Explore the vast range of titles available.

BackgroundHepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX), lenvatinib and programmed death receptor-1 signaling inhibitors (PD1s) all alone have been proven effective in treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), yet the efficacy and safety of the tri-combination therapy in treating HCC patients with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) remains unknown.MethodsIn this retrospective study, HCC patients with PVTT received either induction therapy of HAIC and lenvatinib plus PD1s in the initial period of treatment and then dual maintenance therapy of lenvatinib and PD1s (HAIC-Len-PD1) or continuous lenvatinib combined with PD1s (Len-PD1).ResultsIn total, 53 and 89 patients were enrolled into the Len-PD1 group and HAIC-Len-PD1 group, respectively. The median overall survival times were 13.8 months in the Len-PD1 group and 26.3 months in the HAIC-Len-PD1 group (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.43, P < 0.001). The median progression-free survival (PFS) time was significantly longer in the HAIC-Len-PD1 group than in the Len-PD1 group (11.5 months versus 5.5 months, HR = 0.43, P < 0.001). Induction therapy showed an objective response rate (ORR) 3 times higher than lenvatinib combined with PD1s therapy (61.8% versus 20.8%, P < 0.001), and exhibited inspiring intra- and extra-hepatic tumor control ability. Induction therapy led to more adverse events than lenvatinib combined with PD1s therapy, most of which were tolerable and controllable.ConclusionThe induction therapy of FOLFOX-HAIC and lenvatinib plus PD1s is an effective and safe treatment for HCC patients with PVTT. The concept of induction therapy could be applied to other local–regional treatments and drugs combinations in HCC management.

Peritumoral hepatocytes are critical components of the liver cancer microenvironment, However, the role of peritumoral hepatocytes in the local tumor immune interface and the underlying molecular mechanisms have not been elucidated. YTHDF2, an RNA N 6 -methyladenosine (m 6 A) reader, is critical for liver tumor progression. The function and regulatory roles of YTHDF2 in peritumoral hepatocytes are unknown. This study demonstrated that oxaliplatin (OXA) upregulated m 6 A modification and YTHDF2 expression in hepatocytes. Studies using tumor-bearing liver-specific Ythdf2 knockout mice revealed that hepatocyte YTHDF2 suppresses liver tumor growth through CD8 + T cell recruitment and activation. Additionally, YTHDF2 mediated the response to immunotherapy. Mechanistically, OXA upregulated YTHDF2 expression by activating the cGAS-STING signaling pathway and consequently enhanced the therapeutic outcomes of immunotherapeutic interventions. Ythdf2 stabilized Cx3cl1 transcripts in an m 6 A-dependent manner, regulating the interplay between CD8 + T cells and the progression of liver malignancies. Thus, this study elucidated the novel role of hepatocyte YTHDF2, which promotes therapy-induced antitumor immune responses in the liver. The findings of this study provide valuable insights into the mechanism underlying the therapeutic benefits of targeting YTHDF2.

The relative superiority of atezolizumab-bevacizumab versus pembrolizumab-lenvatinib in treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains uncertain. This study aims to compare the efficacy of atezolizumab-bevacizumab and pembrolizumab-lenvatinib in first-line treatments for unresectable HCC. A total of 72 patients receiving pembrolizumab-lenvatinib (PL group) and 92 patients receiving atezolizumab-bevacizumab (AB group) between January 2019 and June 2023 were included in this study. By employing propensity score matching (PSM), we compared the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between the two groups. After PSM, the 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 70.4%, 54.5%, and 40.0% in the PL group, and 88.4%, 44.2%, and 44.2% in the AB group, respectively. The 6-, 12-, and 18-month PFS rates were 56.9%, 43.0%, and 32.1% in the PL group, and 74.2%, 40.9%, and 30.7% in the AB group, respectively. No significant differences were observed in both OS (HR, 0.498; 95% CI, 0.217-1.143; = 0.1) and PFS (HR, 0.913; 95% CI, 0.512-0.1.629; = 0.758) between the two groups. Through subgroup analysis, we developed a Cirrhosis-Portal vein invasion-ALBI (CPA) score and identified that the AB group exhibited significantly longer OS than the PL group in the CPA high population (HR, 0.219; 95% CI, 0.075-0.637; = 0.005). The treatment-related adverse events between the PL group and the AB group were comparable. This study suggests that the efficacy of pembrolizumab-lenvatinib and atezolizumab-bevacizumab is comparable in first-line treatment of unresectable HCC, the atezolizumab-bevacizumab combination may confer additional benefits for patients with high CPA scores compared to pembrolizumab-lenvatinib.

