Explore the vast range of titles available.

The addition of pembrolizumab, an anti–PD-1 antibody, to a platinum–taxane chemotherapy combination significantly prolonged progression-free and overall survival among patients with untreated squamous cell lung cancer, regardless of the level of tumor PD-L1 expression.

Background and Objectives: KRAS genes are among the most prominent oncogenes that trigger tumor formation in colorectal cancer (CRC) and serve as predictive biomarkers for resistance to anti-EGFR therapies in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. However, the prevalence and mutation spectrum of the KRAS gene family in mCRC patients in Turkey have not been sufficiently analyzed. This study investigates the frequency and distribution of mutations in the KRAS gene family across different regions of Turkey and examines gender-related variations. Materials and Methods: This multicenter observational study included 2458 histologically confirmed mCRC patients collected from 52 centers across Turkey. In a central laboratory, KRAS mutations in codons 12 and 13 were analyzed using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Statistical analyses were performed using chi-square tests and Monte Carlo simulations, with a significance threshold set at p < 0.05. Results: Depending on the region, KRAS mutations were detected in 45% of patients, ranging from 39.6% to 47.5%. The mutation rate was significantly higher in female patients (48.8%) compared to male patients (42.6%) (p = 0.002). Codon 12 mutations were more frequent than codon 13 mutations. G12D, G12V, and G13D mutations accounted for 80% of all detected mutations. The G12V mutation was prevalent in female patients (p = 0.007). Based on region, mutation diversity was similar, and no statistically significant difference was found (p > 0.05). Conclusions: This large-scale, multicenter study provides the most comprehensive dataset of KRAS mutations in mCRC patients in Turkey. This study revealed regional trends, as well as gender differences. The findings highlight the importance of routine KRAS genotyping in guiding personalized treatment strategies, especially regarding candidate selection for anti-EGFR therapies. Further research is required to elucidate the prognostic and therapeutic implications of specific KRAS mutations.

In the KEYNOTE-826 study, the addition of the anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody pembrolizumab to chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab improved overall survival and progression-free survival (primary endpoints) versus placebo plus chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab, with manageable toxicity, in patients with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer. In this Article, we report patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from KEYNOTE-826. KEYNOTE-826 is a multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial in 151 cancer treatment centres in 19 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer not previously treated with systemic chemotherapy (previous radiosensitising chemotherapy was allowed) and not amenable to curative treatment and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) centrally by means of an interactive voice response system in a double-blind manner to receive either pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo every 3 weeks intravenously for up to 35 cycles plus chemotherapy (paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 plus cisplatin 50 mg/m2 or carboplatin area under the curve 5 mg/mL per min, intravenously) with or without bevacizumab 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks intravenously. Randomisation (block size of 4) was stratified by metastatic disease at diagnosis, planned bevacizumab use, and PD-L1 combined positive score. Patients, investigators, and other study personnel involved in study treatment administration or clinical evaluation of patients were unaware of treatment group assignments. PRO instruments were the EORTC Quality-of-Life-Core 30 (QLQ-C30), the EORTC cervical cancer module (QLQ-CX24), and the EuroQol-5 dimension-5 level (EQ-5D-5L) visual analogue scale, each collected before treatment at cycles 1–14 and every other cycle thereafter. Primary endpoints were overall survival and progression-free survival per RECIST version 1.1 by investigator review. Change from baseline in QLQ-C30 global health status (GHS)–quality of life (QoL) was a prespecified secondary endpoint and was assessed in the PRO full analysis population (all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment and completed at least one post-baseline PRO assessment). Other PRO analyses were protocol-specified exploratory endpoints. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03635567, and is ongoing. Between Nov 20, 2018, and Jan 31, 2020, of 883 patients screened, 617 were randomly assigned (pembrolizumab group, n=308; placebo group, n=309). 587 (95%) of 617 patients received at least one dose of study treatment and completed at least one post-baseline PRO assessment and were therefore included in the PRO analyses (pembrolizumab group, n=290; placebo group, n=297). Median follow-up was 22·0 months (IQR 19·1–24·4). At week 30, QLQ-C30 completion was 199 (69%) of 290 patients in the pembrolizumab group and 168 (57%) of 297 patients in the placebo group; compliance was 199 (94%) of 211 and 168 (90%) of 186, respectively. The least squares mean change in QLQ-C30 GHS–QoL score from baseline to week 30 was −0·3 points (95% CI −3·1 to 2·6) in the pembrolizumab group and −1·3 points (−4·2 to 1·7) in the placebo group, with a between-group difference in least squares mean change of 1·0 point (95% CI −2·7 to 4·7). Median time to true deterioration in GHS–QoL was not reached (NR; 95% CI 13·4 months–NR) in the pembrolizumab group and 12·9 months (6·6–NR) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·84 [95% CI 0·65–1·09]). 122 (42%) of 290 patients in the pembrolizumab group versus 85 (29%) of 297 in the placebo group had improved GHS–QoL at any time during the study (p=0·0003). Addition of pembrolizumab to chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab did not negatively affect health-related quality of life. Along with the efficacy and safety results already reported from KEYNOTE-826, these data support the benefit of pembrolizumab and the value of immunotherapy in patients with recurrent, persistent, or metastatic cervical cancer. Merck Sharp & Dohme.

