Explore the vast range of titles available.

Snakebite is a significant public health concern in Africa, with the viperid species Echis ocellatus being responsible for the majority of snakebite deaths in West Africa. Recently E. ocellatus underwent taxonomic revision and was split into two species, E. ocellatus sensu stricto and E. romani , leading to questions regarding differences in venom bioactivities and the efficacy of antivenoms indicated for treatment of ‘ E. ocellatus ’ envenoming against the two redefined species. Using a range of in vitro assays we compared the toxin activities of the two species and the venom-neutralising efficacy of three antivenoms (EchiTAbG, SAIMR Echis and Echiven) raised against ‘ E. ocellatus’ . We then used murine preclinical assays to compare the in vivo efficacy of these antivenoms against E. romani and E. ocellatus s. str venoms. Mitochondrial barcoding of snake skins and venom revealed that E. romani, and not E. ocellatus, is used in the manufacture of several antivenoms raised against ‘ E. ocellatus ’. There were also a number of differences in specific toxin activity between the venoms of the two species in the three in vitro assays utilised in this study.; E. ocellatus (Ghana) had the strongest phospholipase A 2 (PLA 2 ) activity, followed by weak PLA 2 activity for E. romani (Cameroon) and insignificant activity by E. romani (Nigeria). E. ocellatus (Ghana) and E. romani (Nigeria) demonstrated comparable snake venom metalloproteinase activity, whilst E. romani (Cameroon) had reduced, albeit still significant, activity in comparison. However no differences were observed in a plasma clotting assay measuring coagulopathy between the venoms and localities. Venoms from E. ocellatus (Ghana) and E. romani (Cameroon and Nigeria) were all recognised comparably by the three antivenoms, and there were only modest differences between antivenoms in neutralising the various in vitro toxin effects. In murine preclinical assays, each antivenom could neutralise the lethal effects of E. romani (Nigeria), but differences were seen in their comparative potency when the same antivenom doses were tested against E. romani (Cameroon) and E. ocellatus (Ghana). In these comparative potency assays, all three antivenoms were unable to confer 100% survival when tested against E. romani (Cameroon), but SAIMR Echis provided the best protection with 80% survival. When tested against E. ocellatus (Ghana), the comparative doses of SAIMR Echis and Echiven provided 100% protection whereas EchiTAbG failed to prevent lethality beyond three hours. This represents the first detailed analysis of differences between E. ocellatus and E. romani venom bioactivities and the efficacy of existing antivenoms against these two species. Our findings demonstrate that EchiTAbG, SAIMR Echis and Echiven antivenoms are preclinically efficacious against the lethal effects of E. ocellatus and E. romani venom across a number of localities.

Snakebite is a major public health concern in Eswatini, where treatment relies upon one antivenom-SAIMR Polyvalent. Although effective in treating snakebite, SAIMR Polyvalent is difficult to source outside its manufacturing country (South Africa) and is dauntingly expensive. We compared the preclinical venom-neutralising efficacy of two alternative antivenoms with that of SAIMR Polyvalent against the lethal and tissue-destructive effects of venoms from five species of medically important snakes using in vivo murine assays. The test antivenoms were 'Panafrican' manufactured by Instituto Clodomiro Picado and 'PANAF' manufactured by Premium Serums & Vaccines. In vivo murine preclinical studies identified both test antivenoms were equally or more effective than SAIMR Polyvalent at neutralising lethal and tissue-destructive effects of Naja mossambica venom. Both test antivenoms were less effective than SAIMR Polyvalent at neutralising the lethal effects of Bitis arietans, Dendroaspis polylepis, Hemachatus haemachatus and Naja annulifera venoms, but similarly effective at neutralising tissue damage induced by B. arietans and H. haemachatus venoms. In vitro immunological assays identified that the titres and toxin-specificities of immunoglobulins (iGs) in the test antivenoms were comparable to that of SAIMR Polyvalent. Plasma clotting disturbances by H. haemachatus and N. mossambica were neutralised by the test antivenoms, whereas SAIMR Polyvalent failed to neutralise this bioactivity of N. mossambica venom. B. arietans SVMP activity was equally reduced by all three antivenoms, and H. haemachatus and N. mossambica PLA2 activities were neutralised by all three antivenoms. While both Panafrican and PANAF antivenoms exhibited promising preclinical efficacies, both were less poly-specifically effective than SAIMR Polyvalent in these murine assays. The efficacy of these antivenoms against the lethal and tissue-destructive effects of N. mossambica venom, the most common biting species in Eswatini, identify that Panafrican and PANAF antivenoms offer effective alternatives to SAIMR Polyvalent for the treatment of snakebite in Eswatini, and potentially for neighbouring countries.

