Explore the vast range of titles available.

Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) testing might provide a current assessment of the genomic profile of advanced cancer, without the need to repeat tumour biopsy. We aimed to assess the accuracy of ctDNA testing in advanced breast cancer and the ability of ctDNA testing to select patients for mutation-directed therapy. We did an open-label, multicohort, phase 2a, platform trial of ctDNA testing in 18 UK hospitals. Participants were women (aged ≥18 years) with histologically confirmed advanced breast cancer and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0–2. Patients had completed at least one previous line of treatment for advanced breast cancer or relapsed within 12 months of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients were recruited into four parallel treatment cohorts matched to mutations identified in ctDNA: cohort A comprised patients with ESR1 mutations (treated with intramuscular extended-dose fulvestrant 500 mg); cohort B comprised patients with HER2 mutations (treated with oral neratinib 240 mg, and if oestrogen receptor-positive with intramuscular standard-dose fulvestrant); cohort C comprised patients with AKT1 mutations and oestrogen receptor-positive cancer (treated with oral capivasertib 400 mg plus intramuscular standard-dose fulvestrant); and cohort D comprised patients with AKT1 mutations and oestrogen receptor-negative cancer or PTEN mutation (treated with oral capivasertib 480 mg). Each cohort had a primary endpoint of confirmed objective response rate. For cohort A, 13 or more responses among 78 evaluable patients were required to infer activity and three or more among 16 were required for cohorts B, C, and D. Recruitment to all cohorts is complete and long-term follow-up is ongoing. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03182634; the European Clinical Trials database, EudraCT2015-003735-36; and the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN16945804. Between Dec 21, 2016, and April 26, 2019, 1051 patients registered for the study, with ctDNA results available for 1034 patients. Agreement between ctDNA digital PCR and targeted sequencing was 96–99% (n=800, kappa 0·89–0·93). Sensitivity of digital PCR ctDNA testing for mutations identified in tissue sequencing was 93% (95% CI 83–98) overall and 98% (87–100) with contemporaneous biopsies. In all cohorts, combined median follow-up was 14·4 months (IQR 7·0–23·7). Cohorts B and C met or exceeded the target number of responses, with five (25% [95% CI 9–49]) of 20 patients in cohort B and four (22% [6–48]) of 18 patients in cohort C having a response. Cohorts A and D did not reach the target number of responses, with six (8% [95% CI 3–17]) of 74 in cohort A and two (11% [1–33]) of 19 patients in cohort D having a response. The most common grade 3–4 adverse events were raised gamma-glutamyltransferase (13 [16%] of 80 patients; cohort A); diarrhoea (four [25%] of 20; cohort B); fatigue (four [22%] of 18; cohort C); and rash (five [26%] of 19; cohort D). 17 serious adverse reactions occurred in 11 patients, and there was one treatment-related death caused by grade 4 dyspnoea (in cohort C). ctDNA testing offers accurate, rapid genotyping that enables the selection of mutation-directed therapies for patients with breast cancer, with sufficient clinical validity for adoption into routine clinical practice. Our results demonstrate clinically relevant activity of targeted therapies against rare HER2 and AKT1 mutations, confirming these mutations could be targetable for breast cancer treatment. Cancer Research UK, AstraZeneca, and Puma Biotechnology.

