) scale, and Accelerometer devices. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the benefits of the conversion to LCPT formulation in kidney transplant recipients experiencing tremors on prolonged-release tacrolimus (PR-TAC) treatment and to validate the DyCare device, a wearable wireless sensor for tremors. Results: The DyCare device measured tremor frequencies of 8.74 ± 0.11 Hz and 1.36 ± 0.08° and 17.38 ± 1.16°, as root mean square (RMSx100 for accelerometer and Gyroscope, respectively) in PR-TAC patients. After switching ten patients to LCPT, tremor severity significantly decreased, as confirmed by DyCare and the QoL in the Essential Tremor Questionnaire (QUEST). Additionally, LCPT allowed a 34% reduction in tacrolimus dosage while maintaining therapeutic trough concentrations. Immunological and pharmacodynamic biomarkers (p-miR-210-3p, p-IL10, p-IL12p70, p-IFNγ uCXCL10, NFAT-regulated gene expression) confirmed stable immunosuppression post-conversion. Conclusions: The conversion to the LCPT formulation significantly reduced tremors in kidney transplant recipients without altering their immunological status, as confirmed through a panel of immunologic and pharmacodynamic biomarkers. The DyCare device enables a precise quantification of tremors in transplant recipients, allowing physicians to optimize treatment strategies.

Tacrolimus is pivotal in pancreas transplants but poses challenges in maintaining optimal levels due to recipient differences. This study aimed to explore the utility of time spent below the therapeutic range and intrapatient variability in predicting rejection and de novo donor-specific antibody (dnDSA) development in pancreas graft recipients. This retrospective unicentric study included adult pancreas transplant recipients between January 2006 and July 2020. Recorded variables included demographics, immunosuppression details, HLA matching, biopsy results, dnDSA development, and clinical parameters. Statistical analysis included ROC curves, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values. A total of 131 patients were included. Those with biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR, 12.2%) had more time (39.9% ± 24% vs. 25.72% ± 21.57%, p = 0.016) and tests (41.95% ± 13.57% vs. 29.96% ± 17.33%, p = 0.009) below therapeutic range. Specific cutoffs of 31.5% for time and 34% for tests below the therapeutic range showed a high negative predictive value for BPAR (93.98% and 93.1%, respectively). Similarly, patients with more than 34% of tests below the therapeutic range were associated with dnDSA appearance (38.9% vs. 9.4%, p = 0.012; OR 6.135, 1.346–27.78). In pancreas transplantation, maintaining optimal tacrolimus levels is crucial. Suboptimal test percentages below the therapeutic range prove valuable in identifying acute graft rejection risk.

Circulating donor DNA has emerged as a valuable tool for clinical decision-making in kidney transplantation. While most studies focus on cell-free DNA, the role of donor DNA associated with extracellular vesicles (EVs) remains unexplored. To address this, we analyzed donor-derived exosomal DNA (dd-exoDNA) in 100 kidney transplant recipients (KTR) undergoing surveillance or indicated biopsies. Serum exosomes were isolated using precipitation-based technology, and dd-exoDNA was analyzed via digital PCR targeting donor/recipient HLA-DRB1 mismatches. Dd-exoDNA levels were higher in rejection versus non-rejection (2.66 [0.56–7.10] ×10 −3 vs. 0.69 [0.28–1.71] ×10 −3 , p = 0.004) and were associated with Banff score items: glomerulitis ≥1 ( p = 0.037), peritubular capillaritis ≥1 ( p = 0.040), and tubulitis ≥2 ( p = 0.043). In multivariate analysis, dd-exoDNA remained independently associated with rejection, although with wide confidence intervals (OR [95%CI] 3.68 [1.32–10.26], P = 0.013). Exploratory threshold analyses suggested moderate discriminative performance. These findings indicate that donor DNA associated with circulating EVs may offer complementary information to existing biomarkers, warranting validation in external cohorts and comparison with established assays.

Solid organ transplantation (SOT) faces significant challenges in managing allograft rejection, with current immunosuppressive therapies often associated with substantial adverse effects. Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) has emerged as a promising adjunctive treatment for rejection prevention and management in heart and lung transplants, with growing evidence supporting its use in kidney and liver transplants. Despite this, the availability of ECP and its place in standard treatment pathway is widely variable across Europe. This narrative review, supported by a European survey of 51 transplant clinicians, highlights the current usage of ECP in SOT. Findings reveal that ECP is primarily used for recurrent rejection in heart and lung transplants, with limited application currently in kidney and liver transplants. ECP has shown some efficacy in managing acute and chronic rejection, and stabilizing graft function. Barriers including lack of standardized protocols, availability of ECP, lack of high-quality clinical trial data and lack of a defined mechanism of action hinder its broader adoption. Future directions include the development of standardized protocols, multicenter registries, and further controlled clinical trials to define the role of ECP. Increased awareness, cost-effectiveness studies, mechanistic studies and equitable access are essential to integrate ECP into routine SOT management.