Antivenom is currently the first-choice treatment for snakebite envenoming. However, only a low proportion of antivenom immunoglobulins are specific to venom toxins, resulting in poor dose efficacy and potency. We sought to investigate whether linear venom epitopes displayed on virus like particles can stimulate an antibody response capable of recognising venom toxins from diverse medically important species. Bioinformatically-designed epitopes, corresponding to predicted conserved regions of group I phospholipase A 2 and three finger toxins, were engineered for display on the surface of hepatitis B core antigen virus like particles and used to immunise female CD1 mice over a 14 weeks. Antibody responses to all venom epitope virus like particles were detectable by ELISA by the end of the immunisation period, although total antibody and epitope specific antibody titres were variable against the different epitope immunogens. Immunoblots using pooled sera demonstrated recognition of various venom components in a diverse panel of six elapid venoms, representing three continents and four genera. Insufficient antibody yields precluded a thorough assessment of the neutralising ability of the generated antibodies, however we were able to test polyclonal anti-PLA 2 IgG from three animals against the PLA 2 activity of Naja nigricollis venom, all of which showed no neutralising ability. This study demonstrates proof-of-principle that virus like particles engineered to display conserved toxin linear epitopes can elicit specific antibody responses in mice which are able to recognise a geographically broad range of elapid venoms.

Snakebite is a neglected tropical disease that causes high rates of global mortality and morbidity. Although snakebite can cause a variety of pathologies in victims, haemotoxic effects are particularly common and are typically characterised by haemorrhage and/or venom-induced consumption coagulopathy. Despite polyclonal antibody-based antivenoms being the mainstay life-saving therapy for snakebite, they are associated with limited cross-snake species efficacy, as there is often extensive toxin variation between snake venoms, including those used as immunogens for antivenom production. This restricts the therapeutic utility of any antivenom to certain geographical regions. In this study, we explored the feasibility of using recombinantly expressed toxins as immunogens to stimulate focused, pathology-specific, antibodies in order to broadly counteract specific toxins associated with snakebite envenoming. Three snake venom serine proteases (SVSP) toxins, sourced from geographically diverse and medically important viper snake venoms, were successfully expressed in HEK293F mammalian cells and used for murine immunisation. Analyses of the resulting antibody responses revealed that ancrod and RVV-V stimulated the strongest immune responses, and that experimental antivenoms directed against these recombinant SVSP toxins, and a mixture of the three different immunogens, extensively recognised and exhibited immunological binding towards a variety of native snake venoms. While the experimental antivenoms showed some reduction in abnormal clotting parameters stimulated by the toxin immunogens and crude venom, specifically reducing the depletion of fibrinogen levels and prolongation of prothrombin times, fibrinogen degradation experiments revealed that they broadly protected against venom- and toxin-induced fibrinogenolytic functional activities. Overall, our findings further strengthen the case for the use of recombinant venom toxins as supplemental immunogens to stimulate focused and desirable antibody responses capable of neutralising venom-induced pathological effects, and therefore potentially circumventing some of the limitations associated with current snakebite therapies.

IntroductionAntivenom is a lifesaving medicine for treating snakebite envenoming, yet there has been a crisis in antivenom supply for many decades. Despite this, substantial quantities of antivenom stocks expire before use. This study has investigated whether expired antivenoms retain preclinical quality and efficacy, with the rationale that they could be used in emergency situations when in-date antivenom is unavailable.MethodsUsing WHO guidelines and industry test requirements, we examined the in vitro stability and murine in vivo efficacy of eight batches of the sub-Saharan African antivenom, South African Institute for Medical Research polyvalent, that had expired at various times over a period of 30 years.ResultsWe demonstrate modest declines in immunochemical stability, with antivenoms older than 25 years having high levels of turbidity. In vitro preclinical analysis demonstrated all expired antivenoms retained immunological recognition of venom antigens and the ability to inhibit key toxin families. All expired antivenoms retained comparable in vivo preclinical efficacy in preventing the lethal effects of envenoming in mice versus three regionally and medically important venoms.ConclusionsThis study provides strong rationale for stakeholders, including manufacturers, regulators and health authorities, to explore the use of expired antivenom more broadly, to aid in alleviating critical shortages in antivenom supply in the short term and the extension of antivenom shelf life in the longer term.