Desmoid-type fibromatosis (DTF, aggressive fibromatosis) is a non-metastasizing mesenchymal neoplasm of deep soft tissue with a tendency towards local recurrence. Genetic alterations affecting canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling are reported in the majority of DTF. While most sporadic DTF harbor somatic mutations in CTNNB1 , germline mutations in adenomatous polyposis coli ( APC) are known to occur in hereditary DTF types (FAP, Gardner-Syndrome). Additional single nucleotide variants (SNVs) in AKT1 (E17K) and BRAF (V600E) were reported in pediatric DTF with potential clinical implications. We performed targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) in a large cohort of 204 formalin-fixed DTF samples, comprising 22 pediatric cases (patients age ≤18 years). The mutational status was correlated with clinicopathological characteristics. Overall, deleterious CTNNB1 mutations were detected in 89% of DTF, most frequently affecting the serine/threonine phosphorylation sites T41 and S45 of β-catenin. While the T41A CTNNB1 mutation was significantly more often identified in the mesenterial localization, DTF originating from extra-intestinal sites more frequently harbored the S45P CTNNB1 alteration. Beyond common mutations in CTNNB1 , additional SNVs were demonstrated in 7% of the DTF cohort and in 18% of the pediatric DTF subgroup. The mutational spectrum included deleterious mutations in AKT1 (G311S/D and T312I), ALK (R806H and G924S), AR (A159T), EGFR (P848L), ERBB2 (H174Y), IDH2 (H354Y), KIT (V559D), RET (T1038A), SDHA (R325M), and SDHD (R115W), as characterized by in silico prediction tools. In conclusion, our study indicates that DTF may harbor a broader mutational spectrum beyond CTNNB1 mutations, comprising targetable alterations including the herewith first reported imatinib-sensitive KIT V559D mutation in DTF.

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) is implicated in DNA repair and transcription regulation. Niraparib (MK4827) is an oral potent, selective PARP-1 and PARP-2 inhibitor that induces synthetic lethality in preclinical tumour models with loss of BRCA and PTEN function. We investigated the safety, tolerability, maximum tolerated dose, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles, and preliminary antitumour activity of niraparib. In a phase 1 dose-escalation study, we enrolled patients with advanced solid tumours at one site in the UK and two sites in the USA. Eligible patients were aged at least 18 years; had a life expectancy of at least 12 weeks; had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or less; had assessable disease; were not suitable to receive any established treatments; had adequate organ function; and had discontinued any previous anticancer treatments at least 4 weeks previously. In part A, cohorts of three to six patients, enriched for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, received niraparib daily at ten escalating doses from 30 mg to 400 mg in a 21-day cycle to establish the maximum tolerated dose. Dose expansion at the maximum tolerated dose was pursued in 15 patients to confirm tolerability. In part B, we further investigated the maximum tolerated dose in patients with sporadic platinum-resistant high-grade serous ovarian cancer and sporadic prostate cancer. We obtained blood, circulating tumour cells, and optional paired tumour biopsies for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic assessments. Toxic effects were assessed by common toxicity criteria and tumour responses ascribed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Circulating tumour cells and archival tumour tissue in prostate patients were analysed for exploratory putative predictive biomarkers, such as loss of PTEN expression and ETS rearrangements. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00749502. Between Sept 15, 2008, and Jan 14, 2011, we enrolled 100 patients: 60 in part A and 40 in part B. 300 mg/day was established as the maximum tolerated dose. Dose-limiting toxic effects reported in the first cycle were grade 3 fatigue (one patient given 30 mg/day), grade 3 pneumonitis (one given 60 mg/day), and grade 4 thrombocytopenia (two given 400 mg/day). Common treatment-related toxic effects were anaemia (48 patients [48%]), nausea (42 [42%]), fatigue (42 [42%]), thrombocytopenia (35 [35%]), anorexia (26 [26%]), neutropenia (24 [24%]), constipation (23 [23%]), and vomiting (20 [20%]), and were predominantly grade 1 or 2. Pharmacokinetics were dose proportional and the mean terminal elimination half-life was 36·4 h (range 32·8–46·0). Pharmacodynamic analyses confirmed PARP inhibition exceeded 50% at doses greater than 80 mg/day and antitumour activity was documented beyond doses of 60 mg/day. Eight (40% [95% CI 19–64]) of 20 BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers with ovarian cancer had RECIST partial responses, as did two (50% [7–93]) of four mutation carriers with breast cancer. Antitumour activity was also reported in sporadic high-grade serous ovarian cancer, non-small-cell lung cancer, and prostate cancer. We recorded no correlation between loss of PTEN expression or ETS rearrangements and measures of antitumour activity in patients with prostate cancer. A recommended phase 2 dose of 300 mg/day niraparib is well tolerated. Niraparib should be further assessed in inherited and sporadic cancers with homologous recombination DNA repair defects and to target PARP-mediated transcription in cancer. Merck Sharp and Dohme.

