Explore the vast range of titles available.

Myocardial T1, T2 and T2* imaging techniques become increasingly used in clinical practice. While normal values for T1, T2 and T2* times are well established for 1.5 Tesla (T) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), data for 3T remain scarce. Therefore we sought to determine normal reference values relative to gender and age and day to day reproducibility for native T1, T2, T2* mapping and extracellular volume (ECV) at 3T in healthy subjects. After careful exclusion of cardiovascular abnormality, 75 healthy subjects aged 20 to 90 years old (mean 56 ± 19 years, 47% women) underwent left-ventricular T1 (3-(3)-3-(3)-5 MOLLI)), T2 (8 echo- spin echo-imaging) and T2 * (8 echo gradient echo imaging) mapping at 3T CMR (Philips Ingenia 3T and computation of extracellular volume after administration of 0.2 mmol/kg Gadovist). Inter- and intra-observer reproducibility was estimated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Day to day reproducibility was assessed in 10 other volunteers. Mean myocardial T1 at 3T was 1122 ± 57 ms, T2 52 ± 6 ms, T2* 24 ± 5 ms and ECV 26.6 ± 3.2%. T1 (1139 ± 37 vs 1109 ± 73 ms, p < 0.05) and ECV (28 ± 3 vs 25 ± 2%, p < 0.001), but not T2 (53 ± 8 vs 51 ± 4, p = NS) were significantly greater in age matched women than in men. T1 (r = 0.40, p < 0.001) and ECV (r = 0.37, p = 0.001) increased, while T2 decreased significantly (r = −0.25, p < 0.05) with increasing age. T2* was not influenced by either gender or age. Intra and inter-observer reproducibility was high (ICC ranging between 0.81-0.99), and day to day coefficient of variation was low (6.2% for T1, 7% for T2, 11% for T2* and 11.5% for ECV). We provide normal myocardial T2, T2*,T1 and ECV reference values for 3T CMR which are significantly different from those reported at 1.5 Tesla CMR. Myocardial T1 and ECV values are gender and age dependent. Measurement had high inter and intra-observer reproducibility and good day-to-day reproducibility.

Background Increased myocardial fibrosis may play a key role in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) pathophysiology. The study aim was to evaluate the presence, associations, and prognostic significance of diffuse fibrosis in HFpEF patients compared to age- and sex-matched controls. Methods We prospectively included 118 consecutive HFpEF patients. Diffuse myocardial fibrosis was estimated by extracellular volume (ECV) quantified by cardiovascular magnetic resonance with the modified Look-Locker inversion recovery sequence. We determined an ECV age- and sex-adjusted cutoff value (33%) in 26 controls. Results Mean ECV was significantly higher in HFpEF patients versus healthy controls (32.9 ± 4.8% vs 28.2 ± 2.4%, P  <  0.001). Multivariate logistic regression showed that body mass index (BMI) (odds ratio (OR) =0.92 [0.86–0.98], P  = 0.011), diabetes (OR = 2.62 [1.11–6.18], P  = 0.028), and transmitral peak E wave velocity (OR = 1.02 [1.00–1.03], P  = 0.022) were significantly associated with abnormal ECV value. During a median follow-up of 11 ± 6 months, the primary outcome (all-cause mortality or first heart failure hospitalization) occurred in 38 patients. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, diabetes (hazard ratio (HR) =1.98 [1.04; 3.76], P  = 0.038) and hemoglobin level (HR = 0.81 [0.67; 0.98], P  = 0.028) were significant predictors of composite outcome. The ECV ability to improve this model added significant prognostic information. We then developed a risk score including diabetes, hemoglobin and ECV > 33% demonstrating significant prediction of risk and validated this score in a validation cohort of 53 patients. Kaplan–Meier curves showed a significant difference according to tertiles of the probability score ( P  <  0.001). Conclusion Among HFpEF patients, high ECV, likely reflecting abnormal diffuse myocardial fibrosis, was associated with a higher rate of all-cause death and first HF hospitalization in short term follow up. Trial registration Characterization of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction. Trial registration number: NCT03197350 . Date of registration: 20/06/2017. This trial was retrospectively registered.