Cemiplimab provided significant survival benefit to patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with PD-L1 tumour expression of at least 50% and no actionable biomarkers at 1-year follow-up. In this exploratory analysis, we provide outcomes after 35 months' follow-up and the effect of adding chemotherapy to cemiplimab at the time of disease progression. EMPOWER-Lung 1 was a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. We enrolled patients (aged ≥18 years) with histologically confirmed squamous or non-squamous advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with PD-L1 tumour expression of 50% or more. We randomly assigned (1:1) patients to intravenous cemiplimab 350 mg every 3 weeks for up to 108 weeks, or until disease progression, or investigator's choice of chemotherapy. Central randomisation scheme generated by an interactive web response system governed the randomisation process that was stratified by histology and geographical region. Primary endpoints were overall survival and progression free survival, as assessed by a blinded independent central review (BICR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1. Patients with disease progression on cemiplimab could continue cemiplimab with the addition of up to four cycles of chemotherapy. We assessed response in these patients by BICR against a new baseline, defined as the last scan before chemotherapy initiation. The primary endpoints were assessed in all randomly assigned participants (ie, intention-to-treat population) and in those with a PD-L1 expression of at least 50%. We assessed adverse events in all patients who received at least one dose of their assigned treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03088540. Between May 29, 2017, and March 4, 2020, we recruited 712 patients (607 [85%] were male and 105 [15%] were female). We randomly assigned 357 (50%) to cemiplimab and 355 (50%) to chemotherapy. 284 (50%) patients assigned to cemiplimab and 281 (50%) assigned to chemotherapy had verified PD-L1 expression of at least 50%. At 35 months' follow-up, among those with a verified PD-L1 expression of at least 50% median overall survival in the cemiplimab group was 26·1 months (95% CI 22·1–31·8; 149 [52%] of 284 died) versus 13·3 months (10·5–16·2; 188 [67%] of 281 died) in the chemotherapy group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·57, 95% CI 0·46–0·71; p<0·0001), median progression-free survival was 8·1 months (95% CI 6·2–8·8; 214 events occurred) in the cemiplimab group versus 5·3 months (4·3–6·1; 236 events occurred) in the chemotherapy group (HR 0·51, 95% CI 0·42–0·62; p<0·0001). Continued cemiplimab plus chemotherapy as second-line therapy (n=64) resulted in a median progression-free survival of 6·6 months (6·1–9·3) and overall survival of 15·1 months (11·3–18·7). The most common grade 3–4 treatment-emergent adverse events were anaemia (15 [4%] of 356 patients in the cemiplimab group vs 60 [17%] of 343 in the control group), neutropenia (three [1%] vs 35 [10%]), and pneumonia (18 [5%] vs 13 [4%]). Treatment-related deaths occurred in ten (3%) of 356 patients treated with cemiplimab (due to autoimmune myocarditis, cardiac failure, cardio-respiratory arrest, cardiopulmonary failure, septic shock, tumour hyperprogression, nephritis, respiratory failure, [n=1 each] and general disorders or unknown [n=2]) and in seven (2%) of 343 patients treated with chemotherapy (due to pneumonia and pulmonary embolism [n=2 each], and cardiac arrest, lung abscess, and myocardial infarction [n=1 each]). The safety profile of cemiplimab at 35 months, and of continued cemiplimab plus chemotherapy, was generally consistent with that previously observed for these treatments, with no new safety signals At 35 months' follow-up, the survival benefit of cemiplimab for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer was at least as pronounced as at 1 year, affirming its use as first-line monotherapy for this population. Adding chemotherapy to cemiplimab at progression might provide a new second-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals and Sanofi.