Identification of families at risk for ovarian cancer offers the opportunity to consider prophylactic surgery thus reducing ovarian cancer mortality. So far, identification of potentially affected families in Germany was solely performed via family history and numbers of affected family members with breast or ovarian cancer. However, neither the prevalence of deleterious variants in BRCA1/2 in ovarian cancer in Germany nor the reliability of family history as trigger for genetic counselling has ever been evaluated. Prospective counseling and germline testing of consecutive patients with primary diagnosis or with platinum-sensitive relapse of an invasive epithelial ovarian cancer. Testing included 25 candidate and established risk genes. Among these 25 genes, 16 genes (ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CDH1, CHEK2, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, NBN, PMS2, PTEN, PALB2, RAD51C, RAD51D, STK11, TP53) were defined as established cancer risk genes. A positive family history was defined as at least one relative with breast cancer or ovarian cancer or breast cancer in personal history. In total, we analyzed 523 patients: 281 patients with primary diagnosis of ovarian cancer and 242 patients with relapsed disease. Median age at primary diagnosis was 58 years (range 16-93) and 406 patients (77.6%) had a high-grade serous ovarian cancer. In total, 27.9% of the patients showed at least one deleterious variant in all 25 investigated genes and 26.4% in the defined 16 risk genes. Deleterious variants were most prevalent in the BRCA1 (15.5%), BRCA2 (5.5%), RAD51C (2.5%) and PALB2 (1.1%) genes. The prevalence of deleterious variants did not differ significantly between patients at primary diagnosis and relapse. The prevalence of deleterious variants in BRCA1/2 (and in all 16 risk genes) in patients <60 years was 30.2% (33.2%) versus 10.6% (18.9%) in patients ≥60 years. Family history was positive in 43% of all patients. Patients with a positive family history had a prevalence of deleterious variants of 31.6% (36.0%) versus 11.4% (17.6%) and histologic subtype of high grade serous ovarian cancer versus other showed a prevalence of deleterious variants of 23.2% (29.1%) and 10.2% (14.8%), respectively. Testing only for BRCA1/2 would miss in our series more than 5% of the patients with a deleterious variant in established risk genes. 26.4% of all patients harbor at least one deleterious variant in established risk genes. The threshold of 10% mutation rate which is accepted for reimbursement by health care providers in Germany was observed in all subgroups analyzed and neither age at primary diagnosis nor histo-type or family history sufficiently enough could identify a subgroup not eligible for genetic counselling and testing. Genetic testing should therefore be offered to every patient with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer and limiting testing to BRCA1/2 seems to be not sufficient.

Circulating cell-free DNA methylation testing in blood has recently received regulatory approval for screening of colorectal cancer. Its application in other clinical settings, including staging, prognosis, prediction, and recurrence monitoring is highly promising, and of particular interest in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs) that represent a heterogeneous group of cancers with unsatisfactory treatment guidelines. Short stature homeobox 2 ( ) and septin 9 ( ) DNA methylation in plasma from 649 prospectively enrolled patients (training study: 284 HNSCC/122 control patients; testing study: 141 HNSCC/102 control patients) was quantified before treatment and longitudinally during surveillance. In the training study, 59% of HNSCC patients were methylation-positive at 96% specificity. Methylation levels correlated with tumor and nodal category ( < 0.001). Initially increased methylation levels were associated with a higher risk of death [ : hazard ratio (HR) = 5.27, = 0.001; : HR = 2.32, = 0.024]. Disease recurrence/metastases were detected in 47% of patients up to 377 days earlier compared to current clinical practice. The onset of second cancers was detected up to 343 days earlier. In the testing study, sensitivity (52%), specificity (95%), prediction of overall survival ( : HR = 2.78, = 0.022; : HR = 2.50, = 0.026), and correlation with tumor and nodal category ( <0.001) were successfully validated. Methylation testing in plasma is a powerful diagnostic tool for molecular disease staging, risk stratification, and disease monitoring. Patients with initially high biomarker levels might benefit from intensified treatment and posttherapeutic surveillance. The early detection of a recurrent/metastatic disease or a second malignancy could lead to an earlier consecutive treatment, thereby improving patients' outcomes.

