Explore the vast range of titles available.

Adjuvant chemotherapy has not improved disease-free survival among patients with resected esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer. In this trial, after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and resection, patients with residual disease were randomly assigned to receive nivolumab or placebo. Nivolumab doubled the median disease-free survival from 11.0 to 22.4 months.

HER2-targeted therapies have substantially improved outcomes for patients with HER2-positive breast and gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancers. Several other cancers exhibit HER2 expression or amplification, suggesting that HER2-targeted agents can have broader therapeutic impact. Zanidatamab is a humanised, bispecific monoclonal antibody directed against two non-overlapping domains of HER2. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and anti-tumour activity of zanidatamab across a range of solid tumours with HER2 expression or amplification. This first-in-human, multicentre, phase 1, dose-escalation and expansion trial included patients aged 18 years and older, with a life expectancy of at least 3 months, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and locally advanced or metastatic, HER2-expressing or HER2-amplified solid tumours of any kind who had received all available approved therapies. The primary objectives of part 1 were to identify the maximum tolerated dose, optimal biological dose, or recommended dose of zanidatamab; all patients were included in the primary analyses. Part 1 followed a 3 + 3 dose-escalation design, including different intravenous doses (from 5 mg/kg to 30 mg/kg) and intervals (every 1, 2, or 3 weeks). The primary objective of part 2 was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of zanidatamab monotherapy in solid tumours. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02892123), and parts 1 and 2 of the trial are complete. Part 3 of the study evaluates the use of zanidatamab in combination with chemotherapy and is ongoing. Recruitment took place between Sept 1, 2016, and March 13, 2021. In Part 1 (n=46), no dose-limiting toxicities were detected and the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. The recommended dose for part 2 (n=22 for biliary tract cancer; n=28 for colorectal cancer; and n=36 for other HER2-expressing or HER2-amplified cancers excluding breast or gastro-oesophageal cancers; total n=86) was 20 mg/kg every 2 weeks. The most frequent treatment-related adverse events in part 1 of the study were diarrhoea (24 [52%] of 46 patients; all grade 1–2) and infusion reactions (20 [43%] of 46 patients; all grade 1–2). The most frequent treatment-related adverse events in part 2 of the study were diarrhoea (37 [43%] of 86 patients; all grade 1–2 except for one patient) and infusion reactions (29 [34%] of 86 patients; all grade 1–2). A total of six grade 3 treatment-related adverse events were reported in four (3%) of 132 patients. In part 2, 31 (37%; 95% CI 27·0–48·7) of 83 evaluable patients had a confirmed objective response. There were no treatment-related deaths. These results support that HER2 is an actionable target in various cancer histologies, including biliary tract cancer and colorectal cancer. Evaluation of zanidatamab continues in ongoing studies. Zymeworks.

Gastric cancer is a heterogeneous cancer, making treatment responses difficult to predict. Here we show that we identify two distinct molecular subtypes, mesenchymal phenotype (MP) and epithelial phenotype (EP), by analyzing genomic and proteomic data. Molecularly, MP subtype tumors show high genomic integrity characterized by low mutation rates and microsatellite stability, whereas EP subtype tumors show low genomic integrity. Clinically, the MP subtype is associated with markedly poor survival and resistance to standard chemotherapy, whereas the EP subtype is associated with better survival rates and sensitivity to chemotherapy. Integrative analysis shows that signaling pathways driving epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1)/IGF1 receptor (IGF1R) pathway are highly activated in MP subtype tumors. Importantly, MP subtype cancer cells are more sensitive to inhibition of IGF1/IGF1R pathway than EP subtype. Detailed characterization of these two subtypes could identify novel therapeutic targets and useful biomarkers for prognosis and therapy response. The prognosis and treatment of gastric cancer is complicated by heterogeneity. Here, the authors reveal two molecular subtypes, the mesenchymal subtype associated with poor survival and chemoresistance, and the epithelial phenotype associated with better survival and sensitivity to chemotherapy.

Gastric cancer remains a considerable health burden throughout the world. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) analysis has recently unveiled 4 genotypes of gastric cancer with data not ready to change treatment strategy yet. A multimodality approach to therapy is the cornerstone of screening, diagnosing, staging, treating and supporting patients with gastric cancer. The evidence‐based approach to localized gastric cancer (>cT1b) is to use an either preoperative or postoperative strategy to maximize the benefit of surgery. The focus of future research is to optimize chemotherapy regimens, determine the role of radiation therapy and investigate the effect of treatment timing. In metastatic gastric cancer, biologic therapies have been introduced targeting markers shown to be prognostic. The results of ongoing randomized controlled phase 3 trials using targeted and immunotherapy agents, either in combination or alone, have the potential to alter the current treatment landscape of advanced gastric cancer. A multimodality approach to therapy is critical for patients with gastric cancer. One of the most challenging and exciting field that appears promising is the potential of host's immune system to inhibit signaling pathways.

