Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background Enabling behaviour change in health care is a complex process. Although the use of theory to inform behaviour change interventions is advocated, there is limited information about how this might best be achieved. There are multiple models of behaviour change, however, due to their complexity they can be inaccessible to both researchers and healthcare practitioners. To support health care practitioner behaviour change, this was addressed by the development of the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) in 2005. Citations of the TDF and associated papers have increased exponentially. Although not predicted or intended by the authors, the TDF has also been used to investigate health behaviour change interventions. Therefore our aim was to narratively synthesize empirical evidence on how the TDF and subsequent iterations have been applied in health behaviour change to inform future intervention development. Methods Systematic search of four online databases, combined with searches for citations of key papers and key author searches, resulted in 3551 articles eligible for screening. Of these 10 met the pre-determined inclusion criteria. Screening of full-texts, data extraction and quality appraisal were independently performed by both authors. Disagreements regarding eligibility were resolved through discussion. Results Of the 10 included studies three used the TDF and seven used subsequent iterations, the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation to Behaviour / Behaviour Change Wheel to assess and /or categorise behavioural determinants to identify relevant behaviour change techniques. Two studies reported feasibility testing. Most interventions were targeted at diet and exercise. Eight reported an explicit and systematic process in applying the framework. Conclusion There is limited evidence of how the framework has been used to support health behaviour change interventions. In the included studies the process of using the framework is not always reported in detail or with clarity. More recent studies use a systematic and judicious process of framework application. From the limited evidence available we tentatively suggest that the steps proposed in the BCW appear to be sufficient for development of interventions that target health behaviour change interventions. Further research is needed to provide evidence in how the framework may be most effectively applied to intervention development. Protocol registration PROSPERO CRD42018086896 .

This study seeks to understand and address barriers to practitioners' optimal assessment and management of people with delirium in hospices. Retrospective clinical record review to identify areas of low concordance with guideline-adherent delirium care; Survey of healthcare practitioners to identify barriers and facilitators to optimal care; Qualitative interviews with health care practitioners to explore and develop strategies to address barriers or optimise facilitators; Meeting with senior clinical staff to refine identified strategies. Eighty clinical records were reviewed. Elements of poor guideline concordance were identified. Delirium screening on admission was conducted for 61% of admissions. Non-pharmacological management was documented for 59% of those we identified as having delirium from the clinical records. Survey and interview data identified key barriers to delirium assessment as competing priorities, poor knowledge and skills and lack of environmental resources (staff and guidelines, environment). Consultation with staff resulted in strategies to address barriers and enhance facilitators including champions, educational meetings, audit and feedback, and environmental changes (including careful consideration of the staff skills mix on shift and tools to support non-pharmacological management). We conducted a theoretically underpinned, internationally relevant study in a hospice in England, UK. Implementation of strategies should result in greater guideline-adherent delirium care. Further work should test this in practice and include both process and clinical outcomes (e.g., reduction in delirium days).

Background Patients who deteriorate in hospital wards without appropriate recognition and/or response are at risk of increased morbidity and mortality. Track-and-trigger tools have been implemented internationally prompting healthcare practitioners (typically nursing staff) to recognise physiological changes (e.g. changes in blood pressure, heart rate) consistent with patient deterioration, and then to contact a practitioner with expertise in management of acute/critical illness. Despite some evidence these tools improve patient outcomes, their translation into clinical practice is inconsistent internationally. To drive greater guideline adherence in the use of the National Early Warning Score tool (a track-and-trigger tool used widely in the United Kingdom and parts of Europe), a theoretically informed implementation intervention was developed (targeting nursing staff) using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) version 2 and a taxonomy of Behaviour Change Techniques (BCTs). Methods A three-stage process was followed: 1. TDF domains representing important barriers and enablers to target behaviours derived from earlier published empirical work were mapped to appropriate BCTs; 2. BCTs were shortlisted using consensus approaches within the research team; 3. shortlisted BCTs were presented to relevant stakeholders in two online group discussions where nominal group techniques were applied. Nominal group participants were healthcare leaders, senior clinicians, and ward-based nursing staff. Stakeholders individually generated concrete strategies for operationalising shortlisted BCTs (‘applications’) and privately ranked them according to acceptability and feasibility. Ranking data were used to drive decision-making about intervention content. Results Fifty BCTs (mapped in stage 1) were shortlisted to 14 (stage 2) and presented to stakeholders in nominal groups (stage 3) alongside example applications. Informed by ranking data from nominal groups, the intervention was populated with 12 BCTs that will be delivered face-to-face, to individuals and groups of nursing staff, through 18 applications. Conclusions A description of a theory-based behaviour change intervention is reported, populated with BCTs and applications generated and/or prioritised by stakeholders using replicable consensus methods. The feasibility of the proposed intervention should be tested in a clinical setting and the content of the intervention elaborated further to permit replication and evaluation.

