Catalogue Search | MBRL
Search Results Heading
Explore the vast range of titles available.
MBRLSearchResults
-
DisciplineDiscipline
-
Is Peer ReviewedIs Peer Reviewed
-
Series TitleSeries Title
-
Reading LevelReading Level
-
YearFrom:-To:
-
More FiltersMore FiltersContent TypeItem TypeIs Full-Text AvailableSubjectPublisherSourceDonorLanguagePlace of PublicationContributorsLocation
Done
Filters
Reset
8
result(s) for
"Ellis, Cali M"
Sort by:
Response to Matthew Baum and Philip Potter's review of Why Leaders Fight
by
Stam, Allan C.
,
Horowitz, Michael C.
,
Ellis, Cali M.
in
Critical Dialogue
,
Critical Dialogues
,
Foreign policy
2017
Commentary on a review essay covering a book by Matthew A. Baum and Philip B. K. Potter, War and Democratic Constraint: How the Public Influences Foreign Policy (2015).
Journal Article
Response to reviews
by
Stam, Allan C.
,
Horowitz, Michael C.
,
Ellis, Cali M.
in
Foreign Policy
,
International Political Economy
,
International Relations
2017
Journal Article
Critical Dialogues: War and Democratic Constraint: How the Public Influences Foreign Policy. By Matthew A. Baum and Philip B. K. Potter. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2015. 280p. $95.00 cloth, $29.95 paper
2017
Baum and Potter's fundamental claim is that as the number of political parties in a system increases and the media in a country becomes more open, the give-and-take of domestic politics is more likely to place constraints on leaders who want to take their countries to war.[...]neither media access nor the number of political parties, on their own, are enough to significantly influence the militarized behavior of a country.The United States, for example, has free media but a small number of political parties.[...]the United States is less militarily constrained than a country like Germany, which has free media and a larger number of political parties.[...]by explaining the logic of democratic constraint and how it may only apply to certain types of democracies, Baum and Potter's research and theory could break a logjam in research on regime type and audience costs.For their macro claims about conflict initiation and reciprocation, the authors' models do, of course, suffer from the inherent inferential limitations of cross-national, observational time-series analysis, especially when using data like the Militarized Interstate Disputes and International Crisis Behavior data sets.
Book Review