Snakebite envenoming can be a life-threatening medical emergency that requires prompt medical intervention to neutralise the effects of venom toxins. Each year up to 138,000 people die from snakebites and threefold more victims suffer life-altering disabilities. The current treatment of snakebite relies solely on antivenom—polyclonal antibodies isolated from the plasma of hyperimmunised animals—which is associated with numerous deficiencies. The ADDovenom project seeks to deliver a novel snakebite therapy, through the use of an innovative protein-based scaffold as a next-generation antivenom. The ADDomer is a megadalton-sized, thermostable synthetic nanoparticle derived from the adenovirus penton base protein; it has 60 high-avidity binding sites to neutralise venom toxins. Here, we outline our experimental strategies to achieve this goal using state-of-the-art protein engineering, expression technology and mass spectrometry, as well as in vitro and in vivo venom neutralisation assays. We anticipate that the approaches described here will produce antivenom with unparalleled efficacy, safety and affordability.

Snakebite is a significant public health concern in Africa, with the viperid species Echis ocellatus being responsible for the majority of snakebite deaths in West Africa. Recently E. ocellatus underwent taxonomic revision and was split into two species, E. ocellatus sensu stricto and E. romani, leading to questions regarding differences in venom bioactivities and the efficacy of antivenoms indicated for treatment of 'E. ocellatus' envenoming against the two redefined species. Using a range of in vitro assays we compared the toxin activities of the two species and the venom-neutralising efficacy of three antivenoms (EchiTAbG, SAIMR Echis and Echiven) raised against 'E. ocellatus'. We then used murine preclinical assays to compare the in vivo efficacy of these antivenoms against E. romani and E. ocellatus s. str venoms. Mitochondrial barcoding of snake skins and venom revealed that E. romani, and not E. ocellatus, is used in the manufacture of several antivenoms raised against 'E. ocellatus'. There were also a number of differences in specific toxin activity between the venoms of the two species in the three in vitro assays utilised in this study.; E. ocellatus (Ghana) had the strongest phospholipase A2 (PLA2) activity, followed by weak PLA2 activity for E. romani (Cameroon) and insignificant activity by E. romani (Nigeria). E. ocellatus (Ghana) and E. romani (Nigeria) demonstrated comparable snake venom metalloproteinase activity, whilst E. romani (Cameroon) had reduced, albeit still significant, activity in comparison. However no differences were observed in a plasma clotting assay measuring coagulopathy between the venoms and localities. Venoms from E. ocellatus (Ghana) and E. romani (Cameroon and Nigeria) were all recognised comparably by the three antivenoms, and there were only modest differences between antivenoms in neutralising the various in vitro toxin effects. In murine preclinical assays, each antivenom could neutralise the lethal effects of E. romani (Nigeria), but differences were seen in their comparative potency when the same antivenom doses were tested against E. romani (Cameroon) and E. ocellatus (Ghana). In these comparative potency assays, all three antivenoms were unable to confer 100% survival when tested against E. romani (Cameroon), but SAIMR Echis provided the best protection with 80% survival. When tested against E. ocellatus (Ghana), the comparative doses of SAIMR Echis and Echiven provided 100% protection whereas EchiTAbG failed to prevent lethality beyond three hours. This represents the first detailed analysis of differences between E. ocellatus and E. romani venom bioactivities and the efficacy of existing antivenoms against these two species. Our findings demonstrate that EchiTAbG, SAIMR Echis and Echiven antivenoms are preclinically efficacious against the lethal effects of E. ocellatus and E. romani venom across a number of localities.

Background; Chronic lung diseases are a major cause of morbidity and premature mortality worldwide, and pose a significant public health concern. An aberrant inflammatory response plays a key role in respiratory diseases, however many of these diseases are severely heterogeneous. Although there is a recognised regional variation in underlying inflammatory processes, there is a fundamental lack of research into immunophenotyping of the lung as a whole, and as such, cellular immunity across the lungs is poorly understood. Hypothesis; There are fundamental differences in inflammation across the lungs of patients with end stage chronic lung disease that could be characterised by regional sampling of different lobes of the lungs. It was expected that fundamental discovery in the early phases would dictate the direction of later investigations. Methods; Wedge biopsy samples were obtained from the upper, middle and lower lobes of explanted lungs from transplant recipients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), interstitial lung disease (ILD) and cystic fibrosis. Leukocyte phenotyping, cytokine expression and immune checkpoint signaling were explored. Results; The results demonstrated a high degree of heterogeneity in inflammatory distribution across the lungs, as well as between patients, and led to several important observations. Firstly, female patients with emphysematous COPD have greater heterogeneity in leukocytes, compared to males. The number of leukocytes is significantly elevated in the left lungs of patients with ILD compared to the right lung, and there was an unprecedented increase in the frequency of intermediate monocytes in ILD, which coincided with areas of disease severity. The study is also the first of its kind to characterise immune checkpoint molecules in lung tissue without cancer, in two different chronic lung conditions, identifying significant differences in expression between the two cohorts. Conclusion;Is it clear from the evidently heterogenic inflammation described between patients, lungs and lobes, that we should not generalise inflammation in lung disease. Isolated sampling techniques can place exorbitant or insubstantial importance to a finding that may not be relevant to the lung or disease as a whole. The characterisation of regional heterogeneity in chronic lung disease provides an important first step to greater insight into end stage inflammation in lung disease, and could eventually overcome the barriers of lobar heterogeneity to accelerate the effectiveness of lung specific inflammation treatments.

