Explore the vast range of titles available.

The therapy and management of Gaucher disease (GD) have radically changed with the use of substrate reduction therapy, of which eliglustat is the most widely known drug, allowing it to overcome the limits of enzyme replacement therapy (ERT). The rarity of GD and the limited use of eliglustat outside clinical trials require further study of its strengths and weaknesses. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness and safety of eliglustat in a cohort of 12 patients with GD followed up in our center, reporting a reduction in both chitotriosidase (394.3 vs 181.1 nmol/h/mL, P = 0.027) and glucosylsphingosine values (45.1 vs 18.9 ng/mL, P <0.001) after at least 12 months of therapy compared with baseline, regardless of patient demographic characteristics and GD characteristics. There were no drug-related serious adverse effects and no drug-related cardiac events. Most adverse events were mild and transient, mainly dyspepsia and abdominal pain. Of interest, we reported an absence of statistical difference in terms of response regarding glucosylsphingosine reduction in relation to naive or prior exposure to ERT (P = 0.296), which was confirmed also when patients were placed in naive and treated groups for <5 vs >5 years (P = 0.667). The use of eliglustat immediately after diagnosis may guarantee the best treatment for patients with milder phenotypes or with aggressive disease after an initial stabilization with ERT compared with ERT, which cannot adequately remove the disease burden despite the apparent response, thus potentially reducing future complications caused by substrate deposits.

Background Clonal myeloproliferation and fibrotic transformation of the bone marrow (BM) are the pathogenetic events most commonly occurring in myelofibrosis (MF). There is great evidence indicating that tumor microenvironment is characterized by high lactate levels, acting not only as an energetic source, but also as a signaling molecule. Methods To test the involvement of lactate in MF milieu transformation, we measured its levels in MF patients’ sera, eventually finding a massive accumulation of this metabolite, which we showed to promote the expansion of immunosuppressive subsets. Therefore, to assess the significance of its trafficking, we inhibited monocarboxylate transporter 1 (MCT1) by its selective antagonist, AZD3965, eventually finding a mitigation of lactate-mediated immunosuppressive subsets expansion. To further dig into the impact of lactate in tumor microenvironment, we evaluated the effect of this metabolite on mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) reprogramming. Results Our results show an activation of a cancer-associated phenotype (CAF) related to mineralized matrix formation and early fibrosis development. Strikingly, MF serum, enriched in lactate, causes a strong deposition of collagen in healthy stromal cells, which was restrained by AZD3965. To corroborate these outcomes, we therefore generated for the first time a TPO high zebrafish model for the establishment of experimental fibrosis. By adopting this model, we were able to unveil a remarkable increase in lactate concentration and monocarboxylate transporter 1 (MCT1) expression in the site of hematopoiesis, associated with a strong downregulation of lactate export channel MCT4. Notably, exploiting MCTs expression in biopsy specimens from patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms, we found a loss of MCT4 expression in PMF, corroborating changes in MCT expression during BM fibrosis establishment. Conclusions In conclusion, our results unveil lactate as a key regulator of immune escape and BM fibrotic transformation in MF patients, suggesting MCT1 blocking as a novel antifibrotic strategy.

Background: Clinical trials comparing novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) with warfarin reported a lower mortality rate and a reduced incidence of bleeding with NOACs. However, these studies do not allow for final conclusions about safety. Moreover, direct comparisons among NOACs are not available. Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyze data from EudraVigilance in order to compare OAC safety profiles. Methods: We searched for all suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) from OACs collected in the EudraVigilance up to March 2019. We calculated the reporting odds ratios (RORs) in order to assess the risk of reporting specific ADRs among drugs. Moreover, OAC safety profiles were investigated through correspondence analysis and visualized in contribution biplots. Results: A total of 244,149 individual case safety reports (ICSRs; 431,354 ADRs) related to OACs were retrieved from EudraVigilance. About 80% of ICSRs refer to NOACs, especially rivaroxaban. Gastrointestinal (Gastr) and central nervous system (Nerv) disorders were the most represented categories. More than 90% of ADRs were serious and almost 9% fatal, with the highest ROR reported for dabigatran. Both fatal and non-fatal ADRs reported for Vitamin K Antagonists (VKAs) differed from those reported for NOACs. Among the latter, dabigatran and rivaroxaban showed similar profiles, while apixaban differed from all other OACs, even in the case of fatal ADRs. Conclusions: As expected, data collected from EudraVigilance showed differences among drugs, probably related to their specific characteristics and/or the peculiar utilization in clinical practice. Further investigations are needed to better compare the safety profile of OACs.

