Explore the vast range of titles available.

IntroductionRespiratory diseases affect millions of people in the UK, with a disproportionately high burden seen among many marginalised communities. They are the third leading cause of death in the UK and a major driver of morbidity, disability and healthcare service use. Many respiratory conditions cause debilitating symptoms and deterioration in patients’ health and quality of life over time, resulting in substantial increases in National Health Service (NHS) expenditure. Social inequalities, including occupational, housing and environmental disparities, have led to a disproportionate burden of respiratory disease among the Black community. For many Black people living in the UK, respiratory conditions have been under-recognised, misdiagnosed or inadequately treated, further contributing to disparities in health outcomes. Despite the need to address these urgent challenges, research in this area is fragmented and rarely informed by the views and opinions of those most affected. Research prioritisation provides a structured methodology to address this unmet need. The Equal Breath Priority Setting Partnership (PSP) aims to identify the 10 most urgent research priorities in respiratory health for people of Black heritage through meaningful collaboration with people with lived experience of respiratory disease, their caregivers and family members and the healthcare professionals caring for them.Methods and analysisThe top 10 research priorities for the Equal Breath PSP will be established using the James Lind Alliance (JLA) method. A steering group comprising approximately 12 people from key stakeholder groups will first be assembled to guide the PSP. Once the context and scope of the PSP has been agreed, the first survey will be developed and disseminated among stakeholder communities to identify evidence uncertainties. Data analysis of the survey responses will create summary questions and critical appraisal of available evidence will verify which of these are evidence gaps. A longlist of approximately 50 summary questions derived from the first survey will be shared with stakeholders in a second shortlisting survey. The highest ranking questions from this survey will be taken into a workshop where the top 10 research priorities will be established through a consensus process.Ethics and disseminationThis PSP employs the JLA methodology, which does not constitute research as defined by the Health Research Authority. Survey respondent data will be stored in accordance with UK General Data Protection Regulation by Asthma+Lung UK. The final 10 research priorities will be shared with funders, policymakers, professional bodies and relevant communities to inform future investment and promote equity in respiratory health.

The World Health Organization's \"Coordinated Global Research Roadmap: 2019 Novel Coronavirus\" outlined the need for research that focuses on the impact of COVID-19 on pregnant women and children. More than one year after the first reported case significant knowledge gaps remain, highlighting the need for a coordinated approach. To address this need, the Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Working Group (MNCH WG) of the COVID-19 Clinical Research Coalition conducted an international survey to identify global research priorities for COVID-19 in maternal, reproductive and child health. This project was undertaken using a modified Delphi method. An electronic questionnaire was disseminated to clinicians and researchers in three different languages (English, French and Spanish) via MNCH WG affiliated networks. Respondents were asked to select the five most urgent research priorities among a list of 17 identified by the MNCH WG. Analysis of questionnaire data was undertaken to identify key similarities and differences among respondents according to questionnaire language, location and specialty. Following elimination of the seven lowest ranking priorities, the questionnaire was recirculated to the original pool of respondents. Thematic analysis of final questionnaire data was undertaken by the MNCH WG from which four priority research themes emerged. Questionnaire 1 was completed by 225 respondents from 29 countries. Questionnaire 2 was returned by 49 respondents. The four priority research themes which emerged from the analysis were 1) access to healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic, 2) the direct and 3) indirect effects of COVID-19 on pregnant and breastfeeding women and children and 4) the transmission of COVID-19 and protection from infection. The results of these questionnaires indicated a high level of concordance among continents and specialties regarding priority research themes. This prioritized list of research uncertainties, developed to specifically highlight the most urgent clinical needs as perceived by healthcare professionals and researchers, could help funding organizations and researchers to answer the most pressing questions for clinicians and public health professionals during the pandemic. It is hoped that these identified priority research themes can help focus the discussion regarding the allocation of limited resources to enhance COVID-19 research in MNCH globally.

There remain a number of uncertainties globally about the risks posed to women who are infected with SARS-CoV-2 during pregnancy. Furthermore, our understanding of the spread of COVID-19 in Sub-Saharan Africa is limited, owing to low testing rates in many parts of the continent. PeriCOVID Africa, in conjunction with the WHO/HRP Alliance, plans to address these knowledge gaps by harnessing research infrastructures in place in five sub-Saharan African countries in order to screen more than 50,000 pregnant women and their infants for SARS-CoV-2, while monitoring pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. We anticipate that the results of this study will provide much needed information about the risks that SARS-CoV-2 poses to pregnant women and their babies, as well as establishing potential routes of mother-to-child transmission.

