Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background/Objectives: Lumbar spine surgery has undergone significant technological transformation in recent years, driven by the goals of minimizing invasiveness, improving precision, and enhancing clinical outcomes. Emerging tools—including robotics, augmented reality, computer-assisted navigation, and artificial intelligence—have complemented the evolution of minimally invasive surgical (MIS) approaches, such as endoscopic and lateral interbody fusions. Methods: This systematic review evaluates the literature from February 2020 to February 2025 on technological and procedural innovations in LSS. Eligible studies focused on degenerative lumbar pathologies, advanced surgical technologies, and reported clinical or perioperative outcomes. Randomized controlled trials, comparative studies, meta-analyses, and large case series were included. Results: A total of 32 studies met the inclusion criteria. Robotic-assisted surgery demonstrated high accuracy in pedicle screw placement (~92–94%) and reduced intraoperative blood loss and radiation exposure, although long-term clinical outcomes were comparable to conventional techniques. Intraoperative navigation improved instrumentation precision, while AR enhanced ergonomic workflow and reduced surgeon distraction. AI tools showed promise in surgical planning, guidance, and outcome prediction but lacked definitive evidence of clinical superiority. MIS techniques—including endoscopic discectomy and MIS-TLIF—offered reduced blood loss, shorter hospital stays, and faster recovery, with equivalent pain relief, fusion rates, and complication profiles compared to open procedures. Lateral and oblique approaches (XLIF/OLIF) further optimized alignment and indirect decompression, with favorable perioperative metrics. Conclusions: Recent innovations in lumbar spine surgery have enhanced technical precision and perioperative efficiency without compromising patient outcomes. While short-term benefits are clear, long-term clinical advantages and cost-effectiveness require further investigation. Integration of robotics, navigation, AI, and MIS into spine surgery reflects an ongoing shift toward personalized, data-driven, and less invasive care.

BackgroundPercutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) placement is a key step in several minimally invasive spinal surgery (MISS) procedures. Traditional technique for PPS makes use of C-arm fluoroscopy assistance (FA). More recently, newer intraoperative imaging techniques have been developed for PPS, including CT-guided navigation (CTNav). The aim of this study was to compare FA and CTNav techniques for PPS with regard to accuracy, complications, and radiation dosage.Materials and methodsA total of 192 patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis and canal stenosis who underwent MISS posterior fusion ± interbody fusion through transforaminal approach (TLIF) were retrospectively reviewed. Pedicle screws were placed percutaneously using either standard C-arm fluoroscopy guidance (FA group) or CT navigation (CTNav group). Intraoperative effective dose (ED, mSv) was measured. Screw placement accuracy was assessed postoperatively on a CT scan using Gertzbein and Robbins classification (grades A–E). Oswestry disability index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS) scores were compared in both groups before and after surgery.ResultsA total of 101 and 91 procedures were performed with FA (FA group) and CTNav approach (CTNav group), respectively. Median age was 61 years in both groups, and the most commonly treated level was L4–L5. Median ED received from patients was 1.504 mSv (0.494–4.406) in FA technique and 21.130 mSv (10.840–30.390) in CTNav approach (p < 0.001). Percentage of grade A and B screws was significantly higher for the CTNav group (96.4% versus 92%, p < 0.001), whereas there were 16 grade E screws in the FA group and 0 grade E screws in the CTNav group (p < 0.001). A total of seven and five complications were reported in the FA and CTNav group, respectively (p = 0.771).ConclusionsCTNav technique increases accuracy of pedicle screw placement compared with FA technique without affecting operative time. Nevertheless, no significant difference was noted in terms of reoperation rate due to screw malpositioning between CTNav and FA techniques. Radiation exposure of patients was significantly higher with CTNav technique.Level of Evidence: Level 3.

[...]the availability of specimens for neuroanatomical dissection may be limited or expensive if the specimens have to be imported from other countries. [...]we think that a way to fully exploit the educational potential of neurosurgical dissection is to employ multiple technological tools, which assist the trainees during the dissection and create the possibility to collect photographs, videos, and radiologic images. Any time they wanted, the trainees could verify the position of the anatomical structure they had dissected by using the neuronavigation pointer. [...]an “intra-operative” CT scan could be performed at any step of dissection, for example, to verify the amount of bone removed. [...]in this scenario, universities, or anatomical dissection centres, could get specimens from a private company outside Italy. [...]if the trainee follows a predefined schedule, the same head can be more extensively exploited without “wasting” any possibility of learning that is avoiding, for example, any damage to anatomical structures that can be useful for other projects.

