Explore the vast range of titles available.

Globozoospermia is a rare phenotype of primary male infertility inducing the production of round-headed spermatozoa without acrosome. Anomalies of DPY19L2 account for 50–70% of all cases and the entire deletion of the gene is by far the most frequent defect identified. Here, we present a large cohort of 69 patients with 20–100% of globozoospermia. Genetic analyses including multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification, Sanger sequencing and whole-exome sequencing identified 25 subjects with a homozygous DPY19L2 deletion (36%) and 14 carrying other DPY19L2 defects (20%). Overall, 11 deleterious single-nucleotide variants were identified including eight novel and three already published mutations. Patients with a higher rate of round-headed spermatozoa were more often diagnosed and had a higher proportion of loss of function anomalies, highlighting a good genotype phenotype correlation. No gene defects were identified in patients carrying < 50% of globozoospermia while diagnosis efficiency rose to 77% for patients with > 50% of globozoospermia. In addition, results from whole-exome sequencing were scrutinized for 23 patients with a DPY19L2 negative diagnosis, searching for deleterious variants in the nine other genes described to be associated with globozoospermia in human (C2CD6, C7orf61, CCDC62, CCIN, DNAH17, GGN, PICK1, SPATA16, and ZPBP1). Only one homozygous novel truncating variant was identified in the GGN gene in one patient, confirming the association of GGN with globozoospermia. In view of these results, we propose a novel diagnostic strategy focusing on patients with at least 50% of globozoospermia and based on a classical qualitative PCR to detect DPY19L2 homozygous deletions. In the absence of the latter, we recommend to perform whole-exome sequencing to search for defects in DPY19L2 as well as in the other previously described candidate genes.

ObjectiveTesticular germ cell tumours (TGCT) are the most common cancer in men of working age and its incidence has increased notably over the past 40 years. Several occupations have been identified as potentially associated with TGCT risk. The aim of this study was to further explore the relationship between occupations, industries and TGCT risk in men aged 18–45 years.MethodsThe TESTIS study is a multicenter case–control study conducted between January 2015 and April 2018 in 20 of 23 university hospital centers in metropolitan France. A total of 454 TGCT cases and 670 controls were included. Full job histories were collected. Occupations were coded according to the International Standard Classification of Occupation 1968 version (ISCO-1968) and industry according to the 1999 version of Nomenclature d’Activités Française (NAF-1999). For each job held, ORs and 95% CIs were estimated using conditional logistic regression.ResultsA positive association was observed between TGCT and occupation as agricultural, animal husbandry worker (ISCO: 6–2; OR 1.71; 95% CI (1.02 to 2.82)), as well as salesman (ISCO: 4–51; OR 1.84; 95% CI (1.20 to 2.82)). An increased risk was further observed among electrical fitters and related, electrical and electronics workers employed for 2 years or more (ISCO: 8–5; OR≥2 years 1.83; 95% CI (1.01 to 3.32)). Analyses by industry supported these findings.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that agricultural, electrical and electronics workers, and salesmen workers experience an increased risk of TGCT. Further research is needed to identify the agents or chemicals in these high-risk occupations which are relevant in the TGCT development.Trial registration number NCT02109926.

OBJECTIVES: The etiology of testicular germ cell tumors (TGCT) is suspected to be related to prenatal environmental risk factors. Some solvents have potential endocrine disrupting or carcinogenic properties and may disrupt male genital development in utero. The aim of this study was to examine the association between parental occupational exposure to solvents and TGCT risk among their offspring. METHODS: A French nationwide case–control study, TESTIS included 454 TGCT cases and 670 controls frequency-matched on region and 5-year age strata. Participants were interviewed via telephone and provided information on parental occupations at birth. Job-exposure matrices (JEM) developed in the French Matgéné program were used to assign exposure to five petroleum-based solvents, five solvents or groups of oxygenated solvents, and five chlorinated solvents. Odds ratios (OR) for TGCT and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using conditional logistic regression, adjusting for TGCT risk factors. RESULTS: Occupational exposure to at least one solvent during the year of their son’s birth was 41% among fathers and 21% among mothers. Paternal exposure to at least one solvent showed OR 0.89 (95% CI 0.68–1.15). Exposure to perchloroethylene (OR 1.41, 95% CI 0.55–3.61), methylene chloride (OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.54–2.34) and diesel/kerosene/fuel oil (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.80–1.73) disclosed OR >1 but with low precision. Our results suggest a possible modest increase in non-seminoma risk for sons whose fathers were highly exposed to trichloroethylene (OR 1.44, 95% CI 0.79–2.63). Maternal exposure to at least one solvent showed OR 0.90 (95% CI 0.65–1.24). When stratifying by birth year, men born in the 1970s experienced an increased TGCT risk following maternal exposure to fuels and petroleum-based solvents (OR 2.74, 95% CI 1.11–6.76). CONCLUSION: Overall, no solid association was found between parental occupational exposure to solvents and TGCT risk. The association found with maternal occupational exposure to fuels and petroleum solvents among older men needs further investigation.

