Explore the vast range of titles available.

Since January 2020, the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has severely affected hospital systems worldwide. In Europe, the first 3 epidemic waves (periods) have been the most severe in terms of number of infected and hospitalized patients. There are several descriptions of the demographic and clinical profiles of patients with COVID-19, but few studies of their hospital pathways. We used transition matrices, constructed from Markov chains, to illustrate the transition probabilities between different hospital wards for 90,834 patients between March 2020 and July 2021 managed in Paris area. We identified 3 epidemic periods (waves) during which the number of hospitalized patients was significantly high. Between the 3 periods, the main differences observed were: direct admission to ICU, from 14 to 18%, mortality from ICU, from 28 to 24%, length of stay (alive patients), from 9 to 7 days from CH and from 18 to 10 days from ICU. The proportion of patients transferred from CH to ICU remained stable. Understanding hospital pathways of patients is crucial to better monitor and anticipate the impact of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on health system.

IntroductionVentilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) remains the leading cause of infections treated in the intensive care units (ICU). In a personalised care approach, we hypothesise that the duration of treatment of VAP can be reduced in function of the response to treatment.Methods and analysisThe Antimicrobial Stewardship for Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Intensive Care (ASPIC) trial is a pragmatic national multicentre, phase III, non-inferiority, comparative randomised (1:1) single-blinded clinical trial. Five hundred and ninety adult patients hospitalised in 24 French ICU with a microbiologically confirmed first episode of VAP that received appropriate empirical antibiotic therapy will be included. They will be randomly allocated to standard management with duration of appropriate antibiotic fixed for 7 days according to international guidelines or antimicrobial stewardship based on daily clinical assessment of clinical cure. The assessment of clinical cure will be repeated daily until at least three criteria of clinical cure are met, allowing the discontinuation of antibiotic therapy in experimental group. The primary endpoint is a composite endpoint combining of all-cause mortality measured at day 28, treatment failure or new episode of microbiologically confirmed VAP until day 28.The aim of the study is to demonstrate that a strategy to reduce the duration of antibiotic therapy for VAP based on clinical assessment is safe could lead to changes in practice as part of a personalised therapeutic approach, by reducing exposure to antibiotics and their side effects.Ethics and disseminationThe ASPIC trial has been approved by the French regulatory agency (Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament et des Produits de Santé, ANSM; EUDRACT number 2021-002197-78, 19 August 2021) and an independent ethics committee the Comité de Protection des Personnes Ile-de-France III (CNRIPH : 21.03.25.60729, 10 October 2021) for the study protocol (version ASPIC−1.3; 03 September 2021) for all study centres. Participant recruitment is scheduled to begin in 2022. Results will be published in international peer-reviewed medical journals.Trial registration numberNCT05124977.

PurposeThe aim of this work is to study a cohort of patients of ISS < 15 admitted to a TC, and to determine the number of patients that ultimately benefited from the skills and resources specific of a level 1 trauma center.MethodsRetrospective study from a prospective cohort of patients admitted to TC (Beaujon Hospital, APHP) for suspected severe trauma from January 2011 to December 2017. The main outcome criterion was the use of surgery or interventional radiology within the first 24 h after admission of patients with ISS < 15. The secondary outcomes were stratified into severe (mortality, resuscitation care, length of stay in intensive care units) and non-severe criteria (mild head injury, hospital discharge or transfer within 24 h).ResultsOf 3035 patients admitted during the study period, 1409 with an ISS < 15 were included, corresponding to a theoretical overtriage rate of 46.4%. Among these, 611 patients (43.4%) underwent emergency intervention within the first 24 h (586 surgical interventions, 19 direct transfers to the operating theater and 6 acts of interventional radiology), 238 (16.9%) of patients presented with severe and 531 (38%) with non-severe outcome criteria.ConclusionThis work demonstrates that in a cohort of patients classified as ISS < 15 admitted to a TC, a considerable amount of TC-specific resources are required, and patients present with severe outcome criteria despite being classified as overtriaged. These results suggest that triage of trauma patients should be based on resource use and clinical outcome rather than anatomic criteria.

