Explore the vast range of titles available.

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) is a fast moving class of targeted biotherapeutics that currently combines the selectivity of monoclonal antibodies with the potency of a payload consisting of cytotoxic agents. For many years microtubule targeting and DNA-intercalating agents were at the forefront of ADC development. The recent approval and clinical success of trastuzumab deruxtecan (Enhertu ® ) and sacituzumab govitecan (Trodelvy ® ), two topoisomerase 1 inhibitor-based ADCs, has shown the potential of conjugating unconventional payloads with differentiated mechanisms of action. Among future developments in the ADC field, payload diversification is expected to play a key role as illustrated by a growing number of preclinical and clinical stage unconventional payload-conjugated ADCs. This review presents a comprehensive overview of validated, forgotten and newly developed payloads with different mechanisms of action.

Key Points The development of antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) has benefited from general improvements in the design of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and from specific improvements in regard to methods for conjugate synthesis through which both homogeneity and stability is enhanced. Diversification of linking strategies and payloads has opened new perspectives to improve drug delivery to tumours while reducing drug exposure to normal tissues. To enhance the therapeutic index of ADCs, either the potency of the cytotoxic agent has to be improved to lower the minimum effective dose or the tumour selectivity has to be improved to increase the maximum tolerated dose. Protein structural characterization tools such as mass spectrometry and the development of quantitative bioanalytical assays will contribute to the identification of early-developability criteria for all of the ADC components (antibody, drug and linker). Recent ADC development has created a renewed interest in natural cytotoxic products, which are typically highly potent cytotoxic agents but often have unacceptable toxicities. In the future, breakthroughs in the efficacy of ADCs are likely to involve conjugates with previously unknown mechanisms of action. Alternative formats to mAbs, such as protein scaffolds (designed ankyrin-repeat proteins (DARPins), nanobodies, single-chain variable fragments (scFvs) and peptide–drug conjugates), dual-labelled ADCs and biparatopic drug conjugates, present new research avenues. There are several possible indications for ADCs: as single agents in patients with refractory or relapsing disease; in palliative settings, for consolidation or maintenance; and in combination with other agents as first-line therapy or in relapsed patients. Antibody–drug conjugate (ADCs), which aim to target highly cytotoxic drugs specifically to cancer cells, are one of the fastest growing classes of anticancer therapeutics, with more than 50 such agents currently in clinical trials. This Review discusses lessons learned and emerging strategies in the development of ADCs, including aspects such as target selection, the development of warheads, the optimization of linkers and new conjugation chemistries, and provides an overview of agents that are currently in clinical trials. Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are one of the fastest growing classes of oncology therapeutics. After half a century of research, the approvals of brentuximab vedotin (in 2011) and trastuzumab emtansine (in 2013) have paved the way for ongoing clinical trials that are evaluating more than 60 further ADC candidates. The limited success of first-generation ADCs (developed in the early 2000s) informed strategies to bring second-generation ADCs to the market, which have higher levels of cytotoxic drug conjugation, lower levels of naked antibodies and more-stable linkers between the drug and the antibody. Furthermore, lessons learned during the past decade are now being used in the development of third-generation ADCs. In this Review, we discuss strategies to select the best target antigens as well as suitable cytotoxic drugs; the design of optimized linkers; the discovery of bioorthogonal conjugation chemistries; and toxicity issues. The selection and engineering of antibodies for site-specific drug conjugation, which will result in higher homogeneity and increased stability, as well as the quest for new conjugation chemistries and mechanisms of action, are priorities in ADC research.

An armed antibody (antibody–drug conjugate or ADC) is a vectorized chemotherapy, which results from the grafting of a cytotoxic agent onto a monoclonal antibody via a judiciously constructed spacer arm. ADCs have made considerable progress in 10 years. While in 2009 only gemtuzumab ozogamicin (Mylotarg®) was used clinically, in 2020, 9 Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved ADCs are available, and more than 80 others are in active clinical studies. This review will focus on FDA-approved and late-stage ADCs, their limitations including their toxicity and associated resistance mechanisms, as well as new emerging strategies to address these issues and attempt to widen their therapeutic window. Finally, we will discuss their combination with conventional chemotherapy or checkpoint inhibitors, and their design for applications beyond oncology, to make ADCs the magic bullet that Paul Ehrlich dreamed of.

