Explore the vast range of titles available.

Key Points Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathic pain (CIPNP) affects up to 80% of patients during chemotherapy; it is a severe adverse effect that can limit dose and choice of chemotherapy Many substances already approved for treating neuropathic pain failed to ameliorate CIPNP in clinical trials, underlining the importance of assessing drug efficacy in CIPNP independently of other neuropathic pain states CIPNP has distinctive mechanisms that depend on the causative cytostatic drug; this heterogeneity could explain why results from trials addressing classic neuropathic pain states do not translate to CIPNP Clinical trial designers in academia and industry are encouraged to implement sensory profiling in patient stratification to tailor the analgesic treatment according to the individual underlying mechanisms of CIPNP Mechanisms involved in CIPNP include disruption of axonal transport, altered ion channel and receptor activity, neuronal injury and inflammation, oxidative stress, and mitochondrial damage Suggestions for mechanism-based therapy of CIPNP include duloxetine for oxaliplatin-induced CIPNP, and combination of neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory substances for CIPNP caused by paclitaxel or vincristine Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathic pain (CIPNP) is a common and severe adverse effect of cytostatic drugs that can limit dose and choice of chemotherapy, and can lead to delay or discontinuation of cytostatic treatment. Most drugs that are in use for neuropathic pain have failed to alleviate CIPNP in clinical trials. Here, Sisignano et al . review the mechanisms through which the most commonly used cytostatic drugs cause CIPNP, and suggest mechanism-based treatment options. Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathic pain (CIPNP)—a severe adverse effect observed in up to 80% of patients during treatment with antineoplastic drugs—limits the tolerable dose of cytostatics, and can lead to discontinuation of chemotherapy. Many drugs that are approved for the treatment of other neuropathic pain states have shown little or no analgesic effect on CIPNP in large randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials. Here, we review the known mechanisms of CIPNP induced by the three most commonly used cytostatics: paclitaxel, oxaliplatin and vincristine. These substances have distinct neurotoxic and neuroinflammatory properties, but they also have overlapping contributions to pathogenesis of CIPNP that could potentially be targeted for prevention or treatment of CIPNP. We discuss the failure of previously tested antioxidants, neuroprotective agents, anticonvulsants and antidepressants as therapeutic or preventative strategies, and suggest individualized, mechanism-based therapeutic options for CIPNP associated with each of the three main drug groups. We point out the necessity to assess drug efficacy in CIPNP independently of other neuropathic pain states, and emphasize the need for delineation of subpopulations of patients with CIPNP for more-efficient treatment. Finally, we discuss novel therapeutic strategies and recent progress in treatment of CIPNP, and evaluate the potential benefits of these recent proceedings for future therapies.

Oxaliplatin is a third-generation platinum-based anticancer drug that is widely used as first-line treatment for colorectal carcinoma. Patients treated with oxaliplatin develop an acute peripheral pain several hours after treatment, mostly characterized by cold allodynia as well as a long-term chronic neuropathy. These two phenomena seem to be causally connected. However, the underlying mechanisms that trigger the acute peripheral pain are still poorly understood. Here we show that the activity of the transient receptor potential melastatin 8 (TRPM8) channel but not the activity of any other member of the TRP channel family is transiently increased 1 h after oxaliplatin treatment and decreased 24 h after oxaliplatin treatment. Mechanistically, this is connected with activation of the phospholipase C (PLC) pathway and depletion of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) after oxaliplatin treatment. Inhibition of the PLC pathway can reverse the decreased TRPM8 activity as well as the decreased PIP2-concentrations after oxaliplatin treatment. In summary, these results point out transient changes in TRPM8 activity early after oxaliplatin treatment and a later occurring TRPM8 channel desensitization in primary sensory neurons. These mechanisms may explain the transient cold allodynia after oxaliplatin treatment and highlight an important role of TRPM8 in oxaliplatin-induced acute and neuropathic pain.

Fluorescence optical imaging technique (FOI) is a well-established and valid method for visualization of changes in micro vascularization at different organ systems. As increased vascularization is an early feature of joint inflammation, FOI is a promising method to assess arthritis of the hands. But usability of the method is limited to the assessors experience as the measurement of FOI is semi-quantitative using an individual grading system such as the fluorescence optical imaging activity score (FOIAS). The goal of the study was to automatically and thus, objectively analyze the measured fluorescence intensity generated by FOI to evaluate the amount of inflammation of each of the subject’s joints focusing on the distinction between normal joint status or arthritis in psoriatic arthritis patients compared to healthy volunteers. Due to the heterogeneity of the pathophysiological perfusion of the hands, a method to overcome the absoluteness of the data by extracting heatmaps out of the image stacks is developed. To calculate a heatmap for one patient, firstly the time series for each pixel is extracted, which is then represented by a feature value. Secondly, all feature values are clustered. The calculated cluster values represent the relativity between the different pixels and enable a comparison of multiple patients. As a metric to quantify the conspicuousness of a joint a score is calculated based on the extracted cluster values. These steps are repeated for a total number of three features. With this method a tendency towards a classification into unaffected and inflamed joints can be achieved. However, further research is necessary to transform the tendency into a robust classification model.