Background The optimal treatment duration and the nature of regimen of antibiotics (monotherapy or combination therapy) for Pseudomonas aeruginosa ventilator‑associated pneumonia (PA-VAP) remain debated. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether a combination antibiotic therapy is superior to a monotherapy in patients with PA-VAP in terms of reduction in recurrence and death, based on the 186 patients included in the iDIAPASON trial, a multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing 8 versus 15 days of antibiotic therapy for PA-VAP. Methods Patients with PA-VAP randomized in the iDIAPASON trial (short-duration—8 days vs. long-duration—15 days) and who received appropriate antibiotic therapy were eligible in the present study. The main objective is to compare mortality at day 90 according to the antibiotic therapy received by the patient: monotherapy versus combination therapy. The primary outcome was the mortality rate at day 90. The primary outcome was compared between groups using a Chi-square test. Time from appropriate antibiotic therapy to death in ICU or to censure at day 90 was represented using Kaplan–Meier survival curves and compared between groups using a Log-rank test. Results A total of 169 patients were included in the analysis. The median duration of appropriate antibiotic therapy was 14 days. At day 90, among 37 patients (21.9%) who died, 17 received monotherapy and 20 received a combination therapy ( P  = 0.180). Monotherapy and combination antibiotic therapy were similar for the recurrence rate of VAP, the number of extra pulmonary infections, or the acquisition of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria during the ICU stay. Patients in combination therapy were exposed to mechanical ventilation for 28 ± 12 days, as compared with 23 ± 11 days for those receiving monotherapy ( P  = 0.0243). Results remain similar after adjustment for randomization arm of iDIAPASON trial and SOFA score at ICU admission. Conclusions Except longer durations of antibiotic therapy and mechanical ventilation, potentially related to increased difficulty in achieving clinical cure, the patients in the combination therapy group had similar outcomes to those in the monotherapy group. Trial registration : NCT02634411 , Registered 15 December 2015.

To compare two brands of disposable plastic laryngoscope blades, Vital View plastic blades and Heine XP plastic blades, with the reusable Heine Classic+ Macintosh metal blades. Prospective randomized, controlled, single-blinded study. Operating room of a university-affiliated hospital. 519 patients without criteria for predicted difficult intubation, undergoing scheduled surgery during general anesthesia. Patients were randomized to three groups according to laryngoscope blade brand. Difficult tracheal intubation was evaluated by the Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS) (IDS > 5 = procedure involving moderate to major difficulty). The percentage of intubations with an IDS > 5 was 3.1% in Group M (metal blade group), 5.1% in Group V (Vital View plastic blade group), and 10.0% in Group H (Heine plastic blade group). A significant difference was noted between Groups M and H ( P = 0.02) but not between Groups M and V. Intubation may be more challenging when using Heine XP plastic blades but no significant difference exists between Vital-View plastic blades and Heine Classic+ metal blades.

Background There are recognized diagnostic criteria for a first ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) episode, but not for recurrences. Many randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have used the recurrence of VAP as a criterion for efficacy evaluation. Still, the different definitions used in RCTs make it difficult to compare studies. We aimed to develop a consensual definition of VAP recurrences and of the various types of VAP recurrences. Methods Thirty-six European experts constituting a multidisciplinary group of physicians (critical care, infectious diseases, microbiology) with special interest in the management of VAP were polled using the Delphi methodology. Results After the completion of four iterations of the DELPHI method, 94% of experts agreed that the diagnostic criteria for a first VAP episode could also be used for recurrences, except for the radiological criterion, which not all the experts considered to be mandatory. Consensus was also reached regarding the definition of four distinct entities: relapse, persistent VAP, superinfection, and new-pathogen VAP. For relapse and persistent VAP, bacteriological findings were identical for different VAP episodes, whereas they differed for superinfection and new-pathogen VAP. The distinction between relapse and persistent VAP, and between superinfection and new-pathogen VAP depended on the timing of antibiotic treatment (before or after 48–72 h after the end of antibiotic therapy) and the clinical course. Microbiological criteria were proposed to facilitate the diagnosis of persistent VAP. Conclusion This consensus by European experts proposes four different VAP recurrence entities which should facilitate the harmonization of recurrence criteria for clinical practice and future studies.