Abstract Case summary A 47-year-old woman with a past medical history of osteoarthritis only presented to hospital with abdominal pain three days following a diagnostic colonoscopy performed for suspected bowel malignancy. Upon admission, she was diagnosed with a bowel perforation and subsequently underwent an emergency laparotomy and anterior resection for a newly diagnosed sigmoid adenocarcinoma. Her recovery was complicated by an anastomotic leak requiring multiple washouts due to faeculent peritoneal soiling. Following surgery, she was admitted to the ICU with an open abdomen for vacuum-assisted wound closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction. A sample of peritoneal fluid taken during her initial washout grew Escherichia coli, for which she was initially treated with piperacillin/tazobactam, and later, meropenem, after another E. coli isolate from a sample of intra-abdominal pus collected during a subsequent washout demonstrated piperacillin/tazobactam resistance. Despite treatment with meropenem, the patient continued to have intermittent fevers up to 40°C. Blood cultures taken during a febrile episode grew yeasts identified as Candida glabrata, at which point anidulafungin was commenced empirically. Computed tomography imaging of the chest, abdomen and pelvis did not reveal any potential source of invasive candidiasis. To exclude line infection as the source of the Candida, all central lines were removed, leaving only peripheral venous access. Despite this, the candidaemia continued. In total, 18 blood cultures taken over a period of 19 days grew C. glabrata. After 7 days of empirical treatment with anidulafungin, voriconazole was added in view of the persistent elevation in the patient’s serum β-D-glucan (BDG) and recurrent isolation of C. glabrata from blood cultures. Flucytosine was added after a further 10 days with no effect on the patient’s clinical status. Following removal of the abdominal mesh and the eventual closure of the patient’s abdomen, the time to positivity for her blood cultures gradually increased and eventually became negative at 5 days. Flucytosine was then stopped and anidulafungin and voriconazole were continued. A sustained decline in the patient’s serum BDG was observed thereafter and antifungal treatment was eventually stopped after three negative BDG measurements were obtained.1 Conclusions Fungal mesh infection is a rare but serious complication of abdominal surgery involving mesh insertion.2 To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of abdominal surgical mesh infection caused by C. glabrata. Previously reported cases in the literature have been due to other Candida spp. (albicans, krusei and norvegensis), Aspergillus and Coccidioides spp.1–3 C. glabrata is particularly adept at biofilm formation, causing low therapeutic response to antifungal treatment.4 In this case, source control could not be readily achieved as the mesh was required to aid abdominal closure, resulting in treatment failure despite triple antifungal therapy. This case serves as a stark reminder of the devastating and potentially fatal consequences that may result from this surgical complication and the perils associated with the use of mesh in abdominal surgery when the peritoneum has been soiled.

Epidemiological evidence about the etiology and antimicrobial resistance of neonatal infections remains limited in low-resource settings. We aimed to describe the etiology of neonatal infections in a prospective observational cohort study conducted at two hospital sites in Kampala, Uganda. Babies admitted to either unit with risk factors or signs of sepsis, pneumonia, or meningitis had a blood culture, nasopharyngeal swab, and lumbar puncture (if indicated) collected. Basic demographics were collected, and babies were followed up until discharge or death to determine admission outcome. Blood cultures were processed using the BACTEC system and identification confirmed by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Cerebrospinal fluid was processed using standard microbiological testing and swabs were processed using the multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction assay. Antimicrobial susceptibilities of bacterial isolates to World Health Organization-recommended first-line antibiotics (ampicillin or benzylpenicillin and gentamicin) were assessed using e-tests. A total of 7323 infants with signs or risk factors for sepsis had blood cultures, 2563 had nasopharyngeal swabs, and 23 had lumbar punctures collected. Eleven percent of blood cultures and 8.6% of swabs were positive. Inpatient mortality was 12.1%, with 27.7% case fatality observed among infants with Gram-negative bloodstream infections. (14.8%), spp. (10.3%), and spp. (7.6%), were notable contributors to Gram-negative sepsis, whereas Group B was the predominant Gram-positive pathogen identified (13.5%). Almost 60% of Gram-negative pathogens were ampicillin- and gentamicin-resistant. Our study demonstrates high levels of antimicrobial resistance and inpatient mortality from neonatal sepsis in the first months of life in Uganda. This underscores the pressing need for revised, context-specific antimicrobial treatment guidelines that account for the evolving landscape of antimicrobial resistance in neonatal sepsis.

