Explore the vast range of titles available.

This real-world study investigates the direct healthcare costs from the perspective of the Italian Healthcare National Service of experienced statin users according to their level of adherence to therapy and to their cardiovascular (CV) profile in Italian settings of outpatients clinical practice. A retrospective observational analysis was performed based on administrative databases covering approximately 6 million health-assisted individuals. Adult patients with statins prescription between January 2014 and December 2016 were screened, and first prescription within this period was the index date. Follow-up lasted 1 year after index date. Only patients receiving statins prior index date (experienced statin users) were included and distributed in clusters based on their CV profile. Adherence was calculated during follow-up as proportion of days covered (PDC) and classified in low adherence (PDC<40%), partial adherence (PDC=40-79%) and adherence (PDC≥80%). Mean direct healthcare costs of drugs, hospitalizations, and outpatient services were evaluated during follow-up. A total of 436,623 experienced statin users were included and distributed as follows: 5.5% in the previous CV events, 22.6% in diabetes, 55.7% in CV treatments and 16.2% in the no comorbidity cluster. Total mean annual cost/patient decreased from low adherent to adherent patients from €4826 to €3497 in previous CV events, from €2815 to €2360 in diabetes cluster, from €2077 to €1863 for patients with CV treatments. Same trend was reported for the cost item related to hospitalizations, which was the major determinant of the total costs. In previous CV event cluster, adherence was associated to a saving of €879 on total costs. The study highlighted a decrease in overall mean costs as adherence levels increase, particularly for patients with previous CV events, showing how improving adherence could be associated to cost savings and suggesting suited strategy based on CV profile should be undertaken for adherence optimization.

In questo breve articolo viene proposta una possibile correzione a un verso del Furioso («a chi in amor s'invecchia > s'inveschia»), in relazione alla coerenza metafórica complessiva e a varie analisi intertestuali. In this short article a correction is proposed for a line of the Orlando furioso («a chi in amor s'invecchia > s'inveschia»), in relation to the overall metaphorical coherence and to various intertextual analyses.

Background Multi-element interventions for first-episode psychosis (FEP) are promising, but have mostly been conducted in non-epidemiologically representative samples, thereby raising the risk of underestimating the complexities involved in treating FEP in ‘real-world’ services. Methods/Design The Psychosis early Intervention and Assessment of Needs and Outcome (PIANO) trial is part of a larger research program (Genetics, Endophenotypes and Treatment: Understanding early Psychosis - GET UP) which aims to compare, at 9 months, the effectiveness of a multi-component psychosocial intervention versus treatment as usual (TAU) in a large epidemiologically based cohort of patients with FEP and their family members recruited from all public community mental health centers (CMHCs) located in two entire regions of Italy (Veneto and Emilia Romagna), and in the cities of Florence, Milan and Bolzano. The GET UP PIANO trial has a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled design. The randomized units (clusters) are the CMHCs, and the units of observation are the centers’ patients and their family members. Patients in the experimental group will receive TAU plus: 1) cognitive behavioral therapy sessions, 2) psycho-educational sessions for family members, and 3) case management. Patient enrolment will take place over a 1-year period. Several psychopathological, psychological, functioning, and service use variables will be assessed at baseline and follow-up. The primary outcomes are: 1) change from baseline to follow-up in positive and negative symptoms’ severity and subjective appraisal; 2) relapse occurrences between baseline and follow-up, that is, episodes resulting in admission and/or any case-note records of re-emergence of positive psychotic symptoms. The expected number of recruited patients is about 400, and that of relatives about 300. Owing to the implementation of the intervention at the CMHC level, the blinding of patients, clinicians, and raters is not possible, but every effort will be made to preserve the independency of the raters. We expect that this study will generate evidence on the best treatments for FEP, and will identify barriers that may hinder its feasibility in ‘real-world’ clinical settings, patient/family conditions that may render this intervention ineffective or inappropriate, and clinical, psychological, environmental, and service organization predictors of treatment effectiveness, compliance, and service satisfaction. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01436331