Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Source
      Source
      Clear All
      Source
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
2 result(s) for "Farhan, Khairullah"
Sort by:
Study the Inhibitory Effects of Aqueous and Alcoholic Extracts of Melia Azedarach L. on some Bacterial Strain
The current study aimed to preparation of an aqueous and alcoholic extracts of Melia azedarach L.leaves .The antimicrobial activity of these extracts was tested against four strains of bacterial isolates, two of them were Gram-positive, namely Staphyloccocus aureus NCTC6571 standard strain and Staphyloccocus aureus strain from some clinical patients. And other were Gram-negative, namely Escherichia coli ATCC25922 a standard strain and Pseuedomonas aeroginosa clinical strain isolated from some patients. Drug sensitivity test to clinical strains was also tested toward Psuedomonas aeroginosa, Staphyloccocus aureus) to Ciproflaoxacin, Cefoxitin, Strepomycin, Cefoxitin. The clinical bacterial strain Pseuedomonas aeroginosa showed resistance 100% to all antibiotics used in the experiment, while the Staphyloccocus aureus was sensitive to four antibiotics: Ampicillin, Ciproflaoxacin, Ampicillin, and Strepomycin. The current study showed the superiority of the alcoholic extract in inhibiting standard and clinical strains, including antibiotic resistance, while the aqueous extract did not show any inhibitory activity against any of the clinical bacterial, and cytotoxicity was tested using human red blood cells(RBC) , where the results showed the absence of any Cellular toxicity for all concentrations used in the experiment, so the current study recommends the possibility of using the alcoholic extract of the rosary plant as drug alternatives after conducting cytotoxicity tests and drug dose (LD50) on the mentioned extract.
Exploring the In Vitro Anti‐Inflammatory Effect of Citrus Fruit Hesperidin Supplementation
The aim of the present study was to assess the anti‐inflammatory effect of hesperidin. The research was conducted by optimizing the hesperidin extraction process from citrus peel powder, followed by characterization and nutrition profiling of citrus peel hesperidin extract. Citrus peel was collected from the local market and dried in a hot air oven. Then it was ground in a grinder to make powder. Then, the powder was extracted first with petroleum ether and then with methanol inside a Soxhlet apparatus. Then, the methanolic extract was filtered and subjected to evaporation in a rotary evaporator. Hesperidin was precipitated and purified with the help of acetic acid and dimethylformamide. The anti‐inflammatory and antioxidant perspective of hesperidin was assessed through NO2 production assay, assay of inflammatory cytokines, DPPH, and FRAP, respectively. For instance, in the ferric reducing antioxidant power assay, for 10 μM of hesperidin, the mean reduction value of three different tubes was observed as 3.36 ± 0.197. With the rise of the quantity of hesperidin, that is, 50, 75, and 100 μM, the mean values were observed as 5.48 ± 0.279, 7.5 ± 0.259, and 10.050 ± 0.832, respectively. Similarly, for the 2, 2‐diphenyl‐1‐picrylhydrazyl assay, the mean percentage reduction of the DPPH by hesperidin was 24 ± 0.5774, 35 ± 0.5774, 38 ± 0.57, and 40% ± 0.5% against the concentrations of 10, 25, 50, and 100 μM, respectively. As far as anti‐inflammatory activity is concerned, in the NO2 (Nitrite ion) production assay, the mean production of NO2 by LPS induction was 6.3366 ± 0.1 mM. However, co‐incubation of hesperidin with LPS in the concentrations of 10, 20, and 30 μM in the treatments has shown lesser productions of the NO2 as 4.8967 ± 0.5 μM, 3.6 ± 0.7 μM, and 2.8667 ± 0.5, respectively. Likewise, in the assay of IL‐8, IL‐1β and TNF‐α production assay, the mean production rate of cytokines was 0.6 ± 0.21 ng/mL, 0.47 ± 0.012 ng/mL, and 0.3633 ± 0.045 ng/mL according to the exposure rate of hesperidin as 0.01 mg/mL, 0.1 mg/mL, and 20 μM of the positive control drug PD98059. With a similar exposure rate of hesperidin and the positive control drug, the mean rate of production of IL‐1β was 0.0467 ± 0.079 ng/mL, 0.0367 ± 0.036 ng/mL, and 0.033 ± 0.021 ng/mL, respectively. The third cytokine TNF‐α had also shown similar patterns of inhibition against the same dose rate of hesperidin and PD98059. The mean value for the production of TNF‐α was 0.30 ± 0.18 ng/mL, 0.30 ± 0.091 mg/mL, and 0.1767 ± 0.084 ng/mL against the similar dose of hesperidin and PD98059. The inhibitory effect of hesperidin was more significant in IL‐8 as compared to IL‐1β and TNF‐α. Conclusively, hesperidin did prove to be a significant antioxidant and anti‐inflammatory agent. Citrus peel was collected from the local market and dried in a hot air oven. It was then ground in a grinder to make powder. Then, the powder was extracted first with petroleum ether and then with methanol inside a Soxhlet apparatus. The methanolic extract was filtered and subjected to evaporation in a rotary evaporator.