Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background Digital technologies in health care are expected to increase in scope and to affect ever more parts of the health care system. It is important to enhance the knowledge of whether new digital methods and innovations provide value for money compared with traditional models of care. Objective The objective of the study was to evaluate whether a digital health care model for primary care is a less costly alternative compared with traditional in-office primary care in Sweden. Methods Cost data for the two care models were collected and analyzed to obtain a measure in local currency per care contact. Results The comparison showed that the total economic cost of a digital consultation is 1960 Swedish krona (SEK) (SEK100 = US$11.29; February 2017) compared with SEK3348 for a traditional consultation at a health care clinic. Cost differences arose on both the provider side and on the user side. Conclusion The digital health care model may be a less costly alternative to the traditional health care model. Depending on the rate of digital substitution, gross economic cost savings of between SEK1 billion and SEK10 billion per year could be realized if more digital consultations were made. Further studies are needed to validate the findings, assess the types of care most suitable for digital care, and also to obtain various quality-adjusted outcome measures.

Informal carers in paid employment-working carers (WKCs)-have complex support needs. However, little is known about WKCs' pattern of informal care provision, the support they receive, the impact providing care has on their employment, and how these vary between male and female WKCs. This study describes the pattern of informal care provision and received support among Swedish WKCs. The study was a cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey of a stratified random sample of the Swedish population aged 18 or over. The questionnaire addressed the type and extent of informal care provided, support received and the impact of care provision on employment. Of the 30,009 people who received the questionnaire, 11,168 (37.3%) responded, providing an analytic sample of 818 (7.32% of respondents) employed or self-employed informal carers. A typical Swedish WKC was a middle-aged female, providing weekly or daily care to a non-cohabitant parent, who experiences care as sometimes demanding and receives no formal support as a carer. Female WKCs were more likely than males to care alone and with higher intensity, to report a need for help in meeting their care-recipient's needs, and to experience care as demanding. Approximately 17% of WKCs reported their employment had been affected due to caring, 40% their ability to work, and 31% their career development opportunities. Female WKCs' ability to work was affected more than males', and they were more commonly prevented from applying for work. Swedish female WKCs compared to males provide more hours of informal care, across more care domains, more often alone. This places them in a challenging situation when combining paid work and care. Greater recognition of the challenges faced by WKCs is required in Sweden and other countries, as are policies to reduce gender inequalities in informal care provision in this group.

Background Over the past decades, informal care has increased in most OECD-countries. Informal care is costly to caregivers and to society in the form of lost income and direct costs of providing care. Existing evidence suggests that providing informal care affects caregivers’ overall health. However, estimates of the social costs of informal care based on national data on individuals are currently scarce. Objective This study contributes to the existing evidence on the costs of informal care by estimating the direct and indirect costs to caregivers using a purposive national household survey from Sweden. Methods Adopting a bottom-up, prevalence approach, the direct and indirect costs are estimated using the survey data and the value of working time and leisure time from existing sources. Results The results suggest that around 15% of the adult population of Sweden provide informal care and that such care costs around SEK 152 billion per year (around 3% of GDP; USD 16,3 billion; EUR 14,5 billion), or SEK 128000 per caregiver. Around 55% of costs are in the form of income loss to caregivers. The largest cost items are reduced work hours and direct costs of providing informal care. Replacing informal caregivers with professional care providers would be costly at around SEK 193,6 billion per year. Conclusions Findings indicate that, even in a country with a relatively generous welfare system, significant resources are allocated toward providing informal care. The costing analysis suggests that effective support initiatives to ease the burden of informal caregivers may be cost-effective.

The use of digital technologies to deliver primary health care has increased over the past decade. While some technologies have been shown to be medically effective and efficient, the effects of digital primary care on the policy goal of equality in the use of such types of care have not been studied using large register data. The aim of this study was to analyse how digital contacts differ from officebased visits by income as an indicator of socioeconomic status. Specifically, we estimated differences in primary care utilization across income, factors of contribution to these inequalities, and applied a needs-based standardisation of utilization to estimate differences in equity. We used a purposively built consultation level dataset with 726 000 Swedish adult patients diagnosed with an infection, including clinical and sociodemographic variables. Applying concentration indexes (CI) and graphical illustrations we measured how the two types of services are distributed relative to income. We estimated how much of the inequalities were attributed to different sociodemographic factors by decomposing the concentration indexes. Standardised utilization for sex, age and comorbidity allowed for the estimation of horizontal inequity indexes for both types of services. Utilization by the two types of care showed large income inequalities. Office-based visits were propoor (CI -0.116), meaning lowincome patients utilized relatively more of these services, while digital contacts were prorich (CI 0.205). However, within the patient group who had at least one digital contact, the utilization was also propoor (CI -0,101), although these patients had higher incomes on average. The standardised utilization showed a smaller prorich digital utilization (CI 0.143), although large differences remained. Decomposing the concentration indexes showed that education level and being born in Sweden were strong attributes of prorich digital service utilization. The prorich utilization effects of digital primary care may risk undermining the policy goals of access and utilization to services regardless of socioeconomic status. As digital health technologies continue to expand, policy makers need to be aware of the risk.