Background: The arcuate fasciculus (AF) is a critical white matter (WM) tract that connects key cortical language-processing regions, including the so-called Broca’s and Wernicke’s areas. The aim of the present study was to quantitatively assess its radiological–anatomical–morphometric modifications according to different brain tumor histotypes. Methods: A retrospective multicentric Italian study was conducted. AF reconstructions were calculated for both hemispheres for each patient diagnosed with glioblastoma (GBM), low-grade glioma (LGG), brain metastasis, and meningioma using Elements Fibertracking 2.0 software (Brainlab AG, Munich, Germany). A 3D object of each fascicle was evaluated for its volume, average fractional anisotropy (FA), and length. The cerebral healthy hemisphere was compared to the pathological contralateral in different tumor histotypes. Results: In total, 1294 patients were evaluated. A total of 156 met the inclusion criteria. We found a significant difference between healthy hemisphere and the contralateral for AF mean length and volume (p = 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively). Considering separately the different tumor histotypes, the GBM subgroup (98, 63%) confirmed the results for mean FA and volume (p-value < 0.001); LGG patients (26, 17%) showed no significant difference between healthy and pathological hemisphere for AF mean length, mean FA, and volume (p-value 0.5, p-value 0.3, p-value <0.1, respectively). In patients affected by brain metastasis (18, 12%), Student’s t-test showed a significant difference for FA (p-value 0.003). No differences were found in patients affected by meningiomas (14, 9%) (14). Conclusions: Thorough knowledge of the microscopic anatomy and function of the arcuate fasciculus, as well as the pattern of growth of the different brain tumor histotypes, along with a careful preoperative neuroradiological assessment are mandatory to plan a tailored surgical strategy and perform a safe and effective surgical technique. The AF could be displaced and infiltrated/destructed by the solid component and peritumoral edema, respectively, of GBM. LGG shows a prevalent infiltrative pattern. Metastases account for AF dislocation due to peritumoral edema. Meningiomas do not affect WM anatomy.

BackgroundMinimally invasive spine surgery is a field of active and intense research. Image-guided percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) placement is a valid alternative to the standard free-hand technique, thanks to technological advancements that provide potential improvement in accuracy and safety. Herein, we describe the clinical results of a surgical technique exploiting integration of neuronavigation and intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) for minimally invasive PPS.Materials and MethodsAn intraoperative-computed tomography (CT)-based neuronavigation system was combined with IONM in a three-step technique for PPS. Clinical and radiological data were collected to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the procedure. The accuracy of PPS placement was classified according to the Gertzbein–Robbins scale.ResultsA total of 230 screws were placed in 49 patients. Only two screws were misplaced (0.8%); nevertheless, no clinical sign of radiculopathy was experienced by these patients. The majority of the screws (221, 96.1%) were classified as grade A according to Gertzbein–Robbins scale, seven screws were classified as grade B, one screw was classified as grade D, and one last screw was classified as grade E.ConclusionsThe proposed three-step, navigated, percutaneous procedure offers a safe and accurate alternative to traditional techniques for lumbar and sacral pedicle screw placement.Level of Evidence Level 3.Trial registration Not applicable.

Background Inferior Fronto-Occipital Fascicle (IFOF) is a multitasking connection bundle essential for communication and high level mentalization. The aim of the present study was to quantitatively assess its radiological-anatomical-morphometric modifications according to different brain tumor histotype. Methods A retrospective multicentric Italian study was conducted. IFOF reconstructions were calculated for both hemispheres for each patient diagnosed with Glioblastoma (GBM), Low Grade Glioma (LGG), Brain Metastasis and Meningioma using Elements Fibertracking software (Brainlab AG). A 3D object of each fascicle was evaluated for volume, average fractional anisotropy (FA) and length. The cerebral healthy hemisphere was compared to the pathological contralateral in different tumor histotype. Results 1294 patients were evaluated. 156 met the inclusion criteria. We found a significant difference between healthy hemisphere and the contralateral for IFOF mean length and volume ( p -value < 0.001). Considering GBM subgroup, Student’s t-test confirmed the results. In LGG subgroup, there was significant difference between the 2 hemispheres for IFOF mean length, mean FA and volume (respectively p -value 0.011; p -value 0.021, p -value < 0.001). In patients affected by brain metastasis (18) Student’s t-test showed a significant difference for FA and volume ( p -value 0.003 and 0.02 respectively). No differences were found in patients affected by meningiomas. Conclusions The careful preoperative neuroradiological evaluation of the brain-tumor interface is indispensable to plan a tailored surgical strategy and perform a safe and effective surgical technique. It depends on the tumor histology and pattern of growth. GBM have a mixed component, with the solid enhancing nodule which accounts for IFOF displacement and the peritumoral area which accounts for an infiltrative/destructive effect on the fascicle. LGG determine a prevalent infiltrative pattern. Metastases determine an IFOF dislocation due to peritumoral oedema. Meningiomas do not impact on WM anatomy.

