Explore the vast range of titles available.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive primary CNS malignancy and clinical outcomes have remained stagnant despite introduction of new treatments. Understanding the tumor microenvironment (TME) in which tumor associated macrophages (TAMs) interact with T cells has been of great interest. Although previous studies examining TAMs in GBM have shown that certain TAMs are associated with specific clinical and/or pathologic features, these studies used an outdated M1/M2 paradigm of macrophage polarization and failed to include the continuum of TAM states in GBM. Perhaps most significantly, the interactions of TAMs with T cells have yet to be fully explored. Our study uses single-cell RNA sequencing data from adult IDH-wildtype GBM, with the primary aim of deciphering the cellular interactions of the 7 TAM subtypes with T cells in the GBM TME. Furthermore, the interactions discovered herein are compared to IDH-mutant astrocytoma, allowing for focus on the cellular ecosystem unique to GBM. The resulting ligand-receptor interactions, signaling sources, and global communication patterns discovered provide a framework for future studies to explore methods of leveraging the immune system for treating GBM.

Among patients with clinical hemifacial spasm (HFS), imaging exams aim to identify the neurovascular conflict (NVC) location. It has been proven that the identification in the preoperative exam increases the rate of surgical success. Despite the description of specific magnetic resonance image (MRI) acquisitions, the site of neurovascular compression is not always visualized. The authors describe a new MRI finding that helps in the diagnosis of HFS, and evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, and interobserver correlation of the described sign. A cross-sectional study including cases of hemifacial spasm treated surgically from 1 August 2011 to 31 July 2021 was performed. The MRIs of the cases were independently evaluated by two experienced neuroradiologists, who were blinded regarding the side of the symptom. The neuroradiologists were assigned to evaluate the MRIs in two separate moments. Primarily, they evaluated whether there was a neurovascular conflict based on the standard technique. Following this initial analysis, the neuroradiologists received a file with the description of the novel sign, named Prevedello Sign (PS). In a second moment, the same neuroradiologists were asked to identify the presence of the PS and, if it was present, to report on which side. A total of 35 patients were included, mostly females (65.7%) with a mean age of 59.02 (+0.48). Since the 35 cases were independently evaluated by two neuroradiologists, a total of 70 reports were included in the analysis. The PS was present in 66 patients (sensitivity of 94.2%, specificity of 91.4% and positive predictive value of 90.9%). When both analyses were performed in parallel (standard plus PS), the sensitivity increased to 99.2%. Based on the findings of this study, the authors conclude that PS is helpful in determining the neurovascular conflict location in patients with HFS. Its presence, combined with the standard evaluation, increases the sensitivity of the MRI to over 99%, without increasing risks of harm to patients or resulting in additional costs.

Background Long-term postdiscectomy degenerative disc disease and low back pain is a well-recognized disorder; however, its patient-centered characterization and quantification are lacking. Questions/purposes We performed a systematic literature review and prospective longitudinal study to determine the frequency of recurrent back pain after discectomy and quantify its effect on patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Methods A MEDLINE search was performed to identify studies reporting on the frequency of recurrent back pain, same-level recurrent disc herniation, and reoperation after primary lumbar discectomy. After excluding studies that did not report the percentage of patients with persistent back or leg pain more than 6 months after discectomy or did not report the rate of same level recurrent herniation, 90 studies, which in aggregate had evaluated 21,180 patients, were included in the systematic review portion of this study. For the longitudinal study, all patients undergoing primary lumbar discectomy between October 2010 and March 2013 were enrolled into our prospective spine registry. One hundred fifteen patients were more than 12 months out from surgery, 103 (90%) of whom were available for 1-year outcomes assessment. PROs were prospectively assessed at baseline, 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years. The threshold of deterioration used to classify recurrent back pain was the minimum clinically important difference in back pain (Numeric Rating Scale Back Pain [NRS-BP]) or Disability (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]), which were 2.5 of 10 points and 20 of 100 points, respectively. Results Systematic Review The proportion of patients reporting short-term (6–24 months) and long-term (> 24 months) recurrent back pain ranged from 3% to 34% and 5% to 36%, respectively. The 2-year incidence of recurrent disc herniation ranged from 0% to 23% and the frequency of reoperation ranged from 0% to 13%. Prospective Study At 1-year and 2-year followup, 22% and 26% patients reported worsening of low back pain (NRS: 5.3 ± 2.5 versus 2.7 ± 2.8, p < 0.001) or disability (ODI%: 32 ± 18 versus 21 ± 18, p < 0.001) compared with 3 months. Conclusions In a systematic literature review and prospective outcomes study, the frequency of same-level disc herniation requiring reoperation was 6%. Two-year recurrent low back pain may occur in 15% to 25% of patients depending on the level of recurrent pain considered clinically important, and this leads to worse PROs at 1 and 2 years postoperatively.

BACKGROUND:As part of the Affordable Care Act, health utility metrics are being investigated to define a cost-effective, value-based health care model. EuroQOL-5D (EQ-5D) and Short Form-6D (SF-6D) are commonly used quality-of-life instruments. Domains in the EQ-5D questionnaire are thought to be less responsive in measuring quality of life after cervical surgery. OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the validity and responsiveness of SF-6D and EQ-5D in determining health and quality of life after elective cervical spine surgery. METHODS:A total of 420 patients undergoing elective cervical spine surgery over a period of 2 years were enrolled in a prospective longitudinal registry. Patient-reported outcomes Neck Disability Index (NDI), EQ-5D, and SF-12 were recorded. Based on previously published equations, SF-6D was calculated using NDI and SF-12 scores. Patients were asked whether “surgery met their expectations” (meaningful improvement). The validity and relative responsiveness of SF-6D (NDI), SF-6D (SF-12), and EQ-5D to discriminate between meaningful and nonmeaningful improvement were calculated. RESULTS:Sixty-six percent of patients (277) reported a level of improvement after surgery that met their expectations (meaningful improvement). SF-6D (NDI) (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.69) was a more valid discriminator of meaningful improvement compared with the SF-6D (SF-12) (AUC = 0.65) and EQ-5D (AUC = 0.62). SF-6D (NDI) was also a more responsive measure compared with SF-6D (SF-12) and EQ-5D (standardized response mean difference0.66, 0.48, and 0.44, respectively). CONCLUSION:SF-6D is a more valid and responsive measure of general health and quality of life compared with EQ-5D. SF-6D derived from disease-specific disability scores was more valid and responsive than that derived from the generic preference-based SF-12. Cost-effective studies should use SF-6D as a measure of QALY after cervical spine surgery. ABBREVIATIONS:AP, arm painAUC, area under the curveEQ-5D, EuroQol-5DNDI, Neck Disability IndexNP, neck painNRS, Numeric Rating ScalePCS, Physical Component ScorePRO, patient-reported outcomeQALY, quality-adjusted life yearROC, receiver-operating characteristicSF-6D, Short-Form 6DSF-12, Short Form 12SRM, standardized response mean

Malignant transformation of intracranial epidermoid cysts is a rare occurrence. We present the second case of such an event occurring in the pineal region and the first case sent for detailed genomic profiling. MRI demonstrated two lesions: a cyst in a quadrigeminal cistern with restricted diffusion on DWI-weighted images and an adjacent, peripherally enhancing tumor with cerebellar infiltration. Both the lesions were completely resected with a small residual of the epidermoid cyst. The final pathology of both lesions was consistent with epidermoid cyst and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), respectively. The tumor specimen was sent for comprehensive genomic profiling which revealed stable microsatellite status and loss of CDKN2A/B, MTAP (exons 2–8), and PTEN (exons 6–9). Although reports of primary SCC originating from the epidermoid cyst have been previously described, this is the first description of the genomic profile of such a tumor.

BACKGROUND:Sectioning of the C2 nerve root allows for direct visualization of the C1-2 joint and may facilitate arthrodesis. OBJECTIVE:To determine the clinical and functional consequences of C2 nerve root sectioning during placement of C1 lateral mass screws. METHODS:All patients undergoing C1 lateral mass screw fixation were included in this prospective study. A standard questionnaire was used to determine the severity of occipital numbness/pain and its effect on quality of life (QOL). Domains of the neck disability index were used to assess the disability related to C2 symptoms. RESULTS:A total of 28 patients were included (C2 transection, 8; C2 preservation, 20). A trend of decreased blood loss and length of surgery was observed in the C2 transection cohort. Occipital numbness was reported by 4 (50.0%) patients after C2 transection. Occipital neuralgia was reported by 7 (35.0%) patients with C2 preservation. None of the patients with numbness after C2 transection reported being “bothered” by it. All patients with occipital neuralgia after C2 sparing reported being “bothered” by it, and 57.1% reported a moderate to severe effect on QOL. The use of medication was reported by 5 (71.4%) patients with neuralgia vs none with numbness. Mean disability was significantly higher with neuralgia vs numbness (P = .016). CONCLUSION:C2 nerve root transection is associated with increased occipital numbness but this has no effect on patient-reported outcomes and QOL. C2 nerve root preservation can be associated with occipital neuralgia, which has a negative impact on patient disability and QOL. C2 nerve root transection has no negative consequences during C1-2 stabilization. ABBREVIATIONS:NDI, neck disability indexQOL, quality of life

Abstract BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE Brainstem lesions are challenging to manage, and surgical options have been controversial. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been used for local control, but life-threatening toxicities from 0% to 9.5% have been reported. Several microsurgical approaches involving safe entry zones have been developed to optimize the exposure and minimize complications in different portions of the brainstem, but require extensive drilling and manipulation of neurovascular structures. With recent advancements, the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) can provide direct visualization of ventral brainstem. No case has been reported of EEA to remove a brainstem metastasis. CLINICAL PRESENTATION We present an illustrative case of a 68-yr-old female with metastatic colon cancer who presented with 2.8 × 2.7 × 2.1 cm (7.9 cm3) heterogeneously enhancing, right ventral pontine lesion with extensive edema. She underwent endoscopic endonasal transclival approach, and gross total resection of the lesion was achieved. CONCLUSION The endoscopic approach may offer certain advantages for removal of ventral brainstem lesions, as it can provide direct visualization of important neurovascular structures, especially, if the lesion displaces the tracts and comes superficial to the pial surface.

There has been a transition to using patient-reported outcome instruments (PROi) to assess surgical effectiveness. However, none of these instruments have been validated for outcomes of adult Chiari I malformation (CMI). The aim of this study was to determine the relative validity and responsiveness of various PROi in measuring outcomes after surgery for CMI. Fifty patients undergoing suboccipital craniotomy for adult CMI were prospectively followed for 1 year. Baseline and 1-year patient-reported outcomes (visual analog scale for head pain and visual analog scale for neck pain, Neck Disability Index [NDI], Headache Disability Index, SF-12, Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale, and EuroQol-5D [EQ-5D]) were assessed. A level of improvement in general health after surgery was defined as meaningful improvement. Receiver-operating characteristic curves were generated to assess the validity of PROi to discriminate between meaningful improvement and not. The difference between standardized response means (SRMs) in patients reporting meaningful improvement vs not as calculated to determine the relative responsiveness of each outcome instrument. For pain and disability, the NDI was the most accurate discriminator of meaningful effectiveness (area under the curve: 0.90) and also most responsive to postoperative improvement (standardized response means difference: 1.87). For general health and quality of life, the SF-12 PCS, EQ-5D, and Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale were all accurate discriminators; however, SF-12 Physical Component Scale (SF-12 PCS) and EQ-5D were most accurate. SF-12 PCS was also most responsive. For pain and disability, NDI is the most valid and responsive measure of improvement after surgery for CMI. For health-related quality of life, SF-12 PCS and EQ-5D are the most valid and responsive measures. NDI with SF-12 or EQ-5D is the most valid in patients with CMI and should be considered in cost-effectiveness studies.