Following the administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors, an unexpected pattern of response designated as hyperprogression may be observed in certain patients. This paradoxical response corresponds to an acceleration in tumor growth and a dramatic decrease of patient survival. The reported incidence rates of hyperprogressive disease are highly variable, ranging between 4 and 29%. In this review, we have performed a literature search on hyperprogressive disease, including both retrospective studies and case reports, and discuss potential predictive biomarkers as well as potential mechanisms associated with immune-checkpoint inhibitor associated hyperprogression.

On the basis of preclinical studies that show overexpression of class III β-tubulin is associated with resistance to tubulin-binding agents, several investigators have addressed the relation between class III β-tubulin and outcome in patients treated with such agents. High expression of class III β-tubulin has been found to be correlated either with low response rates in patients treated with regimens containing taxanes or vinorelbine or with reduced survival in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer, in breast, ovarian, and gastric cancers, and in cancers of unknown primary site. Two studies have shown patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer receiving paclitaxel whose tumours expressed high levels of class III β-tubulin had a lower response to paclitaxel and shorter survival, whereas this variable was not found to be predictive in patients receiving regimens without tubulin-binding agents. Conversely, analysis of samples from patients in the JBR-10 trial, which compared adjuvant chemotherapy to no further therapy in operable non-small-cell lung cancer, showed that chemotherapy seemed to overcome the negative prognostic effect of high levels of expression of class III β-tubulin and the greatest benefit from cisplatin/vinorelbine was seen in patients with high levels of expression of class III β-tubulin. Further analyses in operable and advanced non-small-cell lung cancer showed a relation between high expression of class III β-tubulin and baseline factors such as age under 60 years, adenocarcinoma and large-cell carcinoma histologies, and advanced stage of disease. These results suggest that class III β-tubulin could be both a prognostic and a predictive factor. Large randomised studies are warranted to determine the prognostic or predictive value of class III β-tubulin in different settings and tumours.

Introduction Clinical studies suggest that obesity, in addition to promoting breast cancer aggressiveness, is associated with a decrease in chemotherapy efficacy, although the mechanisms involved remain elusive. As chemotherapy is one of the main treatments for aggressive or metastatic breast cancer, we investigated whether adipocytes can mediate resistance to doxorubicin (DOX), one of the main drugs used to treat breast cancer, and the mechanisms associated. Methods We used a coculture system to grow breast cancer cells with in vitro differentiated adipocytes as well as primary mammary adipocytes isolated from lean and obese patients. Drug cellular accumulation, distribution, and efflux were studied by immunofluorescence, flow cytometry, and analysis of extracellular vesicles. Results were validated by immunohistochemistry in a series of lean and obese patients with cancer. Results Adipocytes differentiated in vitro promote DOX resistance (with cross-resistance to paclitaxel and 5-fluorouracil) in a large panel of human and murine breast cancer cell lines independently of their subtype. Subcellular distribution of DOX was altered in cocultivated cells with decreased nuclear accumulation of the drug associated with a localized accumulation in cytoplasmic vesicles, which then are expelled into the extracellular medium. The transport-associated major vault protein (MVP), whose expression was upregulated by adipocytes, mediated both processes. Coculture with human mammary adipocytes also induced chemoresistance in breast cancer cells (as well as the related MVP-induced DOX efflux) and their effect was amplified by obesity. Finally, in a series of human breast tumors, we observed a gradient of MVP expression, which was higher at the invasive front, where tumor cells are at close proximity to adipocytes, than in the tumor center, highlighting the clinical relevance of our results. High expression of MVP in these tumor cells is of particular interest since they are more likely to disseminate to give rise to chemoresistant metastases. Conclusions Collectively, our study shows that adipocytes induce an MVP-related multidrug-resistant phenotype in breast cancer cells, which could contribute to obesity-related chemoresistance.

