Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background Cancer vaccines require adjuvants to induce effective immune responses; however, there is no consensus on optimal adjuvants. We hypothesized that toll-like receptor (TLR)3 agonist polyICLC or TLR4 agonist lipopolysaccharide (LPS), combined with CD4 T cell activation, would support strong and durable CD8 + T cell responses, whereas addition of an incomplete Freund’s adjuvant (IFA) would reduce magnitude and persistence of immune responses. Patients and methods Participants with resected stage IIB-IV melanoma received a vaccine comprised of 12 melanoma peptides restricted by Class I MHC (12MP), plus a tetanus helper peptide (Tet). Participants were randomly assigned 2:1 to cohort 1 (LPS dose-escalation) or cohort 2 (polyICLC). Each cohort included 3 subgroups (a-c), receiving 12MP + Tet + TLR agonist without IFA (0), or with IFA in vaccine one (V1), or all six vaccines (V6). Toxicities were recorded (CTCAE v4). T cell responses were measured with IFNγ ELIspot assay ex vivo or after one in vitro stimulation (IVS). Results Fifty-three eligible patients were enrolled, of which fifty-one were treated. Treatment-related dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed in 0/33 patients in cohort 1 and in 2/18 patients in cohort 2 (11%). CD8 T cell responses to 12MP were detected ex vivo in cohort 1 (42%) and in cohort 2 (56%) and in 18, 50, and 72% for subgroups V0, V1, and V6, respectively. T cell responses to melanoma peptides were more durable and of highest magnitude for IFA V6. Conclusions LPS and polyICLC are safe and effective vaccine adjuvants when combined with IFA. Contrary to the central hypothesis, IFA enhanced T cell responses to peptide vaccines when added to TLR agonists. Future studies will aim to understand mechanisms underlying the favorable effects with IFA. Trial registration The clinical trial Mel58 was performed with IRB (#15781) and FDA approval and is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov on April 25, 2012 (NCT01585350). Patients provided written informed consent to participate. Enrollment started on June 24, 2012.

Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are monoclonal antibodies that block inhibitory pathways that cancer cells exploit to suppress T‐cell activation. Although immune‐related adverse events (irAEs) linked to ICI therapy are well documented and encompass dermatologic, endocrine, gastrointestinal, hepatic, and neurologic systems, ICI‐related dysautonomia remains a rare phenomenon. Management of ICI‐related dysautonomia is undefined. Case We report the case of a 57‐year‐old male patient treated with neoadjuvant nivolumab for Merkel cell carcinoma who developed ICI‐related dysautonomia. His dysautonomia was characterized by orthostatic hypotension, urinary retention, hearing loss, and binocular diplopia in addition to the development of ICI‐related hepatitis. We describe the patient's course, including the treatment and outcome of his dysautonomia, and review the literature on this rare toxicity. Conclusion Due to the mechanism of action of ICIs, irAEs can present with a wide range of manifestations. In this case, prompt recognition of ICI‐induced dysautonomia and timely administration of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) led to significant clinical improvement. ICI‐induced dysautonomia is a rare condition that is difficult to diagnose and manage.

BackgroundWe report a case of sarcoidosis in a patient with metastatic melanoma managed with combination ipilimumab/nivolumab. Sarcoid development has been linked with single agent immunotherapy but, to our knowledge, it has not been reported with combination ipilimumab/nivolumab treatment. This case raises unique management challenges for both the melanoma and the immunotherapy-related toxicity.Case presentationA 46 year old Caucasian female with M1c-metastatic melanoma was managed with ipilimumab/nivolumab combination. Patient experienced response in baseline lesions but developed new clinical and radiographic findings. Biopsy of new lesions at two different sites both demonstrated tumefactive sarcoidosis. Staining of the biopsy tissue for PD-L1 expression demonstrated strong PD-L1 staining of the histiocytes and lymphocytes within the granulomas. Monotherapy nivolumab was continued without progression of sarcoid findings or clinical deterioration.ConclusionsTissue biopsy for evaluation of new lesions on immunotherapy is an important step to help guide decision making, as non-melanoma lesions can mimic disease progression.