Cardiac myxoma (CM) is by far the most common primary benign cardiac tumor, typically arising in the left atrium with an attachment point in the fossa ovalis region. Although the etiology of CM remains unclear, we know that this endocardial-based mass originates from undifferentiated mesenchymal cells. Continuous technical improvements in the field of echocardiography since the 1960s has profoundly changed the diagnostic approach by allowing a good tumor detection as well as the preoperative planning by providing crucial information concerning the attachment point location. However, echocardiography has its limitations among which lack of tissue characterization and restricted field of view can arise diagnosis difficulties in atypical presentations. With the widespread and routine use of echocardiography and chest computed tomography (CT), incidental detection of CM is not infrequent. As a consequence, it has become mandatory for cardiologists and radiologists evolving in a multimodality imaging world to be familiar with the wide range of presentations of this tumor. The authors present here a review of the common and less common aspects of CM using the main imaging modalities available: echocardiography, cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging, CT, positron emission tomography and coronary angiography.

Background Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a heterogeneous syndrome, with several underlying etiologic and pathophysiologic factors. The presence of diabetes might identify an important phenotype, with implications for therapeutic strategies. While diabetes is associated with worse prognosis in HFpEF, the prognostic impact of glycemic control is yet unknown. Hence, we investigated phenotypic differences between diabetic and non-diabetic HFpEF patients (pts), and the prognostic impact of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C). Methods We prospectively enrolled 183 pts with HFpEF (78 ± 9 years, 38% men), including 70 (38%) diabetics (type 2 diabetes only). They underwent 2D echocardiography (n = 183), cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) (n = 150), and were followed for a combined outcome of all-cause mortality and first HF hospitalization. The prognostic impact of diabetes and glycemic control were determined with Cox proportional hazard models, and illustrated by adjusted Kaplan Meier curves. Results Diabetic HFpEF pts were younger (76 ± 9 vs 80 ± 8 years, p = 0.002), more obese (BMI 31 ± 6 vs 27 ± 6 kg/m 2 , p = 0.001) and suffered more frequently from sleep apnea (18% vs 7%, p = 0.032). Atrial fibrillation, however, was more frequent in non-diabetic pts (69% vs 53%, p = 0.028). Although no echocardiographic difference could be detected, CMR analysis revealed a trend towards higher LV mass (66 ± 18 vs 71 ± 14 g/m 2 , p = 0.07) and higher levels of fibrosis (53% vs 36% of patients had ECV by T1 mapping > 33%, p = 0.05) in diabetic patients. Over 25 ± 12 months, 111 HFpEF pts (63%) reached the combined outcome (24 deaths and 87 HF hospitalizations). Diabetes was a significant predictor of mortality and hospitalization for heart failure (HR: 1.72 [1.1–2.6], p = 0.011, adjusted for age, BMI, NYHA class and renal function). In diabetic patients, lower levels of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C < 7%) were associated with worse prognosis (HR: 2.07 [1.1–4.0], p = 0.028 adjusted for age, BMI, hemoglobin and NT-proBNP levels). Conclusion Our study highlights phenotypic features characterizing diabetic patients with HFpEF. Notably, they are younger and more obese than their non-diabetic counterpart, but suffer less from atrial fibrillation. Although diabetes is a predictor of poor outcome in HFpEF, intensive glycemic control (HbA1C < 7%) in diabetic patients is associated with worse prognosis.

Background Gadolinium (Gd) Extracellular volume fraction (ECV) by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR) has been proposed as a non-invasive method for assessment of diffuse myocardial fibrosis. Yet only few studies used 3 T CMR to measure ECV, and the accuracy of ECV measurements at 3 T has not been established. Therefore the aims of the present study were to validate measurement of ECV by MOLLI T1 mapping by 3 T CMR against fibrosis measured by histopathology. We also evaluated the recently proposed hypothesis that native-T1 mapping without contrast injection would be sufficient to detect fibrosis. Methods 31 patients (age = 58 ± 17 years, 77 % men) with either severe aortic stenosis ( n  = 12) severe aortic regurgitation ( n  = 9) or severe mitral regurgitation ( n  = 10), all free of coronary artery disease, underwent 3 T-CMR with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and pre- and post-contrast MOLLI T1 mapping and ECV computation, prior to valve surgery. LV biopsies were performed at the time of surgery, a median 13 [1–30] days later, and stained with picrosirius red. Pre-, and post-contrast T1 values, ECV, and amount of LGE were compared against magnitude of fibrosis by histopathology by Pearson correlation coefficients. Results The average amount of interstitial fibrosis by picrosirius red staining in biopsy samples was 6.1 ± 4.3 %. ECV computed from pre-post contrast MOLLI T1 time changes was 28.9 ± 5.5 %, and correlated (r = 0.78, p < 0.001) strongly with the magnitude of histological fibrosis. By opposition, neither amount of LGE (r = 0.17, p  = 0.36) nor native pre-contrast myocardial T1 time (r = −0.18, p  = 0.32) correlated with fibrosis by histopathology. Conclusions ECV determined by 3 T CMR T1 MOLLI images closely correlates with histologically determined diffuse interstitial fibrosis, providing a non-invasive estimation for quantification of interstitial fibrosis in patients with valve diseases. By opposition, neither non-contrast T1 times nor the amount of LGE were indicative of the magnitude of diffuse interstitial fibrosis measured by histopathology.

