Catalogue Search | MBRL
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
{{itemTitle}}
127
result(s) for
"Foote, Matthew"
Sort by:
Response assessment after stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastasis: a report from the SPIne response assessment in Neuro-Oncology (SPINO) group
The SPine response assessment In Neuro-Oncology (SPINO) group is a committee of the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology working group and comprises a panel of international experts in spine stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Here, we present the group's first report on the challenges in standardising imaging-based assessment of local control and pain for spinal metastases. We review current imaging modalities used in SBRT treatment planning and tumour assessment and review the criteria for pain and local control in registered clinical trials specific to spine SBRT. We summarise the results of an international survey of the panel to establish the range of current practices in assessing tumour response to spine SBRT. The ultimate goal of the SPINO group is to report consensus criteria for tumour imaging, clinical assessment, and symptom-based response criteria to help standardise future clinical trials.
Journal Article
The Role of CT and MR Imaging in Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy of the Spine: From Patient Selection and Treatment Planning to Post-Treatment Monitoring
Spine metastases (SMs) are common, arising in 70% of the cases of the most prevalent malignancies in males (prostate cancer) and females (breast cancer). Stereotactic body radiotherapy, or SBRT, has been incorporated into clinical treatment algorithms over the past decade. SBRT has shown promising rates of local control for oligometastatic spinal lesions with low radiation dose to adjacent critical tissues, particularly the spinal cord. Imaging is critically important in SBRT planning, guidance, and response monitoring. This paper reviews the roles of imaging in spine SBRT, including conventional and advanced imaging approaches for SM detection, treatment planning, and post-SBRT follow-up.
Journal Article
Evidence of dose-response following hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy to the cavity after surgery for brain metastases
Background and objectiveA retrospective review of consecutive patients between January 2012 and December 2018 receiving hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HSRT) to the cavity after resection for brain metastases was performed.MethodsTreatment was delivered using an appropriately commissioned linear accelerator. The primary outcome was time to radiological or histological confirmation of local recurrence following completion of HSRT. Dose-fractionation regimens were converted to biologically 2 Gy-equivalent doses assuming α/β = 10 (EQD2[10]). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards modelling was performed to determine hazard ratios (HR) with respective 95% confidence intervals (CI). The Log-rank test was used to determine p values taking statistical significance p < 0.05.ResultsThere were 134 patients and 144 cavities identified. The most common primary histologies were melanoma (n = 49) and lung (n = 32). 116 patients (87%) underwent a gross total resection. Median planning target volume (PTV) was 28 cm3 (range 2.4–149.2). Median EQD2[10] was 38.4 Gy (range 22.3–59.7) and 24 Gy in 3 fractions was the most common regimen. 12 (9%) patients demonstrated local recurrence at median interval 215 days (range 4–594). 7 (5%) patients experienced grade 3 or higher toxicities. In multivariate analysis, EQD2[10] was associated with local failure such that increased equivalent doses improved local control [HR = 0.79 and 95% CI 0.65–0.96, p = 0.0192]. There were no significant associations for primary histology, patient age, volume of residual disease, PTV volume or location.ConclusionThis large series demonstrates that HSFRT to the surgical resection cavity for brain metastases has improved local control with increasing dose. Rates of grade 3 or higher toxicity were low overall.
Journal Article
Radiotherapy for cutaneous melanoma: current and future applications
Cutaneous malignant melanoma remains a significant health burden worldwide despite advances in the management of locoregionally advanced and metastatic disease. Historically, the efficacy of radiation therapy (RT) has been questioned due to the perceived radioresistance of melanoma cancer cells
. Nowadays, RT has limited indications for primary disease, but is used for high-risk nodal disease and in the palliative setting. This review article outlines the current role of RT for melanoma and its expanding role in oligometastatic disease scenarios as an alternative approach to surgery and highlights potential future applications to harness RT interaction with immunomodulatory targeted therapies.
Journal Article
Radiation Necrosis from Stereotactic Radiosurgery—How Do We Mitigate?
Intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an effective and convenient treatment for many brain conditions. Data regarding safety come mostly from retrospective single institutional studies and a small number of prospective studies. Variations in target delineation, treatment delivery, imaging follow-up protocols and dose prescription limit the interpretation of this data. There has been much clinical focus on radiation necrosis (RN) in particular, as it is being increasingly recognized on follow-up imaging. Symptomatic RN may be treated with medical therapy (such as corticosteroids and bevacizumab) with surgical resection being reserved for refractory patients. Nevertheless, RN remains a challenging condition to manage, and therefore upfront patient selection for SRS remains critical to provide complication-free control. Mitigation strategies need to be considered in situations where the baseline risk of RN is expected to be high—such as large target volume or re-irradiation. These may involve reduction in the prescribed dose or hypofractionated stereotactic radiation therapy (HSRT). Recently published guidelines and international meta-analysis report the benefit of HSRT in larger lesions, without compromising control rates. However, careful attention to planning parameters and SRS techniques still need to be adhered, even with HSRT. In cases where the risk is deemed to be high despite mitigation, a combination approach of surgery with or without post-operative radiation should be considered.
