Explore the vast range of titles available.

Introduction We assessed tofacitinib efficacy and safety in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) by body mass index (BMI) category. Methods Data were pooled from phase 2/3 trials; analyses included patients with active AS randomized (1:1) to tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily or placebo, who were stratified by baseline BMI into < 25, ≥ 25 to < 30, and ≥ 30 kg/m 2 categories. Efficacy was assessed at week 12 and safety to week 16. Results Of 370 patients, 153, 131, and 86 had a baseline BMI  of < 25, ≥ 25 to < 30, and ≥ 30 kg/m 2 , respectively. At baseline, patients with BMI < 25 kg/m 2 were younger and more likely to be current smokers/Asian, and patients with BMI ≥ 30 kg/m 2 had higher mean waist circumference/swollen joint count (SJC) and were more likely to have enthesitis, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) > 5 mg/L, an inadequate response to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), and prior biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD) use versus other categories. Across categories, tofacitinib responses/improvements were greater than with placebo, except for ≥ 40% Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society improvement (ASAS40), ASAS partial remission, 50% improvement from baseline in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index score (BASDAI50), and Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score using C-reactive protein (ASDAS-CRP) inactive disease rates, which were similar for tofacitinib and placebo in the BMI ≥ 30 kg/m 2 category. Treatment effects were similar across categories, except for BASDAI50, which was smaller in the BMI ≥ 30 category versus  the < 25 kg/m 2 category. More adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) with tofacitinib were reported in the BMI < 25 kg/m 2 category, which had a higher proportion of current smokers versus other categories. Conclusions Regardless of baseline BMI category, efficacy was greater with tofacitinib versus placebo in patients with AS, and no treatment effect differences between categories were observed, with exceptions for BMI ≥ 30 kg/m 2 (more active/treatment-refractory disease and a smaller sample size). Overall, tofacitinib safety was generally comparable across categories; however, AE/SAE rates with tofacitinib were higher in the BMI < 25 kg/m 2 category (which had more current smokers). This post hoc analysis demonstrates that tofacitinib can be considered as a treatment option for AS, regardless of baseline BMI category; however, interpretation was limited by small sample sizes and differences in sample sizes and baseline characteristics across categories. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers, NCT01786668 and NCT03502616.

The increasing availability of biosimilar medicines in Middle Eastern regions may provide an opportunity to increase the number of rheumatology patients who have access to traditionally more expensive biologic medicines. However, as well as a lack of real-world data on the use of biosimilar medicines in practice, the availability of intended copies in the region may undermine physician confidence in prescribing legitimate biosimilar medicines. There is a need for regional recommendations for healthcare professionals to ensure that biosimilar drugs can be used safely. Therefore, a literature search was performed with the aim of providing important recommendations for the regulation and use of biosimilar medicines in the Middle East from key opinion leaders in rheumatology from the region. These recommendations focus on improving the availability of relevant real-world data, ensuring that physicians are aware of the difference between intended copies and true biosimilars and ensuring that physicians are responsible for making any prescribing and switching decisions.

Background Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are at increased risk of developing comorbid conditions. Objectives To evaluate the prevalence of comorbidities and compare their management in RA patients from different countries worldwide. Methods Study design: international, cross-sectional. Patients: consecutive RA patients. Data collected: demographics, disease characteristics (activity, severity, treatment), comorbidities (cardiovascular, infections, cancer, gastrointestinal, pulmonary, osteoporosis and psychiatric disorders). Results Of 4586 patients recruited in 17 participating countries, 3920 were analysed (age, 56±13 years; disease duration, 10±9 years (mean±SD); female gender, 82%; DAS28 (Disease Activity Score using 28 joints)–erythrocyte sedimentation rate, 3.7±1.6 (mean±SD); Health Assessment Questionnaire, 1.0±0.7 (mean±SD); past or current methotrexate use, 89%; past or current use of biological agents, 39%. The most frequently associated diseases (past or current) were: depression, 15%; asthma, 6.6%; cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, stroke), 6%; solid malignancies (excluding basal cell carcinoma), 4.5%; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 3.5%. High intercountry variability was observed for both the prevalence of comorbidities and the proportion of subjects complying with recommendations for preventing and managing comorbidities. The systematic evaluation of comorbidities in this study detected abnormalities in vital signs, such as elevated blood pressure in 11.2%, and identified conditions that manifest as laboratory test abnormalities, such as hyperglycaemia in 3.3% and hyperlipidaemia in 8.3%. Conclusions Among RA patients, there is a high prevalence of comorbidities and their risk factors. In this multinational sample, variability among countries was wide, not only in prevalence but also in compliance with recommendations for preventing and managing these comorbidities. Systematic measurement of vital signs and laboratory testing detects otherwise unrecognised comorbid conditions.

Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) encompasses both radiographic and non-radiographic axSpA. It is a chronic inflammatory disease with a predilection for involving the axial skeleton. The most common presenting symptoms are chronic back pain and spinal stiffness but peripheral and extra-musculoskeletal manifestations occur also frequently. The diagnosis of axSpA relies on the recognition of a clinical pattern of the disease, based on clinical, laboratory and imaging features. The Assessment in SpondyloArthritis international Society classification criteria for axSpA are valid and well implemented for research purposes. Sustained disease activity, measured by validated tools such as the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score, leads to irreversible structural damage and poor functioning and therefore should be abrogated. As part of the management algorithm, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs remain as the first line of pharmacological treatment besides physiotherapy. As a second line, tumour necrosis factor inhibitor and interleukin-17 inhibitor are available but recently Janus kinase inhibitors have also shown efficacy in improving symptoms of the disease.

The Treat-to-target (T2T) strategy in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) stipulates that treatment should reach a predefined target and if not reached, intensification of therapy is implemented aiming at best future outcomes. Clinical remission was recommended by the 2017 international task force as the treatment target using Ankylosing spondylitis disease activity score (ASDAS) inactive disease, or alternatively, ASDAS low disease activity. The results of a recent T2T trial in axSpA were negative for the chosen primary outcome. Therefore, some concerns are still emerging regarding the optimal treatment target and the weak direct evidence proving the efficacy of such strategy. These challenges among others would preclude the application of T2T strategy in daily clinical practice. This review aims to highlight the updates of the T2T strategy in axSpA, giving an overview of the existing treatment targets, their potential benefits, and challenges to apply this strategy.

Abstract This study was designed to highlight the relation of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) to neuropsychiatric lupus (NPLE) manifestations. The relation of TNF-α to the type of single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) findings in this context was also studied. Twenty-one systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) females, mean age 27.57 ± 9.89 years, and twenty age-matched normal females (controls), were subjected to TNF-α assessment. Different clinical and neuropsychiatric manifestations were evaluated. SPECT was carried out for all patients. The results showed that the mean TNF-α level (pg/ml) was significantly raised in patients compared with controls (167.8 ± 102.5 versus 64 ± 50.2, respectively, P < 0.005). Thirteen patients (69.1%) had NPLE manifestations. NPLE patients had a significantly higher mean TNF-α than patients without NPLE (203 ± 102.8 versus 109 ± 47.3, respectively, P < 0.03). Positive SPECT findings were found in 18 lupus patients (85.7%), including all 13 patients with NPLE (100% sensitivity), with a multiple focal pattern of hypoperfusion being the most frequent type (9/13), followed by diffuse (3/13), and then single focal pattern (1/13). The mean TNF-α was significantly higher in patients with multiple focal pattern (P < 0.001). In conclusion, results of this work support the hypothesis that TNF-α could be involved in the pathogenesis of NPLE, and hence, it could be speculated that the evolving anti-TNF therapy can play a potential role in the management of this disease.