Background Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) 2D feature tracking (FT) left ventricular (LV) myocardial strain has seen widespread use to characterize myocardial deformation. Yet, validation of CMR FT measurements remains scarce, particularly for regional strain. Therefore, we aimed to perform intervendor comparison of 3 different FT software against tagging. Methods In 61 subjects (18 healthy subjects, 18 patients with chronic myocardial infarction, 15 with dilated cardiomyopathy, and 10 with LV hypertrophy due to hypertrophic cardiomyopathy or aortic stenosis) were prospectively compared global (G) and regional transmural peak-systolic Lagrangian longitudinal (LS), circumferential (CS) and radial strains (RS) by 3 FT software (cvi42, Segment, and Tomtec) among each other and with tagging at 3T. We also evaluated the ability of regional LS, CS, and RS by different FT software vs tagging to identify late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) in the 18 infarct patients. Results GLS and GCS by all 3 software had an excellent agreement among each other (ICC = 0.94–0.98 for GLS and ICC = 0.96–0.98 for GCS respectively) and against tagging (ICC = 0.92–0.94 for GLS and ICC = 0.88–0.91 for GCS respectively), while GRS showed inconsistent agreement between vendors (ICC 0.10–0.81). For regional LS, the agreement was good (ICC = 0.68) between 2 vendors but less vs the 3 rd (ICC 0.50–0.59) and moderate to poor (ICC 0.44–0.47) between all three FT software and tagging. Also, for regional CS agreement between 2 software was higher (ICC = 0.80) than against the 3rd (ICC = 0.58–0.60), and both better agreed with tagging (ICC = 0.70–0.72) than the 3rd (ICC = 0.57). Regional RS had more variation in the agreement between methods ranging from good (ICC = 0.75) to poor (ICC = 0.05). Finally, the accuracy of scar detection by regional strains differed among the 3 FT software. While the accuracy of regional LS was similar, CS by one software was less accurate (AUC 0.68) than tagging (AUC 0.80, p < 0.006) and RS less accurate (AUC 0.578) than the other two (AUC 0.76 and 0.73, p < 0.02) to discriminate segments with LGE. Conclusions We confirm good agreement of CMR FT and little intervendor difference for GLS and GCS evaluation, with variable agreement for GRS. For regional strain evaluation, intervendor difference was larger, especially for RS, and the diagnostic performance varied more substantially among different vendors for regional strain analysis.

The accurate quantification of primary mitral regurgitation (MR) and its consequences on cardiac remodeling is of paramount importance to determine the best timing for surgery in these patients. The recommended echocardiographic grading of primary MR severity relies on an integrated multiparametric approach. It is expected that the large number of echocardiographic parameters collected would offer the possibility to check the measured values regarding their congruence in order to conclude reliably on MR severity. However, the use of multiple parameters to grade MR can result in potential discrepancies between one or more of them. Importantly, many factors beyond MR severity impact the values obtained for these parameters including technical settings, anatomic and hemodynamic considerations, patient's characteristics and echocardiographer' skills. Hence, clinicians involved in valvular diseases should be well aware of the respective strengths and pitfalls of each of MR grading methods by echocardiography. Recent literature highlighted the need for a reappraisal of the severity of primary MR from a hemodynamic perspective. The estimation of MR regurgitation fraction by indirect quantitative methods, whenever possible, should be central when grading the severity of these patients. The assessment of the MR effective regurgitant orifice area by the proximal flow convergence method should be used in a semi-quantitative manner. Furthermore, it is crucial to acknowledge specific clinical situations in MR at risk of misevaluation when grading severity such as late-systolic MR, bi-leaflet prolapse with multiple jets or extensive leak, wall-constrained eccentric jet or in older patients with complex MR mechanism. Finally, it is debatable whether the 4-grades classification of MR severity would be still relevant nowadays, since the indication for mitral valve (MV) surgery is discussed in clinical practice for patients with 3+ and 4+ primary MR based on symptoms, specific markers of adverse outcome and MV repair probability. Primary MR grading should be seen as a continuum integrating both quantification of MR and its consequences, even for patients with presumed “moderate” MR.

