Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background People who inject drugs (PWID) are a medically and socially vulnerable population with a high incidence of overdose, mental illness, and infections like HIV and hepatitis C. Existing literature describes social and economic correlations to increased health risk, including stigma. Injection drug use stigma has been identified as a major contributor to healthcare disparities for PWID. However, data on this topic, particularly in terms of the interface between enacted, anticipated, and internalized stigma, is still limited. To fill this gap, we examined perspectives from PWID whose stigmatizing experiences impacted their views of the healthcare system and syringe service programs (SSPs) and influenced their decisions regarding future medical care. Methods Semi-structured interviews conducted with 32 self-identified PWID in New York City. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed. Interview transcripts were coded using a grounded theory approach by three trained coders and key themes were identified as they emerged. Results A total of 25 participants (78.1%) reported at least one instance of stigma related to healthcare system engagement. Twenty-three participants (71.9%) reported some form of enacted stigma with healthcare, 19 participants (59.4%) described anticipated stigma with healthcare, and 20 participants (62.5%) reported positive experiences at SSPs. Participants attributed healthcare stigma to their drug injection use status and overwhelmingly felt distrustful of, and frustrated with, medical providers and other healthcare staff at hospitals and local clinics. PWID did not report internalized stigma, in part due to the availability of non-stigmatizing medical care at SSPs. Conclusions Stigmatizing experiences of PWID in formal healthcare settings contributed to negative attitudes toward seeking healthcare in the future. Many participants describe SSPs as accessible sites to receive high-quality medical care, which may curb the manifestation of internalized stigma derived from negative experiences in the broader healthcare system. Our findings align with those reported in the literature and reveal the potentially important role of SSPs. With the goal of limiting stigmatizing interactions and their consequences on PWID health, we recommend that future research include explorations of mechanisms by which PWID make decisions in stigmatizing healthcare settings, as well as improving medical care availability at SSPs.

Research conducted with violent offenders demonstrates an overwhelming tendency for individuals in this population to frame their violent acts as tuned responses to perceived slights ranging from verbal insults to ostensibly nonviolent physical actions. To date, no review has characterized and categorized specific situational cues that are associated with interpersonal violence/ideation. Here, literature addressing attitudes, attributions, and triggers around reactive forms of violence and perspectives on violence deservedness was thematically and narratively reviewed using a theoretical framework focused on shame and threatened social bonds. Of the 29 articles that met the inclusion criteria, 11 statistically assessed relationships between attributions, attitudes, or triggers and subsequent violence/ideation, with 10 (90.1%) demonstrating, in subgroup analysis, statistically greater attitudes endorsing violence when shame or a threat to a social bond manifested. Overall, three primary axes of attribution, attitudes, or triggers toward interpersonal violence emerged from the review: (1) generalized intrapersonal justifications, (2) environmental and social group triggers, and (3) jealousy and triggers in the context of romantic relationships. These dynamics, both inside and outside of the United States, are reviewed, and a conceptual intervention model is presented. Findings illustrate that behavioral interventions specifically targeting individual- and community-level pathways to shame manifestation and emotion regulation represent an underutilized yet auspicious approach to curbing violence ideation and perpetration.

Little is known about the physical and mental health outcomes of adults in the low-income, predominantly Black city of Flint, Michigan, following the city’s water crisis which began in April 2014 after austerity policies led to the city switching its water source. We investigate these dynamics using data from a longitudinal community-based cohort in Flint. Between June and November 2019, surveys were administered at nine public sites across Flint. Nested models were employed to assess relationships between respondent demographics, including race/ethnicity, and self-report of clinician-diagnosed blood lead levels (BLLs) and various physical symptoms and mental health outcomes, including depression/anxiety (PHQ-4) and psychological trauma (PC-PTSD-5). Of the 331 respondents (mean age: 47.9 + 16.5), most were women (58.6%) and Black (57.7%). In total, 10.0% self-reported elevated BLLs, with borderline significantly higher reports among Blacks (p = 0.07). Skin rashes (58.1% vs. 33.9%, p < 0.01), hair loss (45.5% vs. 30.3%, p = 0.01), and nausea (35.6% vs. 20.2%, p = 0.1) were significantly higher among Blacks versus Whites. Additionally, 29.0% and 26.3% of respondents met trauma and depression/anxiety criteria, respectively. Increasing physical symptoms was associated with psychological trauma (OR 2.1, p < 0.01) and depression/anxiety (OR 1.9, p < 0.01). In closing, Flint adults, particularly Blacks, experienced deleterious physical and mental health outcomes following the city’s water crisis that appear to represent a substantial burden of excess cases. Further research is needed on how austerity impacts community health in economically distressed urban cities and ways to generate capacity to identify and curb adverse consequences.

Strengths-based theory, a pillar of clinical social work practice, emphasizes the importance of recognizing the inherent and learned skills and abilities that people possess and can leverage toward self-actualization and wellness. However, strengths-based approaches are under-investigated in the field of drug use management and treatment, foreclosing a richer view into how to better understand, engage, and support people who nonmedically use drugs (PWUD) through practice and research. Focusing on interventions conducted with PWUD, we conducted a systematic literature review to identify, classify, and characterize existing strengths-based paradigms and approaches to drug use management and treatment. Using these findings, we formulate and describe a holistic conceptual model for advancing training, practice, and research in this space. The following domains emerged and were contextualized for their strengths-based dimensions: (1) Harm Reduction Services; (2) Strengths-Based Case Management; (3) Trauma-Informed Practice; and (4) Collectivist Racial, Ethnic, Gender, Sexual, and Intersectional Identity-Focused Interventions. These bodies of literature showed limited connectivity as a comprehensive clinical modality, which we proposed to address through the Integrated Strengths-Based Engagement Framework (ISBEF). To this end, a complex array of strengths-based paradigms have been developed and implemented to support the well-being of PWUD. However, there is a need for more rigorous and uniform approaches for the implementation and measurement of strengths-based approaches, particularly in work with racial, ethnic, gender, and sexual minority populations, which the ISBEF provides a structure for.

