Explore the vast range of titles available.

The introduction of diagnostic clinical genome and exome sequencing (CGES) is changing the scope of practice for clinical geneticists. Many large institutions are making a significant investment in infrastructure and technology, allowing clinicians to access CGES, especially as health-care coverage begins to extend to clinically indicated genomic sequencing-based tests. Translating and realizing the comprehensive clinical benefits of genomic medicine remain a key challenge for the current and future care of patients. With the increasing application of CGES, it is necessary for geneticists and other health-care providers to understand its benefits and limitations in order to interpret the clinical relevance of genomic variants identified in the context of health and disease. New, collaborative working relationships with specialists across diverse disciplines (e.g., clinicians, laboratorians, bioinformaticians) will undoubtedly be key attributes of the future practice of clinical genetics and may serve as an example for other specialties in medicine. These new skills and relationships will also inform the development of the future model of clinical genetics training curricula. To address the evolving role of the clinical geneticist in the rapidly changing climate of genomic medicine, two Clinical Genetics Think Tank meetings were held that brought together physicians, laboratorians, scientists, genetic counselors, trainees, and patients with experience in clinical genetics, genetic diagnostics, and genetics education. This article provides recommendations that will guide the integration of genomics into clinical practice. Genet Med18 11, 1075–1084.

Purpose: Approximately 50% of medical genetics residency positions remain unfilled each year. This study was designed to assess current recruitment strategies used by program directors, to identify factors that influenced trainees to choose medical genetics as a career, and to use these results as a foundation to develop a strategic plan to address the challenges of recruitment. Methods: Two surveys were created, one for program directors and one for current medical genetics residents, to evaluate current recruiting efforts and institutional support for programs and to identify factors that helped trainees choose genetics as a career. Results: Program directors identified the most successful recruiting methods as “direct contact with residents or medical students” and “word of mouth” (80%). Residents listed having a mentor (50%), previous research in genetics (35%), and genetics coursework (33%) as the top reasons that influenced them to enter the field. Conclusion: Geneticists should become more proactive in providing resources to students to help them understand a career as a medical geneticist and mentor those students/residents who show true interest in the field. Results of these surveys spurred the development of the Task Force on Medical Genetics Education and Training of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Genet Med 16 5, 413–418.

To assess the utilization of genetics on the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE®). A team of clinical genetics educators performed an analysis of the representation of genetics content on a robust sample of recent Step 1, Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK), and Step 3 examination forms. The content of each question was mapped to curriculum recommendations from the peer reviewed Association of Professors of Human and Medical Genetics white paper, Medical School Core Curriculum in Genetics, and the USMLE Content Outline. The committee identified 13.4%, 10.4%, and 4.4% of Steps 1, 2 and 3 respectively, as having genetics content. The genetics content of the exams became less pertinent to the questions from Step 1 to 3, with decreasing genetics content by exam and increasing percentages of questions identified as having genetics content in the distractors only. The current distribution of genetics in USMLE licensing examinations reflects traditional curricular approaches with genetics as a basic science course in the early years of medical school and de-emphasizes clinical relevance of the field. These observations support the notion that further integration is required to move genetics into the clinical curriculum of medical schools and the clinical content of USMLE Step exams.

Purpose: Biotinidase deficiency, if untreated, usually results in neurological and cutaneous symptoms. Biotin supplementation markedly improves and likely prevents symptoms in those treated early. All states in the United States and many countries perform newborn screening for biotinidase deficiency. However, there are few studies about the outcomes of the individuals identified by newborn screening. Methods: We report the outcomes of 142 children with biotinidase deficiency identified by newborn screening in Michigan over a 25-year period and followed in our clinic; 22 had profound deficiency and 120 had partial deficiency. Results: Individuals with profound biotinidase and partial deficiency identified by newborn screening were started on biotin therapy soon after birth. With good compliance, these children appeared to have normal physical and cognitive development. Although some children exhibited mild clinical problems, these are unlikely attributable to the disorder. Biotin therapy appears to prevent the development of neurological and cutaneous problems in our population. Conclusion: Individuals with biotinidase deficiency ascertained by newborn screening and treated since birth appeared to exhibit normal physical and cognitive development. If an individual does develop symptoms, after compliance and dosage issues are excluded, then other causes must be considered. Genet Med 17 3, 205–209.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine analytic performance of laboratories offering molecular testing for conditions such as Tay–Sachs disease, Canavan disease, and familial dysautonomia, which are prevalent in the Ashkenazi Jewish population. Methods: The College of American Pathologists and the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics cosponsor molecular proficiency testing for these disorders. Responses from 2006 to 2013 were analyzed for accuracy (genotyping and interpretations). Results: Between 11 and 36 laboratories participated in each Tay–Sachs disease distribution. Samples tested per month were constant (2,900) from 2006 to 2011 but recently increased. Participants reporting <10 samples tested per month had longer turnaround times (42 vs. 7%, longer than 14 days; P = 0.03). Analytic sensitivity and specificity for US participants were 97.2% (95% confidence interval: 94.7–98.7%) and 99.8% (95% confidence interval: 99.1–99.9%), respectively. Of 11 genotyping errors, 2 were due to sample mix-up. Analytic interpretations were correct in 99.3% of challenges (956/963; 95% confidence interval: 98.5–99.7%). Better performance was found for Canavan disease and familial dysautonomia. International laboratories performed equally well. Conclusion: These results demonstrated high analytic sensitivity and specificity along with excellent analytic interpretation performance, confirming the genetics community impression that laboratories provide accurate test results in both diagnostic and screening settings. Proficiency testing can identify potential laboratory issues and helps document overall laboratory performance. Genet Med 16 9, 695–702.

