Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background Tumor deposits (TD) are independent poor prognostic indicators of an increased risk of distant metastasis. In TNM classification, they are included in the N1c subcategory in the absence of lymph node metastasis (LNM). However, there is still limited knowledge regarding the relative effects of systemic treatment in colon cancer (CC) patients with TD. Material-method We conducted a retrospective population-based analysis of over 50,000 stage III CC patients from the Dutch and SEER cohorts. Patients were subdivided into groups based on the presence of TD, LNM, or both, and whether or not they received systemic treatment. Relative treatment effects were assessed by calculating the hazard ratios (HR) for 5-year overall survival (OS) in each group. Results In the Dutch cohort of 13,704 patients, systemic treatment resulted in a constant better 5-year OS with HR 3.5 (%95 CI 3.2–3.7) for the LNM group, 4.6 (95% CI 3.2–6.8) for the TD group, and 3.5 (95% CI 3.2–4.0) for the LNM + TD group (all p  < .001). A similar effect of treatment was seen in the SEER cohort of 43,148 patients, where HR for the LNM, TD, and LNM + TD groups were 3.0 (95% CI 2.9–3.1), 3.2 (95% CI 2.8–3.7), and 3.0 (95% CI 2.8–3.1), respectively (all p  < .001). Conclusions Relative effect of treatment was consistent across all three groups in both cohorts which suggest patients with TD benefit from treatment similarly to other groups. Our results highlight the importance of classifying patients with TD as stage III, even in the absence of LNM.

Purpose Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is a common and debilitating long-term side effect of cancer and its treatment. While exercise has been shown to effectively reduce CRF, the underlying mechanisms are not fully clear. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore the effects of a 4-month walking exercise program on fatigue severity and to explore potential underlying physiological, behavioral, and psychological mechanisms of action. Methods We included 27 cancer survivors (59 ± 15 years, 37% female) with variable cancer diagnoses who were at least moderately fatigued and finished treatment between 6 and 36 months ago. This study with a quasi-experimental interrupted time-series design compared a 4-month walking intervention period with a 4-month control period. Measurements of fatigue and physiological, behavioral, and psychological factors were performed, supplemented with participants’ perceptions on how exercise influenced their fatigue. Results A significant and clinically relevant decrease in fatigue severity was found over time (β =  − 8.1, 95% CI =  − 12.1; − 4.2), but could not be attributed directly to the walking exercise intervention. Increases in muscle strength (β =  − 0.07, 95% CI =  − 0.12; − 0.02), physical activity (β =  − 0.1, 95% CI =  − 0.2; − 0.04), and sleep quality (β = 1.1, 95% CI = 0.3; 1.9), as well as decreases in muscle relaxation times (β = 0.09, 95% CI = 0.02; 0.16) and psychological distress (β = 1.1, 95% CI = 0.8; 1.3) were associated with reductions in fatigue severity. Resilience and physical well-being were perceived as most important constructs explaining the walking exercise effects on fatigue. Conclusion Our findings reveal potential physiological, behavioral, and psychological mechanisms underlying the multidimensional effects of exercise on fatigue severity. Implications for Cancer Survivors. Incorporating resistance exercise and addressing resilience and physical well-being might improve the efficacy of exercise interventions for cancer survivors.

Purpose Positron emission tomography imaging of zirconium-89-labelled monoclonal antibodies (89Zr-Immuno-PET) allows for visualisation and quantification of antibody uptake in tumours in vivo. Patlak linearization provides distribution volume (VT) and nett influx rate (Ki) values, representing reversible and irreversible uptake, respectively. Standardised uptake value (SUV) and tumour-to-plasma/tumour-to-blood ratio (TPR/TBR) are often used, but their validity depends on the comparability of plasma kinetics and clearances. This study assesses the validity of SUV, TPR and TBR against Patlak Ki for quantifying irreversible 89Zr-Immuno-PET uptake in tumours.MethodsTen patients received 37 MBq 10 mg 89Zr-anti-EGFR with 500 mg/m2 unlabelled mAbs. Five patients received two doses of 37 MBq 89Zr-anti-HER3: 8–24 mg for the first administration and 24 mg–30 mg/kg for the second. Seven tumours from four patients showed 89Zr-anti-EGFR uptake, and 18 tumours from five patients showed 89Zr-anti-HER3 uptake. SUVpeak, TPRpeak and TBRpeak values were obtained from one to six days p.i. Patlak linearization was applied to tumour time activity curves and plasma samples to obtain Ki.ResultsFor 89Zr-anti-EGFR, there was a small variability along the linear regression line between SUV (− 0.51–0.57), TPR (− 0.06‒0.11) and TBR (− 0.13‒0.16) on day 6 versus Ki. Similar doses of 89Zr-anti-HER3 showed similar variability for SUV (− 1.3‒1.0), TPR (− 1.1‒0.53) and TBR (− 1.5‒0.72) on day 5 versus Ki. However, for the second administration of 89Zr-anti-HER3 with a large variability in administered mass doses, SUV showed a larger variability (− 1.4‒2.3) along the regression line with Ki, which improved when using TPR (− 0.38–0.32) or TBR (− 0.56‒0.46).ConclusionSUV, TPR and TBR at late time points were valid for quantifying irreversible lesional 89Zr-Immuno-PET uptake when constant mass doses were administered. However, for variable mass doses, only TPR and TBR provided reliable values for irreversible uptake, but not SUV, because SUV does not take patient and mass dose-specific plasma clearance into account.

