Explore the vast range of titles available.

The era of personalized medicine for advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) began when biomarker-based evidence of molecular pathway and/or oncogene addiction of the tumour became mandatory for the allocation of specific targeted therapies. More recently, the immunotherapy revolution, specifically, the development of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), has dramatically altered the NSCLC treatment landscape. Herein, we compare and contrast the clinical development of immunotherapy and oncogene-directed therapy for NSCLC, focusing on the role of predictive biomarkers. Immunotherapy biomarkers are fundamentally different from oncogene biomarkers in that they are continuous rather than categorical (binary), spatially and temporally variable and reliant on multiple complex interactions rather than a single, dominant determinant. The performance of predictive biomarkers for ICIs might be improved by combining different markers to reduce the assumptive risks associated with each one. Novel combinations with chemotherapy and ICIs complicate biomarker discovery but do not decrease the value of the markers identified. Perfectly predictive biomarkers of benefit from immunotherapy are unlikely to be identified, although exclusionary biomarkers of minimal benefit or an unacceptable risk of toxicity might be feasible. The clinical adoption and applicability of such biomarkers might vary depending on line of treatment, the available therapeutic alternatives and health economic considerations.The advent of effective molecularly targeted treatments and immunotherapies for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has greatly improved patient outcomes. Whereas most patients selected for treatment with molecularly targeted drugs derive benefits from these agents, benefit from immunotherapy is more difficult to predict. Herein, Camidge and colleagues compare and contrast predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy and targeted therapy of NSCLC to highlight considerations for biomarker development.

Crizotinib has provided dramatic and prolonged benefit for patients with the ALK-positive subtype of non-small-cell lung cancer. Despite these early successes, many challenges remain including understanding the mechanisms of resistance to crizotinib. This Review examines what we already know and the major emerging questions associated with optimal management of this disease. Rearrangements of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase ( ALK ) gene occur infrequently in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but provide an important paradigm for oncogene-directed therapy in this disease. Crizotinib, an orally bioavailable inhibitor of ALK, provides significant benefit for patients with ALK-positive (ALK+) NSCLC in association with characteristic, mostly mild, toxic effects, and this drug has been approved by the FDA for clinical use in this molecularly defined subgroup of lung cancer. Many new ALK inhibitors are being developed and understanding the challenges of determining and addressing the adverse effects that are likely to be ALK specific, while maximizing the time of benefit on targeted agents, and understanding the mechanisms that underlie drug resistance will be critical in the future for informing the optimal therapy of ALK+ NSCLC. Key Points Crizotinib shows significant benefit in terms of both radiographic response and progression-free survival in ALK-positive (ALK+) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) Crizotinib is generally well tolerated and associated with common mild adverse effects such as gastrointestinal disturbance, visual changes, and low testosterone, as well as rare serious adverse effects such as transaminitis Crizotinib resistance occurs through multiple different mechanisms including mutations and copy number gain that preserve ALK dominance, and the emergence of other oncogenic drivers that may weaken ALK dominance In addition to a change in the biology of the cancer, cases of isolated central nervous system (CNS) progression on crizotinib could reflect inadequate CNS drug penetration Newer ALK inhibitors, HSP90 inhibitors and pemetrexed have shown preclinical or clinical activity in ALK+ NSCLC and are being investigated further in patients with crizotinib resistant and crizotinib-naive ALK+ disease The potential of these new agents to show activity in patients with CNS disease or crizotinib resistance will be critical to determine their roles in the management of ALK+ NSCLC

Although most activating mutations of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non–small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) are sensitive to available EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), a subset with alterations in exon 20 of EGFR and HER2 are intrinsically resistant and lack an effective therapy. We used in silico, in vitro, and in vivo testing to model structural alterations induced by exon 20 mutations and to identify effective inhibitors. 3D modeling indicated alterations restricted the size of the drug-binding pocket, limiting the binding of large, rigid inhibitors. We found that poziotinib, owing to its small size and flexibility, can circumvent these steric changes and is a potent inhibitor of the most common EGFR and HER2 exon 20 mutants. Poziotinib demonstrated greater activity than approved EGFR TKIs in vitro and in patient-derived xenograft models of EGFR or HER2 exon 20 mutant NSCLC and in genetically engineered mouse models of NSCLC. In a phase 2 trial, the first 11 patients with NSCLC with EGFR exon 20 mutations receiving poziotinib had a confirmed objective response rate of 64%. These data identify poziotinib as a potent, clinically active inhibitor of EGFR and HER2 exon 20 mutations and illuminate the molecular features of TKIs that may circumvent steric changes induced by these mutations. Poziotinib is a candidate inhibitor for a subset of EGFR or HER2 mutant non–small cell lung cancers that lack effective therapy.

