Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Series Title
      Series Title
      Clear All
      Series Title
  • Reading Level
      Reading Level
      Clear All
      Reading Level
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
      More Filters
      Clear All
      More Filters
      Content Type
    • Item Type
    • Is Full-Text Available
    • Subject
    • Publisher
    • Source
    • Donor
    • Language
    • Place of Publication
    • Contributors
    • Location
10 result(s) for "Fulk, R. D. (Robert Dennis)"
Sort by:
Studies in the History of the English Language VI
The future of English linguistics as envisaged by the editors of Topics in English Linguistics lies in empirical studies which integrate work in English linguistics into general and theoretical linguistics on the one hand, and comparative linguistics on the other. The TiEL series features volumes that present interesting new data and analyses, and above all fresh approaches that contribute to the overall aim of the series, which is to further outstanding research in English linguistics.
A history of Old English literature
A HISTORY OF OLD ENGLISH LITERATURE A History of Old English Literature has been significantly revised to provide an unequivocal response to the renewed historicism in medieval studies. Focusing on the production and reception of Old English texts and on their relation to Anglo-Saxon history and culture, this new edition covers an exceptionally broad array of genres. These range from riddles and cryptograms to allegory, liturgical texts, and romance, as well as lyric poetry and heroic legend. The authors also integrate discussions of Anglo-Latin texts, crucial to understanding the development of Old English literature. This second edition incorporates extensive reference to scholarship that has evolved over the past decade, with new chapters on both Anglo-Saxon manuscripts and on incidental and marginal texts. There is expanded treatment throughout, including increased coverage of legal texts and scientific and scholastic texts. The book concludes with a retrospective outline of the reception of Anglo-Saxon literature and culture in subsequent periods.
GERMANIC PROSODY
The earliest poetry recorded in Germanic langs. takes the form of alliterative verse (AV), in which stress, syllable
Some Emendations and Non-Emendations in \Beowulf\ (Verses 600a, 976a, 1585b, 1663b, 1740a, 2525b, 2771a, and 3060a)
The following discussion of cruces in Beowulf is thus offered after his example, explaining the reasoning behind certain of the textual and interpretive choices that are most likely to be adopted in the forthcoming revised edition of Klaeber's work.1 In most instances, a change to the text is advocated, though in some places reasons to doubt Klaeber's readings are answered and his decisions corroborated. Degemination after an unstressed vowel, as in irena for irenna, \"of irons\" (673, 1697, 2259), could have an etymological cause, though more likely it is due to normal late spelling practices.40 However, simplification does not normally occur after a stressed vowel except at the end of a word (e.g., heal, mon) or after a consonant (e.g., eorlic for eorllic [637]).41 The two exceptions in Beowulf have obvious causes: hetende (1828) is most likely influenced by hete (lic), hetol (so Klaeber in his edition, lxxxiv), and hh is simplified between vowels in genehost (794) because in intervocalic position it could not contrast with simple h, since this was lost in the late prehistoric period: cf. geneahe (Genesis A, 2844; Homiletic Fragment I, 36), genehe (Maldon, 269).