Despite advances in combined modality therapy, outcomes in head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) remain dismal with five-year overall survival rates of less than 50%. Prognostic biomarkers are urgently needed to identify patients with a high risk of death after initial curative treatment. Methylation status of the paired-like homeodomain transcription factor 2 (PITX2) has recently emerged as a powerful prognostic biomarker in various cancers. In the present study, the clinical performance of PITX2 methylation was validated in a HNSCC cohort by means of an independent analytical platform (Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChip, Illumina, Inc.). A total of 528 HNSCC patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were included in the study. Death was defined as primary endpoint. PITX2 methylation was correlated with overall survival and clinicopathological parameters. PITX2 methylation was significantly associated with sex, tumor site, p16 status, and grade. In univariate Cox proportional hazards analysis, PITX2 hypermethylation analyzed as continuous and dichotomized variable was significantly associated with prolonged overall survival of HNSCC patients (continuous: hazard ratio (HR) = 0.19 [95%CI: 0.04-0.88], p = 0.034; dichotomized: HR = 0.52 [95%CI: 0.33-0.84], p = 0.007). In multivariate Cox analysis including established clinicopathological parameters, PITX2 promoter methylation was confirmed as prognostic factor (HR = 0.28 [95%CI: 0.09-0.84], p = 0.023). Using an independent analytical platform, PITX2 methylation was validated as a prognostic biomarker in HNSCC patients, identifying patients that potentially benefit from intensified surveillance and/or administration of adjuvant/neodjuvant treatment, i.e. immunotherapy.

Breast cancer, one of the most common cancers in women, is classified by the expression of hormone receptors and the growth factor receptor HER2, which is important for personalised tumour treatment with HER2-targeted therapies. Tumour biopsies are required for histopathological diagnosis of HER2 expression by breast cancer cells but are subject to sampling error. In this study, we present a method for identifying and analysing cancer-derived EVs from plasma for the detection of HER2 expression in breast cancer without the need for additional processing steps. We detected nano-sized particles through an optimised flow cytometry approach that allows for the identification of HER2-expressing EVs and quantification of their HER2 expression levels. In a clinical study of 115 breast cancer patients, this optimised flow cytometric analysis detected a range of 1.3 to 50 × 10 3 HER2 + EVs per µl of plasma. The number of HER2 + EVs did not correlate directly with tumour size, grade, or metastasis. However, computational integration of data from the quantification of HER2 pos EVs per µl/plasma and their HER2 expression levels on a single EV basis allowed for the reliable identification of HER2 expression levels in tumours. Our results reveal the potential for analysing cancer-derived EVs from plasma for the diagnosis and personalised therapy in breast cancer patients.

