Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background: Generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) is a chronic, unpredictable disease associated with high treatment and disease burdens, with a need for more effective and well-tolerated treatments. Objectives: To evaluate the long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of zilucoplan in a mild-to-severe, acetylcholine receptor autoantibody-positive (AChR+) gMG population. Design: Ongoing, multicenter, phase III open-label extension (OLE) study. Methods: Eligible patients had completed a qualifying randomized, placebo-controlled phase II or phase III zilucoplan study and received daily, self-administered subcutaneous 0.3 mg/kg zilucoplan. The primary endpoint was incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Secondary efficacy endpoints included change from baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) score. Results: In total, 200 patients enrolled. At the cut-off date (8 September 2022), median (range) exposure to zilucoplan in RAISE-XT was 1.2 (0.11–4.45) years. Mean age at OLE baseline was 53.3 years. A total of 188 (94%) patients experienced a TEAE, with the most common being MG worsening (n = 52, 26%) and COVID-19 (n = 49, 25%). In patients who received zilucoplan 0.3 mg/kg in the parent study, further improvements in MG-ADL score continued through to Week 24 (least squares mean change [95% confidence interval] from double-blind baseline −6.06 [−7.09, −5.03]) and were sustained through to Week 60 (−6.04 [−7.21, −4.87]). In patients who switched from placebo in the parent study, rapid improvements in MG-ADL score were observed at the first week after switching to zilucoplan; further improvements were observed at Week 24, 12 weeks after switching (−6.46 [−8.19, −4.72]), and were sustained through to Week 60 (−6.51 [−8.37, −4.65]). Consistent results were observed in other efficacy endpoints. Conclusion: Zilucoplan demonstrated a favorable long-term safety profile, good tolerability, and sustained efficacy through to Week 60 with consistent benefits in a broad AChR+ gMG population. Additional long-term data will be available in future analyses. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04225871 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04225871)

While moderate and severe back or extremity pain is frequent in Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), headache appears to be uncommon. Most of the reports of headache in GBS place it in the context of the posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) which is increasingly recognized as a likely dysautonomia-related GBS complication. There are also a few reports of headache in the setting of increased CSF pressure and papilledema and in association with the Miller Fisher GBS variant. In comparison, back and extremity pain is highly prevalent. Aching muscle pain and neuropathic pain are the two most common of several pain types. Pain may be a heralding feature and has been described in patients as long as 2 years after disease onset. Pain management is a major axis of treatment in GBS. Gabapentin is a reasonable first-line choice, and opioid medications can be added for more severe pain but there are few clinical trials to inform specific recommendations. While the understanding of pain pathophysiology in GBS is incomplete, its prevalence and clinical impact are increasingly recognized and studied. Pain should be considered a cardinal manifestation of GBS along with acute, mostly symmetric weakness and diminished reflexes.

Generalised myasthenia gravis is a chronic, unpredictable, and debilitating rare disease, often accompanied by high treatment burden and with an unmet need for more efficacious and well tolerated treatments. Zilucoplan is a subcutaneous, self-administered macrocyclic peptide complement C5 inhibitor. We aimed to assess safety, efficacy, and tolerability of zilucoplan in patients with acetylcholine receptor autoantibody (AChR)-positive generalised myasthenia gravis. RAISE was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial that was done at 75 sites in Europe, Japan, and North America. We enrolled patients (aged 18–74 years) with AChR-positive generalised myasthenia gravis (Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America disease class II–IV), a myasthenia gravis activities of daily living (MG-ADL) score of least 6, and a quantitative myasthenia gravis score of at least 12. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive subcutaneous zilucoplan 0·3 mg/kg once daily by self-injection, or matched placebo, for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline to week 12 in MG-ADL score in the modified intention-to-treat population (all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-dosing MG-ADL score). Safety was mainly assessed by the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in all patients who had received at least one dose of zilucoplan or placebo. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04115293. An open-label extension study is ongoing (NCT04225871). Between Sept 17, 2019, and Sept 10, 2021, 239 patients were screened for the study, of whom 174 (73%) were eligible. 86 (49%) patients were randomly assigned to zilucoplan 0·3 mg/kg and 88 (51%) were assigned to placebo. Patients assigned to zilucoplan showed a greater reduction in MG-ADL score from baseline to week 12, compared with those assigned to placebo (least squares mean change −4·39 [95% CI –5·28 to –3·50] vs −2·30 [–3·17 to –1·43]; least squares mean difference −2·09 [−3·24 to −0·95]; p=0·0004). TEAEs occurred in 66 (77%) patients in the zilucoplan group and in 62 (70%) patients in the placebo group. The most common TEAE was injection-site bruising (n=14 [16%] in the zilucoplan group and n=8 [9%] in the placebo group). Incidences of serious TEAEs and serious infections were similar in both groups. One patient died in each group; neither death (COVID-19 [zilucoplan] and cerebral haemorrhage [placebo]) was considered related to the study drug. Zilucoplan treatment showed rapid and clinically meaningful improvements in myasthenia gravis-specific efficacy outcomes, had a favourable safety profile, and was well tolerated, with no major safety findings. Zilucoplan is a new potential treatment option for a broad population of patients with AChR-positive generalised myasthenia gravis. The long-term safety and efficacy of zilucoplan is being assessed in an ongoing open-label extension study. UCB Pharma.