Zanidatamab, a dual human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted bispecific antibody, previously demonstrated encouraging antitumour activity and a manageable safety profile in patients with treatment-refractory HER2-expressing gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Here, we evaluated the antitumour activity and safety of zanidatamab plus chemotherapy in first-line HER2-positive advanced gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma. This phase 2 trial enrolled patients in Canada, South Korea, and the USA who were aged 18 years and older with untreated, metastatic, or advanced HER2-positive gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma (HER2 IHC 3+ or 2+ by local or central assessment [part 1]; HER2 IHC 3+ or 2+ with FISH+ by central assessment [part 2]). Eligible patients, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 received zanidatamab intravenously plus standard chemotherapy (CAPOX [capecitabine plus oxaliplatin], FP [5-fluorouracil [5-FU] plus cisplatin], or modified FOLFOX6 [mFOLFOX6; leucovorin, 5-FU, and oxaliplatin]). In our study, part 1 aimed to characterise the safety and tolerability of zanidatamab and find the recommended dose when administered with combination chemotherapy and part 2 aimed to evaluate the antitumour activity of zanidatamab administered with combination chemotherapy in patients receiving first-line treatment for HER2-expressing advanced gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Two dosing schemes for zanidatamab were used in this study: a weight-based regimen and a two-tiered flat dosing regimen. In the CAPOX and FP groups, patients received either 30 mg/kg zanidatamab or 1800 mg or 2400 mg (patients weighing <70 kg and ≥70 kg, respectively) every 3 weeks. In the CAPOX group, patients also received 1000 mg/m2 capecitabine orally twice daily on days 1–14 every 3 weeks, plus 130 mg/m2 oxaliplatin intravenously every 3 weeks. In the FP cohort, patients also received 80 mg/m2 cisplatin intravenously every 3 weeks, plus 800 mg/m2 5-FU per day continuous intravenous infusion on days 1–5 every 3 weeks. In the mFOLFOX6 group, patients received either 20 mg/kg zanidatamab or 1200 mg or 1600 mg for patients weighing under 70 kg or 70 kg and above, respectively, every 2 weeks, plus 400 mg/m2 intravenous leucovorin every 2 weeks, 85 mg/m2 intravenous oxaliplatin every 2 weeks, and 1200 mg/m2 5-FU per day as a continuous intravenous infusion for 48 h every 2 weeks. mFOLFOX6–1 included the administration of a 400 mg/m2 5-FU intravenous bolus on days 1 and 15; mFOLFOX6–2 omitted this 5-FU bolus. The primary endpoints of part 1 were safety and tolerability, which included frequencies of dose-limiting toxicities and dose reductions of zanidatamab and chemotherapy. The primary antitumour activity endpoint of part 2 was confirmed objective response rate assessed in the response-evaluable analysis set. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate, duration of response, disease control rate, clinical benefit rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Safety outcomes were assessed in all treated patients. We report the results from an interim analysis. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03929666) and is complete for enrolment. Between Aug 29, 2019, and Feb 18, 2022, 46 patients were enrolled (39 [85%] were male; seven [15%] were female; 28 [61%] were white, 17 [37%] were Asian, and 43 [93%] were not Hispanic or Latino). Median follow-up was 47·9 months (IQR 39·2–53·7); eight (17%) patients were on treatment and 19 (41%) were in survival follow-up. The confirmed objective response rate was 76·2% (95% CI 60·5–87·9) with a median duration of response of 18·7 months (95% CI 10·4–44·1). The median progression-free survival was 12·5 months (95% CI 8·2–21·8) and median overall survival was 36·5 months (23·6–not estimable). The disease control rate was 88·1% (95% CI 74·4–96·0) and clinical benefit rate was 78·6% (95% CI 63·2–89·7). In part 1, there were no dose-limiting toxicities in six patients treated with zanidatamab plus CAPOX. One (50%) of two patients treated with zanidatamab plus FP had dose-limiting toxicities of diarrhoea and acute kidney injury (both grade 3). Two dose-limiting toxicities of diarrhoea (both grade 3) occurred in 2 (15%) of 13 patients receiving 5-FU 400 mg/m2 bolus on day 1 and 15 as part of the zanidatamab plus mFOLFOX6–1 regimen. 30 (65%) patients had treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events. The most common treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events were diarrhoea (18 [39%]; five [24%] in the 21 patients after implementing mandatory antidiarrhoeal prophylaxis) and hypokalaemia (ten [22%]). Six (13%) patients discontinued zanidatamab due to adverse events. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Zanidatamab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma demonstrated clinically meaningful and durable antitumour activity, with a manageable safety profile. Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Zymeworks.

