Explore the vast range of titles available.

Aphasic syndromes usually result from injuries to the dominant hemisphere of the brain. Despite the fact that localization of language functions shows little interindividual variability, several brain areas are simultaneously activated when language tasks are undertaken. Mechanisms of language recovery after brain injury to the dominant hemisphere seem to be relatively stereotyped, including activations of perilesional areas in the acute phase and of homologues of language areas in the non-dominant hemisphere in the subacute phase, later returning to dominant hemisphere activation in the chronic phase. Plasticity mechanisms reopen the critical period of language development, more specifically in what leads to disinhibition of the non-dominant hemisphere when brain lesions affect the dominant hemisphere. The non-dominant hemisphere plays an important role during recovery from aphasia, but currently available rehabilitation therapies have shown limited results for efficient language improvement. Large-scale randomized controlled trials that evaluate well-defined interventions in patients with aphasia are needed for stimulation of neuroplasticity mechanisms that enhance the role of the non-dominant hemisphere for language recovery. Ineffective treatment approaches should be replaced by more promising ones and the latter should be evaluated for proper application. The data generated by such studies could substantiate evidence-based rehabilitation strategies for patients with aphasia.

•Predictors of Lewy body dementia onset differ from other neurodegenerative diseases.•Night-time behavior disturbances are inversely associated with sleep satisfaction.•Caregiver burden is more affected by depression and motor features.•Non-motor symptoms are more burdensome for patients with dementia with Lewy bodies.•In Parkinson’s disease dementia, anxiety and dysphoria arise when motor features are less burdensome. Differential diagnosis between Parkinson’s disease (PD) dementia and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) is difficult due to common features, whereas management decisions and research endpoints depend upon knowledge of dementia severity. We aimed to assess risk factors for age at dementia onset, as well as which neuropsychiatric features are associated with pharmacotherapy and signs and symptoms of Lewy body dementia. Patients with PD dementia or DLB were evaluated for age at disease onset, education, sanitation, anthropometric measures, alcohol use, smoking, history of infections or head trauma with unconsciousness, family history of neurodegenerative diseases, functional independence, cognition, behavior, motor features, caregiver burden and pharmacotherapy. Fifty-one patients were recruited (37 with DLB, 14 with PD dementia). Cumulative alcohol use and married status were associated with earlier dementia onset, whereas history of treated systemic infections and cumulative family history of primary neurodegenerative diseases led to later dementia onset. The length of dementia was shorter only for severely impaired patients who used anti-depressants, but not for users of cholinesterase inhibitors, while no behavioral symptom was associated with dopaminergic therapy. Night-time behavior disturbances were inversely associated with sleep satisfaction, while caregiver burden was more affected by depression and motor features. Non-motor symptoms were more burdensome for patients with DLB, while in PD dementia anxiety and dysphoria occurred when motor features were less burdensome. PD dementia and DLB are two phenotypes of the same pathological entity, differing mostly by the occurrence of parkinsonian signs. Predictors of dementia onset differ from other neurodegenerative diseases.

Aphasic syndromes usually result from injuries to the dominant hemisphere of the brain. Despite the fact that localization of language functions shows little interindividual variability, several brain areas are simultaneously activated when language tasks are undertaken. Mechanisms of language recovery after brain injury to the dominant hemisphere seem to be relatively stereotyped, including activations of perilesional areas in the acute phase and of homologues of language areas in the non-dominant hemisphere in the subacute phase, later returning to dominant hemisphere activation in the chronic phase. Plasticity mechanisms reopen the critical period of language development, more specifically in what leads to disinhibition of the non-dominant hemisphere when brain lesions affect the dominant hemisphere. The non-dominant hemisphere plays an important role during recovery from aphasia, but currently available rehabilitation therapies have shown limited results for efficient language improvement. Large-scale randomized controlled trials that evaluate well-defined interventions in patients with aphasia are needed for stimulation of neuroplasticity mechanisms that enhance the role of the non-dominant hemisphere for language recovery. Ineffective treatment approaches should be replaced by more promising ones and the latter should be evaluated for proper application. The data generated by such studies could substantiate evidence-based rehabilitation strategies for patients with aphasia.