Explore the vast range of titles available.

In 1995, the Japanese Society for Bone and Mineral Metabolism (now the Japanese Society for Bone and Mineral Research) established the Osteoporosis Diagnostic Criteria Review Committee. Following discussion held at the 13th scientific meeting of the Society in 1996, the Committee, with the consensus of its members, proposed diagnostic criteria for primary osteoporosis. The Committee revised those criteria in 1998 and again in 2000. The Japanese Society for Bone and Mineral Research and Japan Osteoporosis Society Joint Review Committee for the Revision of the Diagnostic Criteria for Primary Osteoporosis aimed at obtaining international consistency and made a revised edition based on the new findings in 2012.

Recently the clinical application of bone metabolic markers has achieved significant progress and the measurements of these indices give us a better understanding of the pathogenesis of osteoporosis. Bone metabolic markers were adapted to select drug treatment for osteoporosis and to evaluate drug efficacy. Therefore, the proper application and assessment of bone metabolic markers in clinical practice is very important. To achieve these aims, the committee on the guidelines for the use of biochemical markers of bone turnover in osteoporosis authorized by the Japan Osteoporosis Society has summarized recent progress in bone markers and proposed the proper utilization of bone markers. Although the use of bone metabolic markers now has an important role in the daily management of osteoporosis, their use in Japan is still insufficient because of insurance coverage limitations. Since the Japan Osteoporosis Society first created the 2001 guidelines, new bone metabolic markers have been introduced into clinical practice. The availability of new osteoporosis treatments that promote bone formation has changed the clinical application of bone metabolic markers in current practice. Therefore, revisions to the current clinical practice are needed which led to the proposal to create these new 2012 guidelines.

The positive link between osteoporosis and hypercholesterolemia has been documented, and bone resorption inhibitors, such as nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates (N-BP) and selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), are known to reduce serum cholesterol levels. However, the relationship between the baseline cholesterol level and incident fracture rate under the treatment using the bone resorption inhibitors has not been documented. We investigated the relation between vertebral fracture incident and the baseline cholesterol levels and cholesterol-lowering effect of N-BP and SERM in osteoporosis through a prospective randomized open-label study design. Patients with osteoporosis (n = 3986) were allocated into two groups based on the drug used for treatment: minodronic acid (MIN) (n = 1624) as an N-BP and raloxifene (RLX) as an SERM (n = 1623). Serum levels of cholesterol and incidence of vertebral fracture were monitored for 2 years. The vertebral fracture rates between the two groups were compared using the pre-specified stratification factors. The patients receiving MIN with baseline low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol level of ≥ 140 mg/dL, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level < 40 mg/dL, age group of ≥ 75 years, and T score of BMD ≥ -3 SD had significantly lower vertebral fracture rates than those receiving RLX (incidence rate ratios (IRR) 0.45 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.30 0.75, p = 0.001], 0.25 [95% CI 0.09 0.65, p = 0.005], 0.71 [95% CI 0.56 0.91, p = 0.006], 0.47 [95% CI 0.30 0.75, p = 0.0012], respectively). The cholesterol-lowering effect was stronger in the RLX group than in the MIN group, regardless of prior statin use. These results indicated that MIN treatment was more effective in reducing fracture risk in patients with higher LDL cholesterol levels, although its cholesterol-lowering ability was lesser than the RLX treatment.Trial registration University Hospital Medical Information Network-Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR), No. UMIN000005433; date: April 13, 2011.

Advanced glycation end products (AGE) in collagen have been reported to decrease the mechanical property of bone. However, there are no available data on the relation between fracture risk and levels of glycoxidative (nonenzymatic) cross-links of collagen in clinical samples. A total of 432 Japanese elderly women who were not receiving any drug treatment for osteoporosis were selected and followed for 5.2 ± 3.3 (mean ± SD) years for this observational study. Vertebral fractures and bone mineral density were assessed at baseline and then at 1- to 2-year intervals or at indication of any symptom. Two types of collagen metabolites were measured at baseline: urinary N-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (NTX), a marker of pyridinium cross-link, and urinary pentosidine, a nonenzymatic collagen cross-link produced by AGEs. A total of 97 incident vertebral fractures on 72 subjects were observed. Simple regression analysis using Cox's hazards model showed that log-transformed urinary NTX and pentosidine are significant risk factors for time-dependent incidence of vertebral fractures, in addition to the traditional risk factors (age, lumbar bone mineral density, and number of prevalent vertebral fractures). However, urinary excretion of pentosidine (hazard ratio, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.01–1.76, P = 0.04) was a significant predictor of incident vertebral fracture after adjustment for other traditional risk factors. The present data suggest that AGE-related collagen cross-link is a novel risk for vertebral fracture.