Background SHOX2 and SEPT9 methylation in circulating cell-free DNA (ccfDNA) in blood are established powerful and clinically valuable biomarkers for diagnosis, staging, prognosis, and monitoring of cancer patients. The aim of the present study was to evaluate different quantification algorithms (relative quantification, absolute quantification, quasi-digital PCR) with regard to their clinical performance. Methods Methylation analyses were performed in a training cohort (141 patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma [HNSCC], 170 control cases) and a testing cohort (137 HNSCC cases, 102 controls). DNA was extracted from plasma samples, bisulfite-converted, and analyzed via quantitative real-time PCR. SHOX2 and SEPT9 methylations were assessed separately and as panel [mean SEPT9 / SHOX2 ] using the ΔCT method for absolute quantification and the ΔΔCT-method for relative quantification. Quasi-digital PCR was defined as the number of amplification-positive PCR replicates. The diagnostic (sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC)) and prognostic accuracy (hazard ratio (HR) from Cox regression) were evaluated. Results Sporadic methylation in control samples necessitated the introduction of cutoffs resulting in 61–63% sensitivity/90–92% specificity ( SEPT9 /training), 53–57% sensitivity/87–90% specificity ( SHOX2 /training), and 64–65% sensitivity/90–91% specificity (mean SEPT9 / SHOX2 /training). Results were confirmed in a testing cohort with 54–56% sensitivity/88–90% specificity ( SEPT9 /testing), 43–48% sensitivity/93–95% specificity ( SHOX2 /testing), and 49–58% sensitivity/88–94% specificity (mean SEPT9 / SHOX2 /testing). All algorithms showed comparable cutoff-independent diagnostic accuracy with largely overlapping 95% confidence intervals ( SEPT9 : AUC training  = 0.79–0.80; AUC testing  = 0.74–0.75; SHOX2 : AUC training  = 0.78–0.81, AUC testing  = 0.77–0.79; mean SEPT9 / SHOX2 : AUC training  = 0.81–0.84, AUC testing  = 0.80). The accurate prediction of overall survival was possible with all three algorithms (training cohort: HR SEPT9  = 1.23-1.90, HR SHOX2  = 1.14-1.85, HR mean SEPT9 / SHOX2  =1.19-1.89 ; testing cohort: HR SEPT9  =1.22-1.67, HR SHOX2  = 1.15-1.71, HR mean SEPT9 / SHOX2  = 1.12-1.77). Conclusion The concordant clinical performance based on different quantification algorithms allows for the application of various diagnostic platforms for the analysis of ccfDNA methylation biomarkers.

Acid ceramidase (ASAH1) is a key player in sphingolipid metabolism and signaling. It has prognostic value for several cancers, but histotype-specific analyses of ovarian cancer are not yet available. We used three retrospective TMA cohorts encompassing a total of 1106 ovarian cancers with follow-up data for immunohistochemical analysis of acid ceramidase (ASAH1) expression. Patients with sub-optimal debulking and persistent residual tumor after surgery introduced bias in the prognostic analysis and were excluded from further studies. Overall, we detected an association of ASAH1 expression with better prognosis in ovarian cancer patients. ASAH1 expression differed between histological ovarian cancer histotypes with most frequent expression in endometrioid and clear cell ovarian cancer, which are both associated with good prognosis. Stratified subgroup analyses within these histotypes did not reveal significant survival differences, but the power of the analysis may be limited by smaller sample sizes. In contrast to breast cancer, we found only a modest concordance between estrogen receptor status and ASAH1 expression within the endometrioid ovarian cancer histotype. In an exploratory analysis of estrogen receptor negative endometrioid ovarian cancer, ASAH1 expression was associated with significantly better overall survival (P = 0.007). Acid ceramidase is most frequently expressed in endometrioid and clear cell histotypes and could add independent prognostic value to estrogen receptor in endometrioid ovarian cancer. Modulating sphingolipid metabolism may lead to novel therapeutic intervention strategies for this disease.

Biliary tract cancers (BTC) are rare but highly aggressive malignant epithelial tumors. In order to improve the outcome in this lethal disease, novel biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy response prediction are urgently needed. DNA promoter methylation of PITX2 variants (PITX2ab, PITX2c) and intragenic methylation of the PITX2 adjacent non-coding RNA (PANCR) were investigated by methylations-specific qPCR assays in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue from 80 patients after resection for BTC. Results were correlated with clinicopathologic data and outcome. PITX2 variants and PANCR showed significant hypermethylation in tumor vs. normal adjacent tissue (p < 0.001 and p = 0.015), respectively. In survival analysis, dichotomized DNA methylation of variant PITX2c and PANCR were significantly associated with overall survival (OS). Patients with high tumor methylation levels of PITX2c had a shorter OS compared to patients with low methylation (12 vs. 40 months OS; HR 2.48 [1.38-4.48], p = 0.002). In contrast, PANCR hypermethylation was associated with prolonged survival (25 vs. 19 months OS; HR 0.54 [0.30-0.94], p = 0.015) and qualified as an independent prognostic factor on multivariate analysis. The biomarkers investigated in this study may help to identify BTC subpopulations at risk for worse survival. Further studies are needed to evaluate if PITX2 might be a clinically useful biomarker for an optimized and individualized treatment.