The authors employ targeted next-generation sequencing to identify driving oncogenic alterations in patients with lung cancer with no known oncogenes. They discover two gene fusions involving NTRK1 that lead to constitutive activation of the kinase TRKA and can drive transformation. The fusions can be targeted with available kinase inhibitors and may represent therapeutic targets. We identified new gene fusions in patients with lung cancer harboring the kinase domain of the NTRK1 gene that encodes the high-affinity nerve growth factor receptor (TRKA protein). Both the MPRIP - NTRK1 and CD74 - NTRK1 fusions lead to constitutive TRKA kinase activity and are oncogenic. Treatment of cells expressing NTRK1 fusions with inhibitors of TRKA kinase activity inhibited autophosphorylation of TRKA and cell growth. Tumor samples from 3 of 91 patients with lung cancer (3.3%) without known oncogenic alterations assayed by next-generation sequencing or fluorescence in situ hybridization demonstrated evidence of NTRK1 gene fusions.

The targeting of oncogenic 'driver' kinases with small molecule inhibitors has proven to be a highly effective therapeutic strategy in selected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, acquired resistance to targeted therapies invariably arises and is a major limitation to patient care. ROS1 fusion proteins are a recently described class of oncogenic driver, and NSCLC patients that express these fusions generally respond well to ROS1-targeted therapy. In this study, we sought to determine mechanisms of acquired resistance to ROS1 inhibition. To accomplish this, we analyzed tumor samples from a patient who initially responded to the ROS1 inhibitor crizotinib but eventually developed acquired resistance. In addition, we generated a ROS1 inhibition-resistant derivative of the initially sensitive NSCLC cell line HCC78. Previously described mechanisms of acquired resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors including target kinase-domain mutation, target copy number gain, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, and conversion to small cell lung cancer histology were found to not underlie resistance in the patient sample or resistant cell line. However, we did observe a switch in the control of growth and survival signaling pathways from ROS1 to EGFR in the resistant cell line. As a result of this switch, ROS1 inhibition-resistant HCC78 cells became sensitive to EGFR inhibition, an effect that was enhanced by co-treatment with a ROS1 inhibitor. Our results suggest that co-inhibition of ROS1 and EGFR may be an effective strategy to combat resistance to targeted therapy in some ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC patients.

Drug resistance remains a challenge for targeted therapy of cancers driven by EML4-ALK and related fusion oncogenes. EML4-ALK forms cytoplasmic protein condensates, which result from networks of interactions between oncogene and adapter protein multimers. While these assemblies are associated with oncogenic signaling, their role in drug response is unclear. Here, we use optogenetics and live-cell imaging to find that EML4-ALK assemblies suppress transmembrane receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) signaling by sequestering RTK adapter proteins including GRB2 and SOS1. Furthermore, ALK inhibition, while suppressing oncogenic signaling, simultaneously releases the sequestered adapters and thereby resensitizes RTK signaling. Resensitized RTKs promote rapid and pulsatile ERK reactivation that originates from paracrine ligands shed by dying cells. Reactivated ERK signaling promotes cell survival, which can be counteracted by combination therapies that block paracrine signaling. Our results identify a regulatory role for RTK fusion assemblies and uncover a mechanism of tolerance to targeted therapies. The EML4-ALK oncogene forms  cytoplasmic protein condensates that are associated with its oncogenic signaling. Here, the authors demonstrate that these EML4-ALK assemblies also sequester receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) adapter proteins suppressing signaling which was reversed upon ALK inhibition, resulting in rapid resensitisation to growth factors and tumor cell survival.

Despite initial and sometimes dramatic responses of specific NSCLC tumors to EGFR TKIs, nearly all will develop resistance and relapse. Gene expression analysis of NSCLC cell lines treated with the EGFR TKI, gefitinib, revealed increased levels of FGFR2 and FGFR3 mRNA. Analysis of gefitinib action on a larger panel of NSCLC cell lines verified that FGFR2 and FGFR3 expression is increased at the mRNA and protein level in NSCLC cell lines in which the EGFR is dominant for growth signaling, but not in cell lines where EGFR signaling is absent. A luciferase reporter containing 2.5 kilobases of fgfr2 5' flanking sequence was activated after gefitinib treatment, indicating transcriptional regulation as a contributing mechanism controlling increased FGFR2 expression. Induction of FGFR2 and FGFR3 protein as well as fgfr2-luc activity was also observed with Erbitux, an EGFR-specific monoclonal antibody. Moreover, inhibitors of c-Src and MEK stimulated fgfr2-luc activity to a similar degree as gefitinib, suggesting that these pathways may mediate EGFR-dependent repression of FGFR2 and FGFR3. Importantly, our studies demonstrate that EGFR TKI-induced FGFR2 and FGFR3 are capable of mediating FGF2 and FGF7 stimulated ERK activation as well as FGF-stimulated transformed growth in the setting of EGFR TKIs. In conclusion, this study highlights EGFR TKI-induced FGFR2 and FGFR3 signaling as a novel and rapid mechanism of acquired resistance to EGFR TKIs and suggests that treatment of NSCLC patients with combinations of EGFR and FGFR specific TKIs may be a strategy to enhance efficacy of single EGFR inhibitors.