Low- and middle-income countries lack data on culture-confirmed sepsis in HIV-exposed infants, despite the reported heightened risk of infectious morbidity. This study describes culture-confirmed sepsis and antibiotic resistance patterns among HIV-exposed children in a large etiological cohort study in Kampala, Uganda. This was a prospective birth cohort study based at 2 Ugandan sites, as part of the Progressing Group B Streptococcal Vaccines (PROGRESS) study. Any infant with risk factors, signs, or symptoms of infection presenting before 3 months of age had a blood culture and nasopharyngeal swab taken to determine the etiology of neonatal and young infant sepsis. Among 4492 blood cultures, 460 were obtained from HIV-exposed infants. Nine infants (1.9%) had positive blood cultures. The most frequently isolated organisms were , group B , and , and these organisms demonstrated resistance to the common antibiotics (aminoglycosides, penicillins, and cephalosporins) used for management of suspected sepsis. A higher proportion of the exposed babies died vs HIV-unexposed (15.8 vs 11.2; = .005). Nasopharyngeal swabs were collected from 114 infants, with 7.9% positive for at least one virus or bacterium. Future work is needed to investigate why mortality among HIV-exposed infants persists despite maternal antiretroviral treatment. Antimicrobial resistance is an increasing concern in this setting.

We investigated awareness of neonatal infections among a population of pregnant women and other community members in Kampala, Uganda. We explored perceived causes of neonatal infections and perceptions of appropriate treatments. We conducted focus group discussions (FGDs) and in-depth interviews (IDIs) with 97 participants: 25 community leaders who took part in 3 FGDs, 12 pregnant women who took part in IDIs, and 60 pregnant women who took part in 8 FGDs, between November 2019 and October 2020. Data were analyzed thematically. This work formed part of the PROGRESS study, an observational cohort study undertaken in Kampala, Uganda, between November 2018 and April 2021. Beliefs about causes, signs, symptoms, and treatment of infants with suspected infections impacted health-seeking behavior. Some illnesses were perceived to be caused by environmental factors while others were believed to have social or behavioral causes, such as the promiscuity of the male partner causing infections or the mother being bewitched. Local herbs and traditional remedies were the most preferred method of treatment and were commonly relied on to address various health issues rather than conventional medicines. Notably, no participant mentioned vaccines as a way of preventing infections. Pregnant women and community members' understanding of the causes and treatment of neonatal illnesses were diverse, including environmental, social-behavioral, and supernatural causes, while both conventional and traditional remedies were perceived as appropriate treatments and sought accordingly. Understanding community perceptions and practices around neonatal infections is key to improving neonatal health interventions and outcomes.

Maternal Group B (GBS) rectovaginal colonization is an important risk factor for invasive disease in neonates, yet availability of culture-based methods for detection is limited in low-resource settings. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of the HiberGene (HG) GBS loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay for the rapid detection of GBS in rectal/vaginal swabs collected from women in Uganda. This work forms a part of the PROGRESS GBS study. In phase 1, 1294 rectal and vaginal swabs were collected from pregnant women and inoculated in enrichment (Lim) broth, which was then tested using the HG GBS LAMP assay ( gene target) and culture on chromogenic agar. In phase 2, 166 swabs from nonpregnant women were tested directly (without the enrichment step). For samples with discordant results, an additional method of testing against multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction assay was used. Overall, the HG GBS LAMP assay detected more GBS-positive samples (31.3%; 452/1445) than culture-based methods (13.3%; 192/1445). Multiplex polymerase chain reaction-tested results were concordant with LAMP results in 96.3% of cases. The sensitivity and specificity of the LAMP assay, after adjusting for the tiebreaker results of discordant samples, were 94.4% (95% confidence interval, 86.2-99.4) and 99.0% (95% confidence interval, 94.3-100), respectively. The results of this study demonstrate high sensitivity and specificity of the HG GBS LAMP assay for the detection of GBS rectovaginal colonization in our setting. Given its rapid turnaround time, the HG GBS LAMP assay could appropriately be used to screen women for GBS rectovaginal colonization during labor to enable provision of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis.