Explore the vast range of titles available.

Lung ultrasound (LUS) has proven to be a more sensitive tool than radiography (X-ray) to detect alveolar-interstitial involvement in COVID-19 pneumonia. However, its usefulness in the detection of possible pulmonary alterations after overcoming the acute phase of COVID-19 is unknown. In this study we proposed studying the utility of LUS in the medium- and long-term follow-up of a cohort of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia. This was a prospective, multicentre study that included patients, aged over 18 years, at 3 ± 1 and 12 ± 1 months after discharge after treatment for COVID-19 pneumonia. Demographic variables, the disease severity, and analytical, radiographic, and functional clinical details were collected. LUS was performed at each visit and 14 areas were evaluated and classified with a scoring system whose global sum was referred to as the \"lung score.\" Two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) was performed in 2 anterior areas and in 2 posterior areas in a subgroup of patients. The results were compared with high-resolution computed tomography (CT) images reported by an expert radiologist. A total of 233 patients were included, of whom 76 (32.6%) required Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission; 58 (24.9%) of them were intubated and non-invasive respiratory support was also necessary in 58 cases (24.9%). Compared with the results from CT images, when performed in the medium term, LUS showed a sensitivity (S) of 89.7%, specificity (E) 50%, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 78.8%, while the diagnostic usefulness of X-ray showed an S of 78% and E of 47%. Most of the patients improved in the long-term evaluation, with LUS showing an efficacy with an S of 76% and E of 74%, while the X-ray presented an S of 71% and E of 50%. 2D-SWE data were available in 108 (61.7%) patients, in whom we found a non-significant tendency toward the presentation of a higher shear wave velocity among those who developed interstitial alterations, with a median kPa of 22.76 ± 15.49) versus 19.45 ± 11.39; = 0.1). Lung ultrasound could be implemented as a first-line procedure in the evaluation of interstitial lung sequelae after COVID-19 pneumonia.

Although a reduction in admissions for pathologies other than SARS-CoV-2 has been reported during the pandemic, there are hardly any specific studies in relation to COPD. The objective of this study was to analyse differences in the profile of those admitted for AEPOC and their prognosis during this period. 340 patients (76.6% male, 72 years, FEV1 43.5%) were included, 174 in the post-pandemic phase. During pandemic, especially before population-level vaccination, admissions for AECOPD were in patients with more severe disease and with a higher level of eosinophils. No differences were found in social profile, except they had more informal caregivers. The mortality rate at 90 days was the same (9%), although those admitted during the pandemic came for more hospital visits in the following 3 months (53.8% vs. 42%; p = 0.003), with the pandemic phase being an independent predictor of this possibility (OR = 1.6.; 95% IC = 1.1-2.6). In the first few months of the pandemic, the clinical profile of patients hospitalised for an AECOPD differed from that both prior to this period and during the latter months of the pandemic, with minimal changes at the social level. Although the mortality rate were similar, unscheduled hospital visits increased during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Cryobiopsy has emerged in recent years as a tool of growing interest in the diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We first conducted the study with the primary objective to compare the quality of cryobiopsies versus conventional forceps biopsies, including diagnostic yield and the feasibility of histological characterization and molecular testing, of malignant pleural effusion (MPE). Prospective study including 14 caucasian patients with MPE due to NSCLC who underwent semirigid pleuroscopy with cryobiopsies. The median biopsy size for conventional flexible forceps and cryoprobe was 2.5 mm (1.5–3.2 mm) and 5.5 mm (3.8–7.6 mm), respectively ( p  = 0.07). The number of biopsies also differed: flexible forceps: 5 (4–6.25) biopsies vs cryoprobe: 3 (3–4) biopsies( p  = 0.01). The tumor/non-tumor ratio in the conventional forceps sample was 2.4 (1.2–5.9), while in the cryoprobe sample, it was 3.6 (1.2–10) ( p  = 0.09). Only in one case, the samples obtained during semirigid pleuroscopy were insufficient for molecular diagnosis. The incorporation of cryobiopsy into semirigid pleuroscopy has been demostrated to be a effective and safe diagnostic tool. This technique could shortening procedure time and facilitating tissue collection without increasing procedural risks.

Background and Objectives: The diversity of patients with malignant pleural effusion (MPE) due to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as well as the variability in mutations makes it essential to improve molecular characterization. Objective: Describe clinical, pathological, and molecular characteristics MPE in a Caucasian population. Materials and Methods: Retrospective study of patients with NSCLC diagnosis who had undergone a molecular study from 1 January 2018–31 December 2022. Univariate analysis was performed to compare patient characteristics between the group with and without MPE and molecular biomarkers. Results: A total of 400 patients were included; 53% presented any biomarker and 29% had MPE.PDL1, which was the most frequent. EGFR mutation was associated with women (OR:3.873) and lack of smoking (OR:5.105), but not with MPE. Patients with pleural effusion were older and had lower ECOG. There was no significant difference in the presence of any biomarker. We also did not find an association between the presence of specific mutations and MPE (22.4% vs. 18%, p = 0.2), or PDL1 expression (31.9% vs. 35.9%, p = 0.3). Being younger constituted a protective factor for the presence of MPE (OR:0.962; 95% CI 0.939–0.985, p = 0.002), as well as ECOG ≤ 1 (OR:0.539; 95% CI 0.322–0.902, p = 0.01). Conclusions: This is the first study that describes the clinical, pathological, and molecular characteristics of MPE patients due to NSCLC in a Caucasian population. Although overall we did not find significant differences in the molecular profile between patients with MPE and without effusion, EGFR mutation was associated with a tendency towards pleural progression.

To increase our knowledge of the patient variables related to the overburden of the caregivers of patients with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPDs). This was a cross-sectional study of patients with severe COPD who have informal caregivers. We performed a multivariate analysis of sociodemographic (economic situation, care, dependence, social risk, and use of social services) and clinical (degree of dyspnea, previous hospitalizations, disease impact, pulmonary function, and comorbidity) factors and related these to the burden of informal caregivers, as evaluated using the Zarit scale. The study included 91 patients, age 72.6±8.7 years and 80 were male (89.7%); the mean modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale (mMRC) score was 2.5±0.8; mean FEV was 39.5 ± 13.2%; and 70 patients (76.9%) were dependent for basic activities. Of the informal caregivers, 90 (90.9%) were women, 49 (49.4%) were partners or spouses, and 29 (29.6%) were daughters. The mean Zarit questionnaire score was 51.4±14.2, with 63 of carers (69.2%) perceiving some overburden, and 34 (37.4%) describing the overburden as mild-moderate. The variables related to informal caregiver overburden in the multivariate study were the previous use of social resources [OR = 8.1 (95% CI = 1.03-69.9); = 0.04], degree of mMRC dyspnea 3-4 [OR =4.7 (95% CI = 1.7-13.2); = 0.003], and two or more admissions for AEPOC in the previous year [OR = 4.5 (95% CI = 1.7-13.2); = 0.003]. Of the informal caregivers of patients who had presented two or more of these variables, 92.3% perceived an overburden. The variables associated with overburden are easily accessible in patient medical records, or can be obtained by interviewing patients or their relatives. This information would allow to detect and assess the overburden of informal caregivers to provide an early warning of this problem.

Introduction: Despite the importance of an adequate peak inspiratory flow (PIF) during inhaled therapy in patients with COPD, the available evidence in patients with severe exacerbations and their evolution after admission is limited. We conducted this study to evaluate the PIF during an exacerbation, its variability, and predictors of suboptimal PIF. Material and Methods: A prospective study that included patients admitted for COPD exacerbation. Clinical, demographic, and functional variables were recorded. Using the In-Check DIAL G16 ® , PIF without resistance (PIF-nr) and that obtained by simulating the resistance of the patients’ usual inhalers (PIF) were determined within the first 48 hours of admission and prior to discharge; also assessed during a stable phase in a subgroup of patients. The results were compared and, through a multivariate study, the factors related to a suboptimal PIF were analyzed. Results: A total of 137 patients were included; 27% were women and the mean age was 69.4 ± 9.8 years. Moreover, 30.8% of the participants with dry powder inhalers had a suboptimal PIF at admission and it was independently associated with female sex (odds ratio [OR] = 8.635; 95% confidence interval [CI] [2.007, 37.152]; p < 0.01) and forced expiratory volume in the 1st second (FEV1) (OR = 0.997; 95% CI: [0.995, 0.999]; p = 0.04). At discharge, suboptimal PIF reduced to 17% ( p < 0.01). PIF-nr increased from the time of admission to the stable phase. Conclusion: One third of COPD patients admitted with a severe exacerbation had a suboptimal PIF, being female sex and lower FEV1 independent predictors. PIF-nr improved progressively after the exacerbation.

Objective: Although the importance of assessing inspiratory flow in the selection of treatments for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is understood, evaluation of this factor is not yet widespread or standardized. The objective of the present work was to evaluate the peak inspiratory flow (PIF) of patients with COPD and to explore the variables associated with a suboptimal PIF. Methods: An observational, cross-sectional study was carried out at specialized nursing consultations over a period of 6 months. We collected clinical data as well as data on symptoms, treatment adherence, and patient satisfaction with their inhalers via questionnaires. PIF was determined using the In-Check Dial G16® device (Clement Clarke International, Ltd., Harlow, UK). In each case, the PIF was considered suboptimal when it was off-target for any of the prescribed inhalers. The association with suboptimal PIF was evaluated using multivariate logistic regression and the results were expressed as the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: A total of 122 COPD patients were included in this study, of whom 34 (27.9%) had suboptimal PIF. A total of 229 inhalers were tested, of which 186 (81.2%) were dry powder devices. The multivariate analysis found an association between suboptimal PIF and age (OR = 1.072; 95% CI (1.019, 1.128); p = 0.007) and forced vital capacity (OR = 0.961; 95% CI (0.933, 0.989); p = 0.006). Conclusions: About a third of patients in complex specialized COPD care have suboptimal PIFs, which is related to age and forced vital capacity.

IntroductionAlthough a reduction in admissions for pathologies other than SARS-CoV-2 has been reported during the pandemic, there are hardly any specific studies in relation to COPD. The objective of this study was to analyse differences in the profile of those admitted for AEPOC and their prognosis during this period.MethodsProspective study (SocioEPOC validation cohort) conducted in two hospitals. Demographic, clinical and social characteristics were compared among patients admitted for an AECOPD before and after the declaration of the COVID-19 healthcare emergency. Mortality and the need for hospital care in the following 3 months were analysed.Results340 patients (76.6% male, 72 years, FEV1 43.5%) were included, 174 in the post-pandemic phase. During pandemic, especially before population-level vaccination, admissions for AECOPD were in patients with more severe disease and with a higher level of eosinophils. No differences were found in social profile, except they had more informal caregivers. The mortality rate at 90 days was the same (9%), although those admitted during the pandemic came for more hospital visits in the following 3 months (53.8% vs. 42%; p = 0.003), with the pandemic phase being an independent predictor of this possibility (OR = 1.6.; 95% IC = 1.1-2.6).ConclusionsIn the first few months of the pandemic, the clinical profile of patients hospitalised for an AECOPD differed from that both prior to this period and during the latter months of the pandemic, with minimal changes at the social level. Although the mortality rate were similar, unscheduled hospital visits increased during the COVID-19 pandemic.