Explore the vast range of titles available.

We present the first detailed 2D seismic tomographic image of the trench‐outer rise, fore‐ and back‐arc of the Tonga subduction zone. The study area is located approximately 100 km north of the collision between the Louisville hot spot track and the overriding Indo‐Australian plate where ∼80 Ma old oceanic Pacific plate subducts at the Tonga Trench. In the outer rise region, the upper oceanic plate is pervasively fractured and most likely hydrated as demonstrated by extensional bending‐related faults, anomalously large horst and graben structures, and a reduction of both crustal and mantle velocities. The 2D velocity model presented shows uppermost mantle velocities of ∼7.3 km/s, ∼10% lower than typical for mantle peridotite (∼30% mantle serpentinization). In the model, Tonga arc crust ranges between 7 and 20 km in thickness, and velocities are typical of arc‐type igneous basement with uppermost and lowermost crustal velocities of ∼3.5 and ∼7.1 km/s, respectively. Beneath the inner trench slope, however, the presence of a low velocity zone (4.0–5.5 km/s) suggests that the outer fore‐arc is probably fluid‐saturated, metamorphosed and disaggregated by fracturing as a consequence of frontal and basal erosion. Tectonic erosion has, most likely, been accelerated by the subduction of the Louisville Ridge, causing crustal thinning and subsidence of the outer fore‐arc. Extension in the outer fore‐arc is evidenced by (1) trenchward‐dipping normal faults and (2) the presence of a giant scarp (∼2 km offset and several hundred kilometers long) indicating gravitational collapse of the outermost fore‐arc block. In addition, the contact between the subducting slab and the overriding arc crust is only 20 km wide, and the mantle wedge is characterized by low velocities of ∼7.5 km/s, suggesting upper mantle serpentinization or the presence of melts frozen in the mantle. Key Points Mantle hydration of subducting and upper plates, subduction erosion and arc magmatism

Transition from subduction of normal to thickened oceanic crust occurs in the central portion of the Costa Rican margin, where large interplate earthquakes ( M  ~ 7) and abundant interseismic seismicity have been associated with subduction of bathymetric highs. We relocated ~1,300 earthquakes recorded for 6 months by a combined on- and offshore seismological network using probabilistic earthquake relocation in a 3D P-wave velocity model. Most of the seismicity originated at the seismogenic zone of the plate boundary, appearing as an 18° dipping, planar cluster from 15 to 25–30 km depth, beneath the continental shelf. Several reverse focal mechanisms were resolved within the cluster. The upper limit of this interseismic interplate seismicity seems to be controlled primarily by the overlying-plate thickness and coherency, which in turn is governed by the erosional processes and fluid release and escape at temperatures lower than ~100 to 120 °C along the plate boundary. The downdip limit of the stick–slip behaviour collocates with relative low temperatures of ~150 to 200 °C, suggesting that it is controlled by serpentinization of the mantle wedge. The distribution of the interseismic interplate seismicity is locally modified by the presence of subducted seamounts at different depths. Unlike in northern Costa Rica, rupture of large earthquakes in the last two decades seems to coincide with the area defined by the interseismic interplate seismicity.

Based on a compilation of published and new seismic refraction and multichannel seismic reflection data along the south central Chile margin (33°–46°S), we study the processes of sediment accretion and subduction and their implications on megathrust seismicity. In terms of the frontal accretionary prism (FAP) size, the marine south central Chile fore arc can be divided in two main segments: (1) the Maule segment (south of the Juan Fernández Ridge and north of the Mocha block) characterized by a relative large FAP (20–40 km wide) and (2) the Chiloé segment (south of the Mocha block and north of the Nazca‐Antarctic‐South America plates junction) characterized by a small FAP (≤10 km wide). In addition, the Maule and Chiloé segments correlate with a thin (<1 km thick) and thick (∼1.5 km thick) subduction channel, respectively. The Mocha block lies between ∼37.5° and 40°S and is configured by the Chile trench, Mocha and Valdivia fracture zones. This region separates young (0–25 Ma) oceanic lithosphere in the south from old (30–35 Ma) oceanic lithosphere in the north, and it represents a fundamental tectonic boundary separating two different styles of sediment accretion and subduction, respectively. A process responsible for this segmentation could be related to differences in initial angles of subduction which in turn depend on the amplitude of the down‐deflected oceanic lithosphere under trench sediment loading. On the other hand, a small FAP along the Chiloé segment is coincident with the rupture area of the trans‐Pacific tsunamigenic 1960 earthquake (Mw = 9.5), while a relatively large FAP along the Maule segment is coincident with the rupture area of the 2010 earthquake (Mw = 8.8). Differences in earthquake and tsunami magnitudes between these events can be explained in terms of the FAP size along the Chiloé and Maule segments that control the location of the updip limit of the seismogenic zone. The rupture area of the 1960 event also correlates with a thick subduction channel (Chiloé segment) that may provide enough smoothness at the subduction interface allowing long lateral earthquake rupture propagation.

Two end‐member styles of crustal accretion are observed at two adjacent spreading segments at the Mid‐Atlantic Ridge at 5°S: focused accretion to the segment center with rapid crustal thinning toward the transform in the northern segment and crustal thickening toward the transform at an oceanic core complex in the southern segment. Our results were obtained by tomographic inversion of wide‐angle seismic reflection and refraction data collected along three intersecting profiles. The segment north of the 5°S fracture zone is characterized by a well‐developed median valley with a pronounced seafloor bulge in the segment center. A discrete portion of anomalously low velocities (−0.4 to −0.5 km/s relative to average off‐axis structure) at depths of ∼2.5 km beneath this bulge is possibly related to the presence of elevated temperatures and perhaps small portions of partial melt. This suggests that this segment is currently in a magmatically active period, which is confirmed by the observation of fresh lava flows and ongoing high‐temperature hydrothermal activity at the seafloor. Close to the current spreading axis, the crust thins rapidly from 8.5 km beneath the segment center to less than 3 km beneath the transform fault which indicates that melt supply here is strongly focused to the segment center. The reduction in crustal thickness is almost exclusively accommodated by the thinning of velocity portions indicative of seismic layer 3. The transform fault is characterized by more uniform velocity gradients throughout the entire crustal section and very low upper mantle velocities of 7.2–7.3 km/s indicating that serpentinization could be as much as 25% at 3.5 km depth. In contrast, ∼4.1 Ma old crust of the northern segment shows only minor thinning from the segment center toward the segment end. Here, the transform is characterized by a normal seismic layer 2/3 transition suggesting robust melt supply to the segment end at those times. In the adjacent southern segment, the crust thickens from ∼2.5 km beneath the flank of an oceanic core complex to ∼5.0 km at the segment boundary. The observed changes in crustal thickness show a significant temporal and lateral variability in melt supply and suggest a more complex crustal emplacement process than predicted by models of focused melt supply to the segment centers.

Information about the earth's crust and mantle in offshore regions has been obtained largely from multichannel seismic experiments, sometimes supplemented in the wide-angle range by ocean bottom recorders. Most of these instruments are equipped with a hydrophone only (ocean bottom hydrophone, OBH). Restricting to the monitoring of pressure wave events is sufficient in most many cases and enables work with a relatively uncomplicated instrument.