Explore the vast range of titles available.

Plasma HDL-cholesterol concentrations correlate negatively with the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). According to a widely cited model, HDL elicits its atheroprotective effect through its role in reverse cholesterol transport, which comprises the efflux of cholesterol from macrophages to early forms of HDL, followed by the conversion of free cholesterol (FCh) contained in HDL into cholesteryl esters, which are hepatically extracted from the plasma by HDL receptors and transferred to the bile for intestinal excretion. Given that increasing plasma HDL-cholesterol levels by genetic approaches does not reduce the risk of ASCVD, the focus of research has shifted to HDL function, especially in the context of macrophage cholesterol efflux. In support of the reverse cholesterol transport model, several large studies have revealed an inverse correlation between macrophage cholesterol efflux to plasma HDL and ASCVD. However, other studies have cast doubt on the underlying reverse cholesterol transport mechanism: in mice and humans, the FCh contained in HDL is rapidly cleared from the plasma (within minutes), independently of esterification and HDL holoparticle uptake by the liver. Moreover, the reversibility of FCh transfer between macrophages and HDL has implicated the reverse process — that is, the transfer of FCh from HDL to macrophages — in the aetiology of increased ASCVD under conditions of very high plasma HDL–FCh concentrations.In this Review, Gotto and colleagues summarize the evolution of our understanding of HDL structure and function, current models of atheroprotection by HDL involving reverse cholesterol transport, and their identification of a correlation between the bioavailability of free cholesterol contained in HDL and atherogenesis.

Statins lower high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and cholesterol concentrations, and hypothesis generating analyses suggest that clinical outcomes improve in patients given statins who achieve hsCRP concentrations less than 2 mg/L in addition to LDL cholesterol less than 1·8 mmol/L (<70 mg/dL). However, the benefit of lowering both LDL cholesterol and hsCRP after the start of statin therapy is controversial. We prospectively tested this hypothesis. In an analysis of 15 548 initially healthy men and women participating in the JUPITER trial (87% of full cohort), we prospectively assessed the effects of rosuvastatin 20 mg versus placebo on rates of non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, admission for unstable angina, arterial revascularisation, or cardiovascular death (prespecified endpoints) during a maximum follow-up of 5 years (median 1·9 years), according to on-treatment concentrations of LDL cholesterol (≥1·8 mmol/L or <1·8 mmol/L) and hsCRP (≥2 mg/L or <2 mg/L). We included all events occurring after randomisation. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00239681. Compared with placebo, participants allocated to rosuvastatin who achieved LDL cholesterol less than 1·8 mmol/L had a 55% reduction in vascular events (event rate 1·11 vs 0·51 per 100 person-years; hazard ratio [HR] 0·45, 95% CI 0·34–0·60, p<0·0001), and those achieving hsCRP less than 2 mg/L a 62% reduction (event rate 0·42 per 100 person-years; HR 0·38, 95% CI 0·26–0·56, p<0·0001). Although LDL cholesterol and hsCRP reductions were only weakly correlated in individual patients ( r values <0·15), we recorded a 65% reduction in vascular events in participants allocated to rosuvastatin who achieved both LDL cholesterol less than 1·8 mmol/L and hsCRP less than 2 mg/L (event rate 0·38 per 100 person-years; adjusted HR 0·35, 95% CI 0·23–0·54), versus a 33% reduction in those who achieved one or neither target (event rate 0·74 per 100 person-years; HR 0·67, 95% CI 0·52–0·87) (p across treatment groups <0·0001). In participants who achieved LDL cholesterol less than 1·8 mmol/L and hsCRP less than 1 mg/L, we noted a 79% reduction (event rate 0·24 per 100 person-years; HR 0·21, 95% CI 0·09–0·52). Achieved hsCRP concentrations were predictive of event rates irrespective of the lipid endpoint used, including the apolipoprotein B to apolipoprotein AI ratio. For people choosing to start pharmacological prophylaxis, reduction in both LDL cholesterol and hsCRP are indicators of successful treatment with rosuvastatin. AstraZeneca.