Abstract Background Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer often have poor or short responses to currently available therapies. Drug repurposing with alternative dosing schedules may offer unexpected clinical benefit, even for agents that previously failed for this indication. Methods We explored a high-dose treatment strategy for sunitinib, assessing its potential for both cancer cell killing and inducing immunogenic cell death in patient-derived tumor organoids (PDTOs) of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). In a randomized clinical trial, we studied the efficacy of high-dose intermittent sunitinib (700 mg once every 2 weeks) in patients with advanced CRC compared to standard therapy with trifluridine/tipiracil. The primary outcome measure was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary outcomes included overall survival, safety and tolerability, quality of life, and exploratory biomarker analyses. Results While high, intermittent dosing was found to effectively kill PDTOs in vitro, no support for immunogenic cell death was found. In our clinical trial, among a total of 63 evaluable patients, median PFS was 2.8 months (95% CI 0.9-4.7) for the investigation arm compared to 1.9 months (95% CI 1.6-2.3) for the trifluridine/tipiracil group (P = .78, HR 1.22; 95% CI 0.73-2.04). The trial was halted prematurely due to toxicities: in particular, hemorrhage, fever and gastrointestinal adverse events. Conclusion High-dose intermittent sunitinib treatment did not improve PFS for patients with heavily pretreated mCRC compared to standard 3rd or 4th-line treatment with trifluridine/tipiracil, whereas significant toxicity was observed. In addition, this approach provoked no relevant immunological responses in vitro, discouraging further research for potential combinations with immunotherapeutics. Identifier NCT03909724

Purpose Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) undergoing systemic treatment often experience toxicities. Although exercise may improve physical fitness and quality of life and counteract treatment toxicity, knowledge in patients with mCRC is limited. The ongoing randomized controlled AMICO trial evaluates the effects of supervised exercise on clinical outcomes. The present qualitative study was a pre-planned part of this trial aiming to capture adherence, satisfaction, and perceived effects of exercise among patients with mCRC. Methods Patients with mCRC receiving first-line systemic treatment were randomized (1:1:1) to a control group or one of two supervised exercise arms including continuous aerobic exercise with either resistance exercises or high-intensity interval training. Semi-structured interviews with patients in the exercise arms were transcribed verbatim and thematically analyzed. Descriptive data on adherence (exercise logs) and satisfaction (questionnaire) was collected to complement and contextualize the qualitative findings. Results Twenty-one patients were interviewed. Median exercise attendance was 67% [IQR 35–91], and the median satisfaction score was 8 [IQR 8–9] out of 10. Patients valued the guidance and knowledge of the physical therapist and expressed interindividual preferences regarding training content. Patients experienced that exercise improved their physical and mental wellbeing and helped them to endure treatment. Perceived exercise barriers were treatment toxicity, physical problems, and hospital appointments. Perceived exercise facilitators included adequate tailoring and internal or external motivation. Conclusion Patients with mCRC appreciated exercise during systemic treatment and perceived several beneficial effects, both physically and mentally. Exercise attendance varied and barriers were mainly treatment- and disease-related. Trial registration Clinical trial.GOV ID: NCT04754672. Date of registration: 04–12-2020.