Blinatumomab is a bispecific anti-CD3 and anti-CD19 antibody that acts as a T-cell engager: by binding CD19+ lymphoblasts, blinatumomab recruits cytotoxic CD3+ T-lymphocytes to target the cancer cells. Here we describe seven different patients affected by B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Bcp-ALL) and treated with blinatumomab, on which we evaluated the potential association between the amount of different T-cells subsets and deep molecular response after the first cycle, identified as a complete remission in the absence of minimal residual disease (CR/MRD). The immune-system effector cells studied were CD3+, CD4+ effector memory (T4-EM), CD8+ effector memory (T8-EM), and T-regulatory (T-reg) lymphocytes, and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC). Measurements were performed in the peripheral blood using flow cytometry of the peripheral blood at baseline and after the first cycle of blinatumomab. The first results show that patients with a higher proportion of baseline T-lymphocytes achieved MRD negativity more frequently with no statistically significant difference (p=0.06) and without differences in the subpopulation count following the first treatment. These extremely preliminary data could potentially pave the way for future studies, including larger and less heterogeneous cohorts, in order to assess the T-cell kinetics in a specific set of patients with potential synergy effects in targeting myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC), commonly known to have an immune evasion mechanism in Bcp-ALL.

Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are a subset of heterogeneous, non-hematopoietic fibroblast-like cells which play important roles in tissue repair, inflammation, and immune modulation. MSCs residing in the bone marrow microenvironment (BMME) functionally interact with hematopoietic stem progenitor cells regulating hematopoiesis. However, MSCs have also emerged in recent years as key regulators of the tumor microenvironment. Indeed, they are now considered active players in the pathophysiology of hematologic malignancies rather than passive bystanders in the hematopoietic microenvironment. Once a malignant event occurs, the BMME acquires cellular, molecular, and epigenetic abnormalities affecting tumor growth and progression. In this context, MSC behavior is affected by signals coming from cancer cells. Furthermore, it has been shown that stromal cells themselves play a major role in several hematological malignancies’ pathogenesis. This bidirectional crosstalk creates a functional tumor niche unit wherein tumor cells acquire a selective advantage over their normal counterparts and are protected from drug treatment. It is therefore of critical importance to unveil the underlying mechanisms which activate a protumor phenotype of MSCs for defining the unmasked vulnerabilities of hematological cancer cells which could be pharmacologically exploited to disrupt tumor/MSC coupling. The present review focuses on the current knowledge about MSC dysfunction mechanisms in the BMME of hematological cancers, sustaining tumor growth, immune escape, and cancer progression.

The potent oral inhibitor of BCL2, venetoclax (VEN), used to treat adults with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, has been approved in US for the treatment of naïve patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) unfit for intensive chemotherapy and recently in Europe, too. However, the drug has been used for years in combination with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) in patients not eligible to other treatment option, according to the so-called off-label use. We collected real-world data about patients treated with VEN + HMAs in the context of a pharmacovigilance project focused on the evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of drugs used for unapproved indication in Italian hospitals. From March to December 2020, 24 patients started treatment with VEN combined with HMAs. 21 patients have been assessed for response. Eleven (52%) patients reached complete remission (CR), and three patients (14%) CR with partial hematological recovery (CRh), with a median duration of response of 4.5 months (range 0.5–12.5). 19 patients experienced at least 1 adverse drug reaction (ADR), mostly serious, including 3 deaths (9% of ADRs; 12.5% of patients) in febrile neutropenia. Hematological toxicities and infections (cytopenia, neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, sepsis), were the most reported ADRs (84.4%). In general, neutropenic fever occurred more frequently in patients treated with decitabine (7 out of 9, 78%) compared to azacitidine (5 out of 15, 33%; p = 0.03), whereas response assessment did not differ based on used HMA ( p = 0.1). These results confirm the benefit-risk profile of VEN in a real-world setting of patients with no adequate therapeutic options.