Purpose: Thousands of genetic tests are now offered clinically, but many are for rare disorders that are offered by only a few laboratories. The classic approach to disease-specific external proficiency testing programs is not feasible for such testing, yet calls have been made to provide external oversight. Methods: A methods-based Sequencing Educational Challenge Survey was launched in 2010, under joint administration of the College of American Pathologists and the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Three sets of Sanger ABI sequence data were distributed twice per year. Participants were asked to identify, formally name, and interpret the sequence variant(s). Results: Between 2010 and 2012, 117 laboratories participated. Using a proposed assessment scheme (e.g., at least 10 of 12 components correct), 98.3% of the 67 US participants had acceptable performance (235 of 239 challenges; 95% confidence interval: 95.8–99.5%) as compared with 88.9% (136 of 153; 95% confidence interval: 82.8–93.4%) for the 50 international participants. Conclusion: These data provide a high level of confidence that most US laboratories offering rare disease testing are providing consistent and reliable clinical interpretations. Methods-based proficiency testing programs may be one part of the solution to assessing genetic testing based on next-generation sequencing technology. Genet Med 16 1, 25–32.

Background Elevated plasma and urine formiminoglutamic acid (FIGLU) levels are commonly indicative of formiminoglutamic aciduria (OMIM #229100), a poorly understood autosomal recessive disorder of histidine and folate metabolism, resulting from formiminotransferase‐cyclodeaminase (FTCD) deficiency, a bifunctional enzyme encoded by FTCD. Methods In order to further understanding about the molecular alterations that contribute to FIGLU‐uria, we sequenced FTCD in 20 individuals with putative FTCD deficiency and varying laboratory findings, including increased FIGLU excretion. Results Individuals tested had biallelic loss‐of‐function variants in protein‐coding regions of FTCD. The FTCD allelic spectrum comprised of 12 distinct variants including 5 missense alterations that replace conserved amino acid residues (c.223A>C, c.266A>G, c.319T>C, c.430G>A, c.514G>T), an in‐frame deletion (c.1373_1375delTGG), with the remaining alterations predicted to affect mRNA processing/stability. These included two frameshift variants (c.990dup, c.1366dup) and four nonsense variants (c.337C>T, c.451A>T, c.763C>T, c.1607T>A). Conclusion We observed additional FTCD alleles leading to urinary FIGLU elevations, and thus, providing molecular evidence of FTCD deficiency in cases identified by newborn screening or clinical biochemical genetic laboratory testing. Our study of 20 individuals with formiminoglutamic aciduria identified new variants in the FTCD gene that contributed to this genetic condition. This study expands the number of FTCD variants that leads to increased excretion of formiminoglutamic aciduria.

Context.—The number of clinical laboratories introducing various molecular tests to their existing test menu is continuously increasing. Prior to offering a US Food and Drug Administration–approved test, it is necessary that performance characteristics of the test, as claimed by the company, are verified before the assay is implemented in a clinical laboratory. Objective.—To provide an example of the verification of a specific qualitative in vitro diagnostic test: cystic fibrosis carrier testing using the Luminex liquid bead array (Luminex Molecular Diagnostics, Inc, Toronto, Ontario). Design.—The approach used by an individual laboratory for verification of a US Food and Drug Administration–approved assay is described. Results.—Specific verification data are provided to highlight the stepwise verification approach undertaken by a clinical diagnostic laboratory. Conclusions.—Protocols for verification of in vitro diagnostic assays may vary between laboratories. However, all laboratories must verify several specific performance specifications prior to implementation of such assays for clinical use. We provide an example of an approach used for verifying performance of an assay for cystic fibrosis carrier screening.