Catalogue Search | MBRL
Search Results Heading
Explore the vast range of titles available.
MBRLSearchResults
-
DisciplineDiscipline
-
Is Peer ReviewedIs Peer Reviewed
-
Series TitleSeries Title
-
Reading LevelReading Level
-
YearFrom:-To:
-
More FiltersMore FiltersContent TypeItem TypeIs Full-Text AvailableSubjectPublisherSourceDonorLanguagePlace of PublicationContributorsLocation
Done
Filters
Reset
3
result(s) for
"Duara, Prasenjit, editor"
Sort by:
Beyond regimes : China and India compared
\"Contemporary China and India have been powerfully shaped by trans- and subnational forces. This volume approaches China and India via a strategy of \"convergent comparison,\" exploring local and global influences through a focus on labor relations; legal reform and rights protest; public goods provision; and transnational migration and investment\"--Provided by publisher.
Decolonization
2003,2004
Decolonization brings together the most cutting-edge thinking by major historians of decolonization, including previously unpublished essays and writings by leaders of decolonizing countries including Ho Chi-Minh and Jawaharlal Nehru.
The chapters in this volume present a move away from Western analysis of decolonizaton and instead move towards the angle of vision of the former colonies. This is a ground-breaking study of a subject central to recent global history.
Part 1: In their Words Part 2: Imperialism and Nationalism Part 3: Regions and Themes
China Inside Out
2005
The authors of this text believe that \"areas\" as assemblages of social processes requiring distinct, culture-bound explanations cannot be replaced with global theories, but that the meaning of \"the area\" can be different depending on the question one studies. The study of China and Chinese, in particular, is a good arena to challenge the disciplinary and geographic boundaries of conventional area studies for several reasons. First, because of the wealth of simultaneous processes of rapid political, social, and discursive change in contemporary Chinese society; second, because of the problematic relationship between state, territory, nation, and ethnicity in China; third, because China studies, perhaps more than any other area studies at the moment, is a highly competitive political and academic industry whose internal working must be critically examined. In addition, the subject of China has become one of the primary loci of contesting the meanings of globalization and the universality versus relativity of \"values\" and modernity.