Background/Objectives: Lumbar disc herniation, a complex challenge in spinal health, significantly impacts individuals across diverse age groups. This article delves into the intricacies of this condition, emphasising the pivotal role of anatomical considerations in its understanding and management. Additionally, lumbar discectomy might be considered an “easy” surgery; nevertheless, it carries significant risks. The aim of the study was to present a groundbreaking “three-step approach” with some anatomical insight derived from our comprehensive clinical experiences, designed to systematise the surgical approach and optimise the outcomes, especially for young spine surgeons. We highlighted the purpose of the study and introduced our research question(s) and the context surrounding them. Methods: This retrospective study involved patients treated for lumbar disc herniation at a single institution. The patient demographics, surgical details, and postoperative assessments were meticulously recorded. All surgeries were performed by a consistent surgical team. Results: A total of 847 patients of the 998 patients initially included completed the follow-up period. A three-step approach was performed for every patient. The recurrence rate was 1.89%. Furthermore, the incidence of lumbar instability and the need for reoperation were carefully examined, presenting a holistic view of the outcomes. Conclusions: The three-step approach emerged as a robust and effective strategy for addressing lumbar disc herniation. This structured approach ensures a safe and educational experience for young spinal surgeons.

Stereotactic needle biopsy (SNB) may be performed to collect tissue samples from lesions not amenable to open surgery. Integration of tractography, intraoperative imaging and fluorescence has been applied to reduce risk of complications and confirm the adequacy of bioptic specimens. Clinical and radiological data from patients who underwent stereotactic needle biopsy with the use of intraoperative CT, tractography and 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) fluorescence in a single Hospital were retrospectively reviewed to evaluate the accuracy and safety of the procedure. Seven patients were included in the study, and all the collected specimens showed red fluorescence. In six of them, the final histopathological diagnosis was grade 4 glioblastoma IDH-wt and in the other case it was Diffuse large B-Cell Lymphoma. The integration of tractography, intraoperative CT and 5-ALA as an intraoperative marker of diagnostic samples may be suggested in biopsies of suspect gliomas and lymphomas. The cost-effectiveness of the procedure should be evaluated in future studies.

Background/Objectives: Lumbar decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar stenosis is an intervention which addresses a degenerative condition affecting many patients. This article presents a meticulous three-phase surgical approach, derived from our clinical experiences and intertwining anatomical insights, offering a nuanced perspective tailored for the educational needs of young spinal surgeons. Methods: Six hundred and eighty-seven patients who underwent lumbar decompression surgery at a single institution were included in the present study. A retrospective analysis of patient demographics and surgical techniques was performed. All surgeries were performed by a consistent surgical team, emphasizing uniformity in approach. The surgical technique involves a meticulous three-phase process comprising exposure and skeletal visualization; microscopic identification and decompression; and undermining of the spinous process base and contralateral decompression. Results: Presenting results from 530 patients, the study examines demographic characteristics, health profiles, operative details, complications, and clinical assessments. The three-phase approach demonstrates low complication rates, absence of recurrences, and improved clinical outcomes, emphasizing its efficacy. Conclusions: The three-phase surgical approach emerges as a valuable educational tool for both novice and seasoned spinal surgeons. Rooted in anatomical insights, the structured methodology not only caters to the educational needs of young surgeons, but also ensures a standardized and safe procedure. The emphasis on tissue preservation and anatomical points aligns with current trends toward minimally invasive techniques, promising enhanced patient outcomes and satisfaction.

Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of mindfulness therapy compared to traditional physiotherapy and usual care in alleviating postoperative pain and improving functional outcomes in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Ninety patients undergoing lumbar decompression and fusion (LDF) who presented persistent low back pain after surgery were prospectively followed for one year. They were randomly divided into three groups: mindfulness therapy, physiotherapy, and medical therapy. The primary outcome was the improvement of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score postoperatively and at six months follow-up. Results: Both mindfulness and physiotherapy groups showed significant improvement in ODI scores compared to the control group, with mean variations of 10.6 and 11.6 points, respectively, versus 4.9 points in the control group. There was no significant difference between mindfulness and physiotherapy (p = 0.52), but both were superior to medical care (p < 0.0001 for physiotherapy and p = 0.0007 for mindfulness). Conclusions: This study demonstrated that mindfulness therapy is more effective than usual care in improving postoperative outcomes for patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery. In our cohort, its efficacy was comparable to that of physiotherapy, making it a viable alternative, especially when access to healthcare services is restricted, as seen during the COVID-19 pandemic. Future research should validate the findings of this study and examine the long-term effects on surgical patient populations.