Explore the vast range of titles available.

Persistent disease activity is associated with a poor prognosis in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Therefore, monitoring of patients with intent to suppress subclinical inflammation has emerged as a treatment concept. As endoscopic monitoring is invasive and resource intensive, identification of valid markers of disease activity is a priority. The objective was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of C-reactive protein (CRP), fecal calprotectin (FC), and stool lactoferrin (SL) for assessment of endoscopically defined disease activity in IBD. Databases were searched from inception to November 6, 2014 for relevant cohort and case-control studies that evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of CRP, FC, or SL and used endoscopy as a gold standard in patients with symptoms consistent with active IBD. Sensitivities and specificities were pooled to generate operating property estimates for each test using a bivariate diagnostic meta-analysis. Nineteen studies (n=2499 patients) were eligible. The pooled sensitivity and specificity estimates for CRP, FC, and SL were 0.49 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.34-0.64) and 0.92 (95% CI 0.72-0.96), 0.88 (95% CI 0.84-0.90) and 0.73 (95% CI 0.66-0.79), and 0.82 (95% CI 0.73-0.88) and 0.79 (95% CI 0.62-0.89), respectively. FC was more sensitive than CRP in both diseases and was more sensitive in ulcerative colitis than Crohn's disease. Although CRP, FC, and SL are useful biomarkers, their value in managing individual patients must be considered in specific clinical contexts.

Risankizumab, an interleukin (IL)-23 p19 inhibitor, was evaluated for safety and efficacy as induction therapy in patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease. ADVANCE and MOTIVATE were randomised, double-masked, placebo-controlled, phase 3 induction studies. Eligible patients aged 16–80 years with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease, previously showing intolerance or inadequate response to one or more approved biologics or conventional therapy (ADVANCE) or to biologics (MOTIVATE), were randomly assigned to receive a single dose of intravenous risankizumab (600 mg or 1200 mg) or placebo (2:2:1 in ADVANCE, 1:1:1 in MOTIVATE) at weeks 0, 4, and 8. We used interactive response technology for random assignment, with stratification by number of previous failed biologics, corticosteroid use at baseline, and Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's disease (SES-CD). All patients and study personnel (excluding pharmacists who prepared intravenous solutions) were masked to treatment allocation throughout the study. Coprimary endpoints were clinical remission (defined by Crohn's disease activity index [CDAI] or patient-reported outcome criteria [average daily stool frequency and abdominal pain score]) and endoscopic response at week 12. The intention-to-treat population (all eligible patients who received at least one dose of study drug in the 12-week induction period) was analysed for efficacy outcomes. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. Both trials were registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03105128 (ADVANCE) and NCT03104413 (MOTIVATE), and are now complete. Participants were enrolled between May 10, 2017, and Aug 24, 2020 (ADVANCE trial), and Dec 18, 2017 and Sept 9, 2020 (MOTIVATE trial). In ADVANCE, 931 patients were assigned to either risankizumab 600 mg (n=373), risankizumab 1200 mg (n=372), or placebo (n=186). In MOTIVATE, 618 patients were assigned to risankizumab 600 mg (n=206), risankizumab 1200 mg (n=205), or placebo (n=207). The primary analysis population comprised 850 participants in ADVANCE and 569 participants in MOTIVATE. All coprimary endpoints at week 12 were met in both trials with both doses of risankizumab (p values ≤0·0001). In ADVANCE, CDAI clinical remission rate was 45% (adjusted difference 21%, 95% CI 12–29; 152/336) with risankizumab 600 mg and 42% (17%, 8–25; 141/339) with risankizumab 1200 mg versus 25% (43/175) with placebo; stool frequency and abdominal pain score clinical remission rate was 43% (22%, 14–30; 146/336) with risankizumab 600 mg and 41% (19%, 11–27; 139/339) with risankizumab 1200 mg versus 22% (38/175) with placebo; and endoscopic response rate was 40% (28%, 21–35; 135/336) with risankizumab 600 mg and 32% (20%, 14–27; 109/339) with risankizumab 1200 mg versus 12% (21/175) with placebo. In MOTIVATE, CDAI clinical remission rate was 42% (22%, 13–31; 80/191) with risankizumab 600 mg and 40% (21%, 12–29; 77/191) with risankizumab 1200 mg versus 20% (37/187) with placebo; stool frequency and abdominal pain score clinical remission rate was 35% (15%, 6–24; 66/191) with risankizumab 600 mg and 40% (20%, 12–29; 76/191) with risankizumab 1200 mg versus 19% (36/187) with placebo; and endoscopic response rate was 29% (18%, 10–25; 55/191) with risankizumab 600 mg and 34% (23%, 15–31; 65/191) with risankizumab 1200 mg versus 11% (21/187) with placebo. The overall incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar among the treatment groups in both trials. Three deaths occurred during induction (two in the placebo group [ADVANCE] and one in the risankizumab 1200 mg group [MOTIVATE]). The death in the risankizumab-treated patient was deemed unrelated to the study drug. Risankizumab was effective and well tolerated as induction therapy in patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease. AbbVie.