ObjectiveTo codesign a theoretically underpinned, healthcare practitioner-mediated, tailored intervention to support housebound older patients and their lay carers to adopt pressure ulcer prevention behaviours.DesignTheoretical domains framework informed codesign.SettingOne geographical area in the UK, spanning several community National Health Service Trusts.ParticipantsCommunity-dwelling older patients at risk of pressure ulcer development and their lay carers (n=4) and health practitioners (n=6) providing related care.ResultsCodesigners addressed five identified barriers to pressure ulcer prevention, knowledge and beliefs about consequences, social or professional role and influence, motivation and priorities, emotion and environment. Prioritised intervention components were (1) making every contact count, all health and social care workers to be conversant with basic prevention behaviours and to support and reiterate these at every visit (9.1/10), (2) signposting of existing support groups and sitting services (8.4/10), (3) accessible, timely, trustable and relatable written information including the role of patients, carers and staff in prevention and links to other resources (7.7/10) and (4) supporting close family involvement in some of the practical elements of care (5.6/10).ConclusionsOur study sought to codesign a practitioner-mediated, tailored intervention to support housebound older patients and their lay carers to adopt pressure ulcer prevention behaviours. The process of barrier identification and selection of behaviour change techniques for intervention components was theoretically informed. However, further development will be needed to refine the prototype intervention to take into account the complexity of multiple health needs and priorities of patients. The principles of this study are likely to be transferable to similar national and international contexts.

Background Older patients are at severe risk of harm from medicines following a hospital to home transition. Interventions aiming to support successful care transitions by improving medicines management have been implemented. This study aimed to explore which behavioural constructs have previously been targeted by interventions, which individual behaviour change techniques have been included, and which are yet to be trialled. Method This study mapped the behaviour change techniques used in 24 randomised controlled trials to the Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy. Once elicited, techniques were further mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework to explore which determinants of behaviour change had been targeted, and what gaps, if any existed. Results Common behaviour change techniques used were: goals and planning; feedback and monitoring; social support; instruction on behaviour performance; and prompts/cues. These may be valuable when combined in a complex intervention. Interventions mostly mapped to between eight and 10 domains of the Theoretical Domains Framework. Environmental context and resources was an underrepresented domain, which should be considered within future interventions. Conclusion This study has identified behaviour change techniques that could be valuable when combined within a complex intervention aiming to support post-discharge medicines management for older people. Whilst many interventions mapped to eight or more determinants of behaviour change, as identified within the Theoretical Domains Framework, careful assessment of the barriers to behaviour change should be conducted prior to intervention design to ensure all appropriate domains are targeted.