Objective To analyze changes in primary care utilization as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic. Swedish national register data from 2019 to 2020 on utilization of services were used to compare overall utilization levels and across types of contacts and patient groups. A specific objective was to assess the extent to which remote types of patient consultations were able to compensate for any observed fall in on-site visits. Data were stratified by sex and age to investigate any demographic pattern. Results Findings show significant reductions in overall utilization of services as the pandemic occurred in the first quarter of 2020. On-site visits fell during the first wave of the pandemic and rebounded thereafter. Patients over 65 years of age appear to have reduced utilization to a larger extent compared with younger groups. Simultaneously, remote contacts increased from around 12% before the pandemic to 17% of the total number of consultations. However, the net effect of changes in service utilization suggests an overall reduction of around 12 percent in the number of primary care consultations as a result of the pandemic. No differences between men and women were observed. Further research will continue to monitor changes in primary care utilization as the pandemic continues.

Background The objective of this paper was to estimate the impact of country-wide hospital pay-for-performance on readmissions for a set of common conditions in Lebanon. Methods This retrospective cohort study included all hospitalizations under the coverage of the Ministry of Public Health in Lebanon between 2011 and 2019. We calculated 30-day all-cause readmissions following general, pneumonia, cholecystectomy and stroke cases. We used an interrupted time series design, including the use of AutoRegressive Integrated Moving Average models. This nationwide study including 1,333,691 hospitalizations was undertaken in Lebanon, using hospitalizations at about 140 private and public hospitals contracted by the Ministry. The participants included citizens across all ages under the Ministry’s coverage (52% of citizens). The intervention was the engagement of hospital leaders by the Ministry, informing them of the addition of a readmissions component to the ongoing pay-for-performance initiative. Engagement participants included hospital directors and managers, and the leadership of the Syndicate of Private Hospitals. The main outcome measure was age-adjusted monthly all-cause readmission rates for each of general, pneumonia, cholecystectomy and stroke cases. We also assessed for change in readmissions for three conditions not included in the intervention (myocardial infarction, cataract surgery and appendectomy). Results Across 2011–2019, the overall readmission rates were 6.00% (SD 0.24%) for general readmissions, 5.06% (SD 0.22%) for pneumonia, 2.54% (SD 0.16%) for cholecystectomy, and 6.55% (SD 0.25%) for stroke. Using ARIMA models we found a relative percentage decrease in mean monthly readmissions in the post-intervention period for cholecystectomy (5.9%; CI 0.1%-11.8%) and stroke (13.6%; CI 3.1%-24.2%). There was no evidence of intervention impact on pneumonia and general readmissions, both overall and among small, medium and large hospitals. There was also no evidence of change in non-P4P readmissions of myocardial infarction, cataract surgery and appendectomy. Conclusions Including readmissions within pay-for-performance has the potential to improve hospital performance and patient outcomes, even in countries with more limited resources. Effects may vary across conditions, indicating the need for careful design and understanding of the particular context, both with respect to implementation and to evaluation of impact.

Background Several countries have increased patients’ abilities to choose their health care providers, frequently under the assumption that patients are themselves the best agents to make such decisions. In parallel, national and regional health authorities have enhanced access to Internet based information sources (IBIS) to assist patients in making an informed choice. Relatively little, however, is known about the effect that the use of such sources has on key outcomes, including patients’ perceptions of care. The aim of this study is to analyze the role of the Internet for patients’ confidence in the provider and perceived access to care in the context of choice based reforms in Sweden. Methods The study uses a regional, population health survey from the southern part of Sweden. Non-parametric chi-square tests are used to assess the nature of Internet users, including their gender, age and socioeconomic status. Logistic regression models are specified to analyze the role of IBIS on patient perceptions of care while controlling for other factors. Results Actual use of Internet based information sources for health care was relatively low in 2010 and only somewhat higher in 2013. The characteristics of IBIS users varied significantly across different population groups, such that they were younger, more educated, female, and also considered themselves to be in better health compared with those who reported not using this source of health care information. Finally, the average IBIS user was less likely to report having a high level of satisfaction with respect to their primary care use; OR 0.69 [95 % CI: 0.54–0,87] and OR 0.52 [95 % CI: 0,41–0,66], for confidence in provider and perceived access to care, respectively, in 2013. Conclusions Despite health agencies’ attempts to make information on health care providers available on the Internet, this source of health care information is not used to any large extent in the current sample. The fact that some people use this source of information more compared with others suggests the need to consider alternative ways of informing the general public about choice options. The use of Internet based sources may also be linked with the experience of actually using health services, which suggests a need to further analyze this complex consumer behavior process.