In a phase 3 trial, patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis were randomly assigned to receive placebo or ozanimod, a selective sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulator. Clinical remission was significantly greater with ozanimod during the induction and maintenance periods. The incidence of infection was higher with ozanimod than with placebo during maintenance.

Patients with Crohn’s disease commonly develop ileal and less commonly colonic strictures, containing various degrees of inflammation and fibrosis. While predominantly inflammatory strictures may benefit from a medical anti-inflammatory treatment, predominantly fibrotic strictures currently require endoscopic balloon dilation or surgery. Therefore, differentiation of the main components of a stricturing lesion is key for defining the therapeutic management. The role of endoscopy to diagnose the nature of strictures is limited by the superficial inspection of the intestinal mucosa, the lack of depth of mucosal biopsies and by the risk of sampling error due to a heterogeneous distribution of inflammation and fibrosis within a stricturing lesion. These limitations may be in part overcome by cross-sectional imaging techniques such as ultrasound, CT and MRI, allowing for a full thickness evaluation of the bowel wall and associated abnormalities. This systematic literature review provides a comprehensive summary of currently used radiologic definitions of strictures. It discusses, by assessing only manuscripts with histopathology as a gold standard, the accuracy for diagnosis of the respective modalities as well as their capability to characterise strictures in terms of inflammation and fibrosis. Definitions for strictures on cross-sectional imaging are heterogeneous; however, accuracy for stricture diagnosis is very high. Although conventional cross-sectional imaging techniques have been reported to distinguish inflammation from fibrosis and grade their severity, they are not sufficiently accurate for use in routine clinical practice. Finally, we present recent consensus recommendations and highlight experimental techniques that may overcome the limitations of current technologies.

In this 52-week randomized trial, the α 4 β 7 integrin antibody vedolizumab was effective in treating ulcerative colitis. There were not significantly more adverse events with vedolizumab than with placebo, but the trial was not large or long enough to fully assess safety. Ulcerative colitis is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease characterized by symptoms of bloody diarrhea, abdominal cramps, and fatigue. 1 Current medical therapy has important limitations. Aminosalicylates 2 – 4 are only modestly effective; glucocorticoids can cause unacceptable adverse events and do not provide a benefit as maintenance therapy. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists, although efficacious, 5 , 6 predispose patients to serious infection. 7 Thus, new treatment strategies are needed. The migration of leukocytes into inflamed intestinal tissue is highly regulated by specific molecular mechanisms. The α 4 β 7 integrin, 8 a cell-surface glycoprotein variably expressed on circulating B and T lymphocytes, interacts with mucosal addressin-cell . . .

In three phase 3 trials involving patients with ulcerative colitis, tofacitinib (an oral, small-molecule Janus kinase inhibitor) was more effective as induction and maintenance therapy than placebo. Infections were more common with tofacitinib. Ulcerative colitis is characterized by an increased frequency of bowel movements and bloody diarrhea, which has a negative effect on quality of life. 1 Current therapies for ulcerative colitis include mesalamine, glucocorticoids, thiopurines, and antagonists to tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and α4β7 integrin. 1 – 5 Many patients do not have a response to these therapies or have a response that is not sustained. Additional treatment options with new mechanisms of action are needed to increase efficacy rates. The Janus kinase (JAK) family comprises four intracellular tyrosine kinases — JAK1, JAK2, JAK3, and nonreceptor tyrosine-protein kinase 2 — that activate signal transducers and . . .