BackgroundIncreased risk of some comorbidities has been reported in spondyloarthritis (SpA). Recommendations for detection/management of some of these comorbidities have been proposed, and it is known that a gap exists between these and their implementation in practice.ObjectiveTo evaluate (1) the prevalence of comorbidities and risk factors in different countries worldwide, (2) the gap between available recommendations and daily practice for management of these comorbidities and (3) the prevalence of previously unknown risk factors detected as a result of the present initiative.MethodsCross-sectional international study with 22 participating countries (from four continents), including 3984 patients with SpA according to the rheumatologist.Statistical analysisThe prevalence of comorbidities (cardiovascular, infection, cancer, osteoporosis and gastrointestinal) and risk factors; percentage of patients optimally monitored for comorbidities according to available recommendations and percentage of patients for whom a risk factor was detected due to this study.ResultsThe most frequent comorbidities were osteoporosis (13%) and gastroduodenal ulcer (11%). The most frequent risk factors were hypertension (34%), smoking (29%) and hypercholesterolaemia (27%). Substantial intercountry variability was observed for screening of comorbidities (eg, for LDL cholesterol measurement: from 8% (Taiwan) to 98% (Germany)). Systematic evaluation (eg, blood pressure (BP), cholesterol) during this study unveiled previously unknown risk factors (eg, elevated BP (14%)), emphasising the suboptimal monitoring of comorbidities.ConclusionsA high prevalence of comorbidities in SpA has been shown. Rigorous application of systematic evaluation of comorbidities may permit earlier detection, which may ultimately result in an improved outcome of patients with SpA.

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is the prototype for spondyloarthritis primarily affecting young men. Geographic and ethnic variations exist in the prevalence and severity of AS and relate to the wide disparity in the frequency of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-B27, a major genetic risk factor. The strength of the disease association with HLA-B27 is lower in most Arab populations (25–75 %) than in Western European populations (>90 %), and there is no association in sub-Saharan Africa, where the prevalence of HLA-B27 is <1 %. Other epidemiologic differences between European and African populations are the apparent later age at presentation in sub-Saharan Africa, and the high rate of spondyloarthropathies associated with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Diagnosis of AS is often delayed 8–10 years; potential reasons for the delay in Africa and the Middle East include low awareness among physicians and patients, the requirement for radiographic evidence of sacroiliitis for diagnosis, and limited access to magnetic resonance imaging in some countries. Treatment should be initiated early to prevent or reduce skeletal deformity and physical disability. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are effective first-line treatment and anti-tumor necrosis factor-α drugs are indicated for patients who have an inadequate response to first-line therapy. In Africa and the Middle East, such treatments may be precluded either by cost or contraindicated because of the high prevalence of latent tuberculosis infection. Research is sorely needed to develop cost-effective tools to diagnose AS early as well as effective, inexpensive, and safe treatments for these developing regions.

Objectives: To define the instruments for the ASAS-OMERACT core domain set for axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Methods: An international working group representing key stakeholders selected the core outcome instruments following a predefined process: i) Identifying candidate instruments using a systematic literature review; ii) Reducing the list of candidate instruments by the working group, iii) Assessing the instruments’ psychometric properties following OMERACT Filter 2.2, iv) Selection of the core instruments by the working group; v) Voting and endorsement by ASAS. Results: The updated core set for axSpA includes seven instruments for six domains that are mandatory for all trials: ASDAS and NRS patient global assessment of disease activity; NRS total back pain; average NRS of duration and severity of morning stiffness; NRS fatigue; BASFI; and ASAS health index. There are 9 additional instruments considered mandatory for disease modifying drugs (DMARDs) trials: MRI activity SPARCC sacroiliac joints and SPARCC spine, uveitis, IBD and psoriasis assessed as recommended by ASAS, 44 swollen joint count, MASES, dactylitis count, and mSASSS. The imaging outcomes are considered mandatory to be included in at least one trial for a drug tested for DMARD-properties. Furthermore, 11 additional instruments were also endorsed by ASAS to be used in axSpA trials on top of the core instruments. Conclusions: The previous core instrument set has been updated and endorsed for the use in all axSpA trials. The selection of the instruments for the ASAS-OMERACT core domain set complete the update of the core outcome set for axSpA.