Journal Article
Strategies to Mitigate Toxicities From Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Spine Metastases
Abstract
Improvements in systemic therapy are translating into more patients living longer with metastatic disease. Bone is the most common site of metastasis, where spinal lesions can result in significant pain impacting quality of life and possible neurological dysfunction resulting in a decline in performance status. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) of the spine has emerged as a promising technique to provide durable local control, palliation of symptoms, control of oligoprogressive sites of disease, and possibly augment the immune response. SBRT achieves this by delivering highly conformal radiation therapy to allow for dose escalation due to a steep dose gradient from the planning target volume to nearby critical organs at risk. In our review, we provide an in-depth review and expert commentary regarding seminal literature that defined clinically meaningful toxicity endpoints with actionable dosimetric limits and/or clinical management strategies to mitigate toxicity potentially attributable to SBRT of the spine. We placed a spotlight on radiation myelopathy (de novo, reirradiation after conventional external beam radiation therapy or salvage after an initial course of spinal SBRT), plexopathy, vertebral compression fracture, pain flare, esophageal toxicity, myositis, and safety regarding combination with concurrent targeted or immune therapies.
Journal Article
Volumetric burden of metastatic lesions drives outcomes in patients with extracranial oligometastatic disease
Background We hypothesized that the total volume of metastases at initial oligometastatic (OM) presentation to stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an important prognostic factor that can refine the definition of OM disease. Methods Patients with extracranial oligometastatic cancer (≤5 lesions) treated with SBRT were included in an international multi‐institutional database. Multivariable Cox and competing risks regression models were used to determine the relationship between distant progression‐free survival (DPFS), widespread progression (WSP), and overall survival (OS) with the total planning target volume (PTV) at initial OM presentation to SBRT. All models were adjusted for histology, pre‐SBRT systemic therapy, osseous‐only lesions, and number of metastases. Results In total, 961 patients were included. The median follow‐up was 24.4 months (IQR: 13.8–37.5). Total PTV had a significant effect on DPFS in the first 18 months after SBRT and was most profound in the first 6 months, when each twofold increase in total PTV conferred a 40.6% increased risk of distant progression (p < 0.001). Each twofold increase in total PTV increased the risk of WSP by 45.4% in the first 6 months (p < 0.001). Total PTV had a significant effect on OS in the first 2 years after SBRT, with each twofold PTV change increasing the risk of death by 60.7% during the first 6 months (p < 0.001) and by 34% thereafter (p < 0.001). Exploratory gross tumor volume (GTV) analysis confirmed the PTV‐based observations. Conclusion The total volumetric burden of metastases at initial OM presentation to SBRT is strongly and independently prognostic for the risk of distant and widespread progression and survival. We propose that this metric should drive the definition of OM disease and guide treatment decision‐making. This large international, multi‐institutional series of SBRT to extracranial oligometastases demonstrates total volume of metastatic lesions as a strong, independent prognostic factor for cancer outcomes. This metric can redefine oligometastatic disease beyond number of lesions and refine patient selection for an increasingly important treatment paradigm.
Journal Article
In response to Fogarty et al. and why adjuvant whole brain radiotherapy is not recommended routinely
The routine use of adjuvant whole brain radiotherapy (AWBRT) after surgery or stereotactic radiosurgery is now discouraged by a number of international expert panels. Three decades of randomised studies have shown that, although AWBRT improves radiological measures of intracranial disease control, the clinical benefit is unclear and it is also associated with inferior quality of life and neurocognitive function. The number of patients with melanoma in these trials was low, but data suggesting that treatment-related side effects should vary according to histology of the primary malignancy are lacking. For metastatic melanoma, the role of AWBRT to control microscopic disease in the brain is also a less relevant concern because systemic therapies with intracranial activity are now available. Whether AWBRT is useful in select patients deemed at high risk of neurologic death remains undefined.
Journal Article
Extent of surrounding edema does not correlate with acute complications after radiosurgery for melanoma brain metastases
Aim
To assess whether extent of surrounding edema correlates with acute adverse clinical outcomes within 3 months after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for melanoma brain metastases (BM).
Methods
Patients with melanoma BM treated with SRS were included in a single center retrospective analysis. A contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance image (MRI) brain was acquired on the day of treatment and used to calculate the volume of the largest lesion (the index BM) and total volume of all BM. Their corresponding volume of surrounding edema was defined based on the fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequence. After SRS, MRI was performed every 3 months for at least 2 years if the patient remained well enough to do so. Adverse neurologic events after SRS were defined using common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) version 5.0. Multivariate regression analyses assessed for associations between BM size and edema at baseline with increasing edema and neurologic adverse events within 3 months after SRS.
Results
Mean volume of the index BM reduced from 2.2 to 0.5 cm
3
at 3 months after SRS (p = 0.03). Mean volume of edema surrounding the index BM was 6.4 cm
3
at baseline, 10.2 cm
3
at 3 months and 5.5 cm
3
at 6 months. There were 7/43 (16%) patients that experienced an adverse neurological event within 3 months (attributable to any cause) and 4/43 (9%) were associated with an increase in BM edema. On univariate and multivariate analyses, there were no correlations between any baseline factors and volume of edema at 3 months. However, SRS dose delivered and systemic therapy use within 4 weeks of SRS both correlated with a reduction in edema surrounding the index BM.
Conclusion
A transient increase in mean volume of edema was apparent at 3 months after SRS. However, this resolved by 6 months and did not correlate with adverse events or dexamethasone requirement. Thus, the clinical significance is uncertain.
Journal Article