Explore the vast range of titles available.

Imatinib, the first and arguably the best targeted therapy, became the springboard for developing drugs aimed at molecular targets deemed crucial to tumours. As this development unfolded, a revolution in the speed and cost of genetic sequencing occurred. The result—an armamentarium of drugs and an array of molecular targets—set the stage for precision oncology, a hypothesis that cancer treatment could be markedly improved if therapies were guided by a tumour's genomic alterations. Drawing lessons from the biological basis of cancer and recent empirical investigations, we take a more measured view of precision oncology's promise. Ultimately, the promise is not our concern, but the threshold at which we declare success. We review reports of precision oncology alongside those of precision diagnostics and novel radiotherapy approaches. Although confirmatory evidence is scarce, these interventions have been widely endorsed. We conclude that the current path will probably not be successful or, at a minimum, will have to undergo substantive adjustments before it can be successful. For the sake of patients with cancer, we hope one form of precision oncology will deliver on its promise. However, until confirmatory studies are completed, precision oncology remains unproven, and as such, a hypothesis in need of rigorous testing.

Abstract Importance Mitotane (Lysodren, o,p'-DDD [1-(o-chlorophenyl)-1-(p-chlorophenyl)-2,2-dichloroethane)] is currently the only United States Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency-approved product for the treatment of adrenocortical carcinoma. Observations Mitotane is challenging to administer; however, its toxicities (specifically adrenal insufficiency) are well known, and the management of adverse consequences has established approaches. While often viewed through the prism of a cytotoxic agent, it can also interfere with hormone production making it a valuable asset in managing functional ACC. A recently completed prospective trial has shed some light on its use in the adjuvant setting, but further clarity is needed. Many think mitotane has a role in the advanced or metastatic setting, although prospective data are lacking and retrospective analyses are often difficult to interpret. Conclusions and relevance When used carefully and thoughtfully, especially in patients with hormonal excess, mitotane is an important component of the treatment armamentarium for ACC. The result of an academic effort for the benefit of doctors who encounter patients with adrenocortical cancer, this article examines the clinical experience and practical considerations with mitotane.

Drug resistance, intrinsic or acquired, is a problem for all chemotherapeutic agents. In this review, we examine numerous strategies that have been tested or proposed to reverse drug resistance. Included among these strategies are approaches targeting the apoptosis pathway. Although the process of apoptosis is complex, it provides several potential sites for therapeutic intervention. A variety of targets and approaches are being pursued, including the suppression of proteins inhibiting apoptosis using antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs), and small molecules targeted at proteins that modulate apoptosis. An alternate strategy is based on numerous studies that have documented methylation of critical regions in the genome in human cancers. Consequently, efforts have been directed at re-expressing genes, including genes that affect drug sensitivity, using 5-azacytidine and 2′-deoxy-5-azacytidine (DAC, decitabine) as demethylating agents. While this strategy may be effective as a single modality, success will most likely be achieved if it is used to modulate gene expression in combination with other modalities such as chemotherapy. At a more basic level, attempts have been made to modulate glutathione (GSH) levels. Owing to its reactivity and high intracellular concentrations, GSH has been implicated in resistance to several chemotherapeutic agents. Several approaches designed to deplete intracellular GSH levels have been pursued including the use of buthionine-( S , R )-sulfoxime (BSO), a potent and specific inhibitor of γ -glutamyl cysteine synthetase ( γ -GCS), the rate-limiting step in the synthesis of GSH, a hammerhead ribozyme against γ -GCS mRNA to downregulate specifically its levels and targeting cJun expression to reduce GSH levels. Alternate strategies have targeted p53. The frequent occurrence of p53 mutations in human cancer has led to the development of numerous approaches to restore wild-type (wt) p53. The goals of these interventions are to either revert the malignant phenotype or enhance drug sensitivity. The approach most extensively investigated has utilized one of several viral vectors. An alternate approach, the use of small molecules to restore wt function to mutant p53, remains an option. Finally, the conceptually simplest mechanism of resistance is one that reduces intracellular drug accumulation. Such reduction can be effected by a variety of drug efflux pumps, of which the most widely studied is P-glycoprotein (Pgp). The first strategy utilized to inhibit Pgp function relied on the identification of nonchemotherapeutic agents as competitors. Other approaches have included the use of hammerhead ribozymes against the MDR-1 gene and MDR-1-targeted ASOs. Although modulation of drug resistance has not yet been proven to be an effective clinical tool, we have learned an enormous amount about drug resistance. Should we succeed, these pioneering basic and clinical studies will have paved the road for future developments.

This commentary focuses on the recent article by Sherry et al on missing elements in Kaplan-Meier plots, focusing not on what is left out, but what is often ignored—information that can often call the results, interpretation, and conclusion of a clinical trial into question.

