Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Series Title
      Series Title
      Clear All
      Series Title
  • Reading Level
      Reading Level
      Clear All
      Reading Level
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
      More Filters
      Clear All
      More Filters
      Content Type
    • Item Type
    • Is Full-Text Available
    • Subject
    • Publisher
    • Source
    • Donor
    • Language
    • Place of Publication
    • Contributors
    • Location
8 result(s) for "Ellis, Cali M"
Sort by:
Response to Matthew Baum and Philip Potter's review of Why Leaders Fight
Commentary on a review essay covering a book by Matthew A. Baum and Philip B. K. Potter, War and Democratic Constraint: How the Public Influences Foreign Policy (2015).
Critical Dialogues: War and Democratic Constraint: How the Public Influences Foreign Policy. By Matthew A. Baum and Philip B. K. Potter. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2015. 280p. $95.00 cloth, $29.95 paper
Baum and Potter's fundamental claim is that as the number of political parties in a system increases and the media in a country becomes more open, the give-and-take of domestic politics is more likely to place constraints on leaders who want to take their countries to war.[...]neither media access nor the number of political parties, on their own, are enough to significantly influence the militarized behavior of a country.The United States, for example, has free media but a small number of political parties.[...]the United States is less militarily constrained than a country like Germany, which has free media and a larger number of political parties.[...]by explaining the logic of democratic constraint and how it may only apply to certain types of democracies, Baum and Potter's research and theory could break a logjam in research on regime type and audience costs.For their macro claims about conflict initiation and reciprocation, the authors' models do, of course, suffer from the inherent inferential limitations of cross-national, observational time-series analysis, especially when using data like the Militarized Interstate Disputes and International Crisis Behavior data sets.