People who nonmedically use drugs (PWUD) face intricate social issues that suppress self-actualization, communal integration, and overall health and wellness. “Strengths-based” approaches, an under-used pedagogy and practice in addiction medicine, underscore the significance of identifying and recognizing the inherent and acquired skills, attributes, and capacities of PWUD. A strengths-based approach engenders client affirmation and improves their capacity to reduce drug use-related harms by leveraging existing capabilities. Exploring this paradigm, we conducted and analyzed interviews with 46 PWUD who were clients at syringe services programs in New York City and rural southern Illinois, two areas with elevated rates of opioid-related morbidity and mortality, to assess respondents’ perceived strengths. We located two primary thematic modalities in which strengths-based ethos is expressed: individuals (1) being and advocate and resource for harm reduction knowledge and practices and (2) engaging in acts of continuous self-actualization. These dynamics demonstrate PWUD strengths populating and manifesting in complex ways that both affirm and challenge humanist and biomedical notions of individual agency, as PWUD refract enacted, anticipated, and perceived stigmas. In conclusion, programs that blend evidence-based, systems-level interventions on drug use stigma and disenfranchisement with meso and micro-level strengths-based interventions that affirm and leverage personal identity, decision-making capacity, and endemic knowledge may help disrupt health promotion cleavages among PWUD.

Background There is little research on lead (Pb) screening behaviors and outcomes and possible health sequelae of children in Flint, Michigan in the years following the city’s 2014 water crisis, which included widespread tap water contamination with elevated levels of heavy metals and other environmental contaminants. Methods Between June and November 2019, we collected and analyzed cross-sectional data on Flint children’s demographics and self-report of screenings of blood lead levels (BLLs) and results and various potential water contamination-related health symptoms and outcomes. We calculated descriptive statistics to summarize the prevalence of health outcomes and screenings in children, and fit multivariable models using generalized estimating equations to characterize the association between baseline traits and health symptoms and outcomes in children. Results A total of 244 children (mean age 8.6 ± 4.8) were included in the analysis. Overall, 76.6% of the children were reported to have been screened for elevated BLLs after the water source switch. In total, after the water source switch, 25.0% of children were reported as having clinician-diagnosed elevated BLLs. Overall, 43.9% of children experienced hyperactivity, 39.3% had emotional agitation, 29.1% had comprehension issues/learning delays, while 38.9% of children had skin rashes and 10.7% experienced hair loss. A child having elevated BLLs also significantly increased the odds of experiencing adverse cognitive/behavioral outcomes (comprehension issues/learning delays OR = 4.0, hyperactivity OR = 6.6, emotional agitation OR = 3.5). Conclusion Child BLL screening following the crisis initiation was moderate, and BLLs and potential water contamination-related morbidity outcomes appeared heightened. Further research is needed to contextualize epidemiologic factors contributing to BLL screening patterns and results and the potential water contamination-associated sequelae observed here.

Background Women who use drugs (WWUD) have low rates of contraceptive use and high rates of unintended pregnancy. Drug use is common among women in rural U.S. communities, with limited data on how they utilize reproductive, substance use disorder (SUD), and healthcare services. Objective We determined contraceptive use prevalence among WWUD in rural communities then compared estimates to women from similar rural areas. We investigated characteristics of those using contraceptives, and associations between contraceptive use and SUD treatment, healthcare utilization, and substance use. Design Rural Opioids Initiative (ROI) — cross-sectional survey using respondent-driven sampling (RDS) involving eight rural U.S. regions (January 2018–March 2020); National Survey on Family Growth (NSFG) — nationally-representative U.S. household reproductive health survey (2017–2019). Participants Women aged 18–49 with prior 30-day non-prescribed opioid and/or non-opioid injection drug use; fecundity determined by self-reported survey responses. Main Measures Unweighted and RDS-weighted prevalence estimates of medical/procedural contraceptive use; chi-squared tests and multi-level linear regressions to test associations. Key Results Of 855 women in the ROI, 36.8% (95% CI 33.7–40.1, unweighted) and 38.6% (95% CI 30.7–47.2, weighted) reported contraceptive use, compared to 66% of rural women in the NSFG sample. Among the ROI women, 27% had received prior 30-day SUD treatment via outpatient counseling or inpatient program and these women had increased odds of contraceptive use (aOR 1.50 [95% CI 1.08–2.06]). There was a positive association between contraception use and recent medications for opioid use disorder (aOR 1.34 [95% CI 0.95–1.88]) and prior 6-month primary care utilization (aOR 1.32 [95% CI 0.96–1.82]) that did not meet the threshold for statistical significance. Conclusion WWUD in rural areas reported low contraceptive use; those who recently received SUD treatment had greater odds of contraceptive use. Improvements are needed in expanding reproductive and preventive health within SUD treatment and primary care services in rural communities.