Explore the vast range of titles available.

Fibromyalgia is a musculoskeletal syndrome characterized by chronic widespread pain that is often associated with systemic manifestations. Since mitochondria are the main source of cellular energy, we hypothesized that fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) could be linked to mitochondrial impairment. Aim was to study mitochondrial dysfunction in peripheral blood mononuclear cells isolated from 50 patients with primary FMS and 20 apparently healthy controls. Although no differences in mitochondrial basal respiration were observed between patients with primary FMS and healthy controls, a lower median bioenergetic health index (BHI; − 22.1%, p = 0.03), a proxy of mitochondrial function, was found in patients. According to fibromyalgia severity score (FSS), a composite of widespread pain index and symptom severity scale, a lower median BHI (− 18.7%) was found in patients with a FSS ≥ 20 compared to those with a FSS < 20. Negative moderate correlations were found only between BHI and FSS (r = − 0.36) and widespread pain index (r = − 0.38). We demonstrated that patients with FMS had an impaired mitochondrial function. Additionally, we found a mild correlation between the widespread pain index and the BHI, possibly indicating that the altered mitochondrial function, in these patients, narrows musculoskeletal rather than central nervous system involvement.

Over the last decade, the world of hemophilia has experienced an unprecedented therapeutic advance, thanks to the progress in bioengineering technologies, leading to the introduction of drugs with novel mechanisms of action based on restoring thrombin generation or coagulation factor VIII mimicking. Apart from the bispecific monoclonal antibody emicizumab, already approved for patients with severe hemophilia A with and without inhibitors, novel non-replacement drugs designed to reduce the treatment burden of patients with hemophilia A or B with or without inhibitors are undergoing evaluation in clinical trials. Thanks to their innovative mechanism of action and subcutaneous administration, these drugs promise to provide effective bleeding protection together with improved adherence and improve health-related quality of life for patients with hemophilia. On the other hand, rare thromboembolic events have been reported with some of these drugs and warrant continuous post-marketing surveillance and investigation of predisposing factors, although the overall safety profile of most of these drugs is good. Finally, new challenges need to be faced in the clinical and laboratory monitoring of the hemostatic status in patients treated with these innovative therapies. In this review, we provide an update on the available data on novel non-replacement drugs currently undergoing evaluation in clinical trials for patients with hemophilia.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease affecting about 0. 5–1% of the adult population and manifesting as persistent synovitis, systemic inflammation and production of autoantibodies. Patients affected by RA not only experience chronic disease progression, but are also burdened by a 1.5-fold increased cardiovascular (CV) risk, which is comparable to the risk experienced by patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. RA patients also have a higher incidence and prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD). Although RA patients frequently present traditional CV risk factors such as insulin resistance and active smoking, previous studies have clarified the pivotal role of chronic inflammation–driven by proinflammatory cytokines such as interleukin 6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha)–in accelerating the process of atherosclerosis and impairing the coagulation system. Over the last years, a number of studies have shown that disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) reducing the inflammatory state in general improve the CV risk, however some drugs may carry some apparent negative effects. Thus, RA is a model of disease in which targeting inflammation may counteract the progression of atherosclerosis and reduce CV risk. Clinical and experimental evidence indicates that the management of RA patients should be tailored based on the positive and negative effects of DMARDs on CV risk together with the individual traditional CV risk profile. The identification of genetic, biochemical and clinical biomarkers, predictive of evolution and response to treatment, will be the next challenge for a precision approach to reduce the burden of the disease.