Background Palliative systemic therapy is currently standard of care for patients with extensive metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). A biomarker predicting chemotherapy benefit which prevents toxicity from ineffective treatment is urgently needed. Therefore, a previously developed tissue‐derived microRNA profile to predict clinical benefit from chemotherapy was evaluated in tissue biopsies and serum from patients with mCRC. Methods Samples were prospectively collected from patients (N = 132) who were treated with capecitabine or 5‐FU/LV with oxaliplatin ± bevacizumab. Response evaluation was performed according to RECIST 1.1 after three or four cycles, respectively. Baseline tissue and serum miRNAs expression levels of miR‐17‐5p, miR‐20a‐5p, miR‐30a‐5p, miR‐92a‐3p, miR‐92b‐3p, and miR‐98‐5p were quantified with RT‐qPCR and droplet digital PCR, respectively. Combined predictive performance of selected variables was tested using logistic regression analysis. Results From 132 patients, 81 fresh frozen tissue biopsies from metastases and 93 serum samples were available. Based on expression levels of miRNAs in tissue, progressive disease could be predicted with an AUC of 0.85 (95% CI:0.72‐0.91) and response could be predicted with an AUC of 0.70 (95% CI:0.56‐0.80). This did not outperform clinical parameters alone (respectively P = .14 and P = .27). Expression levels of miR‐92a‐3p and miR‐98‐5p in serum significantly improved the predictive value of clinical parameters for response to chemotherapy (AUC 0.74, 95% CI:0.64‐0.84, P = .003) in this cohort. Conclusions The additive predictive value to clinical parameters of the tissue‐derived six miRNA profile for clinical benefit could not be validated in patients with mCRC treated with first‐line systemic therapy. Although miR‐92a‐3p and miR‐98‐5p serum levels improved the predictive value of clinical parameters, it remained insufficient for clinical decision‐making. For miR‐17‐5p, miR‐20a‐5p, miR‐30a‐5p, miR‐92a‐3p, miR‐92b‐3p and miR‐98‐5p no correlation was observed between tissue and serum miRNA expression levels in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The predictive value of this tissue‐derived 6 miRNA profile for clinical benefit from systemic treatment could not be validated in patients with mCRC starting first line systemic therapy.

We previously reported CHFR methylation in a subset of colorectal cancer (CRC; ∼30%) with high concordance with microsatellite instability (MSI). We also showed that CHFR methylation predicted for sensitivity to docetaxel, whereas the MSI‐high phenotypes were sensitive to gemcitabine. We hypothesized that this subset of patients with CRC would be selectively sensitive to gemcitabine and docetaxel. We enrolled a Phase 2 trial of gemcitabine and docetaxel in patients with MSI‐high and/or CHFR methylated CRC. The primary objective was Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 response rate. Enrolled patients were treated with gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 and docetaxel 70 mg/m2 on day 8 of each 21‐day cycle. A total of 6 patients with CHFR‐methylated, MSI‐high CRC were enrolled from September 2012 to August 2016. The study was closed in September of 2017 due to poor accrual prior to reaching the first interim assessment of response rate, which would have occurred at 10 patients. No RECIST criteria tumor responses were observed, with 3 patients (50%) having stable disease as best response, 1 lasting more than 9 months. Median progression‐free survival (PFS) was 1.79 months (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.28, not available [NA]) and median overall survival (OS) was 15.67 months (95% CI = 4.24, NA). Common grade 3 toxicities were lymphopenia (67%), leukopenia (33%), and anemia (33%). Although negative, this study establishes a proof‐of‐concept for the implementation of epigenetic biomarkers (CHFR methylation/MSI) as inclusion criteria in a prospective clinical trial to optimize combinatorial strategies in the era of personalized medicine. Study Highlights WHAT IS THE CURRENT KNOWLEDGE ON THE TOPIC? CHFR silencing via DNA methylation has been suggested to be predictive of taxane sensitivity in diverse tumors. The frequent association of CHFR methylation with microsatellite instability (MSI) suggested a possible combination therapy with gemcitabine, because the MSI phenotype may result in sensitivity to nucleoside analogues. WHAT QUESTION DID THIS STUDY ADDRESS? We hypothesized that metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), which have CHFR methylation and MSI phenotype were sensitive to gemcitabine and docetaxel, and have designed this Phase 2 trial in biomarker‐selected mCRC to test this prediction. WHAT DOES THIS STUDY ADD TO OUR KNOWLEDGE? The study enrolled a molecularly defined subgroup of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) and showed that the combination is safe in this population. Nevertheless, due to poor enrollment and early termination, no conclusions on the primary and secondary end points could be made. HOW MIGHT THIS CHANGE CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY OR TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE? This study supports the feasibility of implementing DNA methylation markers in a prospective clinical trial and further efforts toward their application as predictive biomarkers for therapeutic agents in defined subsets of patients are warranted.