Aims Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a disease associated with high morbidity and mortality, for which it is difficult to identify patients with the poorest prognosis in routine clinical practice. Carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA 125) has been shown to be a potential marker of congestion and prognosis in HF. We sought to better characterize HFpEF patients with high CA 125 levels by using a multimodal approach. Methods and results We prospectively enrolled 139 HFpEF patients (78 ± 8 years; 60% females) and 25 controls matched for age and sex (77 ± 5 years; 60% females). They underwent two‐dimensional echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance with late gadolinium enhancement [including extracellular volume (ECV) measurement], and serum measurements of CA 125 level. The primary endpoint of the study was a composite of all‐cause mortality or first HF hospitalization. The prognostic impact of CA 125 was determined using Cox proportional hazard models. Median CA 125 levels were significantly higher in HFpEF patients compared with controls [CA 125: 23.5 (14.5–44.7) vs. 14.6 (10.3–21.0) U/mL, P = 0.004]. CA 125 levels were positively correlated with a congestion marker [N‐terminal pro‐brain natriuretic peptide (NT‐proBNP) levels, Pearson's r = 0.37, P < 0.001] and markers of cardiac fibrosis estimated by both ECV (Pearson's r = 0.26, P = 0.003) and fibroblast growth factor 23 levels (Pearson's r = 0.50, P < 0.001). Over a median follow‐up of 49 (22–64) months, 97 HFpEF patients reached the composite endpoint. Even after adjustment for the Meta‐Analysis Global Group in Chronic risk score, a CA 125 level ≥35 U/mL was still a significant predictor of the composite endpoint [hazard ratio (HR): 1.58 (1.04–2.41), P = 0.032] and more particularly of HF hospitalization [HR: 1.81 (1.13–2.92), P = 0.014]. In contrast, NT‐proBNP levels were not an independent predictor. Conclusions CA 125 levels were significantly higher in HFpEF patients compared with controls matched for age and sex and were associated with markers of congestion and cardiac fibrosis. CA 125 levels were a strong and independent predictor of HF hospitalization in HFpEF patients. These data suggest a potential value of CA 125 as a biomarker for staging and risk prediction in HFpEF.

Background: Inflammation and oxidative stress are thought to play an important role in the pathophysiology of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) through the development of endothelial dysfunction. Myeloperoxidase (MPO) functions as a link between oxidative stress and inflammation and is an interesting therapeutic target. The objective of this observational cohort study was to compare MPO levels between HFpEF and old controls, to define clinical characteristics associated with high levels of MPO and to assess the relation between MPO levels and vascular function. Methods: Patients with HFpEF (N = 55) and controls >60 years (N = 18) were prospectively included. All subjects underwent complete echocardiography and blood sampling. MPO levels were dosed by ELISA assay. Effective arterial elastance (Ea) and peripheral arterial tonometry (EndoPAT reactive hyperemia index RHI and augmentation index AIx) were used to assess vascular function. Characteristics between groups defined by the median of MPO were compared using independent samples t-test or chi square test. Results: Patients with HFpEF (80 ± 8.7 years, 65% female) had higher levels of MPO compared to controls (75 ± 5.0 years, 72% female) (34.7 ng/mL [22.7; 44.0] vs 22.6 [18.2; 32.0], p = 0.026). MPO levels were correlated with markers of inflammation; C-reactive protein (Pearson’s R = 0.46, p = 0.001) and neutrophile to lymphocyte ratio (R = 0.36, p = 0.031) and with signs of left ventricular (LV) remodelling and elevated filling pressures, namely NT-proBNP levels (R = 0.32, p = 0.019), decreased LV ejection fraction (LVEF, R = –0.36, p = 0.008) and E/e’ ratio (R = 0.35, p = 0.011). HFpEF patients with levels of MPO above the median were more often men (48% vs 21%, p = 0.037) and suffered more often from diabetes (48% vs 18%, p = 0.017). Intriguingly, they had lower indices of vascular stiffness (augmentation index 11.1 [0.1; 30.7] vs 19.9 [10.5; 33.4], p = 0.018 and arterial elastance Ea 2.06 ± 0.676 vs 2.43 ± 0.721, p = 0.065) and there was no difference in endothelial function (1.82 [1.34; 2.30] vs 1.66 [1.32; 1.95], p = 0.55). Conclusions: HFpEF patients have higher levels of MPO than controls, reflecting leukocyte activation and oxidative stress. Among patients, high levels of MPO are associated with male sex, diabetic status, subtle left ventricular dysfunction and pronounced diastolic dysfunction. The association between oxidative stress and vascular stiffness, on the other hand could not be demonstrated. Clinical Trial Registration: Clinical trial NCT03197350.