Explore the vast range of titles available.

Antitumor therapies have made great strides in recent decades. Chemotherapy, aggressive and unable to discriminate cancer from healthy cells, has given way to personalized treatments that, recognizing and blocking specific molecular targets, have paved the way for targeted and effective therapies. Melanoma was one of the first tumor types to benefit from this new care frontier by introducing specific inhibitors for v-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B (BRAF), mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK), v-kit Hardy–Zuckerman 4 feline sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KIT), and, recently, immunotherapy. However, despite the progress made in the melanoma treatment, primary and/or acquired drug resistance remains an unresolved problem. The molecular dynamics that promote this phenomenon are very complex but several studies have shown that the tumor microenvironment (TME) plays, certainly, a key role. In this review, we will describe the new melanoma treatment approaches and we will analyze the mechanisms by which TME promotes resistance to targeted therapy and immunotherapy.

Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common type of cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, with a survival rate near to 10% when diagnosed at an advanced stage. Hence, the identification of new molecular targets to design more selective and efficient therapies is urgently required. The Mitogen activated protein kinase kinase 3 (MKK3) is a dual-specificity threonine/tyrosine protein kinase that, activated in response to cellular stress and inflammatory stimuli, regulates a plethora of biological processes. Previous studies revealed novel MKK3 roles in supporting tumor malignancy, as its depletion induces autophagy and cell death in cancer lines of different tumor types, including CRC. Therefore, MKK3 may represent an interesting new therapeutic target in advanced CRC, however selective MKK3 inhibitors are currently not available. Methods The study involved transcriptomic based drug repurposing approach and confirmatory assays with CRC lines, primary colonocytes and a subset of CRC patient-derived organoids (PDO). Investigations in vitro and in vivo were addressed . Results The repurposing approach identified the multitargeted kinase inhibitor AT9283 as a putative compound with MKK3 depletion-mimicking activities. Indeed, AT9283 drops phospho- and total-MKK3 protein levels in tested CRC models. Likely the MKK3 silencing, AT9283 treatment: i ) inhibited cell proliferation promoting autophagy and cell death in tested CRC lines and PDOs; ii ) resulted well-tolerated by CCD-18Co colonocytes; iii) reduced cancer cell motility inhibiting CRC cell migration and invasion; iv) inhibited COLO205 xenograft tumor growth. Mechanistically, AT9283 abrogated MKK3 protein levels mainly through the inhibition of aurora kinase A (AURKA), impacting on MKK3/AURKA protein–protein interaction and protein stability therefore uncovering the relevance of MKK3/AURKA crosstalk in sustaining CRC malignancy in vitro and in vivo. Conclusion Overall, we demonstrated that the anti-tumoral effects triggered by AT9283 treatment recapitulated the MKK3 depletion effects in all tested CRC models in vitro and in vivo, suggesting that AT9283 is a repurposed drug. According to its good tolerance when tested with primary colonocytes (CCD-18CO), AT9283 is a promising drug for the development of novel therapeutic strategies to target MKK3 oncogenic functions in late-stage and metastatic CRC patients.

Background During targeted treatment, HER2-positive breast cancers invariably lose HER2 DNA amplification. In contrast, and interestingly, HER2 proteins may be either lost or gained. To longitudinally and systematically appreciate complex/discordant changes in HER2 DNA/protein stoichiometry, HER2 DNA copy numbers and soluble blood proteins (aHER2/sHER2) were tested in parallel, non-invasively (by liquid biopsy), and in two-dimensions, hence HER2-2D. Methods aHER2 and sHER2 were assessed by digital PCR and ELISA before and after standard-of-care treatment of advanced HER2-positive breast cancer patients ( n =37) with the antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) Trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1). Results As expected, aHER2 was invariably suppressed by T-DM1, but this loss was surprisingly mirrored by sHER2 gain, sometimes of considerable entity, in most (30/37; 81%) patients. This unorthodox split in HER2 oncogenic dosage was supported by reciprocal aHER2/sHER2 kinetics in two representative cases, and an immunohistochemistry-high status despite copy-number-neutrality in 4/5 available post-T-DM1 tumor re-biopsies from sHER2-gain patients. Moreover, sHER2 was preferentially released by dying breast cancer cell lines treated in vitro by T-DM1. Finally, sHER2 gain was associated with a longer PFS than sHER2 loss (mean PFS 282 vs 133 days, 95% CI [210-354] vs [56-209], log-rank test p =0.047), particularly when cases ( n =11) developing circulating HER2-bypass alterations during T-DM1 treatment were excluded (mean PFS 349 vs 139 days, 95% CI [255-444] vs [45-232], log-rank test p =0.009). Conclusions HER2 gain is adaptively selected in tumor tissues and recapitulated in blood by sHER2 gain. Possibly, an increased oncogenic dosage is beneficial to the tumor during anti-HER2 treatment with naked antibodies, but favorable to the host during treatment with a strongly cytotoxic ADC such as T-DM1. In the latter case, HER2-gain tumors may be kept transiently in check until alternative oncogenic drivers, revealed by liquid biopsy, bypass HER2. Whichever the interpretation, HER2-2D might help to tailor/prioritize anti-HER2 treatments, particularly ADCs active on aHER2-low/sHER2-low tumors. Trial registration NCT05735392 retrospectively registered on January 31, 2023 https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/search?term=NCT05735392