To describe the incidence and risk factors of methicillin sensitive Staphylococcus aureus ventilator associated pneumonia (MSSA-VAP) relapse in trauma and non-traumatic brain injury patients. Retrospective observational monocentric cohort study of consecutive ICU patients who developed a first episode of MSSA-VAP after trauma and non-traumatic brain injury. MSSA-VAP relapse encompass MSSA-VAP treatment failure (persistence or recurrence of MSSA) or other pathogen - VAP. A total of 165 patients (71% of trauma and 29% of non-traumatic brain injury) with MSSA-VAP were included. MSSA-VAP relapse occurred in 54 (33%) patients, including 28 (17%) MSSA-VAP treatment failure and 46 (28%) other pathogen-VAP. Empirical first-line antibiotic therapy was appropriate in 96% of cases. In multivariate analysis, the presence of Streptococcus species (Odds ratio [OR] 7.37) and oropharyngeal flora (OR 3.64) as initial MSSA co-pathogen, suggested aspiration at the time of admission and independently predicted MSSA-VAP treatment failure. Initial Glasgow coma scale (OR 0.89), need for emergent surgery (OR 5.71) and the presence of an acute respiratory distress syndrome at the time of the first MSSA-VAP (3.99), independently predicted the onset of other pathogen – VAP. Early and simple factors may help to identify patients with high-risk of MSSA-VAP relapse. [Display omitted] •MSSA-VAP relapse is frequent in brain injury patient and extends intubation.•MSSA-VAP treatment failure is associated with oropharyngeal flora identification.•Other pathogen – VAP is associated with the severity of the first MSSA-VAP (SDRA).

Aims Modifications of antimicrobials’ pharmacokinetic parameters have been reported in critically ill patients, resulting in a risk of treatment failure. We characterized amikacin pharmacokinetic variability in critically ill patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and evaluated several dosing regimens. Methods We conducted a prospective multicenter study in critically ill patients with presumptive diagnosis of Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) VAP. Patients empirically received imipenem and a single-dose of amikacin, which was administered as a 30-min infusion (20 mg/kg). Concentrations were measured 0.5, 1, 8, 16, and 24 h after beginning of infusion. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using a population approach. Main pharmacodynamic target was a ratio ≥10 between the concentration achieved 1 h after beginning of infusion ( C 1h ) and the minimal inhibitory concentration of the liable bacteria (MIC). We simulated individual C 1h for several dosing regimens by Monte Carlo method and computed C 1h /MIC ratios for MICs from 0.5 to 64 mg/L. Results Sixty patients (47 males), median (range) age, and body weight, 61.5 years (28–84) and 78 kg (45–126), respectively, were included. Amikacin median C 1h was 45 mg/L (22–87). Mean value (between-patients variability) for CL, V1, Q, and V2 were 4.3 L/h (31 %), 15.9 L (22 %), 12.1 L/h (27 %), and 21.4 L (47 %), respectively. CL increased with CrCL ( p  < 0.001) and V1 with body weight ( p  < 0.001) and PaO 2 /FIO 2 ratio ( p  < 0.001). With a 25 mg/kg regimen, the pharmacodynamic target was achieved in 20 and 96 % for a MICs of 8 and 4 mg/L, respectively. Conclusion Amikacin clearance was decreased and its volume of distribution was increased as previously reported. A ≥25 mg/kg single-dose is needed for empirical treatment of GNB-VAP.