Explore the vast range of titles available.

Health-care-associated infections are the most prevalent adverse events of hospital care, posing a substantial threat to patient safety and burden on society. Hand hygiene with alcohol-based hand rub is the most effective preventive strategy to reduce health-care-associated infections. Over the past two decades, various interventions have been introduced and studied to improve hand hygiene compliance among health-care workers. The global implementation of the WHO multimodal hand hygiene improvement strategy and constant efforts to replace the use of soap and water with alcohol-based hand rub have led to a faster and more efficient hand cleaning method. These strategies have strongly contributed to the success of behaviour change and a subsequent decrease in health-care-associated infections and cross-transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms worldwide. The WHO multimodal behaviour change strategy requires a series of elements including system change as a prerequisite for behaviour change, education, monitoring and performance feedback, reminders in the workplace, and an institutional safety climate. Successful adoption of the promotion strategy requires adaptation to available resources and sociocultural contexts. This Review focuses on the major advances and challenges in hand hygiene research and practices in the past 20 years and sets out various ways forward for improving this lifesaving action.

Abstract Background Antibiotic prophylaxis that covers enteric pathogens is essential in preventing surgical site infections (SSIs) after colorectal surgery. Current prophylaxis regimens do not cover extended-spectrum beta-lactamase–producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-PE). We aimed to determine whether the risk of SSI following colorectal surgery is higher in ESBL-PE carriers than in noncarriers. Methods We conducted a prospective cohort study of patients who underwent elective colorectal surgery in 3 hospitals in Israel, Switzerland, and Serbia between 2012 and 2017. We included patients who were aged ≥18 years, were screened for ESBL-PE carriage before surgery, received routine prophylaxis with a cephalosporin plus metronidazole, and did not have an infection at the time of surgery. The exposed group was composed of ESBL-PE–positive patients. The unexposed group was a random sample of ESBL-PE–negative patients. We collected data on patient and surgery characteristics and SSI outcomes. We fit logistic mixed effects models with study site as a random effect. Results A total of 3600 patients were screened for ESBL-PE; 13.8% were carriers SSIs occurred in 55/220 carriers (24.8%) and 49/440 noncarriers (11.1%, P < .001). In multivariable analysis, ESBL-PE carriage more than doubled the risk of SSI (odds ratio [OR], 2.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.50–3.71). Carriers had higher risk of deep SSI (OR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.27–3.99). SSI caused by ESBL-PE occurred in 7.2% of carriers and 1.6% of noncarriers (OR, 4.23; 95% CI, 1.70–10.56). Conclusions ESBL-PE carriers who receive cephalosporin-based prophylaxis are at increased risk of SSI following colorectal surgery. Standard antibiotic prophylaxis administered before colorectal surgery does not cover extended-spectrum beta-lactamase–producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-PE). We found that ESBL-PE carriers have more than twice the risk of noncarriers of developing surgical site infection following colorectal surgery.

Background Hand hygiene is universally recognized as a cornerstone measure for the prevention of healthcare-associated infections. Although the WHO “My five Moments for hand hygiene” poster has been used for more than a decade to delineate hand hygiene indications and promote action, adherence levels among healthcare workers are still notoriously low and disquieting. To compensate for the lack of effective hand hygiene communication, we aimed to evaluate emojis as possible surrogates for the non-verbal aspects of hand hygiene behaviour. Methods Following a thorough review of the Unicode version 12.0, the most applicable emojis to the terms used in the WHO 5 Moments poster were extracted. We developed a self-administered questionnaire to assess the view of infection prevention and control (IPC) practitioners regarding the use of emojis to show the WHO 5 Moments. Completed questionnaires were collected and analysed to determine the suitability of the existing emojis to illustrate a unified emoji poster. Data were analysed using R (version 3.6.3). Results A total of 95 IPC practitioners completed the questionnaire from May to October 2019 from different countries. Of these, 69 (74%) were female, and the mean age of the participants was 44.6 ± 10.87 years. We found appropriate emojis for six of the words used in the poster, including for touching (72%), for patient (63%), for clean (53%), for procedure (56%), for body fluid (58%), and for exposure risk (71%). The existing emojis proposed for the words “hygiene”, “aseptic”, and “surrounding” seemed to be less satisfactory. Conclusions In summary, the findings of this study indicate that the existing emojis may not be able to substitute the words used in the WHO 5 Moments poster. Emojis might be helpful to address hand hygiene indications in healthcare that may eventually play a role in promoting this measure. However, emojis should be further studied to choose the most appropriate ones and avoid ambiguity and misinterpretation. More emojis to convey health related messages are needed. We recommend further research in this area to evaluate the effect of using emojis in healthcare-related behaviours.