SARS-CoV-2 is a novel coronavirus responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic, in which acute respiratory infections are associated with high socio-economic burden. We applied high-content screening to a well-defined collection of 5632 compounds including 3488 that have undergone previous clinical investigations across 600 indications. The compounds were screened by microscopy for their ability to inhibit SARS-CoV-2 cytopathicity in the human epithelial colorectal adenocarcinoma cell line, Caco-2. The primary screen identified 258 hits that inhibited cytopathicity by more than 75%, most of which were not previously known to be active against SARS-CoV-2 in vitro . These compounds were tested in an eight-point dose response screen using the same image-based cytopathicity readout. For the 67 most active molecules, cytotoxicity data were generated to confirm activity against SARS-CoV-2. We verified the ability of known inhibitors camostat, nafamostat, lopinavir, mefloquine, papaverine and cetylpyridinium to reduce the cytopathic effects of SARS-CoV-2, providing confidence in the validity of the assay. The high-content screening data are suitable for reanalysis across numerous drug classes and indications and may yield additional insights into SARS-CoV-2 mechanisms and potential therapeutic strategies. Measurement(s) cytotoxicity • killing by virus of host cell Technology Type(s) bright-field microscopy Factor Type(s) concentration • incubation time Sample Characteristic - Organism Homo sapiens Machine-accessible metadata file describing the reported data: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.13562570

Pharmacological management of severe chronic pain is difficult to achieve with currently available analgesic drugs, and remains a large unmet therapeutic need. The synthetic peptide ziconotide has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency for intrathecal treatment of patients with severe chronic pain that is refractory to other treatment modalities. Ziconotide is the first member in the new drug class of selective N-type voltage-sensitive calcium-channel blockers. The ziconotide-induced blockade of N-type calcium channels in the spinal cord inhibits release of pain-relevant neurotransmitters from central terminals of primary afferent neurons. By this mechanism, ziconotide can effectively reduce pain. However, ziconotide has a narrow therapeutic window because of substantial CNS side-effects, and thus treatment with ziconotide is appropriate for only a small subset of patients with severe chronic pain. We provide an overview of the benefits and limitations of intrathecal ziconotide treatment and review potential future developments in this new drug class.

Formation of specialized pro-resolving lipid mediators (SPMs) such as lipoxins or resolvins usually involves arachidonic acid 5-lipoxygenase (5-LO, ALOX5) and different types of arachidonic acid 12- and 15-lipoxygenating paralogues (15-LO1, ALOX15; 15-LO2, ALOX15B; 12-LO, ALOX12). Typically, SPMs are thought to be formed via consecutive steps of oxidation of polyenoic fatty acids such as arachidonic acid, eicosapentaenoic acid or docosahexaenoic acid. One hallmark of SPM formation is that reported levels of these lipid mediators are much lower than typical pro-inflammatory mediators including the monohydroxylated fatty acid derivatives (e.g., 5-HETE), leukotrienes or certain cyclooxygenase-derived prostaglandins. Thus, reliable detection and quantification of these metabolites is challenging. This paper is aimed at critically evaluating i) the proposed biosynthetic pathways of SPM formation, ii) the current knowledge on SPM receptors and their signaling cascades and iii) the analytical methods used to quantify these pro-resolving mediators in the context of their instability and their low concentrations. Based on current literature it can be concluded that i) there is at most, a low biosynthetic capacity for SPMs in human leukocytes. ii) The identity and the signaling of the proposed G-protein-coupled SPM receptors have not been supported by studies in knock-out mice and remain to be validated. iii) In humans, SPM levels were neither related to dietary supplementation with their ω-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid precursors nor were they formed during the resolution phase of an evoked inflammatory response. iv) The reported low SPM levels cannot be reliably quantified by means of the most commonly reported methodology. Overall, these questions regarding formation, signaling and occurrence of SPMs challenge their role as endogenous mediators of the resolution of inflammation.