BackgroundA vaccine containing 6 melanoma-associated peptides to stimulate helper T cells (6MHP) is safe, immunogenic, and clinically active. A phase I/II trial was designed to evaluate safety and immunogenicity of 6MHP vaccines plus programmed death 1 (PD-1) blockade.Participants and methodsParticipants with advanced melanoma received 6MHP vaccines in an incomplete Freund’s adjuvant (6 vaccines over 12 weeks). Pembrolizumab was administered intravenously every 3 weeks. Tumor biopsies at baseline and day 22 were analyzed by multiplex immunohistochemistry. Primary end points were safety (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events V.4.03) and immunogenicity (ex vivo interferon-γ ELISpot assay). Additional end points included changes in the tumor microenvironment (TME) and clinical outcomes.ResultsTwenty-two eligible participants were treated: 6 naïve to PD-1 antibody (Ab) and 16 PD-1 Ab-experienced. Median follow-up was 24.4 months. Most common treatment-related adverse events (any grade) included injection site reactions, fatigue, anemia, lymphopenia, fever, elevated aspartate aminotransferase, pruritus, and rash. Treatment-related dose-limiting toxicities were observed in 3 (14%) participants, which did not cross the study safety bound. A high durable T cell response (Rsp) to 6MHP was detected in only one participant, but twofold T cell Rsps to 6MHP were detected in 7/22 (32%; 90% CI (16% to 52%)) by week 13. Objective clinical responses were observed in 23% (1 complete response, 4 partial responses), including 4/6 PD-1 Ab-naïve (67%) and 1/16 PD-1 Ab-experienced (6%). Overall survival (OS) was longer for PD-1 Ab-naïve than Ab-experienced participants (HR 6.3 (90% CI (2.1 to 28.7)). In landmark analyses at 13 weeks, OS was also longer for those with T cell Rsps (HR 6.5 (90% CI (2.1 to 29.2)) and for those with objective clinical responses. TME evaluation revealed increased densities of CD8+ T cells, CD20+ B cells, and Tbet+ cells by day 22.ConclusionsTreatment with the 6MHP vaccine plus pembrolizumab was safe, increased intratumoral lymphocytes, and induced T cell Rsps associated with prolonged OS. The low T cell Rsp rate in PD-1 Ab-experienced participants corroborates prior murine studies that caution against delaying cancer vaccines until after PD-1 blockade. The promising objective response rate and OS in PD-1 Ab-naïve participants support consideration of a larger study in that setting.

Non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) are heterogeneous cancers. In 2004, the identification of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) somatic mutations provided the first glimpse of a clinically relevant NSCLC oncogene. Approximately 70% of NSCLCs with EGFR mutations (exon 19 deletions or the exon 21 L858R) attain responses to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) gefitinib and erlotinib, with improved response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS) and in some reports overall survival (OS) when compared with EGFR wildtype (WT) cases. Three randomized trials of gefitinib versus chemotherapy (IPASS, WJTOG3405, NEJ002) in stage IV NSCLC have consistently demonstrated better RR and PFS (hazard ratios of 0.48 [IPASS], 0.49 [WJTOG3405] and 0.30 [NEJ002]) for EGFR-mutated NSCLCs treated with gefitinib. Novel irreversible EGFR TKIs (afatinib, XL647, PF00299804) show similar activity in EGFR-mutated patients. A translocation involving the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene with EML4, identified in 2007, is the most recent oncogene found in NSCLC. Crizotinib (PF02341066), an ALK TKI, has shown impressive activity against ALK translocated NSCLC in an expanded cohort of a phase I trial (NCT00585195). Over 80 patients have been treated and the RR is ∼60% with the 6-month PFS rate exceeding 70%. A registration phase III trial of crizotinib versus second-line chemotherapy (pemetrexed/docetaxel) is underway (PROFILE 1007, NCT00932893). KRAS, EGFR mutations and ALK translocations are mutually exclusive and few EGFR WT NSCLCs respond to EGFR TKIs. The promising results of EGFR and ALK TKIs in molecular subgroups of NSCLCs herald a new age of drug and clinical trial development for patients with NSCLC.