Molecular targeted therapy has the potential to dramatically improve survival in patients with cancer. However, complete and durable responses to targeted therapy are rare in individuals with advanced-stage solid cancers. Even the most effective targeted therapies generally do not induce a complete tumor response, resulting in residual disease and tumor progression that limits patient survival. We discuss the emerging need to more fully understand the molecular basis of residual disease as a prelude to designing therapeutic strategies to minimize or eliminate residual disease so that we can move from temporary to chronic control of disease, or a cure, for patients with advanced-stage solid cancers. Ultimately, we propose a shift from the current reactive paradigm of analyzing and treating acquired drug resistance to a pre-emptive paradigm of defining the mechanisms that result in residual disease, to target and limit this disease reservoir.

Background Dabrafenib and trametinib combination therapy is approved for the treatment of patients with BRAF V600E positive tumors including melanoma and lung cancer. The effect of BRAF and MEK inhibitors on the immune system is not fully understood although a number of case reports indicate autoimmune side effects related to the use of these drugs. Here, we discuss a case of a patient diagnosed with granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) shortly after starting treatment with dabrafenib and trametinib for BRAF V600E positive metastatic lung adenocarcinoma. Case presentation A 57 years old female patient was diagnosed with recurrent lung adenocarcinoma following initial lobectomy for early stage disease. A BRAF V600E mutation was identified at the time of recurrence and she received combination dabrafenib and trametinib therapy. Shortly after commencement of treatment, she developed persistent fevers necessitating withholding both drugs. Pyrexia continued and was followed by left vision loss and acute kidney injury. Further rheumatological workup led to the unifying diagnosis of GPA. The patient was then treated with rituximab for GPA to the present date while all antineoplastic drugs were held. Lung cancer oligoprogression was addressed with radiation therapy and has not required further systemic treatment whereas GPA has been controlled to-date with rituximab. Conclusions This case report raises awareness among clinicians treating patients with lung cancer for the possibility of triggering a flare of autoimmune diseases like GPA in patients with BRAF V600E positive lung cancer receiving treatment with BRAF directed therapy.

Genomic tumour profiling informs targeted treatment options. Entrectinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor with efficacy in NTRK fusion‐positive (‐fp) solid tumours and ROS1‐fp non‐small cell lung cancer. FoundationOne® Liquid CDx (F1L CDx), a non‐invasive in vitro next‐generation sequencing (NGS)‐based diagnostic, detects genomic alterations in plasma circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA). We evaluated the clinical validity of F1L CDx as an aid in identifying patients with NTRK‐fp or ROS1‐fp tumours and assessed the genomic landscape pre‐ and post‐entrectinib treatment. Among evaluable pre‐treatment clinical samples (N = 85), positive percentage agreements between F1L CDx and clinical trial assays (CTAs) were 47.4% (NTRK fusions) and 64.5% (ROS1 fusions); positive predictive value was 100% for both. The objective response rate for CTA+ F1L CDx+ patients was 72.2% in both cohorts. The median duration of response significantly differed between F1L CDx+ and F1L CDx− samples in ROS1‐fp (5.6 vs. 17.3 months) but not NTRK‐fp (9.2 vs. 12.9 months) patients. Fifteen acquired resistance mutations were detected. We conclude that F1L CDx is a clinically valid complement to tissue‐based testing to identify patients who may benefit from entrectinib and those with acquired resistance mutations associated with disease progression. Entrectinib is a kinase inhibitor that targets both the NTRK and ROS1 oncogenes. We show that NTRK and ROS1 fusions are present in 46% and 64%, respectively, of blood samples from patients enrolled on a clinical trial, with a response rate of 72%. Profiling blood at progression showed that resistance occurs via mutations in NTRK/ROS1 or via downstream MAP‐kinase reactivation.