BackgroundTransarterial therapy (TAT), bevacizumab (Bev), and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have individually exhibited efficacy in treating advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of the combination of these three treatments as a neoadjuvant modality in patients with locally advanced HCC.MethodsThe primary endpoint is overall survival (OS). The second endpoint is progression free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), pathological response rate and safety.ResultsA total of 54 patients received standard systemic therapy comprising Bev combined with ICIs (Bev-ICIs group), 113 patients received direct surgery (Surgery group), and 273 patients received neoadjuvant therapy of TAT combined Bev plus ICIs, among which 79 patients (28.9%) underwent surgical resection after successful tumor downstaging (Neo-surgery group) while the remaining 194 patients (71.1%) received maintenance systemic therapies (Neo-maintenance group). Neoadjuvant following surgery demonstrated a prolonged OS in contrast to direct surgery, with a median OS time not reached in the Neo-surgery group and 30.6 (95% CI: 26.4-34.7) months in the Surgery group (hazard ratio (HR)=0.29, P=0.0058). The median PFS time in the Neo-surgery and Surgery groups stood at 19.2 (95% CI: 16.1-22.2) and 6.3 (95% CI:4.7-8) months, respectively (HR=0.25, P<0.0001). In patients failed to receiving resection after neoadjuvant therapy, the median OS was 22.8 (95% CI: 22.3-23.1) months, whereas that for the standard care population was 19.7 (95% CI: 15.9-24) month (HR=0.53, P=0.023). The median PFS time in Neo-maintenance group and Bev-ICIs groups was 11.2 (95% CI: 10.4-11.9) and 6.4 (95% CI: 4.4-8.5) months (HR=0.60, P=0.024). The ORR and disease control rate (DCR) across all patients received TAT-Bev-ICIs were 38.8% and 89.4%, respectively. Additionally, the pathological complete response (pCR) rate and the major pathological response (MPR) rate were 22.8% and 48.1% in the Neo-surgery group. As for safety, neoadjuvant therapy did not increase the perioperative complications when compared to direct surgery, and demonstrated similar incidences and severity of AEs when compared to the standard systemic therapy.ConclusionThe triple therapy regimen comprising TAT-Bev-ICIs emerged as a promising therapeutic strategy for locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) as a neoadjuvant intervention.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation is a common complication in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated with chemotherapy or immunotherapy. This study aimed to evaluate the risk of HBV reactivation and its effect on survival in HCC patients treated with HAIC and lenvatinib plus PD1s. We retrospectively collected the data of 213 HBV-related HCC patients who underwent HAIC and lenvatinib plus PD1s treatment between June 2019 to June 2022 at Sun Yat-sen University, China. The primary outcome was the risk of HBV reactivation. The secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and treatment-related adverse events. Sixteen patients (7.5%) occurred HBV reactivation in our study. The incidence of HBV reactivation was 5% in patients with antiviral prophylaxis and 21.9% in patients without antiviral prophylaxis, respectively. The logistic regression model indicated that for HBV reactivation, lack of antiviral prophylaxis ( =0.003) and tumor diameter ( =0.036) were independent risk factors. The OS and PFS were significantly shorter in the HBV reactivation group than the non-reactivation group ( =0.0023 and =0.00073, respectively). The number of AEs was more in HBV reactivation group than the non-reactivation group, especially hepatic AEs. HBV reactivation may occur in HCC patients treated with HAIC and lenvatinib plus PD1s. Patients with HBV reactivation had shorter survival time compared with non-reactivation. Therefore, HBV-related HCC patients should undergo antiviral therapy and HBV-DNA monitoring before and during the combination treatment.

Background/purpose: The prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) is generally poor and hepatectomy is optional for these patients. This study aims to explore the survival benefits of neoadjuvant hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) for resectable HCC with PVTT. Methods: This retrospective study included 120 resectable HCC patients with PVTT who underwent hepatectomy, from January 2017 to January 2021 at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. Of these patients, the overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) of 55 patients who received hepatectomy alone (Surgery group) and 65 patients who received neoadjuvant HAIC followed by hepatectomy (HAIC-Surgery group) were compared. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to develop a model predicting the response to neoadjuvant HAIC. Results: The OS rates for the HAIC-Surgery group at 1, 3, and 5 years were 94.9%, 78%, and 66.4%, respectively, compared with 84.6%, 47.6%, and 37.2% in the Surgery group ( p < 0.001). The RFS rates were 88.7%, 56.2%, and 38.6% versus 84.9%, 38.3%, and 22.6% ( p = 0.002). The subgroup analysis revealed that the survival benefit of neoadjuvant HAIC was limited to patients who responded to it. The logistic model, consisting of AFP and CRP, that predicted the response to neoadjuvant HAIC performed well, with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.756. Conclusion: Neoadjuvant HAIC followed by hepatectomy is associated with a longer survival outcome than hepatectomy alone for HCC patients with PVTT and the survival benefit is limited to patients who respond to neoadjuvant FOLFOX-HAIC.