ObjectiveTo identify barriers and facilitators to pressure ulcer prevention behaviours in community-dwelling older people and their lay carers.DesignTheoretically informed qualitative interviews with two-phase, deductive then inductive, thematic analysis.SettingThe study was conducted in one geographical region in the UK, spanning several community National Health Service Trusts.ParticipantsCommunity-dwelling older patients at risk of pressure ulcer development (n=10) and their lay carers (n=10).ResultsSix themes and subthemes were identified: (1) knowledge and beliefs about consequences (nature, source, timing and taboo); (2) social and professional role and influences (who does what, conflicting advice and disagreements); (3) motivation and priorities (competing self-care needs and carer physical ability); (4) memory; (5) emotion (carer exhaustion and isolation, carergiver role conflict and patient feelings) and (6) environment (human resource shortage and equipment).ConclusionsThere is minimal research in pressure ulcer prevention in community-dwelling older people. This study has robustly applied the theoretical domains framework to understanding barriers and facilitators to pressure ulcer prevention behaviours. Our findings will support co-design of strategies to promote preventative behaviours and are likely to be transferable to comparable healthcare systems nationally and internationally.

Epileptic seizures during pregnancy may increase the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Socioeconomic disparities in epilepsy incidence may extend to seizure control. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the association between epileptic seizures during pregnancy and adverse pregnancy outcomes. We also evaluated the association between socioeconomic and individual-level factors and seizure occurrence. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases from inception to May 2025 for observational studies on pregnant women with epileptic seizures. We compared maternal and foetal outcomes in pregnant women with and without seizures and assessed the association between seizure occurrence and socioeconomic or individual-level factors. We used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale to assess the risk of bias of included studies. Meta-analyses using random effects model were performed to estimate pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). From 13,381 identified publications, 25 studies (24,596 pregnancies) are included in this analysis. In pregnant women with epilepsy, women with seizures compared to those without had increased odds of caesarean birth (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.14 to 2.30, p = 0.007), peripartum depression (OR 2.20, 95% CI 1.04 to 4.65, p = 0.04), and small for gestational age baby (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.69, p = 0.03). The odds of preterm birth (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.29 to 2.15, p < 0.001), low birthweight (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.93, p = 0.006), and small for gestational age baby (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.74, p < 0.001) were higher in women with seizures compared to women without epilepsy. The risk of seizures was greater in pregnant women with epilepsy with low income compared to those with higher income (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.22 to 2.02, p < 0.001), and in women with focal epilepsy compared to those with generalised epilepsy (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.54 to 2.20, p < 0.001). The number of studies for some outcomes was small, limiting subgroup analyses and detection of heterogeneity. Epileptic seizures are associated with increased risks of adverse maternal and foetal outcomes. Risk assessment to identify women with epilepsy at highest risk of seizures is needed to optimise care.

Background In 2016, the UK Chief Medical Officers revised their guidance on alcohol and advised women to abstain from alcohol if pregnant or planning pregnancy. Midwives have a key role in advising women about alcohol during pregnancy. The aim of this study was to investigate UK midwives’ practices regarding the 2016 Chief Medical Officers Alcohol Guidelines for pregnancy, and factors influencing their implementation during antenatal appointments. Methods Online cross-sectional survey of a convenience sample of UK midwives recruited through professional networks and social media. Data were gathered using an anonymous online questionnaire addressing knowledge of the 2016 Alcohol Guidelines for pregnancy; practice behaviours regarding alcohol assessment and advice; and questions based on the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to evaluate implementation of advising abstinence at antenatal booking and subsequent antenatal appointments. Results Of 842 questionnaire respondents, 58% were aware of the 2016 Alcohol Guidelines of whom 91% (438) cited abstinence was recommended, although 19% (93) cited recommendations from previous guidelines. Nonetheless, 97% of 842 midwives always or usually advised women to abstain from alcohol at the booking appointment, and 38% at subsequent antenatal appointments. Mean TDF domain scores (range 1–7) for advising abstinence at subsequent appointments were highest (indicative of barriers) for social influences (3.65 sd 0.84), beliefs about consequences (3.16 sd 1.13) and beliefs about capabilities (3.03 sd 073); and lowest (indicative of facilitators) for knowledge (1.35 sd 0.73) and professional role and identity (1.46 sd 0.77). Logistic regression analysis indicated that the TDF domains: beliefs about capabilities (OR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.57, 0.88), emotion (OR = 0.78; 95%CI: 0.67, 0.90), and professional role and identity (OR = 0.69, 95%CI 0.51, 0.95) were strong predictors of midwives advising all women to abstain from alcohol at appointments other than at booking. Conclusions Our results suggest that skill development and reinforcement of support from colleagues and the wider maternity system could support midwives’ implementation of alcohol advice at each antenatal appointment, not just at booking could lead to improved outcomes for women and infants. Implementation of alcohol care pathways in maternity settings are beneficial from a lifecourse perspective for women, children, families, and the wider community.