Given burdensome side-effects and long latency for efficacy with conventional agents, there is a continued need for generalised myasthenia gravis treatments that are safe and provide consistently sustained, long-term disease control. Nipocalimab, a neonatal Fc receptor blocker, was associated with dose-dependent reductions in total IgG and anti-acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibodies and clinically meaningful improvements in the Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) scale in patients with generalised myasthenia gravis in a phase 2 study. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of nipocalimab in a phase 3 study. Vivacity-MG3 was a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study conducted at 81 outpatient centres with expertise in myasthenia gravis in 17 countries in Asia–Pacific, Europe, and North America. Adults (aged ≥18 years) with generalised myasthenia gravis inadequately controlled with standard-of-care therapy (MG-ADL score ≥6) were randomly assigned (1:1) to either nipocalimab (30 mg/kg loading dose then 15 mg/kg every 2 weeks for maintenance dosing) or placebo infusions every 2 weeks, added to standard-of-care therapy in both groups, for 24 weeks. Randomisation was stratified by antibody status, day 1 MG-ADL total score, and region. The sponsor, investigators, clinical raters, and participants were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was the difference between nipocalimab and placebo based on least-squares mean change from baseline in MG-ADL total score averaged over weeks 22, 23, and 24 in the intention-to-treat population of patients who were antibody-positive (for AChR, anti-muscle-specific tyrosine kinase [MuSK], or anti-low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4 [LRP4]). Adverse events were assessed in patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04951622; the double-blind phase is completed and an open-label extension phase is ongoing. Between July 15, 2021, and Nov 17, 2023, 199 patients were enrolled, and 196 patients received study drug (98 in the nipocalimab group and 98 in the placebo group); of these, 153 (77 in the nipocalimab group and 76 in the placebo group) were antibody-positive. The least-squares mean change in MG-ADL score from baseline to weeks 22, 23, and 24 was –4·70 (SE 0·329) in the nipocalimab group versus –3·25 (0·335) in the placebo group (difference –1·45 [95% CI –2·38 to –0·52]; p=0·0024). The incidence of adverse events was similar between groups (82 [84%] of 98 in both the nipocalimab and placebo groups), including infections (42 [43%] of 98 in the nipocalimab group and placebo group) and headache (14 [14%] of 98 in the nipocalimab group and 17 [17%] of 98 in the placebo group). Serious adverse events were reported for nine (9%) of 98 patients in the nipocalimab group and 14 (14%) of 98 patients in the placebo group, three of which had a fatal outcome (nipocalimab: myasthenic crisis; placebo: cardiac arrest and myocardial infarction). Results from the completed double-blind phase of Vivacity-MG3 support the role of nipocalimab, added to standard-of-care therapies, as a safe treatment for sustained disease control over 6 months for a broad population of patients with generalised myasthenia gravis who are antibody-positive. The ongoing open-label extension phase should provide longer term sustained safety and efficacy data with nipocalimab. Janssen Research & Development, LLC, a Johnson & Johnson company.