Background and Objectives: CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) have revolutionized the treatment of hormone receptor-positive HER2 negative (HR(+)/HER2(-)) breast cancer. Despite their efficacy, interstitial lung disease (ILD) remains a rare but potentially fatal adverse effect. This study aims to evaluate the incidence and clinical characteristics of ILD associated with CDK4/6 inhibitors in breast cancer patients in Turkey. Materials and Methods: A retrospective multicenter analysis included 464 breast cancer patients treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors between January 2017 and April 2024. Patients receiving ribociclib or palbociclib were evaluated for the development of ILD. Radiological assessments were performed to confirm ILD and exclude other conditions. Clinical characteristics, treatment regimens, and outcomes were analyzed. Results: ILD was identified in 10 patients (2.1%). The average age of the affected patients was 62.5 ± 9.85 years. Hypersensitivity pneumonitis and nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) were the most common radiological patterns. Palbociclib was implicated in six cases, while ribociclib was associated with four cases. Grade 3 pulmonary toxicity was observed in eight patients, and Grade 4 toxicity in two patients. One patient who was on palbociclib died due to ILD. No significant correlation was found between ILD and age, smoking status, lung metastases, or prior thoracic radiotherapy. Conclusions: The incidence of CDK4/6 inhibitor-associated ILD in Turkish breast cancer patients appears higher than previously reported in clinical trials. More robust, long-term studies are necessary to identify potential risk factors and mitigate ILD-related mortality.

IntroductionTumor lymphocyte infiltration demonstrates a positive effect on patient survival in breast cancer, melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, and lung cancer. This study aimed to elucidate the relationship between tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) ratio and disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) by considering localization, clinical and pathological features, microsatellite instability (MSI) status, mutation status, and demographic data.MethodPatients (n=248) diagnosed with colorectal cancer stages 1, 2, and 3 were analyzed retrospectively. Patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score of <2 were excluded. Clinical characteristics, age, gender, histopathologic features, TIL ratio, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level of the patients were recorded.ResultsStage, CEA level, TIL ratio, N stage, T stage, and lymphovascular invasion were statistically significant. Early stage (p=0.019), low CEA level (p≤0.001), high TIL ratio (p=0.046), low N stage (p=0.004), low T stage (p=0.016), and absence of lymphovascular invasion (p=0.037 and p=0.046) were associated with longer DFS. Lymphovascular invasion, N stage, CEA levels, and TIL ratio were analyzed using multivariate analysis. According to the results, the hazard ratio (HR) for the TIL ratio was 1.68 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.005-2.807; p=0.048), and the HR for the CEA level was 0.49 (95% CI: 0.293-0.846; p=0.01).ConclusionRegarding the outcomes of this research, the TIL ratio was found to be an effective indicator of DFS, confirmed via multivariate analysis to present a 32% reduction in the risk of recurrence/relapse. The TIL ratio was identified as a prognostic factor beyond the effects of stage, grade, lymphovascular invasion, CEA level, and MSI status. The current data provides substantial evidence to support the ratio’s consideration in staging guidelines.

Background and Objectives: Early-onset breast cancer (EOBC), particularly in patients under 40, presents with distinct biological characteristics and worse survival outcomes compared to late-onset cases. Despite intensive treatments, EOBC patients, especially those with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) subtypes, show poorer prognosis. CDK4/6 inhibitors, combined with endocrine therapy (ET) have become the standard for HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer, yet younger patients are underrepresented in clinical trials. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of ribociclib and palbociclib with ET in HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer, addressing the critical gap in understanding treatment outcomes in younger patient populations. Materials and Methods: This multicenter, retrospective study evaluated the efficacy and safety of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK 4/6) inhibitors, ribociclib, and palbociclib, in combination with endocrine therapy in patients with hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer. Results: A total of 198 patients treated between 2019 and 2023 were analyzed for progression-free survival, overall survival, and prognostic factors. Very early-onset breast cancer, which is diagnosed before the age of 35, was identified as an independent prognostic factor for poor progression-free survival. Additional factors associated with poorer outcomes included liver metastasis, progesterone receptor negativity, high tumor grade, and the concurrent use of fulvestrant with CDK4/6 inhibitors. Both ribociclib and palbociclib demonstrated similar efficacy, and dose reductions due to treatment-related adverse events did not compromise therapeutic outcomes. Conclusions: This study is the first to focus specifically on the treatment of early-onset breast cancer with CDK4/6 inhibitors, providing critical insights into the unique challenges faced by this patient population. The findings underscore the urgent need for personalized treatment strategies, routine genetic testing, and dedicated clinical trials designed to address the specific needs of these high-risk subgroups. By advancing our understanding of the clinical and molecular landscape of early-onset breast cancer and very early-onset breast cancer, this study lays the groundwork for improving outcomes in these underserved patients through tailored therapeutic approaches.