Background Tocilizumab blocks pro-inflammatory activity of interleukin-6 (IL-6), involved in pathogenesis of pneumonia the most frequent cause of death in COVID-19 patients. Methods A multicenter, single-arm, hypothesis-driven trial was planned, according to a phase 2 design, to study the effect of tocilizumab on lethality rates at 14 and 30 days (co-primary endpoints, a priori expected rates being 20 and 35%, respectively). A further prospective cohort of patients, consecutively enrolled after the first cohort was accomplished, was used as a secondary validation dataset. The two cohorts were evaluated jointly in an exploratory multivariable logistic regression model to assess prognostic variables on survival. Results In the primary intention-to-treat (ITT) phase 2 population, 180/301 (59.8%) subjects received tocilizumab, and 67 deaths were observed overall. Lethality rates were equal to 18.4% (97.5% CI: 13.6–24.0, P  = 0.52) and 22.4% (97.5% CI: 17.2–28.3, P  < 0.001) at 14 and 30 days, respectively. Lethality rates were lower in the validation dataset, that included 920 patients. No signal of specific drug toxicity was reported. In the exploratory multivariable logistic regression analysis, older age and lower PaO2/FiO2 ratio negatively affected survival, while the concurrent use of steroids was associated with greater survival. A statistically significant interaction was found between tocilizumab and respiratory support, suggesting that tocilizumab might be more effective in patients not requiring mechanical respiratory support at baseline. Conclusions Tocilizumab reduced lethality rate at 30 days compared with null hypothesis, without significant toxicity. Possibly, this effect could be limited to patients not requiring mechanical respiratory support at baseline. Registration EudraCT (2020-001110-38); clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04317092).

A systemic inflammatory response occurs during SARS-CoV2 infection and is associated with hypercoagulability and thrombotic events. From March 2020 in our hospital different dosages of low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) were introduced according to the level of patient care intensity. Because bleeding episodes occurred in hospitalized COVID-19 patients on heparin, the dosage of LMWH at the end of first wave was tailored on the severity of COVID-19. The aim of this study is to describe bleeding and thrombotic events in patients hospitalized with SARS-CoV2 infection on LMWH therapy in the two waves of COVID-19 and analyze the factors associated with these events. Among 1143 patients enrolled in the COVID-19 Network registry, 912 were included in the analysis, 537 of them admitted during the first wave and 375 during the second. Bleeding events were 30 (3.3%): 22 (2.4%) major and 8 (0.9%) non-major. Arterial and venous thrombotic events were 6 (0.7%) and 24 (2.6%). The incidence of venous thrombotic events was higher in the first than in the second wave (0.29% [95% CI 0.20–0.45] events/day vs. 0.05% [95% CI 0.02–0.16]), with a 71% risk reduction (95% CI 22%—94%). The incidence of bleeding was 0.33% (95% CI 0.22–0.50) vs 0.14% events/day (95% CI 0.07–0.28), with no statistical between-wave difference (HR 0.41 95% CI 0.16–1.08). After adjusting for the competing risks of death and comorbidities, patients in the second wave had lower odds to have thrombotic events than in the first wave (0.24 HR [95% C.I. 0.07–0.89]). In this retrospective study on COVID-19 we found a low rate of hemorrhagic and thrombotic events, that may be explained by the absence in the case material of patients admitted to intensive care unit.

Hypercoagulability and endothelial dysfunction related to inflammation have been clearly demonstrated in COVID-19. However, their influence on thromboembolism, lung alterations and mortality in low-intensity-care patients with COVID-19 is not completely clarified. Our aims were to evaluate the prevalence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) with compressive ultrasound (CUS); to describe lung ultrasound (LUS) features; and to study coagulation, inflammatory and endothelial perturbation biomarkers in COVID-19 patients at low-intensity care unit admission. The predictive value of these biomarkers on mortality, need for oxygen support and duration of hospitalization was also evaluated. Of the 65 patients included, 8 were non-survivors. CUS was negative for DVT in all patients. LUS Soldati and Vetrugno scores were strongly correlated (rho = 0.95) with each other, and both significantly differed in patients who needed oxygen therapy vs. those who did not (Soldati p = 0.017; Vetrugno p = 0.023), with coalescent B lines as the most prevalent pattern in patients with a worse prognosis. Mean (SD) levels of thrombomodulin and VCAM-1 were higher in non-survivors than in survivors (7283.9 pg/mL (3961.9 pg/mL) vs. 4800.7 pg/mL (1771.0 pg/mL), p = 0.004 and 2299 ng/mL (730.35 ng/mL) vs. 1451 ng/mL (456.2 ng/mL), p < 0.001, respectively). Finally, in a multivariate analysis model adjusted for age, sex and Charlson score, VCAM-1 level increase was independently associated with death [OR 1.31 (1.06, 1.81; p = 0.036)]. In conclusion, in a cohort of mild COVID-19 patients, we found no DVT events despite the highly abnormal inflammatory, endothelial and coagulation parameters. The presence of lung alterations at admission could not predict outcome. The endothelial perturbation biomarker VCAM-1 emerged as a promising prognostic tool for mortality in COVID-19.