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder leading to muscle weakness and respiratory failure. Arimoclomol, a heat-shock protein-70 (HSP70) co-inducer, is neuroprotective in animal models of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, with multiple mechanisms of action, including clearance of protein aggregates, a pathological hallmark of sporadic and familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of arimoclomol in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. ORARIALS-01 was a multinational, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial done at 29 centres in 12 countries in Europe and North America. Patients were eligible if they were aged 18 years or older and met El Escorial criteria for clinically possible, probable, probable laboratory-supported, definite, or familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; had an ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised score of 35 or more; and had slow vital capacity at 70% or more of the value predicted on the basis of the participant's age, height, and sex. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) in blocks of 6, stratified by use of a stable dose of riluzole or no riluzole use, to receive oral arimoclomol citrate 1200 mg/day (400 mg three times per day) or placebo. The Randomisation sequence was computer generated centrally. Investigators, study personnel, and study participants were masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome was the Combined Assessment of Function and Survival (CAFS) rank score over 76 weeks of treatment. The primary outcome and safety were analysed in the modified intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03491462, and is completed. Between July 31, 2018, and July 17, 2019, 287 patients were screened, 245 of whom were enrolled in the trial and randomly assigned. The modified intention-to-treat population comprised 239 patients (160 in the arimoclomol group and 79 in the placebo group): 151 (63%) were male and 88 (37%) were female; mean age was 57·6 years (SD 10·9). CAFS score over 76 weeks did not differ between groups (mean 0·51 [SD 0·29] in the arimoclomol group vs 0·49 [0·28] in the placebo group; p=0·62). Cliff's delta comparing the two groups was 0·039 (95% CI –0·116 to 0·194). Proportions of participants who died were similar between the treatment groups: 29 (18%) of 160 patients in the arimoclomol group and 18 (23%) of 79 patients in the placebo group. Most deaths were due to disease progression. The most common adverse events were gastrointestinal. Adverse events were more often deemed treatment-related in the arimoclomol group (104 [65%]) than in the placebo group (41 [52%]) and more often led to treatment discontinuation in the arimoclomol group (26 [16%]) than in the placebo group (four [5%]). Arimoclomol did not improve efficacy outcomes compared with placebo. Although available biomarker data are insufficient to preclude future strategies that target the HSP response, safety data suggest that a higher dose of arimoclomol would not have been tolerated. Orphazyme.

BackgroundIn RAISE (NCT04115293; Phase 3 study), zilucoplan, a macrocyclic peptide complement component 5 inhibitor, demonstrated rapid and clinically meaningful improvements in Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) and Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) total scores versus placebo in adults with acetylcholine receptor autoantibody-positive generalised myasthenia gravis. We evaluated the effect of zilucoplan on MG-ADL and QMG subdomain scores (ocular, bulbar, respiratory and limb/axial).MethodsPatients were randomised to zilucoplan 0.3mg/kg (n=86) or placebo (n=88) for 12 weeks. Primary endpoint: change from baseline (CFB) in MG-ADL total score at Week 12. Exploratory analyses assessed CFB in MG-ADL and QMG subdomain scores for patients with baseline score ≥1.ResultsAt Week 12, least-squares mean (LSM) (95% CI) CFB in MG-ADL total score was: zilucoplan –4.39 (–5.28, –3.50) and placebo –2.30 (–3.17, –1.43); difference –2.09 [–3.24, –0.95]; p=0.0004. LSM CFB in QMG total score was: zilucoplan –6.19 (–7.29, –5.08) and placebo –3.25 (–4.32, –2.17); difference –2.94 (–4.39, –1.49); p<0.0001. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) CFB in MG-ADL subdomain scores (zilucoplan vs placebo) were: ocular, –1.5 (1.7) vs –0.8 (1.6); bulbar, –1.9 (1.8) vs –1.1 (1.7); respiratory, –0.4 (0.6) vs –0.3 (0.7); limb/axial, −1.2 (1.5) vs –0.8 (1.4), respectively. Mean (SD) CFB in QMG subdomain scores were: ocular, −2.0 (2.1) vs −1.3 (2.2); bulbar, −1.6 (1.4) vs −1.1 (1.5); respiratory, −0.6 (0.7) vs −0.3 (0.8); limb/axial, −2.9 (2.6) vs −1.2 (2.4), respectively.ConclusionZilucoplan demonstrated improvements versus placebo across all subdomain scores in MG-ADL and QMG. Funding: UCB.

The purpose of this qualitative research case study was to analyze the impact that an integration lesson plan, used as part of the TPACK professional development model, might have on the use of technology in the instructional practices of seven classroom teachers. The study also analyzed what impact the lesson plan might have on these teachers' beliefs and perceptions about the role of technology in the classroom. A constant comparative method of data analysis was used to analyze the data and identify patterns and themes. Two research questions guided this study: 1) What impact, if any, does ongoing professional development using a TPACK supported model have on the use of technology in the instructional practices of classroom teachers? 2) What impact, if any, does ongoing professional development using a TPACK supported model have on these teachers' beliefs about the role of technology in the classroom? Data analysis of the first research question identified three broad areas of impact using the model: instructional planning process, use of assessment practices, and awareness of technological limitations. Data analysis of the second research question identified two significant categories on participants' beliefs. It was an effective way to motivate students while reaching the participants' goals. Second, participants now believed that they would include technology as a standard feature in their future classroom instruction. Results of the study found that educators who were introduced to and aided in the use of a TPACK supported model for technology integration were able to use technology more effectively.