Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background Lassa fever (LF), is a viral hemorrhagic illness endemic to West Africa and poses significant public health challenges. This study explores and identifies socioeconomic, and environmental markers contributing to transmission of LF in Lower Bambara Chiefdom, Kenema District, Eastern Sierra Leone. Methods A descriptive cross-sectional quantitative survey was used, and through stratified sampling and a systematic data collection approach, we selected 26 enumeration areas (EAs) generating 2,167 households. A structured questionnaire was administered to capture respondents’ demographics, community characteristics, and LF-related risk factors. Statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS). These included descriptive statistics to summarize the data, Chi-square tests to assess associations between categorical variables, and bivariate analyses specifically cross-tabulations and Chi-square tests to identify potential risk factors and correlations between sociodemographic/environmental variables and LF transmission. Results Less-bushy surroundings (53.9% to 73.5%); common mixed farming practice (61.5%); standpipes water source (40.5%) and waste burning practice (77.3%) are the most dominant environmental markers. Socioeconomic markers: farming (53.9%); construction materials included mud walls (72.0%) and zinc roofing (90.0%). Logging activities (36.9%) were conducted close to residential areas, with an average distance of just 14.7 m. Demographic variables sex, age, education, occupation, and relationship to the household head were statistically significant to LF transmission ( p  < 0.05). Environmental and socioeconomic markers such as farming practices, construction materials, palm-fruit storage, slashing and burning activities were significant ( p  < 0.05) LF transmission markers. Conclusion In conclusion, demographic factors and poor environmental and socioeconomic practices like inadequate waste disposal, close proximity to logging sites and unsafe farming practices were significantly associated with LF transmission. These findings highlight areas that community education and environmental sanitation should be prioritised by public health policymakers and community-based prevention programs.

Background Lassa fever (LF) presents significant public health challenges in Sierra Leone, particularly in the Lower Bambara Chiefdom. This study aims to deeply understand how knowledge and attitudes towards LF correlate with community-driven prevention and control measures. Methods A descriptive cross-sectional quantitative approach was used to conduct the research. Data from 2167 participants were collected using an Android-based survey from 1st February 2022 to 14th February 2022. Respondents' knowledge of LF causes, risk factors, transmission modes, and preventive measures were evaluated through a multiple-choice questionnaire, and attitudes toward prevention and control were measured on a 5-point Likert scale. Quantitative data were analyzed using SPSS version 26.0 and frequencies were presented in count, percentage, and table. Chi-square statistics were used to test for associations. Results Among the 2167 participants, over half were males (1184, 54.60%), farmers (1406, 64.90%), married (monogamous) (1428, 65.90%), and had never attended school (1336, 61.70%). Respondents demonstrated high knowledge levels of LF across socio-demographic groups (33% to 100%) and shared a positive attitude towards prevention and control (mean score of 26.77 on a 5–40 scale). Educational level, religious beliefs, and occupational status significantly influenced LF knowledge (p < 0.05). Specifically, illiterates had a high knowledge score of 48.24%, while those with tertiary education had the highest score at 83.33%. Additionally, a Pearson correlation analysis revealed a positive linear relationship between the degree of knowledge and positive attitude towards LF infection and mortality risk factors (r = 0.090, p = 0.02). Conclusion High LF knowledge in Lower Bambara Chiefdom positively influences prevention attitudes. Education, religion, and occupation are key factors. Tailored interventions enhance public health efforts.

Lassa fever is a critical public health issue in Sierra Leone that demands appropriate health system responses and interventions to mitigate infections and reduce mortality. A qualitative study was conducted to delve into healthcare workers' experiences with Lassa fever management and interventions across diverse healthcare settings in Sierra Leone, including the Eastern Province and Freetown's Directorate of Health Security and Emergency (DHSE). Engaging ten key informants through purposive sampling, the study employed NVivo version 10 for a detailed thematic analysis using Query and Coding to systematically identify, classify, and organize key themes regarding knowledge, diagnostics, management roles, and community impact. The findings indicate a well-informed healthcare workforce but highlight gaps in early detection, diagnostic accuracy, and procedural standardization. Concerns were raised about the potential overestimation of disease incidence due to improved diagnostics, suggesting a historical under-detection of Lassa fever. The analysis underscores the need for a multifaceted management approach, emphasizing international collaboration and culturally sensitive community engagement to effectively tackle the disease. A significant concern identified is the high mortality rate resulting from delayed referrals and communication challenges within the health system, leading to actionable recommendations for enhancing Lassa fever response strategies. The study's thematic analysis provides a nuanced understanding of the challenges and areas for improvement, emphasizing the critical role of healthcare professionals in combating Lassa fever. Combating Lassa fever in Sierra Leone demands an integrative strategy that extends beyond medical interventions to encompass educational and infrastructural enhancements. This research pays homage to the commitment of healthcare professionals, underscoring the importance of sustained support and recognition of their essential contributions to advancing Lassa fever management and interventions.