Eldecalcitol, a vitamin D 3 analogue, significantly reduces the risk of new vertebral fractures and increases bone mineral density (BMD) more than does alfacalcidol. To determine the effect of eldecalcitol on the incidence of all fragility fractures caused by osteoporosis, we conducted post hoc analyses of the phase III clinical trial to evaluate the incidence of the osteoporotic fractures defined in the World Health Organization (WHO) Technical Report, and, also, the incidence of the major osteoporotic fractures utilized in the WHO Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX), and compared those in the eldecalcitol group with those in the alfacalcidol group. We also analyzed the incidence of osteoporotic fractures stratified by prespecified risk factors for fractures. Eldecalcitol treatment reduced the incidence of osteoporotic fractures defined by the WHO more than alfacalcidol treatment (18.6 % vs. 25.2 %; hazard ratio, 0.70; 95 % CI, 0.54–0.93). Prevalent vertebral fractures, two or more prevalent vertebral fractures, and total hip BMD T score less than −2.5 were the risk factors for new osteoporotic fractures with significant differences between the two treatments. Eldecalcitol also decreased the incidence of major osteoporotic fractures in the FRAX more than alfacalcidol (11.1 % vs. 16.3 %; hazard ratio, 0.66; 95 % CI, 0.46–0.94). In conclusion, treatment with eldecalcitol reduced the risk of fragility fractures caused by osteoporosis compared with alfacalcidol administration, which may result from a potent effect of eldecalcitol on BMD, bone structure, and bone turnover.

We planned to conduct multi-center, open-labeled, blinded-endpoints, head-to-head randomized trial of minodronate and raloxifene to compare incidences of vertebral and non-vertebral fractures. The study is the Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial protocol number 4 (JOINT-4). Here, we present the pre-fixed study design. The inclusion criteria are ambulatory older women with osteoporosis, aged > 60 years, and without pre-specified risk factors for secondary osteoporosis and dementia. The subjects who meet selection criteria will be randomly allocated to the raloxifene (60 mg/day) or minodronate (1 mg/day or 50 mg/4 weeks) groups using the central registry. The co-primary endpoints are osteoporotic (vertebral, humeral, femoral, and radial), vertebral, and major osteoporotic (clinical vertebral, humeral, femoral, and radial) fractures. Furthermore, we plan to use the Hochberg procedure to preserve an overall type 1 error rate. In addition, changes in bone mineral density (BMD), hip-structure analysis (HSA) variables, height, bone turnover markers, serum cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations, dental health questionnaire, fall frequency, fall risk index, nursing care level, physical function, quality of life (QOL), and safety profiles were assessed as secondary endpoints. To detect 24% reduction of major osteoporotic fractures with 80% power and a two-sided significance level of 5% with a 2-year observation period, 1734 patients/treatment arm would be required. Subgroup analysis stratified to the following factors age, body mass index, BMD, 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), prevalent vertebral fracture number, hypertension status, and diabetes mellitus is pre-specified. The protocol is registered in the trial registry system, and the trial identification number is UMIN000005433.

Substantial evidence from animal studies indicates that jumping increases bone mass and strength. However, most studies have focused on the take-off, rather than the landing phase of jumps. Thus, we compared the effects of landing and upward jump impact on trabecular bone mass and microarchitecture. Male Wistar rats aged 10 weeks were randomly assigned to the following groups: sedentary control (CON), 40-cm upward jumps (40UJ); 40-cm drop jumps (40DJ); and 60-cm drop jumps (60DJ) (n = 10 each). The upward jump protocol comprised 10 upward jumps/day, 5 days/week for 8 weeks to a height of 40 cm. The drop jump protocol comprised dropping rats from a height of 40 or 60 cm at the same frequency and time period as the 40UJ group. Trabecular bone mass, architecture, and mineralization at the distal femoral metaphysis were evaluated using microcomputed tomography. Ground reaction force (GRF) was measured using a force platform. Bone mass was significantly higher in the 40UJ group compared with the DJ groups (+49.1% and +28.3%, respectively), although peak GRF (-57.8% and -122.7%, respectively) and unit time force (-21.6% and -36.2%, respectively) were significantly lower in the 40UJ group. These results showed that trabecular bone mass in growing rats is increased more effectively by the take-off than by the landing phases of jumps and suggest that mechanical stress accompanied by muscle contraction would be more important than GRF as an osteogenic stimulus. However, the relevance of these findings to human bone physiology is unclear and requires further study.

