Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
30 result(s) for "Garciaz, S"
Sort by:
FMS-Like Tyrosine Kinase 3 Inhibitors in the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia: An Update on the Emerging Evidence and Safety Profile
FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 ( ) is one of the most frequently mutated genes in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Approximately 30% of the adult cases harbor an internal tandem duplication ( -ITD) and 5-10% a tyrosine kinase domain (TKD) amino acid substitution ( ). The treatment paradigm of AML patients harboring mutations (30%) has been modified by the discovery of tyrosine kinase inhibitors. First- and second-generation inhibitors classify FLT3 inhibitors according to FLT3 specificity: first-generation FLT3 inhibitors include sorafenib and midostaurin and second-generation inhibitors are represented by quizartinib, gilteritinib and crenolanib, among others. Activity of these inhibitors depends on their mechanism of receptor binding (active vs inactive conformation) and efficacy against the FLT3-ITD and -TKD mutations (type 1 inhibitors are active both on -ITD and TKD, whereas type 2 inhibitors are active only on -ITD). The FLT3 inhibitors sorafenib, midostaurin, quizartinib and gilteritinib have been tested in monotherapy in several settings including refractory or relapsed AML (R/R AML), post-transplant maintenance as well as in combination with intensive chemotherapy (ICT) or non-intensity regimens. The results of published randomized studies support the use of sorafenib in a post-transplant setting (SORMAIN trial), midostaurin in combination with ICT based (RATIFY trial) and gilteritinib for R/R AML (ADMIRAL trial). Gilteritinib in combination with hypomethylating agent as well as quizartinib are not supported by solid randomized trial results for their use in FLT3-mutated AML patients.
Erratum: Familial haploidentical challenging unrelated donor Allo-SCT in advanced non-Hodgkin lymphomas when matched related donor is not available
Correction to: Bone Marrow Transplantation (2015) 50, 865–867; doi:10.1038/bmt.2015.22; published online 2 March 2015 Since the publication of this article, it has been noted that the name of J El-Cheikh was incorrect. This has now been rectified and the corrected article together with this erratum appears in this issue.
Venetoclax Resistance in Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Venetoclax is a BH3-mimetics agent interacting with the anti-apoptotic protein BCL2, facilitating cytochrome c release from mitochondria, subsequent caspases activation, and cell death. Venetoclax combined with azacitidine (VEN-AZA) has become a new standard treatment for AML patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy. In the phase III VIALE-A study, VEN-AZA showed a 65% overall response rate and 14.7 months overall survival in comparison with 22% and 8 months in the azacitidine monotherapy control arm. Despite these promising results, relapses and primary resistance to venetoclax are frequent and remain an unmet clinical need. Clinical and preclinical studies have been conducted to identify factors driving resistance. Among them, the most documented are molecular alterations including IDH, FLT3, TP53, and the newly described BAX mutations. Several non-genetic factors are also described such as metabolic plasticity, changes in anti-apoptotic protein expression, and dependencies, as well as monocytic differentiation status. Strategies to overcome venetoclax resistance are being developed in clinical trials, including triplet therapies with targeted agents targeting IDH, FLT3, as well as the recently developed menin inhibitors or immunotherapies such as antibody–drug conjugated or monoclonal antibodies. A better understanding of the molecular factors driving venetoclax resistance by single-cell analyses will help the discovery of new therapeutic strategies in the future.
Venetoclax in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Molecular Basis, Evidences for Preclinical and Clinical Efficacy and Strategies to Target Resistance
Venetoclax is a BH3-mimetics agent specifically interacting with the antiapoptotic protein BCL-2, facilitating cytochrome c release from mitochondria, subsequent caspases activation, and cell death. Utilization of venetoclax has profoundly changed the landscape of treatment for the poor-prognosis category of AML patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy. In the phase III VIALE-A study, Venetoclax, in combination with the hypomethylating agent azacitidine, showed a 65% overall response rate and 14.7-month overall survival, in comparison with 22% and 8 months in the control arm. These results led to the widespread use of venetoclax in this indication. Other combination regimens, consisting of low-intensity, intensive, or targeted therapies are currently under evaluation. Despite promising results, preventing relapses or resistance to venetoclax is still an unmet clinical need. Numerous studies have been conducted to identify and overcome venetoclax resistance in preclinical models or in clinical trials, including the inhibition of other antiapoptotic proteins, the induction of proapoptotic BH3-only proteins, and/or the targeting of the mitochondrial metabolism and machinery.
Caspase-2 protects against ferroptotic cell death
Caspase-2, one of the most evolutionarily conserved members of the caspase family, is an important regulator of the cellular response to oxidative stress. Given that ferroptosis is suppressed by antioxidant defense pathways, such as that involving selenoenzyme glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4), we hypothesized that caspase-2 may play a role in regulating ferroptosis. This study provides the first demonstration of an important and unprecedented function of caspase-2 in protecting cancer cells from undergoing ferroptotic cell death. Specifically, we show that depletion of caspase-2 leads to the downregulation of stress response genes including SESN2, HMOX1, SLC7A11 , and sensitizes mutant-p53 cancer cells to cell death induced by various ferroptosis-inducing compounds. Importantly, the canonical catalytic activity of caspase-2 is not required for its role and suggests that caspase-2 regulates ferroptosis via non-proteolytic interaction with other proteins. Using an unbiased BioID proteomics screen, we identified novel caspase-2 interacting proteins (including heat shock proteins and co-chaperones) that regulate cellular responses to stress. Finally, we demonstrate that caspase-2 limits chaperone-mediated autophagic degradation of GPX4 to promote the survival of mutant-p53 cancer cells. In conclusion, we document a novel role for caspase-2 as a negative regulator of ferroptosis in cells with mutant p53. Our results provide evidence for a novel function of caspase-2 in cell death regulation and open potential new avenues to exploit ferroptosis in cancer therapy.
Analysis of a large single institution cohort of related donors fails to detect a relation between SDF1/CXCR4 or VCAM/VLA4 genetic polymorphisms and the level of hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization in response to G-CSF
We studied a cohort of 367 healthy related donors who volunteered to donate their hematopoietic stem cells for allogeneic transplantation. All donors were homogeneously cared for at a single institution, and received rhG-CSF as a mobilization treatment prior to undergoing apheresis. Peripheral blood CD34+ cell counts were used as the main surrogate marker for rhG-CSF induced mobilization. We searched whether inter-individual variations in known genetic polymorphisms located in genes whose products are functionally important for mobilization, could affect the extent of CD34+ mobilization, either individually or in combination. We found little or no influence of individual SNPs or haplotypes for the SDF1, CXCR4, VCAM and VLA4 genes, whether using CD34+ cell counts as a continuous or a categorical variable. Simple clinical characteristics describing donors such as body mass index, age and possibly sex are more potent predictors of stem cell mobilization. The size of our cohort remains relatively small for genetic analyses, however compares favorably with cohorts analyzed in previously published reports suggesting associations of genetic traits to response to rhG-CSF; notwithstanding this limitation, our data do not support the use of genetic analyses when the choice exists of several potential donors for a given patient.