Inflammatory bowel disease, including Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, comprises multiple complex immune-mediated disorders. Early diagnosis and prompt disease control may prevent long-term complications and hospitalization. The therapeutic options have expanded in the last two decades, with the development of biologics and small molecules targeting specific pathways implicated in inflammatory bowel disease pathogenesis. The interleukin (IL)-23/Th-17 axis is one such example. Targeting IL-12/23 is effective for the treatment of both moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, and ustekinumab (an IL-12/23p40 antagonist) is approved for both indications. In patients with psoriasis, improved clinical outcomes were observed with agents that more selectively targeted IL-23 (IL-23p19 antagonists) compared with those that target both IL-12 and IL-23. Many specific IL-23p19 antagonists are currently being investigated in Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, and risankizumab has been recently approved for moderate-to-severely active Crohn’s disease. In this review, we summarize the mechanisms of action and the evidence from clinical trials supporting the efficacy and safety of IL-23p19 antagonists for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease.

In this 52-week randomized trial, the α 4 β 7 integrin antibody vedolizumab was effective in treating Crohn's disease. The incidence of serious adverse events was higher with vedolizumab than with placebo. Crohn's disease is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease. 1 Current treatments include glucocorticoids, immunosuppressive agents (i.e., azathioprine, mercaptopurine, or methotrexate), and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists. 1 – 3 Many patients do not have a response to therapy, 4 and treatments are associated with important toxic effects. 5 , 6 Natalizumab, a monoclonal antibody that modulates gut and brain lymphocyte migration by antagonizing α 4 β 1 and α 4 β 7 integrin–mediated interactions, 7 is efficacious in the treatment of multiple sclerosis 8 , 9 and Crohn's disease. 10 – 12 Its use in patients with Crohn's disease has been limited by the development in some patients of progressive multifocal . . .

The inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) are chronic immune-mediated inflammatory disorders, including ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD). IBD results from a complex interplay between environmental, microbial, and genetic factors to create an abnormal immunological response leading to intestinal inflammation. Many pathways driving inflammation have been described, and different pathways may predominate in an individual patient. The interleukin (IL)-23 pathway plays a key role in IBD pathogenesis through promoting a pathological Th17 response. Targeting IL-23 is effective in the treatment of IBD. Ustekinumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the shared p40 subunit of IL-12/23, is approved for treatment of moderate-to-severe CD and UC. Specific IL-23p19 antagonists are in development and promising results from phase II trials of mirikizumab and risankizumab underscore the potential for this class of treatment. In this review, we summarize the mechanisms of action and the evidence from clinical trials supporting the efficacy and safety of different IL-23 antagonists for IBD.

Interleukin-12 (IL-12) and interleukin-23 (IL-23), which belong to the IL-12 family of cytokines, have a key role in intestinal homeostasis and inflammation and are implicated in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. Upon their secretion by antigen-presenting cells, they exert both pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory receptor-mediated effects. An increased understanding of these biological effects, particularly the pro-inflammatory effects mediated by IL-12 and IL-23, has led to the development of monoclonal antibodies that target a subunit common to IL-12 and IL-23 (p40; targeted by ustekinumab and briakinumab), or the IL-23-specific subunit (p19; targeted by risankizumab, guselkumab, brazikumab and mirikizumab). This Review provides a summary of the biology of the IL-12 family cytokines IL-12 and IL-23, discusses the role of these cytokines in intestinal homeostasis and inflammation, and highlights IL-12- and IL-23-directed drug development for the treatment of Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis.IL-12 and IL-23 have been implicated in inflammatory bowel disease. In this Review, Vande Casteele and colleagues summarize the mechanistic role of IL-12 and IL-23 in inflammatory bowel disease, and discuss the clinical development of drugs targeting IL-12 and/or IL-23.