Explore the vast range of titles available.

Clearance of senescent cells (SnCs) can prevent several age-related pathologies, including bone loss. However, the local versus systemic roles of SnCs in mediating tissue dysfunction remain unclear. Thus, we developed a mouse model (p16-LOX-ATTAC) that allowed for inducible SnC elimination (senolysis) in a cell-specific manner and compared the effects of local versus systemic senolysis during aging using bone as a prototype tissue. Specific removal of Sn osteocytes prevented age-related bone loss at the spine, but not the femur, by improving bone formation without affecting osteoclasts or marrow adipocytes. By contrast, systemic senolysis prevented bone loss at the spine and femur and not only improved bone formation, but also reduced osteoclast and marrow adipocyte numbers. Transplantation of SnCs into the peritoneal cavity of young mice caused bone loss and also induced senescence in distant host osteocytes. Collectively, our findings provide proof-of-concept evidence that local senolysis has health benefits in the context of aging, but, importantly, that local senolysis only partially replicates the benefits of systemic senolysis. Furthermore, we establish that SnCs, through their senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP), lead to senescence in distant cells. Therefore, our study indicates that optimizing senolytic drugs may require systemic instead of local SnC targeting to extend healthy aging.

Cells expressing features of senescence, including upregulation of p21 and p16, appear transiently following tissue injury, yet the properties of these cells or how they contrast with age-induced senescent cells remains unclear. Here, we used skeletal injury as a model and identified the rapid appearance following fracture of p21+ cells expressing senescence markers, mainly as osteochondroprogenitors (OCHs) and neutrophils. Targeted genetic clearance of p21+ cells suppressed senescence-associated signatures within the fracture callus and accelerated fracture healing. By contrast, p21+ cell clearance did not alter bone loss due to aging; conversely, p16+ cell clearance, known to alleviate skeletal aging, did not affect fracture healing. Following fracture, p21+ neutrophils were enriched in signaling pathways known to induce paracrine stromal senescence, while p21+ OCHs were highly enriched in senescence-associated secretory phenotype factors known to impair bone formation. Further analysis revealed an injury-specific stem cell-like OCH subset that was p21+ and highly inflammatory, with a similar inflammatory mesenchymal population (fibro-adipogenic progenitors) evident following muscle injury. Thus, intercommunicating senescent-like neutrophils and mesenchymal progenitor cells were key regulators of tissue repair in bone and potentially across tissues. Moreover, our findings established contextual roles of p21+ versus p16+ senescent/senescent-like cells that may be leveraged for therapeutic opportunities.

Purpose of Review Beyond aging, senescent cells accumulate during multiple pathological conditions, including chemotherapy, radiation, glucocorticoids, obesity, and diabetes, even earlier in life. Therefore, cellular senescence represents a unifying pathogenic mechanism driving skeletal and metabolic disorders. However, whether senescent bone marrow adipocytes (BMAds) are causal in mediating skeletal dysfunction has only recently been evaluated. Recent Findings Despite evidence of BMAd senescence following glucocorticoid therapy, additional evidence for BMAd senescence in other conditions has thus far been limited. Because the study of BMAds presents unique challenges making these cells difficult to isolate and image, here we review issues and approaches to overcome such challenges, and present advancements in isolation and histological techniques that may help with the future study of senescent BMAds. Summary Further insights into the roles of BMAd senescence in the pathogenesis of skeletal dysfunction may have important basic science and clinical implications for human physiology and disease.

There is an increasing need for biomarkers of senescent cell burden to facilitate the selection of participants for clinical trials. p16Ink4a is encoded by the CDKN2A locus, which produces five variant transcripts in humans, two of which encode homologous p16 proteins: p16Inka4a, encoded by p16_variant 1, and p16ɣ, encoded by p16_variant 5. While distinct quantitative polymerase chain reaction primers can be designed for p16_variant 5, primers for p16_variant 1 also measure p16_variant 5 (p16_variant 1 + 5). In a recent clinical trial evaluating the effects of the senolytic combination, dasatinib + quercetin (D + Q), on bone metabolism in postmenopausal women, we found that women in the highest tertile for T‐cell expression of p16_variant 5 had the most robust skeletal responses to D + Q. Importantly, the assessment of p16_variant 5 was more predictive of these responses than p16_variant 1 + 5. Here, we demonstrate that in vitro, p16_variant 1 + 5 increased rapidly (Week 1) following the induction of DNA damage, whereas p16_variant 5 increased later (Week 4), suggesting that p16_variant 5 becomes detectable only when the abundance of senescent cells reaches some threshold. Further analysis identified a SASP panel in plasma that performed as well in identifying postmenopausal women with a positive skeletal response to D + Q. Collectively, our findings provide further support for the T‐cell p16_variant 5 assay as a biomarker for selecting participants in clinical trials of senolytic interventions. In addition, our data indicate that correlated plasma SASP markers could be used in lieu of the more technically challenging T‐cell p16 assay. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04313634. Assessment of T‐cell p16_variant 5 expression may be useful for selecting participants in clinical trials of senolytics. We further characterize p16_variant 5 expression in the context of senescence and demonstrate that correlated plasma senescence‐associated secretory phenotype factors could be used in lieu of the technically challenging T‐cell p16_variant 5 assay.

Cells expressing features of senescence, including upregulation of p21 and p16, appear transiently following tissue injury, yet the properties of these cells or how they contrast with age-induced senescent cells remains unclear. Here, we used skeletal injury as a model and identified the rapid appearance following fracture of p21+ cells expressing senescence markers, mainly as osteochondroprogenitors (OCHs) and neutrophils. Targeted genetic clearance of p21+ cells suppressed senescence-associated signatures within the fracture callus and accelerated fracture healing. By contrast, p21+ cell clearance did not alter bone loss due to aging; conversely, p16+ cell clearance, known to alleviate skeletal aging, did not affect fracture healing. Following fracture, p21+ neutrophils were enriched in signaling pathways known to induce paracrine stromal senescence, while p21+ OCHs were highly enriched in senescence-associated secretory phenotype factors known to impair bone formation. Further analysis revealed an injury-specific stem cell-like OCH subset that was p21+ and highly inflammatory, with a similar inflammatory mesenchymal population (fibro-adipogenic progenitors) evident following muscle injury. Thus, intercommunicating senescent-like neutrophils and mesenchymal progenitor cells are key regulators of tissue repair in bone and potentially across tissues. Moreover, our findings establish contextual roles of p21+ vs p16+ senescent/senescent-like cells that may be leveraged for therapeutic opportunities.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.