Background Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) is now widely performed in treating primary liver cancer (PLC) and yields equal long-term and superior short-term outcomes to those of open liver resection (OLR). The optimal surgical approach for resectable PLC (rPLC) remains controversial. Herein, we aimed to develop a nomogram to determine the most appropriate resection approach for the individual patient. Methods Patients with rPLC who underwent hepatectomy from January 2013 to December 2018 were reviewed. Prediction model for risky surgery during LLR was constructed. Results A total of 900 patients in the LLR cohort and 423 patients in the OLR cohort were included. A history of previous antitumor treatment, tumor diameter, tumor location and resection extent were independently associated with risky surgery of LLR. The nomogram which was constructed based on these risk factors demonstrated good accuracy in predicting risky surgery with a C index of 0.83 in the development cohort and of 0.76 in the validation cohort. Patients were stratified into high-, medium- or low-risk levels for receiving LLR if the calculated score was more than 0.8, between 0.2 and 0.8 or less than 0.2, respectively. High-risk patients who underwent LLR had more blood loss (441 ml to 417 ml) and a longer surgery time (183 min to 150 min) than those who received OLR. Conclusions Patients classified into the high-risk level for LLR instead undergo OLR to reduce surgical risks and complications and patients classified into the low-risk level undergo LLR to maximize the advantages of minimally invasive surgery. Trial registration This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration number: ChiCTR2100049446).

Background: Systemic chemotherapy (SC) remains the only first-line treatment for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA). Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) has been recently proven to be effective in managing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Hence, our study aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of HAIC in treating unresectable iCCA patients. Methods: We reviewed 146 patients with unresectable iCCA who had received HAIC or SC between March 2016 and March 2022 in a retrospective manner. Outcomes of patients and safety were compared between the HAIC and SC groups. Results: There were 75 and 71 patients in the HAIC and SC groups, respectively. The median OS in the HAIC and SC groups was 18.0 and 17.8 months ( p = 0.84), respectively. The median PFS in the HAIC and SC groups was 10.8 and 11.4 months ( p = 0.59), respectively. However, the HAIC group had significantly longer intrahepatic progression-free survival (IPFS) than the SC group ( p = 0.035). The median IPFS in the HAIC and SC groups was 13.7 and 11.4 months, respectively. According to the OS ( p = 0.047) and PFS ( p = 0.009), single-tumor patients in the HAIC group appeared to benefit more. In addition, the overall incidence of adverse events (AEs) was lower in the HAIC group than that in the SC group. Conclusion: Our study revealed that HAIC was a safe and effective therapeutic regimen for unresectable iCCA with better intrahepatic tumor control when compared to SC. Meanwhile, patients with single tumor were more likely to benefit from HAIC than SC.

Background: Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with cisplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFOX) demonstrated promising efficacy against advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) as an alleviative treatment. We aimed to explore the survival benefit of preoperative FOLFOX-HAIC and establish a predictive nomogram. Methods: This study retrospectively reviewed data from 1251 HCC patients who underwent liver resection. 1027 patients received liver resection alone (LR group), and 224 patients were treated with FOLFOX-HAIC followed by liver resection (HLR group). Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted between the two groups. The nomogram was established based on the findings of the multivariable Cox regression analysis. Results: After Propensity score matching according to initial tumor characteristics, the 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival rates were 85.4, 72.0, and 67.2% in the LR group and 95.2, 84.7, and 75.9% in the HLR group, respectively ( p = 0.014). After PSM according to preoperative tumor characteristics, the 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 87.9, 76.6, and 72.3% in the LR group and 95.4, 84.4, and 75.1% in the HLR group, respectively ( p = 0.24). Harrell’s C-indexes of the nomogram for OS prediction in patients with preoperative FOLFOX-HAIC were 0.82 (95% CI 0.78–0.86) in the training cohort and 0.87 (95% CI 0.83–0.93) in the validation cohort and the nomogram performed well-fitted calibration curves. Conclusion: Preoperative FOLFOX-HAIC is associated with a longer survival outcome for HCC patients. The novel nomogram efficiently predicted the OS of patients who underwent preoperative FOLFOX-HAIC.