There is a need for novel therapies for patients with previously treated HER2-positive gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA). This phase 1 (NCT02892123) dose-escalation and expansion trial evaluated zanidatamab (a dual HER2-targeted bispecific antibody) ± chemotherapy in previously treated patients with HER2-expressing, locally advanced/metastatic cancers. Here, we report the outcomes for GEA cohorts receiving zanidatamab monotherapy or with chemotherapy (paclitaxel or capecitabine). The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability. Secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate, progression-free survival, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity. Seventy patients were enrolled ( n  = 29 monotherapy; n  = 41 combination therapy); most received prior HER2-targeted agents (monotherapy, 93%; combination therapy, 95%). With monotherapy, 69% of patients had any-grade treatment-related AEs (TRAEs); 17% had grade ≥ 3 TRAEs. The most common any-grade TRAEs were diarrhea (41%) and infusion-related reactions (24%). With combination therapy, 98% of patients had any-grade TRAEs; 51% had grade ≥ 3 TRAEs. The most common any-grade TRAEs were diarrhea (68%) and fatigue (44%). Confirmed ORR was 32.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 15.9–52.4) with monotherapy and 48.6% (95% CI 31.9–65.6) with combination therapy. In heavily pre-treated patients with HER2-expressing GEA, zanidatamab ± chemotherapy had a manageable safety profile and promising antitumor activity. Following progression on HER2-targeted first-line regimens, there are limited HER2-targeted therapies that have demonstrated efficacy in patients with gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA). Here, the authors report the results of a phase 1 clinical trial investigating zanidatamab (a HER2-targeted bispecific antibody) in heavily pre-treated patients with advanced or metastatic, HER2-expressing GEA.

Purpose To determine the prognostic value of sarcopenia measurements done on staging 2-[18F] FDG PET/CT together with metabolic activity of the tumor in patients with adenocarcinoma esophagogastric cancer with surgical treatment. Methods Patients with early-stage, surgically treated esophageal adenocarcinoma and available pre-treatment 2-[18F] FDG PET/CT were included. The standard uptake value (SUV) and SUV normalized by lean body mass (SUL) were recorded. Skeletal muscle index (SMI) was measured at the L3 level on the CT component of the PET/CT. Sarcopenia was defined as SMI < 34.4cm 2 /m 2 in women and < 45.4cm 2 /m 2 in men. Results Of the included 145 patients. 30% were sarcopenic at baseline. On the univariable Cox proportional hazards analysis, ECOG, surgical T and N staging, lymphovascular invasion (LVI) positive lymph nodes, and sarcopenia were significant prognostic factors concerning RFS and OS. On multivariable Cox regression analysis, surgical N staging ( p  = 0.025) and sarcopenia ( p  = 0.022) remained significant poor prognostic factors for OS and RFS. Combining the clinical parameters with the imaging-derived nutritional evaluation of the patient but not metabolic parameters of the tumor showed improved predictive ability for OS and RFS. Conclusion Combining the patients’ imaging-derived sarcopenic status with standard clinical data, but not metabolic parameters, offered an overall improved prognostic value concerning OS and RFS.

Background: Predictive biomarkers or signature(s) for oesophageal cancer (OC) patients undergoing preoperative therapy could help administration of effective therapy, avoidance of ineffective ones, and establishment new strategies. Since the hedgehog pathway is often upregulated in OC, we examined its transcriptional factor, Gli-1, which confers therapy resistance, we wanted to assess Gli-1 as a predictive biomarker for chemoradiation response and validate it. Methods: Untreated OC tissues from patients who underwent chemoradiation and surgery were assessed for nuclear Gli-1 by immunohistochemistry and labelling indices (LIs) were correlated with pathologic complete response (pathCR) or

Journal Article

Share this book

Add to My Shelf