Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
13 result(s) for "Ghaith, Summer"
Sort by:
Bell Palsy Mimics: Lessons from Four Malpractice Cases
Introduction: Bell palsy, an idiopathic dysfunction of the seventh cranial nerve, is the leading cause of unilateral facial paralysis, although other more serious entities such as stroke, infection, and tumor may present similarly, leading to both medical and legal risks in cases of misdiagnosis. Case Series: We present four malpractice cases revolving around misdiagnosis of Bell palsy. These cases alleged failure to diagnose, failure to obtain informed consent, and failure to provide appropriate discharge instructions. Outcomes ranged from a jury verdict in favor of the physician, to an out-of-court settlment for$400,000, to a jury verdict in favor of the patieint for over $ 3.1 million. Conclusion: Bell palsy is the most common cause of unilateral facial paralysis. While the diagnosis can be made at the bedside without advanced testing, doing so requires a clear understanding of the pathophysiology of the disease, an appreciation for the role of advanced diagnostics, and thorough documentation of a supportive history and physical exam. Misdiagnosis or mismanagement confers both clinical and legal risks.
Second Scope, New Findings: Pediatric Stridor Is Not Always Due to Croup or Laryngomalacia: A Case Report
Introduction: Infantile subglottic hemangioma is a rare and serious condition characterized by stridor, respiratory distress, and a barking cough. This condition poses a significant risk as it can lead to life-threatening airway obstruction. Case Report: We present a patient who was diagnosed in the ED with moderate laryngomalacia via laryngoscopy by otolaryngology and discharged; he returned to the ED the next day with worsening symptoms of recurrent stridor, difficulty feeding, and worsening respiratory distress. A second laryngoscopic exam performed on the return ED visit revealed a subglottic mass which was later identified as a left-sided subglottic hemangioma via bronchoscopy and MRI. The patient was treated with propranolol and discharged from the inpatient unit with dermatology and otolaryngology follow-up. Conclusion: Infantile subglottic hemangioma is a rare but serious cause of respiratory distress in infants, posing a risk of airway obstruction. It should be considered in the ED, particularly for patients under two years of age, who present with recurrent stridor and respiratory distress and do not respond to standard treatments for croup or laryngomalacia.
Trends in Emergency Department Exam Medicare Reimbursements Between 2010 and 2018
As the Medicare population continues to grow, financial pressure is placed upon hospitals, physicians, and other providers as the payer mix has an increasing proportion of Medicare patients. The purpose of this study was to further the understanding of reimbursement trends surrounding the five levels of emergency department (ED) examinations (CPT codes 99281-99285) from 2010 to 2018 and determine how they have changed with respect to each procedure. CPT codes were filtered into the 2010 and 2018 Physician/Supplier Procedure Summaries from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' website to gather data on emergency physician submissions and Medicare denials and payments. In 2010, 15,669,196 ED examinations were submitted to Medicare for $7,628,693,382 while in 2018, 16,432,184 ED examinations were submitted for $14,522,456,383. Despite an increase of $397/submission made by emergency physicians, Medicare paid 20.5% of the submitted charges in 2010 for ED examinations and 11.9% in 2018. The denial rate in 2018 was highest for level I ED examinations (11.3%), and the lowest for level V examinations (5.1%). The utilization of level V ED examinations increased 22.3% from 2010 to 2018, while the utilization of the others decreased. Of the five levels of ED examinations, only the level I examination did not exhibit a decrease. From 2010 to 2018, emergency physicians charged a higher amount for ED examinations, yet Medicare reimbursement accounted for a smaller proportion of these charges, resulting in less payment per submission for the four most common levels. Downward trends in Medicare reimbursement may place financial burdens that could potentially hamper healthcare outcomes.
Medical and Legal Risks in Tibial Plateau Fractures
Introduction: Tibial plateau fractures, which comprise about 1% of all fractures, can be challenging to diagnose in the emergency department setting. Missed and delayed diagnoses can result in poor outcomes for patients and legal risks for clinicians, necessitating a high level of vigilance. Case Series: In this article we review three malpractice cases related to tibial plateau fractures. Key issues included missed or delayed diagnosis, mismanagement of associated complications, inadequate discharge instructions, and lack of documentation. Conclusion: Tibial plateau fractures can be challenging to identify, heightening the risk of downstream complications. As a result, emergency physicians must remain vigilant in assessing patients who are at increased risk for these injuries and document their efforts to both evaluate for and communicate these risks to patients.
Charting Practices to Protect Against Malpractice: Case Reviews and Learning Points
Introduction: Medical documentation issues play a role in 10-20% of medical malpractice lawsuits. Inaccurate, incomplete, or generic records undermine a physician’s defense and make a plaintiff’s lawyer more likely to take on a case. Despite the frequency of documentation errors in malpractice suits, physicians receive very little education or feedback on their documentation. Our objective in this case series was to evaluate malpractice cases related to documentation to help improve physicians’ documentation and minimize their liability risks. Methods: We used Thomson Reuters Westlaw legal database to identify malpractice cases related to documentation. Common issues related to documentation and themes in the cases were identified and highlighted. Results: We classified cases into the following categories: incomplete documentation; inaccurate text; transcription errors; judgmental language; and alteration of documentation. By evaluating real cases, physicians can better understand common errors of other practitioners and avoid these in their own practice. Conclusion: Emergency physicians can reduce their liability risks by relying less on forms and templates and making a habit of documenting discussions with the patients, recording others’ involvement in patient care (chaperones, consultants, trainees, etc.), addressing others’ notes (triage staff, nurses, residents, etc.), paying attention to accuracy of transcribed or dictated information, avoiding judgmental language, and refraining from altering patient charts.
Let’s Be Honest: These Medical Malpractice Cases Were a Pain in the Back
Introduction: This series reviews three cases of back pain where a highly morbid diagnosis was missed by an emergency physician and subsequently successfully litigated. Case Report: We review the clinical entities of spinal epidural abscess and cauda equina syndrome, challenging diagnoses that can be easily missed and lead to patient harm if not treated promptly. Here we offer suggestions for recognizing these conditions quickly, performing an adequate history and exam, and using documentation to support decision-making. Conclusion: When confronted with an unfortunate medical outcome, maintaining honesty is of paramount importance in medical-legal environments.
Federalism’s Fallacy at the Forefront of Public Health Law
Amid undulating conceptions of the role and prowess of federalism emerges its central constitutional role: protecting American liberties against unwarranted governmental intrusions . To the extent that federalism is used as a guise for withdrawing fundamental rights to abortion by the U.S. Supreme Court in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization , individual rights are sacrificed in contravention of constitutional structural norms.
Legal Challenges Underlying COVID-19 Vaccinations
Immunizing hundreds of millions against COVID- 19 through the most extensive national vaccine campaign ever undertaken in the United States has generated significant law and policy challenges.Immunizing hundreds of millions against COVID- 19 through the most extensive national vaccine campaign ever undertaken in the United States has generated significant law and policy challenges.
Supreme Court Impacts in Public Health Law: 2022-2023
In another tumultuous term of the United States Supreme Court in 2022-2023 a series of critical cases implicate instant and forthcoming changes in multiple fronts that collectively shift the national public health law and policy environment.