Background: Snakebite is a major public health concern in Eswatini, where treatment relies upon one antivenom – SAIMR Polyvalent. Although effective in treating snakebite, SAIMR Polyvalent is difficult to source outside its manufacturing country (South Africa) and is dau ntingly expensive. We compared the preclinical venom-neutralising efficacy of two alternative antivenoms and SAIMR Polyvalent against the lethal and tissue-destructive effects of venoms from five species of medically important snakes using in vivo murine assays. The test antivenoms were 'Panafrican' manufactured by Instituto Clodomiro Picado and 'PANAF' manufactured by Premium Serums & Vaccines. Principal Findings: In vivo murine preclinical studies identified both test antivenoms were equally or more effective than SAIMR Polyvalent at neutralising lethal and tissue-destructive effects of Naja mossambica venom. Both test antivenoms were less effective than SAIMR Polyvalent at neutralising the lethal effects of Bitis arietans, Dendroaspis polylepis, Hemachatus haemachatus and Naja annulifera venoms, but similarly effective at neutralising tissue damage induced by B. arietans and H. haemachatus venoms. In vitro immunological assays identified that IgG titres and toxin-specificities of the test antivenoms were comparable to SAIMR Polyvalent. Plasma clotting disturbances by H. haemachatus and N. mossambica were effectively neutralised by the test antivenoms, whereas SAIMR Polyvalent failed to neutralise this bioactivity of N. mossambica venom. The SVMP activity of B. arietans venom was equally reduced by all three antivenoms. The PLA 2 activities of H. haemachatus and N. mossambica were effectively neutralised by all three antivenoms. Conclusions: Panafrican outperformed PANAF, though both were less poly-specifically effective than SAIMR Polyvalent. The efficacy of these antivenoms against the lethal and tissue-destructive effects of N. mossambica venom, the most common biting species in Eswatini, identify that Panafrican and PANAF antivenoms offer effective alternatives to SAIMR for the treatment of snakebite in Eswatini, and potentially for neighbouring countries. Competing Interest Statement I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: RAH communicated with the antivenom manufacturers Instituto Clodomiro Picado (Costa Rica) and Premium Serums & Vaccines (India) to (i) acquire antivenoms for this study and (ii) discuss future antivenom supply to conduct clinical observations/clinical trials. The antivenom manufacturers had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of this manuscript.

Snakebite is a neglected tropical disease that causes high rates of global mortality and morbidity. Although snakebite can cause a variety of pathologies in victims, haemotoxic effects are particularly common and are typically characterised by haemorrhage and/or venom-induced consumption coagulopathy. Despite polyclonal antibody-based antivenoms being the mainstay life-saving therapy for snakebite, they are associated with limited cross-snake species efficacy, as there is often extensive toxin variation between snake venoms, including those used as immunogens for antivenom production. This restricts the therapeutic utility of any antivenom to certain geographical regions. In this study, we explored the feasibility of using recombinantly expressed toxins as immunogens to stimulate focused, pathology-specific, antibodies to broadly counteract specific toxins associated with snakebite envenoming. Three snake venom serine proteases (SVSP) toxins, sourced from geographically diverse and medically important viper snake venoms were successfully expressed in HEK293F mammalian cells and used for murine immunisation. Analyses of the resulting antibody responses revealed that ancrod and RVV-V stimulated the strongest immune responses, and that experimental antivenoms directed against these recombinant SVSP toxins, and a mixture of the three different immunogens, extensively recognised and exhibited immunological binding towards a variety of native snake venoms. While the experimental antivenoms showed some reduction in abnormal clotting parameters stimulated by the toxin immunogens and crude venom, specifically reducing the depletion of fibrinogen levels and prolongation of prothrombin times, fibrinogen degradation experiments revealed they broadly protected against venom- and toxin-induced fibrinogenolytic functional activities. Overall, our findings further strengthen the case for the use of recombinant venom toxins as supplemental immunogens to stimulate focused and desirable antibody responses capable of neutralising venom-induced pathological effects, and therefore potentially circumventing some of the limitations associated with current snakebite therapies. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.