Background Access to contraception can be a transformational intervention towards advancement of education, health, and freedom of choice. Countries have committed to improving access to contraception enshrined in the sustainable development goals (SDGs), indicator 3.7.1. Our study seeks to investigate the level of inequality in current use of modern contraception and unmet need for contraception among sexually active women of reproductive age in Zambia during 2007, 2013/14 and 2018 to inform family planning policy. Methods We use three rounds of Zambia demographic and health survey datasets for the years 2007, 2013/14 and 2018, which are nationally representative surveys. We included a total of 19,973 sexually active women of reproductive age from 15 to 49 years living in Zambia. The level of inequality was assessed using concentration curves, and indices. The concentration indices were decomposed to identify the causes of the inequality. Results Our analysis shows that there was inequality in the current use of modern contraception across the years 2007, 2013/14 and 2018. The concentration curves showed that current use of modern contraception was higher among the wealthy than the poor. This pro-rich trend was consistent throughout the study period. Erreygers concentration Index (EI) values were 0.2046 in 2007, 0.1816 in 2013/14, and 0.1124 in 2018. The inequality in current use of modern contraception was significantly influenced by having access to contraceptive counselling, education level and being in a union (living with a partner). In addition, there was inequality in unmet need for contraception with concentration curves showing that unmet need for modern contraception was experienced more among the poor compared to the wealthy. Unmet need was thus pro poor. The EI values were – 0.0484 in 2007, – 0.0940 in 2013/14 and – 0.0427 in 2018. This inequality was significantly influenced by education, employment status, being in a union, and having health insurance. Conclusion Inequality in modern contraceptive use and unmet need for contraception exists and has persisted over the years in Zambia. Such inequality can be addressed through a multipronged approach that includes encouraging women to visit health facilities, access to contraceptive counselling, and promoting formal education. Plain Language Summary Background to the study The use of effective methods of contraception (also known as modern contraception) has several advantages including prevention of dropping out of school due to unintended pregnancies, increased freedom to choose when to have a child, among others. Such advantages translate into development of the community and society at large. Increasing access to contraception is one of the targets under the sustainable development goals. The level of inequality in contraceptive use affects the chances of achieving the target. Our study therefore aims to find out whether there are any existing inequalities in modern contraceptive use among women in Zambia that still have the capacity to give birth (from 15- to 49-yearolds). Methods used in this study The study looks at two measures, using modern contraception and unmet need for contraception. Unmet need for contraception in this study is where a woman that is sexually active and does not want to get pregnant, but she is not using any form of contraception. We use information that has been collected in a way that it represents the population of Zambia. The information was collected at three time points, that is 2007, 2013/14, and 2018. A total 19,973 women provided the information. We investigate the presence of inequalities through graphs called concentration curves and estimate the quantity of inequality. We further use the latest and reliable method by find what causes the inequality. Results of the study We find that there are inequalities in modern contraceptive use and unmet need for contraception based on population-based data collected during 2007, 2013/14, and 2018 in Zambia. The inequalities favour the rich people in society where you find rich people using modern contraception more than the poor people. For the inequality in unmet need for contraception, which is a negative indicator, we found that it is the poor people that experience unmet need for contraception compared to the rich people. The causes of these inequalities included having no formal education, employment status, being in a union, and having health insurance. Conclusion of the study There is inequality in the use of modern contraceptives and unmet need for contraception in Zambia. This inequality can be addressed through multiple ways including encouraging women to visit health facilities, access to contraceptive counselling, promoting formal education among others.

Patient perspectives have received increasing importance within health systems over the past four decades. Measures of patient experience and satisfaction are commonly used. However, these measures do not capture all the information that is available through engaging with patients. An improved understanding of the various types of patient perspectives and the distinctions between them is needed. The lack of such knowledge limits the usefulness of including patient perspectives as components within pay-for-performance initiatives. This study aimed to explore patient perspectives on hospital care in Lebanon. It also aimed to contribute insights that may improve the national pay-for-performance initiative and to the knowledge on engaging patients towards person-centered health systems. We conducted a qualitative study using focus group discussions with persons recently discharged after hospitalization under the coverage of the Lebanese Ministry of Public Health. This study was implemented in 2017 and involved 42 participants across eight focus groups. Qualitative content analysis was used to analyze the information provided by participants. Five overall themes supported by 17 categories were identified, capturing the meaning of the participants' perspectives: health is everything; being turned into second class citizens; money and personal connections make all the difference; wanting to be treated with dignity and respect; and tolerating letdown, for the sake of right treatment. The most frequently prioritized statement in a ranking exercise regarding patient satisfaction was regular contact with the patient's doctor. Patient perspectives include more than what is traditionally incorporated in measures of patient satisfaction and experience. Patient valuing of health and their perceptions on each of the health system, and access and quality of care should also be taken into account. Hospital pay-for-performance initiatives can be made more responsive through a broader consideration of these perspectives. More broadly, health systems would benefit from wider engagement of patients. We propose a framework relating patient perspectives to value-based healthcare and health system performance.