Nailfold videocapillaroscopic alterations have been described in COVID-19, but their correlations with biomarkers of inflammation, coagulation and endothelial perturbation are still unclear, and no information is available on nailfold histopathology. Nailfold videocapillaroscopy was performed on fifteen patients with COVID-19 in Milan, Italy and the signs of microangiopathy were correlated with plasma biomarkers of inflammation (C reactive protein [CRP], ferritin), coagulation (D-dimer, fibrinogen), endothelial perturbation (Von Willebrand factor [VWF]) and angiogenesis (vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF]) along with genetic drivers of COVID-19 susceptibility. Histopathological analysis of autoptic nailfold excisions was performed on fifteen patients who died for COVID-19 in New Orleans, United States. All COVID-19 patients studied with videocapillaroscopy showed alterations rarely seen in healthy individuals consistent with microangiopathy, such as hemosiderin deposits (sign of microthrombosis and microhemorrhages) and enlarged loops (sign of endotheliopathy). The number of hemosiderin deposits correlated both with ferritin and CRP levels (r = 0.67, p = 0.008 for both) and the number of enlarged loops significantly correlated with the levels of VWF (r = 0.67, p = 0.006). Ferritin levels were higher in non-O groups, determined by the rs657152 C > A cluster, (median 619, min–max 551–3266 mg/dL) than in the O group (373, 44–581 mg/dL, p = 0.006). Nailfold histology revealed microvascular damage, i.e., mild perivascular lymphocyte and macrophage infiltration and microvascular ectasia in the dermal vessels of all cases, and microthrombi within vessels in five cases. Alterations in nailfold videocapillaroscopy and elevated biomarkers of endothelial perturbation that match histopathologic findings open new perspectives in the possibility of non-invasively demonstrating microangiopathy in COVID-19.

Specific immune suppression types have been associated with a greater risk of severe COVID-19 disease and death. We analyzed data from patients >17 years that were hospitalized for COVID-19 at the “Fondazione IRCCS Ca′ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico” in Milan (Lombardy, Northern Italy). The study included 1727 SARS-CoV-2-positive patients (1,131 males, median age of 65 years) hospitalized between February 2020 and November 2022. Of these, 321 (18.6%, CI: 16.8–20.4%) had at least one condition defining immune suppression. Immune suppressed subjects were more likely to have other co-morbidities (80.4% vs. 69.8%, p  < 0.001) and be vaccinated (37% vs. 12.7%, p  < 0.001). We evaluated the contribution of immune suppression to hospitalization during the various stages of the epidemic and investigated whether immune suppression contributed to severe outcomes and death, also considering the vaccination status of the patients. The proportion of immune suppressed patients among all hospitalizations (initially stable at <20%) started to increase around December 2021, and remained high (30–50%). This change coincided with an increase in the proportions of older patients and patients with co-morbidities and with a decrease in the proportion of patients with severe outcomes. Vaccinated patients showed a lower proportion of severe outcomes; among non-vaccinated patients, severe outcomes were more common in immune suppressed individuals. Immune suppression was a significant predictor of severe outcomes, after adjusting for age, sex, co-morbidities, period of hospitalization, and vaccination status (OR: 1.64; 95% CI: 1.23–2.19), while vaccination was a protective factor (OR: 0.31; 95% IC: 0.20–0.47). However, after November 2021, differences in disease outcomes between vaccinated and non-vaccinated groups (for both immune suppressed and immune competent subjects) disappeared. Since December 2021, the spread of the less virulent Omicron variant and an overall higher level of induced and/or natural immunity likely contributed to the observed shift in hospitalized patient characteristics. Nonetheless, vaccination against SARS-CoV-2, likely in combination with naturally acquired immunity, effectively reduced severe outcomes in both immune competent (73.9% vs. 48.2%, p  < 0.001) and immune suppressed (66.4% vs. 35.2%, p  < 0.001) patients, confirming previous observations about the value of the vaccine in preventing serious disease.