In this secondary analysis of data from JUPITER, rosuvastatin, as compared with placebo, resulted in a reduced risk of symptomatic venous thromboembolism (including deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism). In this secondary analysis of data from JUPITER, rosuvastatin, as compared with placebo, resulted in a reduced risk of symptomatic venous thromboembolism (including deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism). Venous and arterial thrombosis are common, serious, and strongly age-related events that often occur together 1 , 2 and share some risk factors. 3 – 7 Controversies persist regarding the nature and extent of their shared pathways and whether treatments of demonstrated efficacy for one condition, including anticoagulant agents, antiplatelet therapy, thrombolytic agents, and statins, have consistent benefits for the primary or secondary prevention of the other. 8 – 10 The benefits of statins might accrue not only through their effects on lipid levels but also through their influence on thrombosis and inflammation. 11 – 13 Two prospective, observational studies showed that substantial and significant reductions in the . . .

In this trial, 17,802 healthy men and women with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels of less than 130 mg per deciliter and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels of 2.0 mg per liter or more were randomly assigned to rosuvastatin or placebo. At a median of 1.9 years, the incidence of major cardiovascular events was significantly lower in the rosuvastatin group. 17,802 healthy men and women with LDL cholesterol levels of less than 130 mg per deciliter and high-sensitivity CRP levels of 2.0 mg per liter or more were treated with rosuvastatin or placebo. The incidence of major cardiovascular events was significantly lower in the rosuvastatin group. Current treatment algorithms for the prevention of myocardial infarction, stroke, and death from cardiovascular causes recommend statin therapy for patients with established vascular disease, diabetes, and overt hyperlipidemia. 1 , 2 However, half of all myocardial infarctions and strokes occur among apparently healthy men and women with levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol that are below currently recommended thresholds for treatment. Measurement of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, an inflammatory biomarker that independently predicts future vascular events, improves global classification of risk, regardless of the LDL cholesterol level. 3 – 9 We have previously shown that statin therapy reduces high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels 10 , 11 and that . . .

Abstract Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin Type 9 (PCSK9) is now identified as an important and major player in hypercholesterolaemia and atherosclerosis pathophysiology. PCSK9, through promoting lysosomal degradation of hepatic low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor, can decrease the clearance of plasma LDLs, leading to hypercholesterolaemia and consequent atherosclerotic plaque formation. Hypercholesterolaemia has been found to promote systemic and vascular inflammation, which can cause atherosclerotic lesion formation and progression and subsequent incidence of cardiovascular disease. Recent studies have shown the involvement of PCSK9 in the inflammatory pathway of atherosclerosis. Although trials with PCSK9 inhibitors have not shown any alteration in plasma C-reactive protein levels, there is accumulating evidence showing lessened inflammatory response in the arterial wall that could attenuate atherosclerotic plaque development beyond the established LDL-lowering effect of PCSK9 inhibition. In this review, we represent mounting evidence indicating that PCSK9 can locally increase vascular inflammation and contribute to atherosclerotic plaque progression in patients with hypercholesterolaemia.

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is a target for cardiovascular prevention. Contemporary equations for LDL-C estimation have limited accuracy in certain scenarios (high triglycerides [TG], very low LDL-C). We derived a novel method for LDL-C estimation from the standard lipid profile using a machine learning (ML) approach utilizing random forests (the Weill Cornell model). We compared its correlation to direct LDL-C with the Friedewald and Martin-Hopkins equations for LDL-C estimation. The study cohort comprised a convenience sample of standard lipid profile measurements (with the directly measured components of total cholesterol [TC], high-density lipoprotein cholesterol [HDL-C], and TG) as well as chemical-based direct LDL-C performed on the same day at the New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medicine (NYP-WCM). Subsequently, an ML algorithm was used to construct a model for LDL-C estimation. Results are reported on the held-out test set, with correlation coefficients and absolute residuals used to assess model performance. Between 2005 and 2019, there were 17,500 lipid profiles performed on 10,936 unique individuals (4,456 females; 40.8%) aged 1 to 103. Correlation coefficients between estimated and measured LDL-C values were 0.982 for the Weill Cornell model, compared to 0.950 for Friedewald and 0.962 for the Martin-Hopkins method. The Weill Cornell model was consistently better across subgroups stratified by LDL-C and TG values, including TG >500 and LDL-C <70. An ML model was found to have a better correlation with direct LDL-C than either the Friedewald formula or Martin-Hopkins equation, including in the setting of elevated TG and very low LDL-C.