Background Previous screening interventions have demonstrated a series of features related to social determinants which have increased uptake in targeted populations, including the assessment of health beliefs and barriers to screening attendance as part of intervention development. Many studies cite the use of theory to identify methods of behaviour change, but fail to describe in detail how theoretical constructs are transformed into intervention content. The aim of this study was to use data from a qualitative exploration of cervical screening in women over 50 in the UK as the basis of intervention co-design with stakeholders using behavioural change frameworks. We describe the identification of behavioural mechanisms from qualitative data, and how these were used to develop content for a service-user leaflet and a video animation for practitioner training. The interventions aimed to encourage sustained commitment to cervical screening among women over 50, and to increase sensitivity to age-related problems in screening among primary care practitioners. Methods Secondary coding of a qualitative data set to extract barriers and facilitators of cervical screening attendance. Barrier and facilitator statements were categorised using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to identify relevant behaviour change techniques (BCTs). Key TDF domains and associated BCTs were presented in stakeholder focus groups to guide the design of intervention content and mode of delivery. Results Behavioural determinants relating to attendance clustered under three domains: beliefs about consequences, emotion and social influences, which mapped to three BCTs respectively: (1) persuasive communication/information provision; (2) stress management; (3) role modelling and encouragement. Service-user stakeholders translated these into three pragmatic intervention components: (i) addressing unanswered questions, (ii) problem-solving practitioner challenges and (iii) peer group communication. Based on (ii), practitioner stakeholders developed a call to action in three areas – clinical networking, history-taking, and flexibility in screening processes. APEASE informed modes of delivery (a service-user leaflet and a cartoon animation for practitioners). Conclusion The application of the TDF to qualitative data can provide an auditable protocol for the translation of qualitative data into intervention content.

IntroductionBreathlessness is common and impairs the quality of life of people with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and non-IPF fibrotic interstitial lung diseases (ILD). We report the findings of a multicentre, fast-track (wait-list), mixed-methods, randomised controlled, feasibility study of a complex breathlessness intervention in breathless IPF and non-IPF fibrotic ILD patients.MethodsBreathless IPF and non-IPF fibrotic ILD patients were randomised to receive the intervention within 1 week (fast-track) or after 8 weeks (wait-list). The intervention comprised two face-to-face and one telephone appointment during a 3-week period covering breathing control, handheld fan-use, pacing and breathlessness management techniques, and techniques to manage anxiety. Feasibility and clinical outcomes were assessed to inform progression to, and optimal design for, a definitive trial. A qualitative substudy explored barriers and facilitators to trial and intervention delivery.Results47 patients (M:F 38:9, mean (SD) age 73.9 (7.2)) were randomised with a recruitment rate of 2.5 participants per month across three sites. The adjusted mean differences (95% CI) for key clinical outcomes at 4 weeks post randomisation were as follows: Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire breathlessness mastery domain (0.45 (−0.07, 0.97)); and numerical rating scales for ‘worst’ (−0.93 (−1.95, 0.10)), ‘best’ (−0.19 (−1.38, 1.00)), ‘distress caused by’ (−1.84 (−3.29, –0.39)) and ‘ability to cope with’ (0.71 (−0.57, 1.99)) breathlessness within the past 24 hours. The qualitative substudy confirmed intervention acceptability and informed feasibility and acceptability of study outcome measures.ConclusionA definitive trial of a complex breathlessness intervention in patients with IPF and non-IPF fibrotic ILD is feasible with preliminary data supporting intervention effectiveness.Trial registration numberISRCTN13784514.