BackgroundAnti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of stage III and IV melanoma. Real-world data on its resistance is needed to facilitate the development of combinatorial approaches to overcome anti-PD-1 resistance.ObjectivesTo characterize anti-PD-1 resistance and assess whether progressive disease assigned by clinicians is concordant with scan data assessed by independent central reviewers (ICR).MethodsA retrospective chart review was conducted in adult patients with stage III/IV melanoma who initiated anti-PD-1 therapy from January 2018 until 12 months before the start of data collection at 22 sites across six countries. Primary resistance and late relapse in the adjuvant setting, and primary, secondary resistance, and late progression in the advanced setting were assigned using Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer definitions. Demographic and clinical characteristics by type of resistance were compared with appropriate univariate tests. Time to resistance (TTR) and overall survival were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier. To compare the concordance of progression assigned by clinicians and ICR, the positive predictive value (PPV) was calculated in a subset of patients.ResultsOf 981 eligible patients, 738 were included. In the adjuvant setting (n=240), 53 (22.1%) patients developed primary resistance and 60 (25.0%) experienced late relapse. In the advanced setting (n=498), 222 (44.6%), 50 (10.0%), and 64 (12.9%) patients developed primary, secondary resistance, and late progression. Type of resistance significantly differed by country, race, type of BRAF mutation, and PD-L1 expression in both settings; and by sex, disease stage and tumor thickness in the adjuvant setting only (p<0.05). Mean (SD) TTR was 47.7 (1.3) and 24.2 (1.0) months in the adjuvant and advanced setting, respectively. Patients with primary resistance had the poorest overall survival. The PPV of progression assigned by clinicians was 87.2% (95% CI 72.6% to 95.7%).ConclusionsThis study showed that a substantial proportion of patients with melanoma receiving anti-PD-1 therapy in the adjuvant (47.1%) and advanced (67.5%) settings developed resistance or late relapse/progression, highlighting an unmet medical need. Real-world clinical practice provided a reliable assessment of progression. Factors associated with different types of resistance were identified. Further study is warranted to evaluate their impact on patient risk stratification. (Graphical abstract)

BackgroundFor patients with high-risk melanoma who are unresponsive or intolerant to immune checkpoint inhibitors, cancer vaccines may provide benefit with a favorable toxicity profile. CD4+ T cells provide essential help to dendritic cells (DCs) for optimal CD8+ T cell priming in the antitumor response, and induction of tumor-cognate CD4+ T cell responses may enhance vaccine efficacy. We report on a first-in-human approach to treat patients with high-risk melanoma using a vaccine composed of six non-mutated melanoma-specific helper peptides (6MHP) and a shared mutated BRAF-V600E neoantigen helper peptide (mBRAF) co-administered locally with a TLR3 agonist (poly-ICLC) and agonistic CD40 antibody (CDX-1140).MethodsAdults with high-risk melanoma arising from cutaneous, mucosal, or ocular primary sites who were rendered clinically free of disease after definitive treatment were enrolled to this nonrandomized phase I/II trial (NCT04364230) designed to assess safety and immunogenicity. Participants received vaccine (6MHP+mBRAF+poly-ICLC) with a dose-escalation allocation of CDX-1140 into the vaccine mixture at one of four dose levels (50, 200, 800, 3000 μg). Vaccines were administered at 3-week intervals for four doses. Primary endpoints were safety and peripheral CD4+ T cell response. Exploratory analysis to characterize the vaccine site microenvironment was performed.ResultsOf 22 eligible participants, 11 (50%) had ocular melanoma. Sixteen (73%) received the maximum CDX-1140 dose. Toxicities were limited to grade 1 or 2 treatment-related adverse events, with no dose-limiting toxicities reported. Peripheral CD4+ T cell responses to 6MHP were found ex vivo in six (27%, 95% CI 11% to 50%), including four with the maximum CDX-1140 dose. One had a durable and persistent T cell response to week 25. T cell responses to mBRAF did not meet criteria for positivity ex vivo, but one participant had a durable response after in vitro stimulation, with expansion of multifunctional Th1-polarized CD4+ T cells. Favorable immune-related changes were observed at the vaccine site, including CDX-1140-mediated increases in mature (DC-LAMP+) DCs.ConclusionsThe vaccine was safe, well-tolerated, and immunogenic. Optimization of vaccines that include agonistic CD40 antibody is needed to enhance immunogenicity. Induction of a multifunctional CD4+ T cell response to mBRAF supports targeting shared mutated neoantigens with melanoma vaccines.Trial registration number NCT04364230.