Statins are the first-line therapy for the prevention and treatment of atherosclerotic vascular disease; however, various other lipid-lowering agents can provide additional beneficial effects when to statin therapy or alternatives for patients who are intolerant to statins. In this Review, Antonio Gotto Jr and Jennifer Moon discuss the mechanisms of action, indications, and clinical data for existing pharmacotherapies for lipid modification, as well as trials of investigational agents that are being developed for cardiovascular risk reduction. The widespread clinical use of statins has contributed to significant reductions in the rate of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality over the past 3 decades, and statins are considered first-line therapy for the prevention and treatment of atherosclerotic vascular disease. Nevertheless, various other lipid-lowering agents can provide clinical benefit by supplementing or augmenting statin therapy in patients with severe hypercholesterolaemia or mixed dyslipidaemia, or by providing an alternative for patients who are intolerant to statins. Bile acid resins and niacin were prescribed for lipid modification for years before the introduction of the statins, and new data continue to emerge regarding their use in different patient groups and for specific conditions. Ezetimibe can be appropriate for patients whose primary lipid abnormality is an elevated LDL-cholesterol level, whereas the fibrates seem to be most beneficial in patients with low levels of HDL cholesterol and elevated triglycerides. At the end of 2012 and the beginning of 2013, the first microsomal triglyceride transfer protein inhibitor, lomitapide, and the first antisense therapy to target apolipoprotein B, mipomersen, were approved for the treatment of individuals with extremely elevated LDL-cholesterol levels caused by homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia. Although two agents in the experimental class of cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitors have failed to show a benefit in clinical trials, newer drugs in this class could provide an additional strategy to address residual cardiovascular risk in patients treated with statins. Key Points Statin therapy is the mainstay of lipid-lowering treatment, but residual cardiovascular risk remains unacceptably high in patients with coronary heart disease receiving optimal statin therapy Patients with statin intolerance, mixed dyslipidaemia, or an extremely elevated LDL-cholesterol level might benefit from additional LDL-cholesterol lowering therapies, or agents that favourably modify HDL-cholesterol and triglyceride levels Bile acid resins and ezetimibe can be used with or without statins to reduce LDL-cholesterol levels, although the clinical benefit of ezetimibe awaits the results of a randomized clinical trial Patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia might benefit from lomitapide, a microsomal triglyceride transfer protein inhibitor, and mipomersen, an antisense inhibitor of apolipoprotein B synthesis Niacin and fibrates help correct lipid abnormalities and can reduce cardiovascular risk in patients with a low HDL-cholesterol level, high triglyceride levels, or both Results of clinical trials with experimental cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitors are eagerly anticipated, and are expected to provide valuable data on the clinical benefit of pharmacologically raising HDL cholesterol

