Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
6 result(s) for "Floris, Leda"
Sort by:
Resolved versus confirmed ARDS after 24 h: insights from the LUNG SAFE study
PurposeTo evaluate patients with resolved versus confirmed ARDS, identify subgroups with substantial mortality risk, and to determine the utility of day 2 ARDS reclassification.MethodsOur primary objective, in this secondary LUNG SAFE analysis, was to compare outcome in patients with resolved versus confirmed ARDS after 24 h. Secondary objectives included identifying factors associated with ARDS persistence and mortality, and the utility of day 2 ARDS reclassification.ResultsOf 2377 patients fulfilling the ARDS definition on the first day of ARDS (day 1) and receiving invasive mechanical ventilation, 503 (24%) no longer fulfilled the ARDS definition the next day, 52% of whom initially had moderate or severe ARDS. Higher tidal volume on day 1 of ARDS was associated with confirmed ARDS [OR 1.07 (CI 1.01–1.13), P = 0.035]. Hospital mortality was 38% overall, ranging from 31% in resolved ARDS to 41% in confirmed ARDS, and 57% in confirmed severe ARDS at day 2. In both resolved and confirmed ARDS, age, non-respiratory SOFA score, lower PEEP and P/F ratio, higher peak pressure and respiratory rate were each associated with mortality. In confirmed ARDS, pH and the presence of immunosuppression or neoplasm were also associated with mortality. The increase in area under the receiver operating curve for ARDS reclassification on day 2 was marginal.ConclusionsARDS, whether resolved or confirmed at day 2, has a high mortality rate. ARDS reclassification at day 2 has limited predictive value for mortality. The substantial mortality risk in severe confirmed ARDS suggests that complex interventions might best be tested in this population.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02010073.
Initial setting of high-flow nasal oxygen post extubation based on mean inspiratory flow during a spontaneous breathing trial
High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is commonly used post-extubation in intensive care (ICU). Patients' comfort during HFNC is affected by flow rate. The study aims to describe the relationship between pre-extubation inspiratory flow requirements and the post-extubation flow rates on HFNC that maximises patient's comfort. This was an observational, retrospective study conducted in a university-affiliated ICU. We included patients extubated following successful spontaneous breathing trial (SBT). During the SBT we recorded variables including inspiratory flow. Patients who passed the SBT were extubated onto HFNC. HFNC was titrated from 20 L/min and increased in steps of 10 L/min, up to 60 L/min. At each step, patient's level of comfort was assessed. Fraction of inspired oxygen was titrated to maintain oxygen saturation 92–97%. Nineteen participants were enrolled in the study. There was a significant positive correlation between mean inspiratory flow pre-extubation and the flow setting on HFNC which achieved the best comfort post-extubation (r2 0.88; p < 0.001). Overall, greatest comfort was observed for HFNC flows between 30 and 40 L/min but with individual variability. Measuring mean inspiratory flow during an SBT allows for individualised setting of HFNC flow rate immediately post-extubation and achieves the greatest comfort and interface tolerance. •Patients' comfort during HFNC therapy is affected by flow rate.•Setting initial HFNC rate based on mean inspiratory flow pre-extubation provides best comfort for post-extubation HFNC.•Greatest comfort was observed for HFNC flows between 30 and 40 L/min.•Flow requirements varied during the day by up to 20 L/min.
Death in hospital following ICU discharge: insights from the LUNG SAFE study
Background To determine the frequency of, and factors associated with, death in hospital following ICU discharge to the ward. Methods The Large observational study to UNderstand the Global impact of Severe Acute respiratory FailurE study was an international, multicenter, prospective cohort study of patients with severe respiratory failure, conducted across 459 ICUs from 50 countries globally. This study aimed to understand the frequency and factors associated with death in hospital in patients who survived their ICU stay. We examined outcomes in the subpopulation discharged with no limitations of life sustaining treatments (‘treatment limitations’), and the subpopulations with treatment limitations. Results 2186 (94%) patients with no treatment limitations discharged from ICU survived, while 142 (6%) died in hospital. 118 (61%) of patients with treatment limitations survived while 77 (39%) patients died in hospital. Patients without treatment limitations that died in hospital after ICU discharge were older, more likely to have COPD, immunocompromise or chronic renal failure, less likely to have trauma as a risk factor for ARDS. Patients that died post ICU discharge were less likely to receive neuromuscular blockade, or to receive any adjunctive measure, and had a higher pre- ICU discharge non-pulmonary SOFA score. A similar pattern was seen in patients with treatment limitations that died in hospital following ICU discharge. Conclusions A significant proportion of patients die in hospital following discharge from ICU, with higher mortality in patients with limitations of life-sustaining treatments in place. Non-survivors had higher systemic illness severity scores at ICU discharge than survivors. Trial Registration : ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02010073 .
Mechanical ventilation in patients with cardiogenic pulmonary edema: a sub-analysis of the LUNG SAFE study
Background Patients with acute respiratory failure caused by cardiogenic pulmonary edema (CPE) may require mechanical ventilation that can cause further lung damage. Our aim was to determine the impact of ventilatory settings on CPE mortality. Methods Patients from the LUNG SAFE cohort, a multicenter prospective cohort study of patients undergoing mechanical ventilation, were studied. Relationships between ventilatory parameters and outcomes (ICU discharge/hospital mortality) were assessed using latent mixture analysis and a marginal structural model. Results From 4499 patients, 391 meeting CPE criteria (median age 70 [interquartile range 59–78], 40% female) were included. ICU and hospital mortality were 34% and 40%, respectively. ICU survivors were younger (67 [57–77] vs 74 [64–80] years, p  < 0.001) and had lower driving (12 [8–16] vs 15 [11–17] cmH 2 O, p  < 0.001), plateau (20 [15–23] vs 22 [19–26] cmH 2 O, p  < 0.001) and peak (21 [17–27] vs 26 [20–32] cmH 2 O, p  < 0.001) pressures. Latent mixture analysis of patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation on ICU day 1 revealed a subgroup ventilated with high pressures with lower probability of being discharged alive from the ICU (hazard ratio [HR] 0.79 [95% confidence interval 0.60–1.05], p  = 0.103) and increased hospital mortality (HR 1.65 [1.16–2.36], p  = 0.005). In a marginal structural model, driving pressures in the first week (HR 1.12 [1.06–1.18], p  < 0.001) and tidal volume after day 7 (HR 0.69 [0.52–0.93], p  = 0.015) were related to survival. Conclusions Higher airway pressures in invasively ventilated patients with CPE are related to mortality. These patients may be exposed to an increased risk of ventilator-induced lung injury. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02010073