Abstract BACKGROUND: To date, there has been no study to comprehensively assess the effectiveness of suboccipital craniectomy (SOC) for Chiari malformation I (CMI) using validated patient-reported outcome measures. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness and minimum clinically important difference thresholds of SOC for the treatment of adult patients with CMI using patient-reported outcome metrics. METHODS: Fifty patients undergoing first-time SOC and C1 laminectomy for CMI at a single institution were followed up for 1 year. Baseline and 1-year postoperative pain, disability, quality of life, patient satisfaction, and return to work were assessed. Minimum clinically important difference thresholds were calculated with 2 anchors: the Health Transition Index and North American Spine Society satisfaction questionnaire. RESULTS: The severity of headaches improved in 37 patients (74%). Improvement in syrinx size was seen in 12 patients (63%) and myelopathy in 12 patients (60%). All patient-reported outcomes showed significant improvement 1 year postoperatively (P < .05). Of the 38 patients (76%) employed preoperatively, 29 (76%) returned to work postoperatively at a median time of 6 weeks (interquartile range, 4-12 weeks). Minimum clinically important difference thresholds after SOC for CMI were 4.4 points for numeric rating scale for headache, 0.7 points for numeric rating scale for neck pain, 13.8 percentage points for Headache Disability Index, 14.2 percentage points for Neck Disability Index, 7.0 points for Short Form-12 Physical Component Summary, 6.1 points for Short Form-12 Mental Component Summary, 4.5 points for Zung depression, 1.7 points for modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association, and 0.34 quality-adjusted life-years for Euro-Qol-5D. CONCLUSION: Surgical management of CMI in adults via SOC provides significant and sustained improvement in pain, disability, general health, and quality of life as assessed by patient-reported outcomes. This patient-centered assessment suggests that suboccipital decompression for CMI in adults is an effective treatment strategy.

INTRODUCTION:Validated patient reported outcomes (PROs) for spinal disorders may be too lengthy to feasibly apply to large scale registry efforts. We set out to determine which PROs and their items are most valid and responsive, and which domains have closest correlation (overlap). Our aim was to introduce a shorter, valid and responsive, and more feasible questionnaire for measuring effectiveness of cervical surgery. METHODS:A total of 87 patients undergoing cervical surgery for cervical radiculopathy were enrolled into our prospective registry. Baseline and 1-yr PROs were assessed. In order to assess the validity of PROs, ROC analysis was performed. In order to assess the responsiveness, standardized response means (SRM) was calculated. Correlation between items was assessed via Spearman rank. For PROs and their items demonstrating high validity (AUC > 0.70), and for individual items with similar dimensions and high correlation, items with maximum validity (AUC) were included in the final questionnaire, Vanderbilt Neck Index (VNI-6). RESULTS:NDI (AUC0.72; SRM diff0.97) and SF-12 PCS (AUC0.66;SRM diff0.63) were found to be the most valid and responsive outcome measures. For NDI, pain intensity, personal care, reading, sleep and recreation had the highest AUC. For SF-12 PCS, general health, less accomplishment and limitation due to pain and effect on usual work had the highest AUC. Three of these 9 most valid items were found to have significant correlation (r = 0.52, P < .0001). Thus, 6 out of 22-items (personal care, reading, recreation, general health, accomplishment due to pain, effect on usual work) comprised our modified PRO, VNI-6. VNI-6 (AUC0.78; SRM diff1.15) demonstrated better validity and responsiveness than NDI or SF-12 PCS and strongly correlated with ODI (r = 0.81;P < .0001) and SF-12 PCS (r = 0.80;P < .0001). CONCLUSION:The 10-item NDI and 12-item SF-12 PCS were the most valid and responsive measures for assessing effectiveness of cervical surgery. However, a more valid, responsive and feasible PRO instrument, VNI-6, can be constructed using 6 items, which can be utilized in large scale registry efforts.