Abstract Introduction This study aims to report the efficacy and safety of capecitabine plus temozolomide (CAPTEM) across different lines of treatment in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Methods We conducted a multicenter retrospective study analyzing the data of 308 patients with metastatic NETs treated with CAPTEM between 2010 and 2022 in 34 different hospitals across various regions of Turkey. Results The median follow-up time was 41.0 months (range: 1.7-212.1), and the median age was 53 years (range: 22-79). Our results across the entire patient cohort showed a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 10.6 months and a median overall survival (OS) of 60.4 months. First-line CAPTEM treatment appeared more effective, with a median PFS of 16.1 months and a median OS of 105.8 months (median PFS 16.1, 7.9, and 9.6 months in first-, second- and ≥third-line respectively, P = .01; with median OS values of 105.8, 47.2, and 24.1 months, respectively, P = .003) In terms of ORR, the first-line treatment again performed better, resulting in an ORR of 54.7% compared to 33.3% and 30.0% in the second and third or higher lines, respectively (P < .001). Grade 3-4 side effects occurred only in 22.5% of the patients, leading to a discontinuation rate of 9.5%. Despite the differences in outcomes based on treatment line, we did not observe a significant difference in terms of side effects between the first and subsequent lines of treatment. Conclusions and Relevance The substantial superior outcomes in patients receiving first-line CAPTEM treatment highlight its potential as an effective treatment strategy for patients with metastatic NET. This article reports on the efficacy and safety of capecitabine plus temozolomide (CAPTEM) across different lines of treatment in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Background/Objectives: Prostate cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality. While prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is crucial for monitoring, its static levels are limited in predicting outcomes precisely. The Kinetics of Elimination of PSA (KELIM PSA) has recently emerged as a dynamic biomarker of treatment response. This research sought to determine the predictive power of KELIM PSA in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) on androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI). Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed 98 CRPC patients treated with enzalutamide or abiraterone. The patients were categorized as either unfavorable (KELIM < 1) or favorable (KELIM ≥ 1). Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared, and survival outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox regression. Results: Of the cohort, 42 (42.9%) patients had favorable and 56 (57.1%) unfavorable KELIM values. The unfavorable group had a higher mortality rate (62.5% vs. 38.1%, p = 0.029). Univariate analysis showed that poor KELIM results increased mortality risk twofold (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.30, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.26–4.19, p = 0.006). In multivariable analysis, unfavorable KELIM remained independently associated with worse overall survival (HR: 2.09, 95% CI: 1.12–3.89, p = 0.020), together with second-line ARPI (HR: 3.19, 95% CI: 1.71–5.93, p < 0.001) and ADT + docetaxel during CSPC (HR: 2.14, 95% CI: 1.11–4.12, p = 0.022). Kaplan–Meier curves revealed that the unfavorable group had notably reduced overall survival and progression-free survival (log-rank p = 0.018). Conclusions: KELIM PSA is an independent predictor in ARPI-treated CRPC. By integrating PSA kinetics into prognostic models, risk stratification may be improved, and this may guide individualized treatment. Prospective multicenter validation is warranted.

We aimed to examine cemiplimab, a programmed cell death 1 inhibitor, in the first-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) of at least 50%. In EMPOWER-Lung 1, a multicentre, open-label, global, phase 3 study, eligible patients recruited in 138 clinics from 24 countries (aged ≥18 years with histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–1; never-smokers were ineligible) were randomly assigned (1:1) to cemiplimab 350 mg every 3 weeks or platinum-doublet chemotherapy. Crossover from chemotherapy to cemiplimab was allowed following disease progression. Primary endpoints were overall survival and progression-free survival per masked independent review committee. Primary endpoints were assessed in the intention-to-treat population and in a prespecified PD-L1 of at least 50% population (per US Food and Drug Administration request to the sponsor), which consisted of patients with PD-L1 of at least 50% per 22C3 assay done according to instructions for use. Adverse events were assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of the assigned treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03088540 and is ongoing. Between June 27, 2017 and Feb 27, 2020, 710 patients were randomly assigned (intention-to-treat population). In the PD-L1 of at least 50% population, which consisted of 563 patients, median overall survival was not reached (95% CI 17·9–not evaluable) with cemiplimab (n=283) versus 14·2 months (11·2–17·5) with chemotherapy (n=280; hazard ratio [HR] 0·57 [0·42–0·77]; p=0·0002). Median progression-free survival was 8·2 months (6·1–8·8) with cemiplimab versus 5·7 months (4·5–6·2) with chemotherapy (HR 0·54 [0·43–0·68]; p<0·0001). Significant improvements in overall survival and progression-free survival were also observed with cemiplimab in the intention-to-treat population despite a high crossover rate (74%). Grade 3–4 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 98 (28%) of 355 patients treated with cemiplimab and 135 (39%) of 342 patients treated with chemotherapy. Cemiplimab monotherapy significantly improved overall survival and progression-free survival compared with chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with PD-L1 of at least 50%, providing a potential new treatment option for this patient population. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals and Sanofi.