Background Immune checkpoint inhibition is part of standard systemic management for many advanced malignancies. Toxicities from this treatment approach are unpredictable, though usually reversible with management per established guidelines. Some patients suffer major morbidity and treatment-related mortality from these agents in an unpredictable manner. Cardiac and neurologic complications are rare, but can result in serious clinical consequences. Methods We describe the presentation, management, and outcomes of eight sequential cases of combined cardiac and neurologic toxicities resulting in severe illness and demonstrating lack of rapid response to immunosuppression. Results Our cohort consisted of six males and two females with an average age of 73.5 years (61–89 years). There were four patients with melanoma, and one patient each with urothelial carcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, breast cancer, and non-small cell lung cancer. Four patients received combination immunotherapy and four patients received monotherapy. The median time to presentation from treatment initiation was 27 days (11–132 days). All patients had a cardiovascular and neurologic toxicity, and most had hepatitis and myositis. The cardiac signs and symptoms were the prominent initial features of the clinical presentation. Each patient was managed by a multidisciplinary team and received a range of immunosuppressive agents. All patients died as a consequence of the immune related adverse events. Conclusions The evaluation of patients with cardiac adverse events from immunotherapy, should include assessment of overlapping toxicities such as myasthenia gravis and myositis. Providers should be aware of the potential for an extended duration of disability and slow improvement for certain toxicities as these expectations may factor prominently in goals of care decisions.

BackgroundPeptide vaccines designed to stimulate melanoma-reactive CD4+ T cells can induce T cell and antibody (Ab) responses, associated with enhanced overall survival. We hypothesized that adding toll-like receptor 3 agonist polyICLC to an incomplete Freund’s adjuvant (IFA) would be safe and would support strong, durable CD4+ T cell and Ab responses. We also hypothesized that oral low-dose metronomic cyclophosphamide (mCy) would be safe, would reduce circulating regulatory T cells (T-regs) and would further enhance immunogenicity.Participants and methodsAn adaptive design based on toxicity and durable CD4+ T cell immune response (dRsp) was used to assign participants with resected stage IIA-IV melanoma to one of four study regimens. The regimens included a vaccine comprising six melanoma peptides restricted by Class II MHC (6MHP) in an emulsion with IFA alone (Arm A), with IFA plus systemic mCy (Arm B), with IFA+ local polyICLC (Arm C), or with IFA+ polyICLC+ mCy (Arm D). Toxicities were recorded (CTCAE V.4.03). T cell responses were measured by interferon γ ELIspot assay ex vivo. Serum Ab responses to 6MHP were measured by ELISA. Circulating T-regs were assessed by flow cytometry.ResultsForty-eight eligible participants were enrolled and treated. Early data on safety and dRsp favored enrollment on arm D. Total enrollment on Arms A-D were 3, 7, 6, and 32, respectively. Treatment-related dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed in 1/7 (14%) participants on arm B and 2/32 (6%) on arm D. None exceeded the 25% DLT threshold for early closure to enrollment for any arm. Strong durable T cell responses to 6MHP were detected ex vivo in 0%, 29%, 67%, and 47% of participants on arms A-D, respectively. IgG Ab responses were greatest for arms C and D. Circulating T-regs frequencies were not altered by mCy.Conclusions6MHP vaccines administered with IFA, polyICLC, and mCy were well tolerated. The dRsp rate for arm D of 47% (90% CI 32 to 63) exceeded the 18% (90% CI 11 to 26) rate previously observed with 6MHP in IFA alone. Vaccination with IFA+ polyICLC (arm C) also showed promise for enhancing T cell and Ab responses.

Background: Host physiological factors may influence immune response, treatment tolerance, and survival during immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. Allostatic load (AL) summarizes cumulative physiological dysregulation across multiple biological systems. We evaluated whether pre-treatment AL is associated with immune-related toxicity and clinical outcomes among patients with advanced melanoma receiving ICIs. Methods: We analyzed 399 patients with melanoma treated with ICIs at the University of Virginia Cancer Center (2013–2025). AL was derived from routinely collected clinical laboratory biomarkers measured prior to treatment initiation. Multinominal logistic and Cox regression models assessed associations between AL and immune-related adverse events (irAEs), treatment response, disease progression, and overall survival (OS), adjusting for demographic, clinical, and treatment factors. Results: The mean AL score was 4.43. Each 1-unit increase in AL was associated with higher odds of grade ≥ 2 toxicity (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.30; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08–1.57). Among patients who developed irAEs, higher AL was associated with poorer treatment response (adjusted OR = 1.24; 95% CI: 1.01–1.54) and increased risk of disease progression (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 1.14; 95% CI: 0.98–1.33). Higher AL was also associated with shorter OS, with a 26% higher mortality risk per 1-unit increase in AL (adjusted HR = 1.26; 95% CI: 1.14–1.39). Conclusions: Higher pre-treatment AL was associated with increased immune-related toxicity and poorer survival in melanoma patients treated with ICIs. AL represents a feasible pre-treatment marker of host physiological vulnerability that may complement existing clinical predictors. Prospective studies are needed to validate these findings and assess clinical utility.