Background Pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) is an established prognostic marker in breast cancer (BC). Multimodal deep learning (DL), integrating diverse data sources (radiology, pathology, omics, clinical), holds promise for improving pCR prediction accuracy. This systematic review synthesizes evidence on multimodal DL for pCR prediction and compares its performance against unimodal DL. Methods Following PRISMA, we searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science (January 2015–April 2025) for studies applying DL to predict pCR in BC patients receiving NAST, using data from radiology, digital pathology (DP), multi-omics, and/or clinical records, and reporting AUC. Data on study design, DL architectures, and performance (AUC) were extracted. A narrative synthesis was conducted due to heterogeneity. Results Fifty-one studies, mostly retrospective (90.2%, median cohort 281), were included. Magnetic resonance imaging and DP were common primary modalities. Multimodal approaches were used in 52.9% of studies, often combining imaging with clinical data. Convolutional neural networks were the dominant architecture (88.2%). Longitudinal imaging improved prediction over baseline-only (median AUC 0.91 vs. 0.82). Overall, the median AUC across studies was 0.88, with 35.3% achieving AUC ≥ 0.90. Multimodal models showed a modest but consistent improvement over unimodal approaches (median AUC 0.88 vs. 0.83). Omics and clinical text were rarely primary DL inputs. Conclusion DL models demonstrate promising accuracy for pCR prediction, especially when integrating multiple modalities and longitudinal imaging. However, significant methodological heterogeneity, reliance on retrospective data, and limited external validation hinder clinical translation. Future research should prioritize prospective validation, integration underutilized data (multi-omics, clinical), and explainable AI to advance DL predictors to the clinical setting.

Tumor dissemination to the central nervous system (CNS) is almost a rule in the treatment journey of advanced HER2+ breast cancer (BC). Recent results demonstrated high intracranial efficacy with Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd). However, a real-world evidence is lacking in literature. We conducted a multicenter, observational, retrospective real-world analysis on 39 cases collected at 12 Italian Oncological Units. Patients with brain metastases (BMs) from HER2 + BC treated with T-DXd in various treatment lines were enrolled. Primary endpoint was the intracranial overall response rate (iORR). Secondary endpoints were intra- and global progression free survival (iPFS - gPFS); other secondary objectives were the intracranial disease control rate (iDCR), duration of response (iDoR), clinical benefit rate at 6 and 12 months (iCBr), overall survival, and safety. iORR was 59%, iPFS was 15.6 months, gPFS was 11.8 months. iDCR was 94.9%, iDoR was 11.9 months, and iCBr at 6 and 12 months were 69.2% and 59%, respectively. OS was not reached, with an overall rate of 77.9% of patients alive at 12 months. This study confirmed the high intracranial efficacy and manageable safety profile of T-DXd in this first-ever real world analysis.

Inflammation might substantially contribute to the limited therapeutic success of current systemic therapies in colorectal cancer (CRC). Amongst cytokines involved in CRC biology, the proinflammatory chemokine IL-8 has recently emerged as a potential prognostic/predictive biomarker. Here, we show that BRAF mutations and PTEN-loss are associated with high IL-8 levels in CRC models in vitro and that BRAF/MEK/ERK, but not PI3K/mTOR, targeting controls its production in different genetic contexts. In particular, we identified a BRAF/ERK2/CHOP axis affecting IL-8 transcription, through regulation of CHOP subcellular localization, and response to targeted inhibitors. Moreover, RNA Pol II and an open chromatin status in the CHOP-binding region of the IL-8 gene promoter cooperate towards increased IL-8 expression, after a selective BRAF inhibition. Overall, our data show that IL-8 production is finely and differentially regulated depending on the tumor genetic context and might be targeted for therapeutic purposes in molecularly defined subgroups of CRC patients. Conciatori et al find that BRAF mutations and PTEN-loss promote IL-8 production in colorectal cancer cell (CRC) lines and identify a genetic-context-dependent BRAF/ERK2/CHOP molecular axis that controls IL-8 transcription. These data may assist in the identification of drugs to target CRC.