The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare resources has led to an increase in self-medication as a coping mechanism. The purpose of the study is to investigate the prevalence of self-medication, the reasons behind it, and its potential consequences during the pandemic. A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted in Moriba Town, Bo City, Southern Sierra Leone. Using a multistage systematic sampling technique, 246 adult participants were selected. Data were collected using Kobo collect electronic platform and analyzed using SPSS version 26.0. Out of the 246 adult residents who were sampled, 63 (26%) practiced self-medication. Among them, females (33 or 52%) were more prevalent than males (30 or 48%). The most dominant age groups for self-medication were 38-47 (22 or 35%) and 28-37 (18 or 29%). The major reasons for self-medication were fear of infection (189 or 77%), fear of quarantine (199 or 81%), and stigma (189 or 77%). Delays in treatment (113 or 46%) and unavailability of Covid-19 medications (92 or 37%) were also cited. However, a majority of respondents (162 or 66%) denied the influence of friends or media (168 or 68%) on their decision to self-medicate. Reasons like \"delay in receiving treatment\" and \"influence of friends\" showed significant association with self-medication (pValue <0.05). More than half of the respondents 177 (72%) did not practice self-medication before the pandemic. Adverse reactions due to self-medication included skin rashes and blisters 29 (45%) and drowsiness 24 (38%). The prevalence of unsupervised medication before and after the pandemic was minimal suggesting little impact of the pandemic. Fear and social stigma were the main drivers for self-medication. To promote safety and informed health decisions, regulatory measures, and awareness campaigns are essential to control unsupervised medication sales, improve drug labeling, and educate the public about the dangers of self-medication.

By the end of the Ebola epidemic, death reporting in Sierra Leone (SL) became more acceptable amongst local populations, with nearly all deaths being reported to the Ebola hot line alert centers. To continue the positive momentum generated by the epidemic, the Sierra Leone Ministry of Health and Sanitation (MoHS) and the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) organized and conducted the two-day Inter-agency Consultations on Improving Mortality Reporting in Sierra Leone (Consultations). In conjunction with the Consultations, participants were also offered a one-day, in-person training on the major components, characteristics, and uses of a national Civil Registration and Vital Statistics (CRVS) system. To understand processes used by governmental and non-governmental organizations in collection of death data before and during the Ebola epidemic, and to develop recommendations on improving death reporting and CRVS in Sierra Leone. The Inter-agency Consultations were conducted in person over two days in October, 2015. Real-time notes were kept by CDC staff for later abstraction and summarizing. Presenters agreed to share their materials (usually PowerPoint presentations) and approved the summaries. Challenges to implementation and suggestions for improving death reporting were drawn from the presentations and from anonymous suggestions collected at the end of each of three days of the Consultations. The Consultations attracted more than 80 participants from 28 Sierra Leone governmental, business, and other non-governmental organizations. Over the course of 18 presentations, participants presented and discussed the ways deaths were reported before and during the Ebola epidemic and ways in which the CRVS in Sierra Leone might be improved. The presentations made clear the need to improve death reporting in order to improve the health status of Sierra Leone. Many presenters and participants discussed the challenges to improvements, including lack of infrastructure and country diversity. In addition, participants generally agreed upon the need for improving the government’s understanding of the benefits of death reporting at multiple levels: from local chiefdom authorities and councils to the community and individual families. Despite the many challenges identified, all participants stressed the need for modernizing and improving death registration in Sierra Leone. The recommendations from the presentations and notes collected at the end of each day can be categorized within the following five domains: capacity building (organizational, staffing, infrastructure, policies, guidelines and tools), awareness and sensitization (including strategies to use best practices and emerging technologies), political will (governmental support and prioritization), funding (providing resources to achieve sustainability), and monitoring and evaluation (developing charts of existing death reporting pathways and identifying challenges).

Background: Lassa fever is a critical public health issue in Sierra Leone that demands appropriate health system responses and interventions to mitigate infections and reduce mortality. Methods: A qualitative study was conducted to delve into healthcare workers' experiences with Lassa fever management and interventions across diverse healthcare settings in Sierra Leone, including the Eastern Province and Freetown's Directorate of Health Security and Emergency (DHSE). Engaging ten key informants through purposive sampling, the study employed NVivo version 10 for a detailed thematic analysis using Query and Coding to systematically identify, classify, and organize key themes regarding knowledge, diagnostics, management roles, and community impact. Results: The findings indicate a well-informed healthcare workforce but highlight gaps in early detection, diagnostic accuracy, and procedural standardization. Concerns were raised about the potential overestimation of disease incidence due to improved diagnostics, suggesting a historical under-detection of Lassa fever. The analysis underscores the need for a multifaceted management approach, emphasizing international collaboration and culturally sensitive community engagement to effectively tackle the disease. A significant concern identified is the high mortality rate resulting from delayed referrals and communication challenges within the health system, leading to actionable recommendations for enhancing Lassa fever response strategies. The study's thematic analysis provides a nuanced understanding of the challenges and areas for improvement, emphasizing the critical role of healthcare professionals in combating Lassa fever. Conclusion: Combating Lassa fever in Sierra Leone demands an integrative strategy that extends beyond medical interventions to encompass educational and infrastructural enhancements. This research pays homage to the commitment of healthcare professionals, underscoring the importance of sustained support and recognition of their essential contributions to advancing Lassa fever management and interventions. Keywords: Lassa fever, Sierra Leone, healthcare professionals, health system response, community engagement, diagnostic challenges, mortality, communication strategies