Smoldering myeloma (SMM) is associated with a high-risk of progression to myeloma (MM). We report the results of a study of 82 patients with both targeted sequencing that included a capture of the immunoglobulin and MYC regions. By comparing these results to newly diagnosed myeloma (MM) we show fewer NRAS and FAM46C mutations together with fewer adverse translocations, del(1p), del(14q), del(16q), and del(17p) in SMM consistent with their role as drivers of the transition to MM. KRAS mutations are associated with a shorter time to progression (HR 3.5 (1.5–8.1), p  = 0.001). In an analysis of change in clonal structure over time we studied 53 samples from nine patients at multiple time points. Branching evolutionary patterns, novel mutations, biallelic hits in crucial tumour suppressor genes, and segmental copy number changes are key mechanisms underlying the transition to MM, which can precede progression and be used to guide early intervention strategies. Progression from asymptomatic smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) to symptomatic Multiple Myeloma occurs at different rates in different patients. Here, the authors report fewer NRAS and FAM46C mutations and adverse translocations in SMM compared to MM, while KRAS mutations are associated with a shorter time to progression.

In spite of impressive response rates in multiple cancer types, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are active in only a minority of patients. Alternative strategies currently aim to combine immunotherapies with conventional agents such as cytotoxic chemotherapies. Here, we performed a study of PD-1 or PDL-1 blockade in combination with reference chemotherapies in four fully immunocompetent mouse models of cancer. We analyzed both the antitumor response, and the tumor immune infiltrate 4 days after the first treatment. tumor growth experiments revealed variable responsiveness to ICIs between models. We observed enhanced antitumor effects of the combination of immunotherapy with chemotherapy in the MC38 colon and MB49 bladder models, a lack of response in the 4T1 breast model, and an inhibition of ICIs activity in the MBT-2 bladder model. Flow cytometry analysis of tumor samples showed significant differences in all models between untreated and treated mice. At baseline, all the tumor models studied were predominantly infiltrated with cells harboring an immunosuppressive phenotype. Early alterations of the tumor immune infiltrate after treatment were found to be highly variable. We found that the balance between effector cells and immunosuppressive cells in the tumor microenvironment could be altered with some treatment combinations, but this effect was not always correlated with an impact on tumor growth. These results show that the combination of cytotoxic chemotherapy with ICIs may result in enhanced, similar or reduced antitumor activity, in a model- and regimen-dependent fashion. The present investigations should help to select appropriate combination regimens for ICIs.

The large subunit of human ribonucleotide reductase, RRM1, is involved in the regulation of cell proliferation, cell migration, tumour and metastasis development, and the synthesis of deoxyribonucleotides for DNA synthesis. It is also a cellular target for the chemotherapeutic agent, gemcitabine. RRM1 has been studied in a large number of patients with different types of cancer, such as non-small-cell lung cancer, pancreatic cancer, breast cancer, and biliary tract cancer, to establish its prognostic or predictive value when patients were treated with gemcitabine, and mRNA expression and genetic variants as determined by genotyping have in some cases been associated with clinical outcome of patients with cancer. Here, we review preclinical and clinical studies of RRM1 assessment and discuss the further steps in the development of this clinically pertinent biomarker.

We herein report the development and evaluation of a novel HER2-targeting antibody–drug conjugate (ADC) based on the topoisomerase I inhibitor payload exatecan, using our hydrophilic monodisperse polysarcosine (PSAR) drug-linker platform (PSARlink). In vitro and in vivo experiments were conducted in breast and gastric cancer models to characterize this original ADC and gain insight about the drug-linker structure–activity relationship. The inclusion of the PSAR hydrophobicity masking entity efficiently reduced the overall hydrophobicity of the conjugate and yielded an ADC sharing the same pharmacokinetic profile as the unconjugated antibody despite the high drug-load of the camptothecin-derived payload (drug–antibody ratio of 8). Tra-Exa-PSAR10 demonstrated strong anti-tumor activity at 1 mg/kg in an NCI-N87 xenograft model, outperforming the FDA-approved ADC DS-8201a (Enhertu), while being well tolerated in mice at a dose of 100 mg/kg. In vitro experiments showed that this exatecan-based ADC demonstrated higher bystander killing effect than DS-8201a and overcame resistance to T-DM1 (Kadcyla) in preclinical HER2+ breast and esophageal models, suggesting potential activity in heterogeneous and resistant tumors. In summary, the polysarcosine-based hydrophobicity masking approach allowsfor the generation of highly conjugated exatecan-based ADCs having excellent physicochemical properties, an improved pharmacokinetic profile, and potent in vivo anti-tumor activity.