The aim of this study was to assess the effects on lipids and safety during a 12-week reversal period after 18 months of treatment with anacetrapib. The cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitor anacetrapib was previously shown to reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol by 39.8% (estimated using the Friedewald equation) and increase high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol by 138.1%, with an acceptable side-effect profile, in patients with or at high risk for coronary heart disease in the Determining the Efficacy and Tolerability of CETP Inhibition With Anacetrapib (DEFINE) trial. A total of 1,398 patients entered the 12-week reversal-phase study, either after completion of the active-treatment phase or after early discontinuation of the study medication. In patients allocated to anacetrapib, placebo-adjusted mean percentage decreases from baseline were observed at 12 weeks off the study drug for Friedewald-calculated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (18.6%), non-HDL cholesterol (17.6%), and apolipoprotein B (10.2%); placebo-adjusted mean percentage increases were observed for HDL cholesterol (73.0%) and apolipoprotein A-I (24.5%). Residual plasma anacetrapib levels (about 40% of on-treatment apparent steady-state trough levels) were also detected 12 weeks after cessation of anacetrapib. No clinically important elevations in liver enzymes, blood pressure, electrolytes, or adverse experiences were observed during the reversal phase. Preliminary data from a small cohort (n = 30) revealed the presence of low concentrations of anacetrapib in plasma 2.5 to 4 years after the last anacetrapib dose. In conclusion, after the cessation of active treatment, anacetrapib plasma lipid changes and drug levels decreased to approximately 40% of on-treatment trough levels at 12 weeks after dosing, but modest HDL cholesterol elevations and low drug concentrations were still detectable 2 to 4 years after the last dosing.

Treatment with lovastatin reduced the risk of coronary events. Both the Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study (AFCAPS/TexCAPS) and the West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study demonstrated that inhibitors of hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase (statins) reduce the risk of first coronary events. 1 , 2 However, the use of statins for primary prevention has not been widely adopted, in part because the number of persons who need to be treated to prevent one clinical event is relatively large and the cost of this approach is substantial. 3 A method of distinguishing high-risk from low-risk patients might make possible better targeting of statin therapy for primary prevention. 4 For example, restricting statin use . . .

HDL-cholesterol concentrations are inversely associated with occurrence of cardiovascular events. We addressed, using the JUPITER trial cohort, whether this association remains when LDL-cholesterol concentrations are reduced to the very low ranges with high-dose statin treatment. Participants in the randomised placebo-controlled JUPITER trial were adults without diabetes or previous cardiovascular disease, and had baseline concentrations of LDL cholesterol of less than 3·37 mmol/L and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein of 2 mg/L or more. Participants were randomly allocated by a computer-generated sequence to receive rosuvastatin 20 mg per day or placebo, with participants and adjudicators masked to treatment assignment. In the present analysis, we divided the participants into quartiles of HDL-cholesterol or apolipoprotein A1 and sought evidence of association between these quartiles and the JUPITER primary endpoint of first non-fatal myocardial infarction or stroke, hospitalisation for unstable angina, arterial revascularisation, or cardiovascular death. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00239681. For 17 802 patients in the JUPITER trial, rosuvastatin 20 mg per day reduced the incidence of the primary endpoint by 44% (p<0·0001). In 8901 (50%) patients given placebo (who had a median on-treatment LDL-cholesterol concentration of 2·80 mmol/L [IQR 2·43–3·24]), HDL-cholesterol concentrations were inversely related to vascular risk both at baseline (top quartile vs bottom quartile hazard ratio [HR] 0·54, 95% CI 0·35–0·83, p=0·0039) and on-treatment (0·55, 0·35–0·87, p=0·0047). By contrast, among the 8900 (50%) patients given rosuvastatin 20 mg (who had a median on-treatment LDL-cholesterol concentration of 1·42 mmol/L [IQR 1·14–1·86]), no significant relationships were noted between quartiles of HDL-cholesterol concentration and vascular risk either at baseline (1·12, 0·62–2·03, p=0·82) or on-treatment (1·03, 0·57–1·87, p=0·97). Our analyses for apolipoprotein A1 showed an equivalent strong relation to frequency of primary outcomes in the placebo group but little association in the rosuvastatin group. Although measurement of HDL-cholesterol concentration is useful as part of initial cardiovascular risk assessment, HDL-cholesterol concentrations are not predictive of residual vascular risk among patients treated with potent statin therapy who attain very low concentrations of LDL cholesterol. AstraZeneca.