The group of proton-sensing G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) consists of the four receptors GPR4, TDAG8 (GPR65), OGR1 (GPR68), and G2A (GPR132). These receptors are cellular sensors of acidification, a property that has been attributed to the presence of crucial histidine residues. However, the pH detection varies considerably among the group of proton-sensing GPCRs and ranges from pH of 5.5 to 7.8. While the proton-sensing GPCRs were initially considered to detect acidic cellular environments in the context of inflammation, recent observations have expanded our knowledge about their physiological and pathophysiological functions and many additional individual and unique features have been discovered that suggest a more differentiated role of these receptors in health and disease. It is known that all four receptors contribute to different aspects of tumor biology, cardiovascular physiology, and asthma. However, apart from their overlapping functions, they seem to have individual properties, and recent publications identify potential roles of individual GPCRs in mechanosensation, intestinal inflammation, oncoimmunological interactions, hematopoiesis, as well as inflammatory and neuropathic pain. Here, we put together the knowledge about the biological functions and structural features of the four proton-sensing GPCRs and discuss the biological role of each of the four receptors individually. We explore all currently known pharmacological modulators of the four receptors and highlight potential use. Finally, we point out knowledge gaps in the biological and pharmacological context of proton-sensing GPCRs that should be addressed by future studies.

The function of islet macrophages is poorly understood. They promote glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS) in lean mice, however, the underlying mechanism has remained unclear. We show that activation of the free fatty acid receptor FFAR4 on islet macrophages leads to interleukin-6 (IL-6) release and that IL-6 promotes β-cell function. This mechanism is required for GSIS in lean male mice, but does not function anymore in islets from people with obesity and obese type 2 diabetic male mice. In islets from obese mice, FFAR4 downstream signaling in macrophages is strongly reduced, resulting in impaired FFAR4-mediated IL-6 release. However, IL-6 treatment can still improve GSIS in islets from people with obesity and obese type 2 diabetic mice. These data show that a defect in FFAR4-mediated macrophage activation contributes to reduced GSIS in type 2 diabetes and suggest that reactivating islet macrophage FFAR4 and promoting or mimicking IL-6 release from islet macrophages improves GSIS in type 2 diabetes. The authors show that activation of free fatty acid receptor 4 on islet macrophages leads to release of interleukin-6, which promotes glucose-stimulated insulin secretion. This mechanism is impaired in obesity-associated type 2 diabetes.

This dataset presents a real-world lipidomics resource for developing and benchmarking quality control methods, batch effect detection algorithms, and data validation workflows. The data originates from a cross-sectional clinical study of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients (n = 81) and healthy controls (n = 26), matched for age, sex, and body mass index, which was collected at a tertiary university rheumatology center. Subtle laboratory irregularities were detected only through advanced unsupervised analysis, after passing conventional quality control and standard analytical methods. Blood samples were processed using standardized protocols and analyzed using high-resolution and tandem mass spectrometry platforms. Both targeted and untargeted lipid assays captured lipids of several classes (including carnitines, ceramides, glycerophospholipids, sphingolipids, glycerolipids, fatty acids, sterols and esters, endocannabinoids). The dataset is organized into four comma-separated value (CSV) files: (1) Box–Cox-transformed and imputed lipidomics values; (2) outlier-cleaned and imputed values on the original scale; (3) metadata including clinical classifications, biological sex, and batch information for all assay types and control sample processing dates; and (4) a variable-level description file (readme.csv). The 292 lipid variables are named according to LIPID MAPS classification and standardized nomenclature. Complete batch documentation and FAIR-compliant data structure make this dataset valuable for testing the robustness of analytical pipelines and quality control in lipidomics and related omics fields. This unique dataset does not compete with larger lipidomics quality control datasets for comparisons of results but provides a unique, real-life lipidomics dataset displaying traces of the laboratory sample processing schedule, which can be used to challenge quality control frameworks.

Outbreaks of infections with viruses like Sars‐CoV‐2, Ebola virus and Zika virus lead to major global health and economic problems because of limited treatment options. Therefore, new antiviral drug candidates are urgently needed. The promising new antiviral drug candidate silvestrol effectively inhibited replication of Corona‐, Ebola‐, Zika‐, Picorna‐, Hepatis E and Chikungunya viruses. Besides a direct impact on pathogens, modulation of the host immune system provides an additional facet to antiviral drug development because suitable immune modulation can boost innate defence mechanisms against the pathogens. In the present study, silvestrol down‐regulated several pro‐ and anti‐inflammatory cytokines (IL‐6, IL‐8, IL‐10, CCL2, CCL18) and increased TNF‐α during differentiation and activation of M1‐macrophages, suggesting that the effects of silvestrol might cancel each other out. However, silvestrol amplified the anti‐inflammatory potential of M2‐macrophages by increasing expression of anti‐inflammatory surface markers CD206, TREM2 and reducing release of pro‐inflammatory IL‐8 and CCL2. The differentiation of dendritic cells in the presence of silvestrol is characterized by down‐regulation of several surface markers and cytokines indicating that differentiation is impaired by silvestrol. In conclusion, silvestrol influences the inflammatory status of immune cells depending on the cell type and activation status.