In this large international study of patients with adrenal cancer, a rare, treatment-refractory disease, mitotane plus a combination of etoposide, cisplatin, and doxorubicin had greater antitumor activity than mitotane plus streptozotocin. Adrenocortical carcinoma is a rare cancer (estimated incidence, 0.7 to 2.0 cases per 1 million population per year) 1 , 2 with a poor prognosis; the 5-year survival rate is less than 15% among patients with metastatic disease. 3 – 7 Mitotane is the only drug approved for the treatment of adrenocortical carcinoma and is used both as adjuvant therapy and for advanced disease, 8 – 14 although its efficacy has never been shown in a randomized trial. The experience with other antineoplastic drugs for the treatment of this disease is even more limited. Current treatment strategies for advanced disease are based exclusively on retrospective series . . .

Two patients with paraganglioma (one of whom also had somatostatinoma) were found to have mutations in HIF2A that altered HIF-2α turnover and led to excess erythropoietin production and polycythemia. Hypoxia-inducible factors, originally described by Wang et al., 1 are transcription factors that respond to changes in tissue oxygen concentration. These highly conserved proteins are composed of α and β subunits. The HIF-β subunit is constitutively expressed, whereas the α subunits are inducible by hypoxia and are associated with aggressive, treatment-refractory tumors. 2 , 3 Under normoxic conditions, HIF-1α, HIF-2α, and HIF-3α are hydroxylated on specific prolyl residues, allowing for recognition by the von Hippel–Lindau (VHL) tumor-suppressor protein, ubiquitination, and rapid degradation through the proteasome. 4 Under hypoxic conditions, prolyl hydroxylation of HIF-α proteins is reduced, resulting in their stabilization and, in turn, transcription . . .

This editorial addresses the magnitude of the challenge of spiraling drug costs, a challenge that affects everyone, everywhere, but may not be adequately addressed even at the ASCO annual meeting.

This article continues the discussion on the results of the BILCAP trial and advocates for careful examination and consideration of data in its entirety to inform a clinician’s decision.

Overall about 10 to 20% of pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas (PHEOs/PGLs) are metastatic, with higher metastatic potential observed in succinate dehydrogenase subunit B/fumarate hydratase (SDHB/FH)-related tumors. Due to the improved availability of biochemical and genetic testing and the frequent use of anatomical/functional imaging, there is currently a higher detection rate of metastatic PHEO/PGL. A retrospective analysis of 132 patients (27 children, 105 adults) with metastatic PHEO/PGL diagnosed and treated from 2000 to 2014 was conducted. Seventy-seven (58%) males and 55 (42%) females were included; 39 (30%) have died, with no sex preference. Seventy-three (55%) patients had SDHB mutations; 59 (45%) patients had apparently sporadic tumors (AST). SDHB patients had an average age at primary tumor diagnosis of 31 ± 16 years compared to 40 ± 15 years in AST patients (P<.001). The average metastatic interval (MI) decreased with increasing age in both SDHB and AST patients (P = .013 for both). Only 16% of all primary tumors were smaller than 4.5 cm. Eleven percent of patients had biochemically silent disease, more with SDHB. Of SDHB patients, 23% had metastatic tumors at first diagnosis, compared to 15% of AST patients. Five- and 10-year survival rates were significantly better for metastatic AST than SDHB patients (P = .01). Overall survival was significantly different between children and adults (P = .037); this was mostly attributed to the SDHB patients, in whom children had statistically significantly longer survival than adults (P = .006). The deceased patients all died due to the PHEO/PGL and mainly had noradrenergic phenotypes. In children, metastatic PHEOs/PGLs are mainly due to SDHB mutations; in adults they are equally distributed between in SDHB mutations and AST, with better 5- and 10-year survival rates for ASTs. In SDHB patients, children survive longer than adults. Primary metastatic tumors, most presenting as noradrenergic PGLs, are larger than 4.5 cm in >80% of patients. The frequency of metastatic tumors from primary AST increases with age, including a decreased MI compared to SDHB tumors. These results support several recommendations that are summarized in the Discussion.

Improving the management of metastasis in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) is critical, as nearly half of patients with PanNETs present with liver metastases, and this accounts for the majority of patient mortality. We identified angiopoietin-2 (ANGPT2) as one of the most upregulated angiogenic factors in RNA-Seq data from human PanNET liver metastases and found that higher ANGPT2 expression correlated with poor survival rates. Immunohistochemical staining revealed that ANGPT2 was localized to the endothelial cells of blood vessels in PanNET liver metastases. We observed an association between the upregulation of endothelial ANGPT2 and liver metastatic progression in both patients and transgenic mouse models of PanNETs. In human and mouse PanNET liver metastases, ANGPT2 upregulation coincided with poor T cell infiltration, indicative of an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Notably, both pharmacologic inhibition and genetic deletion of ANGPT2 in PanNET mouse models slowed the growth of PanNET liver metastases. Furthermore, pharmacologic inhibition of ANGPT2 promoted T cell infiltration and activation in liver metastases, improving the survival of mice with metastatic PanNETs. These changes were accompanied by reduced plasma leakage and improved vascular integrity in metastases. Together, these findings suggest that ANGPT2 blockade may be an effective strategy for promoting T cell infiltration and immunostimulatory reprogramming to reduce the growth of liver metastases in PanNETs.