Eldecalcitol reduces the risk of vertebral fractures in comparison to alfacalcidol in osteoporotic patients under vitamin D repletion. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of eldecalcitol on the spinal location of incident vertebral fractures, the severity of the fractures, and the changes in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) compared with those of alfacalcidol. The post hoc analysis has been performed on the data from the three-year, double-blind, randomized, head-to-head clinical trial of eldecalcitol versus alfacalcidol conducted in Japan. A total of 1054 patients were enrolled and randomized to take 0.75 μg eldecalcitol or 1.0 μg alfacalcidol daily for 3 years. The incidence of vertebral fractures was re-evaluated based on the location on the spine (upper T4–T10; lower T11–L4). The severity of vertebral fractures was determined by the semi-quantitative method, and the change in HRQOL was analyzed by using the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-item questionnaire. The incidence of vertebral fracture at the lower spine was less in the eldecalcitol group than in the alfacalcidol group ( p  = 0.029). The incidence of severe vertebral fracture (Grade 3) was 3.8 % in the eldecalcitol group and 6.7 % in the alfacalcidol group, demonstrated a significant difference between the 2 groups ( p  = 0.036). Both eldecalcitol and alfacalcidol improved HRQOL in osteoporotic patients. Although no significant differences in each HRQOL scores were observed between eldecalcitol and alfacalcidol during the observational period, overall improvement from baseline of HRQOL scores were clearly observed in the eldecalcitol group. In conclusion, the incidences of lower spinal vertebral fractures and severe vertebral fractures were reduced further by eldecalcitol compared to alfacalcidol in the 3-year clinical trial. Daily treatment with eldecalcitol is effective in improving HRQOL, possibly owing to the reduced risk of lower spinal vertebral fractures and/or severe vertebral fractures.

The objective of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of long-term minodronate treatment in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis based on re-analysis of a phase III 2-year clinical trial with a 1-year extension. Women aged 55–80 years old with fragility fractures were enrolled and randomized to take 1 mg minodronate or placebo once a day in the original 2-year study. The subjects who completed the 2-year study were invited to participate in an additional 1-year extension in which all subjects were to receive minodronate. Finally, a total 380 subjects completed the extension study (186 from the placebo group and 194 from the minodronate group). Fracture results observed in the extension study were consistent with those observed in the first 2 years in minodronate group. In contrast, the placebo/minodronate group showed a decreased incidence of new vertebral fractures during year 3 compared to that in year 2. In the patients who received minodronate in the original 2-year study, lumbar bone mineral density (BMD) increased consistently during year 3 and bone turnover markers decreased within the first 6 months and remained constant thereafter over 3 years. Similar positive effects of minodronate on BMD and bone turnover markers occurred when therapy was initiated in the placebo/minodronate group. No new safety concerns observed during the extension period compared to the safety observations made during the 2-year study. It was concluded that daily administration of 1 mg oral minodronate is safe and well tolerated, and that the efficacy of this dose in reducing vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women over 2 years is sustained with continuing treatment.

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of concurrent treatment with vitamin K 2 and risedronate compared with treatment with risedronate alone in patients with osteoporosis and to explore subsets of patients for which concurrent treatment is particularly efficacious. Women with osteoporosis aged 65 years or older were recruited from 123 institutes in Japan and allocated to take either vitamin K 2 (45 mg/day) and risedronate (2.5 mg/day or 17.5 mg/week) or risedronate (2.5 mg/day or 17.5 mg/week) alone. The primary end point was the incidence of any fracture (vertebral and nonvertebral). The secondary end points were bone mineral density, height, undercarboxylated osteocalcin concentration, quality of life, and safety. Over a 2-year follow-up, vertebral or nonvertebral fractures occurred in 117 or 22 sites respectively among 931 patients in the risedronate and vitamin K 2 group and in 104 or 26 sites respectively among 943 patients in the risedronate alone group. The rates of any incident fracture were similar between the two groups (incidence rate ratio 1.074, 95 % confidence interval 0.811–1.422, p  = 0.62), implying that the primary end point was not met. There were no differences in the degree of increase in bone mineral density between the two groups. Undercarboxylated osteocalcin concentration decreased from 5.81 ± 3.93 ng/mL to 2.59 ± 1.52 ng/mL at 6 months in the risedronate and vitamin K 2 group, whereas the change in the risedronate alone group was minimal (from 5.96 ± 4.36 ng/mL to 4.05 ± 3.40 ng/mL at 6 months) ( p  < 0.01). The treatment discontinuation rate was higher in the risedronate and vitamin K 2 group than in the risedronate alone group (10.0 % vs 6.7 %). No unknown adverse drug reactions were reported. In conclusion, concurrent treatment with vitamin K 2 and risedronate was not efficacious compared with monotherapy with risedronate in terms of fracture prevention.