Background/Objectives: The combination of venetoclax (VEN) and hypomethylating agents (HMA), such as azacitidine (AZA) or decitabine (DEC), has transformed the treatment landscape for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy. However, optimal management of neutropenia and the impact of post-remission treatment interruptions (washouts) remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of post-remission washouts and their effect on clinical outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective single-center study of 44 AML patients treated with HMA/VEN between 2020 and 2021. Clinical, molecular, and treatment-related data were collected, including treatment duration, post-remission washout duration, response rates, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Statistical analyses included Fisher’s exact test and univariate and multivariate Cox models. Results: Overall, 61% of patients responded to therapy, with significantly higher response rates among those potentially eligible for the VIALE-A trial (86% vs. 39%, p = 0.002). Neither treatment duration nor post-remission washout length was associated with DFS or OS. DFS was significantly longer in patients treated with AZA compared to DEC (p = 0.006). Median OS was 7.7 months, with longer OS observed in patients who met VIALE-A trial eligibility criteria (p = 0.021). Achieving complete remission (CR) was associated with improved OS (14.5 months). Conclusions: Post-remission treatment interruptions (washouts) did not negatively impact DFS or OS, suggesting they may be a safe strategy to support hematologic recovery. However, the choice of HMA appears to influence response duration, with AZA outperforming DEC in maintaining disease control.

Background: Relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (R/R AML) remains a therapeutic challenge due to disease heterogeneity, resistance mechanisms, and poor tolerability to intensive regimens. Venetoclax (VEN), a BCL-2 inhibitor, has shown promise in combination with hypomethylating agents (HMAs), but data on response timing in the R/R setting are limited. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy, safety, and kinetics of response to HMA-VEN therapy in a real-world cohort of R/R AML patients, with particular focus on early versus late responders. Methods: This prospective single-center study included 33 adult patients with R/R AML treated with VEN plus either azacitidine (AZA) or decitabine (DEC) from 2018 to 2021. The primary endpoint was the composite complete remission (cCR) rate and the rate of early and late response, respectively, occurring within two cycles of therapy or later; secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), time to relapse (TTR), and safety. Results: The cCR was 58%, with complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete recovery (CRi) achieved in 52% of patients. Median OS was 9 months. No significant differences in OS or TTR were observed between early (≤2 cycles) and late (>2 cycles) responders. Eight responders (42%) underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), with comparable transplant rates in both groups of responders. Toxicity was manageable. Grade 3–4 neutropenia occurred in all patients, and febrile neutropenia occurred in 44% of patients. An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score >2 was associated with inferior response and shorter treatment duration. Conclusions: HMA-VEN therapy is effective and safe in R/R AML, including for patients with delayed responses. The absence of a prognostic disadvantage for late responders supports flexible treatment schedules and suggests that the continuation of therapy may be beneficial even without early blast clearance. Tailored approaches based on performance status and comorbidities are warranted, and future studies should incorporate minimal residual disease (MRD)-based monitoring to refine response assessment.

Background/Objectives: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with FLT3 internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) mutations carries a poor prognosis. While FLT3 inhibitors like midostaurin show benefits in combination with chemotherapy, the role of allelic ratio (AR), NPM1 mutation status, and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains uncertain. Real-world data can help refine prognostic classification and treatment strategies. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 37 fit patients with FLT3-ITD AML treated with standard “7+3” chemotherapy, with and without midostaurin, between 2013 and 2022. Patients were stratified by FLT3-ITD AR, NPM1 status, and treatment approach. Outcomes assessed included complete remission (CR), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: Overall, 67.6% achieved CR/CRi. Response rates did not differ significantly by AR (low vs. high: 66.7% vs. 69.2%) or midostaurin use (72.6% vs. 60%; p = 0.49). NPM1 mutations were associated with improved DFS (10.3 vs. 3 months, p = 0.036) but not OS. HSCT, performed in 54.1% of patients, mainly in first remission (CR1), significantly prolonged DFS (not reached vs. 5.3 months, p = 0.005) and remained an independent predictor in multivariate analysis (HR: 0.160, p = 0.039). OS (median 15.1 months) did not vary significantly across subgroups. Among patients achieving CR1, OS was significantly longer in those who underwent HSCT after midostaurin-based induction compared to those not transplanted (median OS not reached vs. 12.8 months; 95% CI, 6.9–18.7; p = 0.045), whereas no significant benefit was observed after standard induction. In a landmark analysis restricted to patients transplanted in CR1, those who had received midostaurin-based induction showed a trend toward improved OS compared to those treated with standard induction (median OS not reached vs. 11.5 months; 95% CI, 0.5–25.0; p = 0.086). Conclusions: This real-life study supports the importance of NPM1 mutations and HSCT in CR1, especially in the midostaurin era, for improving DFS in FLT3-ITD AML. These findings support updated guidelines for reducing the prognostic weight of AR and highlight the need for improved post-remission strategies in this setting.