The threatening notoriety of pancreatic cancer mainly arises from its negligible early diagnosis, highly aggressive progression, failure of conventional therapeutic options and consequent very poor prognosis. The most important driver genes of pancreatic cancer are the oncogene KRAS and the tumor suppressors TP53, CDKN2A, and SMAD4. Although the presence of few drivers, several signaling pathways are involved in the oncogenesis of this cancer type, some of them with promising targets for precision oncology. Pancreatic cancer is recognized as one of immunosuppressive phenotype cancer: it is characterized by a fibrotic-desmoplastic stroma, in which there is an intensive cross-talk between several cellular (e.g., fibroblasts, myeloid cells, lymphocytes, endothelial, and myeloid cells) and acellular (collagen, fibronectin, and soluble factors) components. In this review; we aim to describe the current knowledge of the genetic/biological landscape of pancreatic cancer and the composition of its tumor microenvironment; in order to better direct in the intrinsic labyrinth of this complex tumor type. Indeed; disentangling the genetic and molecular characteristics of cancer cells and the environment in which they evolve may represent the crucial step towards more effective therapeutic strategies

There is a deep need to improve the care of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients, since even today it remains an incurable disease. Taxanes are considered the most effective cytotoxic drugs for the treatment of MBC, both in monotherapy and in combined schedules, but the need for synthetic solvents contributes to the severe toxicities and may have a negative impact on the efficacy. Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (Nab-paclitaxel) is a colloidal suspension of paclitaxel and human serum albumin initially developed to avoid the toxicities associated with conventional taxanes. The aim of this prospective, single-center open-label, noncomparative study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel in MBC patients pretreated with taxanes. The patients were treated with nab-paclitaxel as a single agent, 260 mg/m(2) on day 1 of each 3-week cycle or 125 mg/m(2) weekly. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR). Secondary objectives were duration of response, clinical benefit rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and safety. A total of 42 patients (median age 48 years, median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0, triple-negative MBC 19%, all pretreated with a taxane-based therapy, mainly in advanced disease) were enrolled in the study. The ORR was 23.8%, including one complete response (2.4%) and nine partial responses (21.4%); the disease control rate was 50%. The median duration of response was 7.2 months. After a median follow-up of 9 months, the median PFS was 4.6 months. ORR and PFS were similar irrespective of the previous chemotherapy lines, metastatic sites, and biomolecular expression. Nab-paclitaxel was well tolerated, and the most frequent treatment-related toxicities were mild to moderate (grades 1-2). This real-life study shows that nab-paclitaxel has a significant antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile in patients pretreated with taxanes and experiencing a treatment failure after at least one line of chemotherapy.

Background Data on efficacy of bevacizumab (B) beyond first-line taxane -including regimen (BT) as first-line treatment are lacking. Although preclinical results that anti-angiogenic agents combined with hormonal therapy (HT) could be active, no clinical data exist about combination of maintenance Bevacizumab (mBev) with HT. Methods Thirty-five patients who experienced a response after first-line BT, were given mBev at the dose of 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks. Among 30 pts with hormonal receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC), 20 (66.6%) received HT with mBev (mHTBev). Objective of the study was the outcome and safety of mBev and in two groups of patients receiving HT or not. Results Complete response and partial response was achieved/maintained in 4 (11.4%) and 13 (37.1%) patients, respectively (overall response rate: 48.5%). Clinical benefit was obtained on 23 patients (65.7%). Median of mBev PFS and clinical benefit were 6.8 months (95% CI: 0.8-12.7) and 17.1 months (95% CI :12.2-21.9), respectively. Median PFS of patients who received mHTBev was longer than mBev without HT (13 months and 4.1 months, respectively, p = 0.05). The most common severe toxicities were proteinuria (11.4%) and hypertension (8.5%). No additional toxicity was observed with HTBev. Conclusion Maintenance bevacizumab with or without anti-hormonal therapy in patients with hormone receptor positive breast cancer is tolerable and associated with long-term clinical outcome; these results encourage the strategy of prolonging bevacizumab until progression in combination with anti-hormonal agents.

Background Although the addition of bevacizumab significantly improves the efficacy of chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer, regulatory concerns still exist with regard to the magnitude of the benefits and the overall safety profile. Methods A literature-based meta-analysis to quantify the magnitude of benefit and safety of adding bevacizumab to chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer patients was conducted. Meta-regression and sensitivity analyses were also performed to identify additional predictors of outcome and to assess the influence of trial design. Results Five trials (3,841 patients) were gathered. A significant interaction according to treatment line was found for progression-free survival (PFS, p = 0.027); PFS was significantly improved for 1 st line (Hazard Ratio, HR 0.68, p < 0.0001), with a 1-yr absolute difference (AD) of 8.4% (number needed to treat, NNT 12). A non-significant trend was found in overall survival (OS), and in PFS for 2 nd line. Responses were improved with the addition of bevacizumab, without interaction between 1 st line (Relative Risk, RR 1.46, p < 0.0001) and 2 nd line (RR 1.58, p = 0.05). The most important toxicity was hypertension, accounting for a significant AD of 4.5% against bevacizumab (number needed to harm, NNH 22). Other significant, although less clinically meaningful, adverse events were proteinuria, neurotoxicity, febrile neutropenia, and bleeding. At the meta-regression analysis for 1 st -line, more than 3 metastatic sites (p = 0.032), no adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.00013), negative hormonal receptor status (p = 0.009), and prior anthracyclines-exposure (p = 0.019), did significantly affect PFS. Conclusions Although with heterogeneity, the addition of bevacizumab to 1 st -line chemotherapy significantly improves PFS, and overall activity. Hypertension should be weighted with the overall benefit on the individual basis.