Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Reading Level
      Reading Level
      Clear All
      Reading Level
  • Content Type
      Content Type
      Clear All
      Content Type
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
      More Filters
      Clear All
      More Filters
      Item Type
    • Is Full-Text Available
    • Subject
    • Publisher
    • Source
    • Donor
    • Language
    • Place of Publication
    • Contributors
    • Location
2,518 result(s) for "Fagin, Dan"
Sort by:
Toxicology: The learning curve
Researchers say that some chemicals have unexpected and potent effects at very low doses — but regulators aren't convinced.
THE LEARNING CURVE
What if, for a large and potent class of compounds, lower doses pose higher risks? A growing number of academic researchers are making just such a claim for endocrine disrupters, a large group of synthetic chemicals able to interact with cellular hormone receptors. Vom Saal and his colleagues believe that very low doses of these compounds in the environment are contributing to a wide range of human health problems - including obesity, diabetes, cancer, cardiovascular disease, and infertility and other disorders related to sexual development.
Science and Journalism Fail to Connect
Fagin addresses the common ground beneath the coverage of intelligent design and global warming. He observes that science is not adept at feeding the media's craving for novelty, since the credibility of science depends on meticulous process in which each hypothesis builds incrementally on all the work that has come before.