CD276 can discriminate between tumor derived and normal CECs (circulating endothelial cells). We evaluated whether CD276+CEC is a clinically relevant biomarker to predict response to palliative systemic therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Samples were prospectively collected from patients with mCRC enrolled in the ORCHESTRA trial (NCT01792934). At baseline and after three cycles of 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin and oxaliplatin ± bevacizumab, CECs were measured by flowcytometry (CD34+CD45negCD146+DNA+; and CD276+). A clinically relevant cut-off value of (CD276+)CECs was determined as 100% sensitivity (and 80% specificity in 95% confidence interval) identifying patients with progressive disease within 6 months. There were 182 baseline samples and 133 follow up samples available for analysis. CEC and CD276+CEC counts significantly increased during treatment from 48 to 90 CEC/4 mL (p = 0.00) and from 14 to 33 CD276+CEC/4 mL (p = 0.00) at baseline and at first evaluation, respectively. CEC and CD276+CEC counts were not predictive for poor response (area under the curve (AUC) 0.53 for CEC and AUC 0.52 for CD276+CEC). Despite numerical changes during therapy, CEC and CD276+CEC counts do not adequately predict poor response to first line palliative systemic therapy in patients with mCRC.

Background Several international high-volume centers have reported good outcomes after resection of locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) following chemo(radio)therapy, but it is unclear how this translates to nationwide clinical practice and outcome. This study aims to assess the nationwide use and outcome of resection of LAPC following induction chemo(radio)therapy. Patients and Methods A multicenter retrospective study including all patients who underwent resection for LAPC following chemo(radio)therapy in all 16 Dutch pancreatic surgery centers (2014–2020), registered in the mandatory Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit. LAPC is defined as arterial involvement > 90° and/or portomesenteric venous > 270° involvement or occlusion. Results Overall, 142 patients underwent resection for LAPC, of whom 34.5% met the 2022 National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria. FOLFIRINOX was the most commonly (93.7%) used chemotherapy [median 5 cycles (IQR 4–8)]. Venous and arterial resections were performed in 51.4% and 14.8% of patients. Most resections (73.9%) were performed in high-volume centers (i.e., ≥ 60 pancreatoduodenectomies/year). Overall median volume of LAPC resections/center was 4 (IQR 1–7). In-hospital/30-day major morbidity was 37.3% and 90-day mortality was 4.2%. Median OS from diagnosis was 26 months (95% CI 23–28) and 5-year OS 18%. Surgery in high-volume centers [HR = 0.542 (95% CI 0.318–0.923)], ypN1-2 [HR = 3.141 (95% CI 1.886–5.234)], and major morbidity [HR = 2.031 (95% CI 1.272–3.244)] were associated with OS. Conclusions Resection of LAPC following chemo(radio)therapy is infrequently performed in the Netherlands, albeit with acceptable morbidity, mortality, and OS. Given these findings, a structured nationwide approach involving international centers of excellence would be needed to improve selection of patients with LAPC for surgical resection following induction therapy.

To identify predictive factors for postoperative coma or stupor and to examine the value of neuroimaging techniques in elucidating structural brain damage. We performed a case-control study of surgical patients admitted to a Mayo Clinic-affiliated hospital. We studied preoperative comorbidity, intraoperative hypotension, and postoperative data in patients with postoperative stupor or coma and compared the characteristics with control patients (surgical intensive care unit patients with neurologic consultations for other reasons). A total of 35 patients with stupor or coma after surgery and 31 control patients participated in this study. Comatose patients were older ( P=.004) and had significantly more presurgical comorbidity ( P<.001), cardiovascular surgical procedures ( P<.001), and intraoperative hypotension ( P=.03). Adjusted for age and comorbidity, intraoperative hypotension remained statistically significant but not after adjusting for cardiovascular surgery. Of the 34 computed tomograms obtained, 41% showed abnormal results; of the 12 magnetic resonance images obtained, 58% showed abnormal results. Both showed primarily infarctions. In 4 patients with normal computed tomographic results, magnetic resonance imaging showed multiple territorial infarctions. Prior comorbidity, older age, intraoperative hypotension, and cardiovascular surgery may predispose patients to postoperative coma. Widespread structural ischemic brain damage was often documented by neuroimaging. Metabolic causes for coma were uncommon.