Background Non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) with history of cryptorchidism and idiopathic NOA are the most common forms of NOA without genetic aetiology. Of all patients with one of these two types of NOA, only a few will have a positive TEsticular Sperm Extraction (TESE). Of those with positive extraction followed by sperm freezing, not all will have a child after TESE-ICSI. What are the ways and probabilities of taking home a baby for patients with NOA and a history of cryptorchidism compared with patients with idiopathic NOA? Results Patients with idiopathic NOA or NOA and a history of cryptorchidism who underwent their first TESE were included. The patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 was composed of 125 patients with idiopathic NOA and Group 2 of 55 patients with NOA and a history of surgically treated cryptorchidism. Our results showed that more than half of the NOA patients succeeded in becoming parents. The main way to fulfil their plans for parenthood is to use sperm or embryo donation (72%) for men with idiopathic NOA, whereas the majority of men with NOA and a history of cryptorchidism had a child after TESE-ICSI (58.8%). Conclusions In our centre, before considering TESE for a patient with NOA, we explain systematically TESE-ICSI alternatives (sperm donation, embryo donation or adoption). As a result, the couple can consider each solution to become parents.

Resume Contexte L’azoospermie non obstructive (ANO) avec un antécédent de cryptorchidie et l’ANO idiopathique sont les causes les plus fréquentes d’ANO sans étiologie génétique. Parmi les patients présentant un de ces 2 types d’ANO, seuls quelques-uns auront une extraction positive de spermatozoïdes testiculaires (TESE). Parmi les patients ayant une extraction positive suivie d’une congélation de spermatozoïdes, tous n’obtiendront pas de naissance après TESE-ICSI. Quels sont les moyens et les probabilités de « ramener un enfant à la maison » pour les patients avec une ANO associée à un antécédent de cryptorchidie en comparaison à ceux présentant une ANO idiopathique ? Résultats De tels patients ont été inclus dans notre étude et divisés en deux groupes : Groupe 1 composé de 125 patients avec une ANO idiopathique et Groupe 2 de 55 patients avec une ANO associée à un antécédent de cryptorchidie traitée chirurgicalement. Nos résultats ont montré que plus de la moitié des patients atteints d’ANO ont réussi à devenir parents. Le principal moyen pour réaliser leur projet parental était le recours au don de sperme ou l’accueil d’embryons (72%) pour les hommes avec ANO idiopathique, alors que la majorité des hommes avec ANO et antécédent de cryptorchidie (58.8%) achevaient leur projet parental par TESE-ICSI. Conclusions Dans notre centre, avant d’envisager une biopsie testiculaire chez un patient présentant une ANO, les alternatives (don de sperme, accueil d’embryon ou adoption) à la TESE-ICSI sont explicitées systématiquement. En conséquence, le couple peut envisager chaque solution pour devenir parent.

The introduction of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) provided an effective treatment for infertile couples whose infertility was attributed to male factors. However, some of them face poor results after ICSI and subsequently use artificial insemination with donor sperm (AID). Only a few studies have reported on the clinical outcome of AID cycles after previous failed ICSI cycles, with contrasting results. The results reported here involve a cohort of 47 couples undertaking 175 AID cycles after 120 failed ICSI cycles for various reasons. Couples were allocated to two groups according to the availability of top quality embryos (TQE) in ICSI cycles. In our series, AID was successful for couples with and without TQE previously transferred in ICSI cycles, the live birth rate (LBR) per cycle being 20.0% and 13.3%, respectively. However, couples with TQE tended to succeed more rapidly than couples with poor quality embryos, with a higher cumulative LBR (68.0% versus 54.5%, respectively). These findings demonstrate that even couples with a history of unsuccessful ICSI cycles because of poor embryo quality are able to achieve high LBR after AID cycles. However, such couples have a lower cumulative LBR and are required to be more patient to achieve parenthood.